[Arterial back table pressure perfusion prevents ischemic biliary lesions after orthotopic liver transplantation]

Comparison of Perfusion Pressure in Aorta Using High-Pressure Perfusion and Gravity Perfusion During the Kidney Transplant Procedure

Organ perfusion is an element of organ donation aimed at cooling the organ, washing out morphotic elements, and creating favorable conditions for the storage and transport of organs. Depending on the method used, perfusion is performed under gravity perfusion (GP) or perfusion under high pressure (HPP). This study aimed to measure the pressure of the perfusion fluid in the abdominal aorta during the use of GP and HPP. The study was performed during 35 organ procurements from deceased donors. The direct proportional increase of pressure in the aorta, depending on the applied perfusion method, was observed. GP was on average 37.8 mm Hg; using a pressure of 50 mm Hg in the HPP, an average of 57 mm Hg was obtained, and using a pressure of 200 mm Hg, 99.4 mm Hg was obtained. The study found that during the application of GP, the pressure generated in the abdominal aorta is low, which may lead to inadequate perfusion of organs. HPP is a faster method that leads to a proper perfusion of the procured organs and is also a safe method because, despite the use of high pressure, no damage to the transplanted kidneys was observed.

[Technique of liver procurement in postmortem donation]

BACKGROUND

The procurement of the liver is a standardized surgical procedure in the hands of qualified transplantation and organ procurement surgeons which is defined in the German guidelines.

METHODS

Literature review and discussion of critical aspects concerning the procurement of liver allografts. The procurement of livers should be performed by qualified transplantation and organ procurement surgeons (certification). The technique is standardized in German guidelines. A thoracotomy can help to optimize exposition which is essential to avoid technical complications and injuries to the graft especially in a training situation. Dissection in the cold is recommended. Knowledge of the anatomic variations of the hepatic artery is essential in procuring liver allografts. Documentation of errors and anatomic variations, packing of organs and a standardized closure of the thorax and abdomen are obligations of the responsible leading organ procurement surgeon.

Dynamical changing patterns of glycogen and enzyme histochemical activities in rat liver graft undergoing warm ischemia injury

AIM: To investigate the changing patterns of glycogen and enzyme histochemical activities in rat liver graft under a different warm ischemia time (WIT) and to predict the tolerant time limitation of the liver graft to warm ischemia injury.

METHODS: The rats were randomized into five groups, WIT was 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, respectively, and histochemical staining of liver graft specimens was observed. The recovery changes of glycogen and enzyme histochemistry activities were measured respectively 6 and 24 h following liver graft implantation.

RESULTS: The activities of succinic dehydrogenase, cytochrome oxidase, apyrase (Mg++-ATPase) and content of glycogen were decreased gradually after different WIT in a time-dependent manner. The changes were significant when WIT was over 30 min.

CONCLUSION: Hepatic injury is reversible within 30 min of warm ischemia injury. Glycogen and enzyme histochemistry activities of liver grafts and their recovery potency after reperfusion may serve as criteria to evaluate the quality of liver grafts.

Safe time to warm ischemia and posttransplant survival of liver graft from non-heart-beating donors

AIM: To explore the dynamical changes of histology, histochemistry, energy metabolism, liver microcirculation, liver function and posttransplant survival of liver graft in rats under different warm ischemia times (WIT) and predict the maximum limitation of liver graft to warm ischemia.

METHODS: According to WIT, the rats were randomized into 7 groups, with WIT of 0, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 min, respectively. The recovery changes of above-mentioned indices were observed or measured after liver transplantation. The graft survival and postoperative complications in each subgroup were analyzed.

RESULTS: Liver graft injury was reversible and gradually resumed normal structure and function after reperfusion when WIT was less than 30 min. In terms of graft survival, there was no significant difference between subgroups within 30 min WIT. When WIT was prolonged to 45 min, the recipients’ long-term survival was severely insulted, and both function and histological structure of liver graft developed irreversible damage when WIT was prolonged to 60 min.

CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that rat liver graft can be safely subjected to warm ischemia within 30 min. The levels of ATP, energy charge, activities of glycogen, enzyme-histochemistry of liver graft and its recovery potency after reperfusion may serve as the important criteria to evaluate the quality of liver graft.