[Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany : Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure]

Characteristics of Patients Lost to Follow-up after Bariatric Surgery

After bariatric surgery lifelong follow-up is recommended. Evidence of the consequences and reasons for being lost to follow-up (LTFU) is sparse. In this prospective study follow-up data of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a certified obesity centre were investigated. LTFU patients were evaluated through a structured telephone interview. Overall, 573 patients (female/male 70.9%/29.1%), aged 44.1 ± 11.2 years, preoperative BMI 52.1 ± 8.4 kg/m2 underwent bariatric surgery. Out of these, 33.2% had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 74.4% had arterial hypertension. A total of 290 patients were LTFU, of those 82.1% could be reached. Baseline characteristics of patients in follow-up (IFU) and LTFU were comparable, but men were more often LTFU (p = 0.01). Reported postoperative total weight loss (%TWL) and improvements of comorbidities were comparable, but %TWL was higher in patients remaining in follow-up for at least 2 years (p = 0.013). Travel issues were mentioned as the main reason for being LTFU. A percentage of 77.6% of patients reported to regularly supplement micronutrients, while 71.0% stated regular monitoring of their micronutrient status, mostly by primary care physicians. Despite comparable reported outcomes of LTFU to IFU patients, the duration of the in-centre follow-up period affected %TWL. There is a lack of sufficient supplementation and monitoring of micronutrients in a considerable number of LTFU patients.

Adipositas Care and Health Therapy (ACHT) after Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Intervention Study

INTRODUCTION

Almost 25% of German adults have obesity and numbers are rising, making it an important health issue. Bariatric-metabolic surgery reduces body weight and complications for persons with obesity, but therapeutic success requires long-term postoperative care. Since no German standards for follow-up by family physicians exist, follow-up is provided by surgical obesity centers, but they are reaching their limits. The ACHT study, funded by the German Innovation Fund, is designed to establish and evaluate the follow-up program, with local physicians following patients supported remotely by obesity centers.

METHODS

ACHT is a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized control group study. The 18-month ACHT follow-up program is a digitally supported, structured, cross-sectoral, and close-to-home program to improve success after bariatric-metabolic surgery. Four groups are compared: intervention group 1 starts the program immediately (3 weeks) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (months 1-18 postoperatively), intervention group 2 begins the program 18 months after surgery (months 19-36 postoperatively). Intervention groups are compared to respective control groups that had surgery 18 and 36 months previously. In total, 250 patients, enrolled in the intervention groups, are compared with 360 patients in the control groups, who only receive standard care.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint to compare intervention and control groups is the adapted King's score, a composite tool evaluating physical, psychological, socioeconomic, and functional health status. Secondary endpoints include changes in care structures and care processes for the intervention groups. Multivariate regression analyses adjusting for confounders (including the type of surgery) are used to compare intervention and control groups and evaluate determinants in longitudinal analyses. The effect of the intervention on healthcare costs will be evaluated based on health insurance billing data of patients who had bariatric-metabolic surgery in the 3 years prior to the start of the study and of patients who undergo bariatric-metabolic surgery during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

ACHT will be the one of the first evaluated structured, close-to-home follow-up programs for bariatric surgery in Germany. It will evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented program regarding improvements in health status, mental health, quality of life, and the feasibility of such a program outside of specialized obesity centers.

[Impact of the COVID pandemic on treatment of bariatric patients in Germany-An analysis of the national StuDoQ/MBE register]

BACKGROUND

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic the standard inpatient care of patients was restricted to increase overall and intensive care capacity reserves for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected persons.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical and postoperative care of bariatric patients in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A statistical analysis of the national StuDoQ/MBE register data for the period from 1 May 2018 until 31 May 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

Throughout the entire study period there was a continuous increase in documented operations, which continued even during the COVID-19 pandemic. A significant intermittent decline in surgery performed was observed only during the imposition of first lockdown in the months of March to May 2020, with a minimum number of 194 cases performed monthly in April 2020. The pandemic had no measurable effect on the surgically treated patient population, the type of surgical procedure, the perioperative and postoperative outcomes and follow-up care.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the StuDoQ data and the current literature, it can be deduced that bariatric surgery can be carried out with no increased risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and the quality of postoperative care is not impaired.

[Developing a competence center for obesity and metabolic surgery-Experiences from two different clinics]

BACKGROUND

Due to the high incidence of obesity and the effectiveness of obesity (metabolic) surgery, the number of metabolic operations and the formation of certified obesity centers continue to increase. The aim of this study was to compare the experiences of two hospitals during establishing a certified obesity center in Heidelberg/Salem (HD/Salem) and in Baden-Baden (Bad).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The operation numbers, surgical procedures, the need for revision and the length of hospital stay were analyzed from August 2012 to June 2015 in HD/Salem and from May 2017 to December 2021 in Bad. In addition, a structured survey of patients took place to find out the preferred discharge date. The statistical evaluation was carried out with T-tests and χ²-tests for binary data.

RESULTS

This analysis comprised 387 patients (181 patients Bad). There were 258 female patients (131 Bad). The mean age of all patients was 44.6 years (44.0 years Bad), the mean body mass index was 47.5 kg/m² (47.0 kg/m² Bad). In 12 of 206 patients (5.8%) from HD/Salem and 8 of 181 patients (4.4%) from Bad a revision was necessary. The average length of hospital stay decreased in HD/Salem from 6.5 days to 4.4 days (p < 0.05) and from 3.7 days to 3.4 days in Bad. Late revisions were necessary in HD/Salem in 4 of 206 patients (2.2%) and in Bad in 8 out of 181 patients (4.4%). The needed number of yearly operations required for certification was achieved for the first time in HD/Salem after 7 years and in Bad after 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Building an obesity center at a different location from scratch to certification can be initiated and carried out by one experienced surgeon without loss of treatment quality regarding morbidity and mortality. From the start, the team should be familiar with early and late complications of metabolic surgery.

Safety of anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery in octogenarians: a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Up to 20 per cent of all operations for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are performed in octogenarians. Anastomotic leakage is a leading cause of morbidity and death after resection for CRC. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of anastomosis creation, the risk of anastomotic leakage and death in surgery for left-sided CRC in elderly patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study compared patients less than 80 and 80 or more years with left-sided CRC resection performed between 2013 and 2019. Data were provided from a risk-adjusted surgical quality-assessment system with 219 participating centres in Germany. Outcome measures were the rate of anastomoses, anastomotic leakages, death at 30 days and 2-year overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias and compare subgroups of patients of less than 80 and 80 or more years.

RESULTS

Out of 18 959 patients, some 3169 (16.7 per cent) were octogenarians. Octogenarians were less likely to receive anastomoses (82.0 versus 92.9 per cent, P < 0.001; odds ratio 0.50 (95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.58), P < 0.001). The rate of anastomotic leakages did not differ between age groups (8.6 versus 9.7 per cent, P = 0.084), but 30-day mortality rate after leakage was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.8 versus 3.5 per cent, P < 0.001). Overall, anastomotic leakage was the strongest predictor for death (odds ratio 4.95 (95 per cent c.i. 3.66 to 6.66), P < 0.001). In the subgroup with no leakage, octogenarians had a lower 2-year OS rate than younger patients (71 versus 87 per cent, P < 0.001), and in the population with anastomotic leakage, the 2-year OS was 80 per cent in younger and 43 per cent in elderly patients (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, older age remained predictive for not receiving an anastomosis (odds ratio 0.54 (95 per cent c.i. 0.46 to 0.63), P < 0.001) and for death (odds ratio 2.60 (95 per cent c.i. 1.78 to 3.84), P < 0.001), but not for the occurrence of leakages (odds ratio 0.94 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 1.15), P = 0.524).

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic leakage is not more common in octogenarians, but an age of 80 years or older is an independent factor for not receiving an anastomosis in surgery for left-sided CRC. The mortality rate in the case of leakage in octogenarians was reported to exceed 15 per cent.

[Will laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy continue to exist as a stand-alone procedure? : A procedure critical perspective]

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy is currently the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide; however, with respect to a certain need for revisional surgery (due to reflux disease or weight regain) there is an ongoing discussion about the value of sleeve gastrectomy in terms of a stand-alone procedure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to critically discuss whether sleeve gastrectomy can still be considered a stand-alone procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current literature was searched for results after sleeve gastrectomy and the recommendations regarding this procedure are discussed.

RESULTS

Currently approximately 50% of primary bariatric procedures are sleeve gastrectomies, which has become a well-established stand-alone procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy leads to good mid-term results; however, the results of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are comparatively superior in terms of type 2 diabetes remission, control of preexisting or de novo reflux disease and weight loss. The mortality is comparable; however, the morbidity is lower after sleeve gastrectomy but there is a relevant rate of fistulas of the stapler suture.

CONCLUSION

Patients considered for sleeve gastrectomy must be informed of the procedure-specific risks, including the unforeseeable need for revision or redo surgery firstly due to weight regain or failing to reach the individual therapy target and secondly for worsening of a preexisting or de novo reflux disease.

[Bariatric surgery: Expectations and therapeutic goals-a contradiction?]

In the majority of patients with morbid obesity, metabolic/bariatric surgery leads to relevant and sustained weight loss and improves obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life and functionality. Moreover, the associated reduction of risk factors for cardiovascular events and cancerous diseases has been shown to improve life expectations. Due to its excellent antidiabetic effect, the currently valid national S3 guidelines now recommend metabolic/bariatric surgery in patients who have a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² with poorly controlled diabetes. The Edmonton staging system enables a multidimensional consideration of the severity grade of obesity for each individual patient independent of the BMI. Patients with relevant obesity-related metabolic comorbidities should be prioritized for treatment and if possible before the occurrence of end-organ damage that is at least in some cases irreversible and which also increases the perioperative risk. Therapeutic goals for each individual patient should be carefully defined preoperatively in order to mediate realistic expectations. Unrealistic expectations, such as "surgery solves my problems", "surgery makes me more beautiful", "surgery eliminates stigma", and "surgery guarantees success", are common in bariatric surgery patients. These unrealistic expectations can lead to frustration and to severe psychological decompensation and need to be addressed as early as possible by an interdisciplinary team. Redundancies, conclusive and empathic communication in the team improve therapy adherence, the expectations and therefore the overall outcome.

[Barriers to the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) accreditation "Center for bariatric and metabolic surgery"]

INTRODUCTION

The certification and accreditation process of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) aims to improve the quality of care and enhance transparency in accredited centers. To achieve these goals a high level of infrastructural and staffing requirements are set out by the DGAV.

AIMS

The Surgical Working Group on Obesity Treatment and Metabolic Surgery (CAADIP) survey 2017 of the members of the German Bariatric Society aimed to identify the perceived and encountered barriers in the DGAV accreditation process.

METHODS

Between February and March 2017 an online poll was conducted of all members of the CAADIP on topics pertaining to the accreditation process.

RESULTS

A total of 214 (51%) CAADIP members participated in the poll, 47% reported that they worked at a non-certified center and 53% worked at a DGAV certified center. Of these, 68% reported employment in a unit with the lowest accreditation level, 21% in an intermediate level center, 11% reported employment in a unit with the highest accreditation level (Center of Excellence) and 86% of those currently working in non-accredited units stated that they aimed for future accreditation. Reasons stated for not having obtained accreditation were recent establishment of the new bariatric specialty (54%), lack of bariatric case numbers (71%), lack of human resources and infrastructure (28% and 13%, respectively). Of those surgeons in non-accredited centers 24% stated that the hospital management had no interest in a certification and 12% of the surgeons themselves felt that accreditation was unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

The majority of CAADIP members strived for DGAV certification. The main barriers encountered and perceived were the specific time (reference years) and caseload requirements.