Operative Interdisziplinarit�t?Extremit�ten

Anastomotic Technique and Preoperative Imaging in Microsurgical Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience

BACKGROUND

The need for preoperative imaging as well as anastomotic technique (ie, end-to-side [ETS] vs end-to-end [ETE]) are areas of controversy in microsurgical lower-extremity reconstruction. The objective of this study was to (1) investigate whether preoperative imaging is mandatory and (2) to elicit if the type of anastomosis impacts clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent microvascular lower-extremity reconstruction between 2007 and 2015 by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were categorized into groups based on anastomotic technique, that is, ETE versus ETS anastomosis. Patients in the ETE group were further subclassified into those who had preoperative imaging (computed tomography angiography [CTA]+) versus those who did not (CTA-). Parameters of interest included flap type, thrombosis rate, flap loss, length of stay (LOS), return to ambulation, and rate of secondary amputation. Two-sided statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test and Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight patients were analyzed: ETE (n = 40) and ETS (n = 88). Mean follow-up for both groups was 20 ± 19 months. Anterolateral thigh flaps were most commonly performed (71%). Overall flap loss rate was 3.1% without any significant differences noted with respect to thrombosis (arterial, P = 0.09; venous, P = 0.56), flap loss (P = 0.33), LOS (P = 0.28), amputation (P = 1.00), or return to ambulation (P = 0.77). Furthermore, the availability of preoperative imaging (CTA+: N = 11 vs CTA-: N = 29) did not impact rates of thrombosis (arterial, P = 0.29; venous, P = 0.31), flap loss (P = 1.00), LOS (P = 0.26), or return to mobility (P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

In light of similar reconstructive outcomes, we prefer to preserve distal extremity perfusion via ETS anastomoses whenever possible. Furthermore, preoperative vascular imaging angiography might not be necessary in patients with palpable pedal pulses on preoperative examination. An actionable algorithm for determining ETS versus ETE anastomosis in lower-extremity reconstruction is presented.

Complete major amputation of the upper extremity: Early results and initial treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

Traumatic major amputations of the upper extremity are devastating injuries. These injuries have a profound impact on patient's quality of life and pose a burden on social economy. The aims of the current study were to report about the initial management of isolated traumatic major upper limb amputation from the time of admission to definitive soft tissue closure and to establish a distinct initial management algorithm.

METHODS

We recorded data concerning the initial management of the patient and the amputated body part in the emergency department (ED) (time from admission to the operation, Injury Severity Score [ISS], cold ischemia time from injury to ED, and total cold ischemia time). The duration, amount of surgical procedures, the time to definitive soft tissue coverage, and the choice of flap were part of the documentation. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully replanted (time from injury to ED, 59 ± 4 minutes; ISS16; time from admission to operating room 57 ± 10 minutes; total cold ischemia time 203 ± 20 minutes; total number of procedures 7.3 ± 2.5); definitive soft tissue coverage could be achieved 23 ± 14 days after injury. Two thromboembolic complications occurred, which could be treated by embolectomy during revision surgery, and we saw one early infection, which could be successfully managed by serial debridements in our series.

CONCLUSION

The management of complete major amputations of the upper extremity should be reserved for large trauma centers with enough resources concerning technical, structural, and personnel infrastructure to meet the demands of surgical reconstruction as well as the postoperative care. Following a distinct treatment algorithm is mandatory to increase the rate of successful major replantations, thus laying the foundation for promising secondary functional reconstructive efforts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level V.

[Fractures of the extremities with severe open soft tissue damage. Initial management and reconstructive treatment strategies]

The successful management of open extremity injuries continues to represent a surgical challenge requiring a structured and multidisciplinary treatment concept. The treatment strategy depends on specific parameters, including the overall injury severity, life threatening trauma components, the degree oft soft tissue injury, the ischemia time, the contamination of the wound as well as the age and accompanying diseases of the patient. The treatment of fractures with a high-grade open soft tissue injury is guided by the severity of soft tissue damage including neurovascular damages, type of the fracture, overall state of the patient and is based on a clearly defined reconstructive algorithm sequentially employing initial wound treatment (debridement), stabilisation of the fracture and soft tissue coverage. The initial wound management includes radical and serial debridements and vessel reconstruction, followed by the gradual reconstruction of bone, tendons and nerves and a subsequent plastic soft tissue coverage.The sequential and priority-orientated implementation of these treatment steps is decisive for the long term outcome, which ideally results in an regular healing of bone and soft tissue without the presence of infection and good regain of extremity function.

Lower extremity arterial injury patterns and reconstructive outcomes in patients with severe lower extremity trauma: a 26-year review

BACKGROUND

Management of severe traumatic lower extremity injuries remains a considerable challenge. Free tissue transfer is now a standard part of reconstruction for Gustilo IIIB and IIIC injuries. There is limited information on arterial injury patterns in this population. We undertook a review of our experience to gain insight on vascular injury patterns and surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A 26-year retrospective analysis was performed of all lower extremity Gustilo IIIB and IIIC injuries requiring microvascular reconstruction at New York University Medical Center. Patient demographics, Gustilo classification, angiographic findings (conventional/computed tomographic angiography/magnetic resonance angiography), recipient vessels, elapsed time from injury, flap choices, and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two free flaps on 191 patients were performed from September 1982 until March 2008. There were 151 males and 40 females ranging in age from 4 to 83 years (median age 33 years). Patients sustained either Gustilo IIIB (170 patients) or IIIC (21 patients) open fractures. One hundred fifty-four patients had angiograms (78.2% IIIB, 100% IIIC). Sixty-six (42.9%) had normal 3-vessel runoff and 88 (57.1%) were abnormal. Sixty-one patients (31.9%) had anterior tibial injuries, 17 patients (8.9%) had posterior tibial injuries, and 30 (15.7%) had peroneal injuries. Sixty-three complications occurred (11 early thrombosis, 33 requiring secondary procedures, and 10 requiring amputation).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography of severe lower extremity injuries requiring free flap reconstruction usually revealed arterial injury and is generally indicated. In our experience, the anterior tibial artery is most commonly injured and the posterior tibial artery is most likely to be spared and used as a recipient.

Bioabsorbable scaffold for in situ bone regeneration

A non-porous poly-DL-lactide tubular chamber filled by demineralised bone matrix (DBM) and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) in combination, was evaluated as a scaffold for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in an experimental model using the rabbit radius. The tubular chamber had an internal diameter of 4.7 mm, a wall thickness of 0.4 mm and a length of 18 mm. Autologous BMSC were obtained, under general anaesthesia from rabbit iliac crest and isolated by centrifugation technique. Allogenic DBM was obtained from cortico-cancellous bone of rabbits. In general anaesthesia, a 10-mm defect was bilaterally created in the radii of 10 rabbits. On the right side (experimental side) the defect was bridged with the chamber filled with both BMSC and DBM. On the left side (control side) the defect was treated by positioning DBM and BMSC between the two stumps. At an experimental time of 4 months histology and histomorphometry demonstrated that the presence of a tubular chamber significantly improved bone regrowth in the defect The mean thickness of newly-formed bone inside the chamber was about 56.7+/-3.74% of the normal radial cortex, in comparison with 46.7+/-10.7% when DBM and BMSC without the chamber were placed in the defect, P<0.05). These results confirmed the effectiveness of the chamber as a container for factors promoting bone regeneration.