Mundhygiene und Mundgesundheit bei Bewohnern von Altenpflegeheimen

Oral health care in older people in long-term care facilities: An updated systematic review and meta-analyses of implementation strategies

Introduction

Oral health care of older people in long-term care facilities is insufficient, stressing the need for clear evidence-based implementation strategies to improve oral care. In 2013, a systematic review was performed and new evidence was published. This study aimed to gain insights into implementation strategies used to promote or improve oral health care for older people in long-term care facilities, explore their effectiveness and uncover strategy content in behavioral change techniques, and report the differences between the current results and those of the 2013 study.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines and meta-analyses of implementation strategies were performed. Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CINAHL databases were searched for papers published between 2011 and 2023. Strategies were identified using the Coding Manual for Behavioral Change Techniques. Meta-analyses of oral health outcomes ("plaque" and "denture plaque") were performed with random-effects models using R language for statistical computing.

Results

16 studies were included in the current results; 20 studies were included in the 2013 findings. More high-quality studies (67 %) were included in this review than in 2013 (47 %). Dental care professionals were involved in 14 of the 16 studies. Fourteen of the 16 studies used and/ or combined five or more different implementation strategies: knowledge, intention, awareness, self-efficacy, attitude, and facilitation of behavior. Implementation positively affected the knowledge and attitudes of the nursing staff; however, the oral health of older people did not necessarily improve. In the 2013 review, more studies indicated combined oral health measurements were effective (71 %) than in the current review (20 %-33 %). Meta-analysis of four studies on dental plaque (0-3 scale) showed a significant, statistically small mean difference of -.21 (CI -.36; -.07, Cohen's d -.29) between the control and treatment group. Meta-analysis of three studies on denture plaque (0-4 scale), showed a significant, statistically large mean difference of -.76 (CI -1.48; -.05, Cohen's d -.88).

Conclusions

In this review, more implementation strategies and combinations were used to implement oral care in long-term care. Implementation strategies positively affected the knowledge and attitudes of nursing staff; however, the oral health of older people did not necessarily improve. Meta-analyses on plaque showed that oral care implementations are effective; for denture plaque, the effect size was large and thus may have more clinical value than for dental plaque.

Oral health in patients with neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This retrospective study investigates oral health and oral care in patients with neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs) treated in a dental facility for people with disabilities.

METHODS

Oral health indices decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT), periodontal screening index (PSI), treatment spectrum, and oral hygiene were evaluated in 152 patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, and CVD and 30 controls. Regression analyses identified group differences and influencing factors on DMFT.

RESULTS

Patients with neurodegenerative or CVD had a significantly higher DMFT (21.2 ± 5.8 vs. 18.3 ± 5.9), more decayed teeth (4.3 ± 4.8 vs. 1 ± 1.9), fewer filled teeth (7.9 ± 5.5 vs. 11 ± 5.6), and a higher number of surgical (39.5% vs. 20%) treatments but significantly less conservative (49.3% vs. 73.3%) and prosthetic (15.1% vs. 56.7%) treatments than the control group (p< 0.05). The frequency of toothbrushing and the use of an electric toothbrush were related to lower DMFT in patients with neurodegenerative and CVD. Smoking was associated with higher DMFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor oral health was found in all individuals with disabilities, suggesting that limitations in oral care attributed to aging and neurological disorders negatively affect oral health. Oral rehabilitation of patients with disabilities requires awareness of oral health limitations and early intervention through dental care. Implications for rehabilitationPoor oral health and oral hygiene is common among older people with disabilities.To optimize oral rehabilitation of patients with disabilities, early intervention, individualized treatment plans and an adapted time frame for dental treatment are required.Education of dentists, caregivers, and family members is essential for oral rehabilitation and improvement of oral hygiene in patients with disabilities.

[Development and validation of the Mini Dental Assessment : A procedure for improved estimation of need for dental treatment in geriatrics]

BACKGROUND

In the future there will be an increasing demand for professional care with simultaneous retention of the dentition in older people. Due to inadequate dental knowledge, it is often not possible for caregivers to adequately assess dental deficits.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to develop and validate a simple tool (Mini Dental Assessment, MDA) to assess possible dental treatment needs (DTN) of residential geriatric facilities by nursing personnel.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the study 169 patients (51 from the University Hospital Giessen, 118 from the Bonifatius Hospital Lingen) underwent a dental examination. The dental status was evaluated based on the California Dental Association (CDA) criteria and the DTN determined. In addition, the time since the patients last visit to a dentist (TLVD) and denture age (DA) were documented and a chewing function test (carrot eating test, CET) was carried out. In a second study 155 patients were examined (115 from the University Hospital Giessen, 40 from the Bonifatius Hospital Lingen) corresponding to the reference sample and including a further chewing function test (after Schimmel und Slavicek) and questionnaires on quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), Denatl Impact on Daily Living (DiDDL)).

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients required dental treatment. The mean value (±SD) for the TLVD was 2.5 ± 3.8 years and 10.8 ± 8.9 years for the DA. There was a positive correlation (Spearman, P < 0.005) between the DTN and degree of comminution in the CET (3.4 ± 1.8 grade). Based on the results an assessment tool was developed using the variables CET, TLVD and DA weighted by the respective regression coefficients (10:3:1). The resulting mean total MDA score was 51.32 ± 28.14. A sensitivity/specificity analysis was conducted and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve calculated (area under curve, AUC: 0.805; 95% CI: 0.738-0.873). The ROC curve from the follow-up study showed a good agreement with the ROC curve from the reference study (AUC 0.829, 95% CI: 0.751-0.907).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the study it could be shown that the MDA is a suitable instrument for making a valid statement on the assessment of DTN of patients in long-term care facilities. The validation study revealed the validity of the MDA in its originally developed form and the addition of two further chewing function tests did not significantly improve the validity of the MDA. Overall, the MDA appears to be an appropriate tool to help nursing home personnel to assess the necessity for nursing home residents to visit a dentist.

Aged care staff's experiences of 'Better Oral Health in Residential Care Training': a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The The Better Oral Health in Residential Care (BOHRC) Training was rolled out to Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACF) across Australia in 2010.

AIM

To examine aged care staff's views on the implementation of the BOHRC Training at their facilities; challenges that they faced in the provision of oral health care to residents and their training needs.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 20 staff across Tasmania. Interview data was thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Major barriers reported were a lack of time, competing priorities, workload and staffing issues. The majority of participants did not receive the BOHRC training directly. Participants preferred to have practical, 'hands-on' training delivered on site at least every 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral hygiene training should be provided regularly to equip staff with knowledge and skills to overcome some of the challenges they face and to improve oral hygiene care provision to residents.

An oral health survey of vulnerable older people in Belgium

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain insight in the oral health of persons aged 65 years or more.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from 652 vulnerable older persons (≥65) by means of a clinical oral examination. Additional demographic data were gathered including age, gender, residence, and care dependency.

RESULTS

The mean age of the total study sample was 83 (7.7) years and 71 % was female. Nearly 33 % of the sample was living at home with support, and 67 % was residing in nursing homes. The number of occluding pairs was low and the proportion of edentulous people was highest among persons with the highest care dependency. The mean Decay-missing-filled teeth index (DMFT) was 20.3 (9.0). A prosthetic treatment need and inadequate oral hygiene levels were observed in 40 % and more than 60 % of the subjects, respectively. The highest treatment need was observed in the oldest age group and the highest mean dental plaque in older persons with the highest care dependency.

CONCLUSIONS

The oral health in frail older people in Belgium is poor. The restorative and prosthetic treatment need is high and oral hygiene levels are problematic. Age, residence, and care dependency seemed to have some influence on oral health parameters.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In the long term, the most important future challenge of oral health care policies is to identify older adults before they begin to manifest such oral health deterioration. Regular dental visits should be strongly promoted by all (oral) health care workers during the lifespan of all persons including older adults.

Oral health care in older people in long term care facilities: a systematic review of implementation strategies

OBJECTIVES

Oral hygiene is necessary to maintain oral health and quality of life. However, the oral hygiene and the oral health care of older people in long term care facilities are poor. This indicates that care is not in compliance with the available guidelines and protocols, and stresses the importance of a clear evidence-based implementation strategy to improve oral health care. The aim of this study is to review implementation strategies used to promote or improve oral health care for older people in long term care facilities from the perspective of behaviour change, to code strategy content at the level of determinants, and to explore their effectiveness.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature.

DATA SOURCES

The digital databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Cinahl have been searched up to September 2011 for relevant articles.

REVIEW METHODS

After a systematic selection process, included studies were quality assessed by three researchers. We extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist and Data Abstraction Form. Strategy content was extracted and coded by using the Coding Manual for Behavioural Change Techniques. This manual groups the behaviour change techniques under relevant behavioural determinants.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in this review. Implementation strategies were delivered by dental hygienists or dentists. Oral health care was performed by nurses and nurse assistants in all studies. All studies addressed knowledge, mostly operationalized as one educational session. Knowledge was most often combined with interventions addressing self efficacy. Implementation strategies aimed at knowledge (providing general information), self-efficacy (modelling) or facilitation of behaviour (providing materials to facilitate behaviour) were most often identified as successful in improving oral health.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge, self-efficacy and facilitation of behaviour are determinants that are often addressed in implementation strategies for successful improvement of oral health care in older patients. Strategies addressing increasing memory, feedback of clinical outcomes, and mobilizing social norm are promising and should be studied in the future. However, as the quality and heterogeneity of studies is a reason for concern, it is not possible to unequivocally recommend strategies or combinations of strategies for improving oral health care in the older population. When choosing strategies to improve oral health care, care professionals should thoroughly examine the setting and target group, identify barriers to change and tailor their implementation strategies to these barriers for oral health care.