[Preconditioning prior to visceral oncological surgery : A paradigm shift in visceral surgery?]

Effect of Prehabilitation on Stoma Self-Care, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Stomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

An intestinal stoma has severe psychosocial effects on patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the effects of prehabilitation on stoma self-care, quality of life, anxiety, and depression levels.

DESIGN

This study was a a randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

Patients were allocated into 3 groups according to enterostomal management: group A (stoma marking and postoperative education), group B (marking and pre- and postoperative education), and group C (prehabilitation group) (marking and preoperative education with introduction of the stoma appliance preoperatively and postoperative education). A stoma care follow-up form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a stoma-specific quality-of-life questionnaire were used for evaluation.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent colorectal surgery and fecal diversion at the Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey, between 2011 and 2016 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the effect of stoma prehabilitation on self-care ability.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty patients were included in the study. The outcome of stoma self-care revealed that 24 patients (31.2%) in group A, 51 patients (78.5%) in group B, and 72 patients (94.7%) in group C could perform stoma care independently ( p < 0.001). Among patients with temporary stomas, group C had a better outcome than patients in groups A and B ( p < 0.001). There was no similar relationship among patients with permanent stomas. The prehabilitation group had fewer patients with anxiety and depression than the other groups. Among patients with temporary stomas, similar findings were found. No differences were found in either anxiety or depression among patients with permanent stomas. Stoma quality-of-life scores were significantly higher in the prehabilitation group ( p < 0.001). Among patients with temporary stomas, similar findings were found. There was no difference among those with permanent stoma.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study of heterogeneous groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation facilitates stoma self-care, decreases predisposition to anxiety and depression and improves quality of life in patients with stomas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B918 .

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610.

EFECTO DE LA PREHABILITACIN EN EL AUTOCUIDADO, LA ANSIEDAD, LA DEPRESIN Y LA CALIDAD DE VIDA EN PACIENTES OSTOMIZADOS ENSAYO CONTROLADO ALEATORIO

ANTECEDENTES:Una estoma intestinal ejerce serios efectos psicosociales en los pacientes. La prehabilitación tiene el potencial de superar estos problemas.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo medir los efectos de la prehabilitación en el autocuidado de la estoma, la calidad de vida, la ansiedad y los niveles de depresión.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un ensayo aleatorio controlado ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610).AJUSTE:Los pacientes fueron distribuidos en 3 grupos según su manejo enterostomal: grupos A (marcación preoperatoria de la estoma, educación posoperatoria), B (marcación preoperatoria y educación preoperatoria y posoperatoria) y C (el grupo de pre habilitación con marcación preoperatoria y educación preoperatoria con introducción del paciente al aparato ostomal de manera preoperatoria y educación posoperatoria). Para la evaluación se utilizaron el formulario de seguimiento del cuidado de la estoma, la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión y un cuestionario específico de la estoma sobre la calidad de vida.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía colorrectal y derivación fecal en la Universidad de Ankara entre 2011 y 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue el efecto de la prehabilitación de la estoma sobre la capacidad de autocuidado.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en este estudio 240 pacientes. Autocuidado de la estoma: Veinticuatro (31,2%), 51 (78,5%), y 72 (94,7%) pacientes de los grupos A, B, y C, respectivamente, pudieron realizar el cuidado de la estoma de forma independiente ( p < 0,001). En el análisis de subgrupos, entre los pacientes con ostomía temporal, los pacientes del grupo de prehabilitación también fueron mejores que los pacientes de los grupos B y C ( p < 0,001); sin embargo, no hubo una relación similar entre los pacientes con ostomía permanente. HADS: El grupo de prehabilitación tuvo menos pacientes con ansiedad y depresión con respecto a los demás grupos. Entre los pacientes con estomas temporales, el grupo de prehabilitación también tuvo menos pacientes con ansiedad y depresión. No hubo diferencias con la ansiedad o depresión entre los pacientes con estomas permanentes. Estoma-QoL (calidad de vida): Las puntuaciones de QoL (calidad de vida) fueron significativamente más altas en el grupo de prehabilitación ( p < 0,001). Entre los pacientes con estoma temporal, el grupo de prehabilitación fue significativamente mejor que los otros grupos ( p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias entre los portadores de estoma permanente.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de un solo centro y grupos heterogéneos.CONCLUSIÓNES:La prehabilitación facilita el autocuidado de la estoma, disminuye la predisposición a la ansiedad y la depresión y mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes con ostomía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B918 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto )Registro de ensayos clínicos:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610.

[Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-Indicators for quality in diagnostics and treatment]

BACKGROUND

Within the framework of the quality initiative of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) a review article was compiled based on a systematic literature search. Recommendations for the current diagnostics and treatment of esophageal cancer were also elaborated.

METHODS

The systematic literature search was carried out in March 2019 according to the PRISMA criteria using the MEDLINE databank. The recommendations were formulated based on a consensus in the DGAV.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Operations below the currently valid minimum quantity threshold should no longer be carried out. There are many indications that the minimum quantity in Germany should be raised to ≥20 resections/year/hospital in order to comprehensively improve the quality. Prehabilitation programs with endurance, strength and intensive breathing training as well as nutritional therapy improve patient outcome. The current treatment of esophageal cancer is stage-dependent and incorporates endoscopic resection of (sub)mucosal low-risk tumors (T1m1-3 or T1sm1 low risk), primary esophagectomy of submucosal high-risk tumors (T1a), submucosal cancer (T1sm2-3) and T2N0 tumors, multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy and operations for advanced stages. Esophagectomy is nowadays carried out in one stage as a so-called hybrid procedure (laparoscopy and muscle-preserving thoracotomy) or as a total minimally invasive operation (laparoscopy and thoracoscopy).

[Preoperative cognitive function in very old patients : Influence on the complication rate and length of hospitalization]

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal cancer is a frequent diagnosis in older patients. A curative resection, possibly in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, is the standard therapy. The advanced age of the patients with an increasing number of comorbidities and often the presence of cognitive impairment represents a high risk for perioperative complications and a longer stay in hospital. The challenge in the clinical routine is to recognize a cognitive impairment in older patients and to prepare these patients for the operative intervention in the best possible way.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis was carried out to find out whether preoperative cognitive impairment is a prognostic factor for the postoperative outcome.

METHODS

In patients over the age of 75 years who were prepared for abdominal surgery of gastrointestinal cancer in the preoperative consultation, the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the clock test were carried out. The results of the tests were retrospectively compared with the complication rate and the duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Low MMSE values were significantly associated with the complication rate and the development of a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a). A cut-off value of 24 points in the MMSE was predictive for the development of complications and a longer hospital stay. The age of the patients was not associated with the MMSE.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive impairment is an important prognostic factor for the development of perioperative complications and the duration of the hospital stay in patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Therefore, a preoperative assessment, for example with the MMSE, is recommended in order to identify high-risk patients.

Use of a Perioperative Web-Based Exercise Program for a Patient with Barrett's Carcinoma Scheduled for Esophagectomy

A poor preoperative functional capacity increases the perioperative risk. Therefore, a web-based exercise approach has been initiated for a careful supervision and individual support of patients during their perioperative cancer therapy. Here, we present the data of a 57-year-old patient, scheduled for esophagectomy. Beside a five-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the patient performed 10 weeks of a web-based prehabilitation exercise training (preconditioning) and continued the exercise program for 14 weeks after surgery. The patient performed 42 of 44 recommended training sessions in the preconditioning period in his home environment. This corresponds to a mean of 131 (±38) min of total training per week. The patient performed 52 of 48 recommended training sessions in the postconditioning period. This corresponds to a mean of 165 (±87) min of total training per week. The patient could maintain his functional capacity during CRT and enhanced his submaximal performance level to the end of the intervention. The patient's adherence to the program was noteworthy. The most important features of this approach are the personalized design and the flexible scheduling precisely in tune with the patient's needs, concerns, and therapy related downtimes. Thus, the patient nearly fulfilled the exercise guidelines at a sufficient exercise intensity even during the neoadjuvant therapy. The preconditional exercise prevented a presumed CRT-induced and tumor-associated loss of functional capacity. The postoperative exercise led to a structured and adequate return into regular physical activities after surgery. Finally, this approach complements a comprehensive clinical care, in a health-promoting, cost-effective, and patient-safely manner.

[Preconditioning of the lungs and circulation before visceral and thoracic surgical interventions]

BACKGROUND

Estimation of the perioperative risk plays a decisive role in the surgical indications, particularly in view of the demographic change. For this reason, prehabilitation concepts for reducing perioperative risk nowadays play an increasingly important role.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of the current recommendations for preoperative diagnostics in thoracic surgical interventions as well as existing prehabilitation concepts and their practical applicability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective review of the literature was carried out by searching the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library and ISRCTN, including the guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS).

RESULTS

Preconditioning includes the conservative treatment of underlying diseases, smoking cessation and prehabilitation. Prehabilitation is an increasingly pressing concept in routine clinical practice, even though the evidence is limited due to the very heterogeneous study situation. Overall, however, there is a tendency for positive effects on the quality of life and postoperative complications as well as convalescence.

CONCLUSION

In addition to preoperative diagnostics to assess the perioperative risk, effective preconditioning of patients is also necessary. For this an interdisciplinary approach including anesthesia, pneumology, psychotherapy and physiotherapy is necessary. In addition to the conservative medicinal optimization, prehabilitation concepts are gaining in importance and will certainly become established in routine clinical practice. From the surgical perspective, minimally invasive approaches and parenchyma-sparing resections also serve to reduce risks.