[Modern diagnostics and stage-oriented surgery: therapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction]

[Hospital volume effects in surgical treatment of gastric cancer : Results of a prospective multicenter observational study]

BACKGROUND

The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on the treatment outcome based on data obtained from cohort and register studies has been controversially discussed in the international literature. The results of large-scale prospective observational studies within the framework of clinical healthcare research may lead to relevant recommendations in this ongoing discussion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Within the framework of the prospective multicenter German Gastric Cancer Study 2 (QCGC 2), from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009 a total of 2897 patients with the histological diagnosis of gastric cancer from 140 surgical departments were registered and analyzed. The departments were subdivided according to the number of cases into 4 volume groups: I) <5, II) 5-10, III) 11-20 and IV) >20 patients with surgical interventions per year.

RESULTS

Overall 1163 patients (65.6 %) underwent surgical interventions in the departments of groups III and IV. Of the patients 521 (18 %) were scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment but with no significant differences among the various volume groups. In the departments of volume groups I and II subtotal gastric resection was performed significantly more often. Transthoracic extended surgical interventions in cases of a proximal tumor site were significantly more frequent in departments from volume group IV (p <0.001). The proportion of intraoperative fresh frozen sections correlated with the case volume: group I 23.2 % vs. group IV 61.2 %. Overall hospital mortality was 6.1 % and slightly higher in volume group I with 7.8 %. The median survival time and the 5‑year survival rate showed no significant differences between the various volume groups independent of tumor stages. There was a tendency towards a longer median survival time in volume group IV only for proximal tumor sites, i.e. adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Using Cox regression analysis hospital volume did not have an independent impact on long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Hospital volume effects could only be detected for the treatment of AEG. To improve oncological long-term outcome, centralization of treatment of proximal gastric cancer appears to be recommendable.

Preoperative airway colonization prior to transthoracic esophagectomy predicts postoperative pulmonary complications

PURPOSE

Respiratory complications are responsible to a high degree for postoperative morbidity and mortality after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The etiology of respiratory failure is known to be multifactorial with preoperative impaired lung function being the most important one. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between preoperative airway colonization (PAC) and postoperative respiratory complications.

METHODS

In this observational study, 64 patients with esophageal cancer were included. All patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with laparoscopic or open gastric mobilization. After induction of anesthesia and intubation with a double-lumen tube, bronchial exudate was collected by random endoluminal suction for further microbiological work-up. Length of postoperative mechanical ventilation (<24 h, 24-72 h, >72 h), re-intubation, and tracheostomy were recorded as primary and secondary study endpoints.

RESULTS

In 13 of 64 study patients (20.3 %), pathological colonization of the bronchial airways could be proved prior to esophagectomy. Haemophilus species was the most frequently identified pathogen. PAC was associated with a longer history of smoking (p = 0.025), a lower preoperative forced expiratory volume (FEV1, p = 0.009) or vital capacity (VC, p = 0.038), a prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and a higher frequency of re-intubation (p < 0.001) and tracheostomy (p = 0.017). In the multivariate analysis, PAC was identified as an independent predictor of respiratory failure (hazard ratio 11.4, 95 % confidence interval 2.6-54, p = 0.002). Mortality in the PAC group was 30.8 % compared to 0 % in patients without PAC (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PAC is a significant risk factor for postoperative respiratory failure. A routine bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage as part of preoperative management prior to esophagectomy need to be discussed.

Surgery of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the only option for curative treatment in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Despite the debates related to the peri-operative therapy regime, a generally accepted consensus on surgical approach is not reached yet. The debate focuses mainly on pros and cons between radical transthoracic resection and the (limited) transhiatal resection in the last decade.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for randomized trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective single-center studies. The search terms were "esophageal carcinoma," "esophageal junction carcinomas," "transhiatal," "transthoracic," "morbidity," "mortality," and "surgery."

RESULTS

The radical transthoracic approach should be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma since it does not go along with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or mortality but reveals an improved survival. Patient-related co-morbidities are the most influencing factors for the postoperative outcome. For type II esophageal junction carcinoma, treatment options from transhiatal extended gastrectomy to esophagectomy with hemigastrectomy or esophagogastrectomy with colonic interposition are existing. In type III esophagogastric junction carcinomas, the transhiatal extended gastrectomy is the standard of care, and the minimally invasive approach should be performed in specialized centers.

CONCLUSION

Based on current available study results, this expert review provides a decision support for the best surgical strategy depending on tumor localization and patients' characteristics.