Abdomino-rechts-thorakale Ösophagusresektion mit intrathorakaler Anastomose beim Barrett-Karzinom

[Neoadjuvant therapy in the upper gastro-intestinal tract. Modern strategies for Barrett's cancer]

While primary surgical resection with systematic lymphadenectomy remains the treatment of choice for locoregional Barrett's cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an increasingly accepted treatment modality for patients with locally advanced tumors and patients with extensive lymphatic spread. In contrast to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy preoperative chemotherapy alone does not seem to increase peri-operative complications and mortality. Responders to pre-operative treatment clearly have a survival advantage as compared to those who do not respond. The use of positron emission tomography to measure changes in glucose metabolism of the primary tumor can predict response early after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and thus help to select patients who will or will not benefit from this approach. The best treatment strategy for non-responders to neoadjuvant therapy remains to be defined.

[Therapy of mediastinitis in patients with esophageal cancer]

Mediastinitis caused by anastomotic leaks is the most severe complication after esophagectomy and the major source of morbidity and mortality. It is characterized by local intrathoracic reactions (mediastinitis) and systemic extrathoracic reactions (sepsis). Consequently the therapeutic concepts are clearly defined. To achieve successful management, early diagnostic work-up is mandatory in every disturbance of the normal postoperative course. This includes direct endoscopic inspection of the anastomosis to evaluate the vitality of the anastomosed organs and the size of the leak. According to location and clinical classifications of the leak, the spectrum of therapeutic options ranges from simple drainage procedures, endoscopic interventions, and stent implantation to reoperation or discontinuity resection. In any case the treatment goals must be immediate and sufficient drainage of the leakage and hindrance of further contamination across the leakage by gastrointestinal content. Also mandatory is the early initiation of supportive systemic strategies according to pathophysiologic principles of sepsis. The fundamental requirements for successful management are therefore aggressive local intervention and application of new concepts in sepsis therapy.

[Resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction care: which perioperative treatment?]

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction has an ominous prognosis. Until now, oesophageal adenocarcima care was close to the squamous cell cancer one whereas adenocarcinoma of the cardia was mixed with gastric cancers. Results from randomised studies mixed them without making distinctions. Nevertheless, context, natural history and clinical outcome differ. Five-year survival rate is around 40 %, all stages included. Results from several phase-III studies or meta-analysis allowed to define three therapeutic strategies applicable to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and the oesophagogastric junction. In Europe, in the case of a resectable tumour, preoperative chemotherapy became a standard treatment since results from the Magic trial. In the United States, post-operative radiochemotherapy according to the "Macdonald" scheme is used in case of a resected tumour with a R0 surgery. Actually, modern techniques of irradiation could reduce the rate of gastro-intestinal toxicities. The survival benefit from preoperative radiochemotherapy is still very controversial with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. We have performed a review of the literature with a methodological analysis of data with a high level of evidence in order to advise perioperative treatment guidelines for patients with a resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Results from pre- or postoperative strategies and the role of radiotherapy will need to be analysed in the future through a randomised study.

[Lymphadenectomy with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract]

In surgical therapy for upper gastrointestinal cancer, adequate lymphadenectomy together with R0 resection of the primary tumour is one of the most important prognostic factors which can be influenced by the surgeon. Recommendations for localization- and stage-adapted lymphadenectomy can be made according to histopathologic and anatomic investigations of the patient collectives of large centres. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in cancer of the cervical oesophagus, the absence of lymph nodes on the resected specimen seems to be of less prognostic value. In squamous cell cancer of the suprabifurcal oesophagus, radical lymphadenectomy is recommended. Despite significant morbidity, in specialized centres this procedure yields good results with low mortality. For infrabifurcal oesophageal cancer, two-field lymphadenectomy during the so-called Ivor-Lewis operation is the method of choice. Locally advanced Barrett carcinoma is also an indication for classic two-field lymphadenectomy together with abdominothoracic oesophagectomy and creation of a stomach tube with intrathoracic anastomosis. The lymphadenectomy should however include the area of retroperitoneal lymphatic drainage at the pedicle of the left kidney. Submucosal cancer in this area can be treated with luminal limited resection of the oesophagogastric junction with adequate lymphadenectomy. Adenocarcinoma of the cardia and subcardial gastric cancer including the cardia both require lymphadenectomy analogous to that performed in gastric cancer, with special attention paid to the retroperitoneal lymphatic drainage towards the left kidney pedicle. For therapy of gastric cancer, a systematic D2 lymphadenectomy should always be performed.

Ösophaguskarzinom

Esophageal cancer is more than ever a surgical problem. Modern diagnostic procedures facilitate individual staging, and risk analysis is important for adequate patient selection. Using both allows an individualized indication. Under multimodal therapeutic protocols, neoadjuvant treatment can best be evaluated and is recommended in locally advanced tumors: RCTx in SCC, and CTx in Barrett cancer. Here the Ivor-Lewis procedure is the surgical method of choice. Postoperative complications are always possible, but the management now is standardized and has largely decreased mortality.

Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease?

Esophageal cancer can be divided in squamous-cell cancer (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (Barrett cancer: AEG I) by histopathology. However, most studies do not differentiate between these two tumor entities. SCC is associated with a lower socioeconomic level with nicotine and alcohol abuse resulting in comorbidities like liver cirrhosis and reduced pulmonary function; in contrast, AEG I is associated with a high socioeconomic level and cardiovascular risk factors. The median age of patients with SCC is 10 years younger than with AEG I. The localization of AEG I is in 94% below the tracheal bifurcation, whereas SCC has contact to the tracheal bronchial tree in 75%. Furthermore, SCC shows an earlier lymphatic spread and a worse prognosis compared to AEG I. The different localization and different comorbidities require different therapeutic strategies. The preoperative induction therapy consists of combined chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced SCC and of chemotherapy for AEG I in our department. Due to the favorable position of AEG I a classic Ivor-Lewis procedure ending with an intrathoracic anastomosis is possible, in contrast, SCC frequently requires a subtotal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (in a two step strategy). Therefore, at the moment there is no doubt that SCC and AEG I are two different diseases with different pathogenesis, epidemiology, tumor biology and prognosis requiring different therapeutic strategies. We suggest that the two different tumor entities should be analyzed and reported separately to provide comparable results in the future.

Ösophagektomie als chirurgisches Therapieprinzip beim Plattenepithelkarzinom des Ösophagus

The fatalistic approach towards surgical therapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer has been replaced in recent years by a more differentiated view. This was triggered by the establishment of individualized therapeutic modalities based on tumor stage, tumor location, general patient status, and comorbidity. Despite advances in nonsurgical therapy of squamous cell esophageal cancer, esophagectomy remains the central therapeutic modality. Primary subtotal en-bloc esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the only curative option with a high likelihood of success for resectable tumors (uT1-3 categories) located below the level of the tracheal bifurcation and for early more proximal tumors. In patients with locally advanced tumors at or above the level of the tracheal bifurcation, surgical resection can still cure those who respond to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Preoperative "conditioning" of risk patients, surgical safety strategies in risk situations, and standardization of both the operative procedure and the perioperative management have resulted in a marked reduction of the previously substantial postoperative mortality to below 3% in experienced centers. In our own experience of 900 esophagectomies for squamous cell esophageal cancer, the 5-year survival rate rose from about 20% to more than 50% in the last two decades. Esophagectomy thus has become a safe operation and remains the only therapeutic option offering cure for a substantial proportion of patients with squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.