Robotic hernia repair III. English version : Robotic incisional hernia repair with transversus abdominis release (r‑TAR). Video report and results of a cohort study

Early postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia

BACKGROUND

The extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a novel approach for ventral hernia repair. This technique has been recently advanced using robotics (r-eTEP). The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive analysis of the initial results of r-eTEP and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique compared to the eTEP technique.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study of patients with ventral hernias who underwent surgery via eTEP or r-eTEP in our department between 2019 and 2023. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the groups. Preoperative patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were subsequently analysed.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were comparable between the groups. The r-eTEP group had a significantly greater proportion of M3 hernias (p = 0.006), M4 hernias (p = 0.020), incisional hernias (p = 0.002), and hernias with rectus diastasis (p < 0.001). The r-eTEP group had a significantly larger hernia defect (p = 0.003) and larger mesh size (p = 0.015). The r-eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) and shorter operative time, though not statistically significant (p = 0.211). Intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as postoperative pain, were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study show that the r-eTEP technique may offer potential benefits as the overall hospital stay was shorter while intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable for both techniques.

To drain or not to drain in minimal invasive ventral hernia surgery

PURPOSE

Despite the high prevalence of ventral hernias worldwide, intraoperative drain placement remains a controversial topic. The benefit in reducing postoperative complications has not yet been clearly demonstrated. This study investigates whether a drain prevents postoperative complications after minimally invasive ventral hernia repair using the extended-totally-extraperitoneal-(eTEP)-technique.

METHODS

This monocentric, retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent eTEP between 2019 and 2024. Two comparison groups were formed (54 patients with drain,106 patients without) and analysed for potential differences.

RESULTS

There were no significant sociodemographic or clinical differences between the study groups. The defect size was larger in the drain group (drain: 13 cm2 (64,5) †, no-drain: 6,5 cm2 (21) †, p = 0,025). There were no significant differences regarding frequency of postoperative complications (drain: 13%, no-drain: 8,5%, p = 0,373), surgical site infections (SSI) (drain: 0%, no-Drain: 1,9%, p = 0,550), and surgical site occurrences (SSO) (drain: 13%, no-Drain: 4,7%, p = 0,108). A subgroup analysis showed that robotically operated patients were more frequently provided with drains (rob: 30 (47,6%), lap: 24 (24,7%), p = 0,003), had larger defect sizes (rob: 28 cm2 (72)†, lap: 6 cm2 (9,87)†, p < 0,001), and received Transversus-abdominis-releases (TAR) more often (rob: 14 (22,2%), lap: 5 (5,2%), p = 0,001).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences between patients with and without drains after eTEP regarding the frequency of postoperative complications, SSOs and SSIs. Our findings do not suggest nor refute that wound drains prevent postoperative complications.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery for ventral hernia repair (VHR) is gaining attention for its potential advantages over laparoscopic and open techniques. This approach combines the advantages of minimally invasive surgery with the ability to perform technically challenging procedures, often required in open surgery but difficult with conventional laparoscopy. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic VHR compared to other surgical approaches, focusing on postoperative complications, operative time, and costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis were conducted, including 67 studies from January 2010 to May 2023 on Robotic VHR compared with other techniques. Primary outcome was 30-days postoperative complications; SSI, SSO, seroma, mortality, recurrence, length of hospital stay, operative time and costs were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Robotic surgery was associated with longer operative times compared to both laparoscopic (MD 64.67 min; p < 0.001) and open repairs (MD 69.69 min; p < 0.001). However, it resulted, compared to open surgery, in fewer SSIs (OR 0.62; p 0.05), mortality (OR 0.44; p 0.04) and shorter hospital stay (MD -3.77 days; p < 0.001). No differences were found in overall complications or length of stay between robotic and laparoscopic approaches but higher costs and longer operative times were reported in robotic VHR.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available low-quality evidence, robotic VHR appears to offer limited advantages compared to laparoscopic techniques. However, when compared to open approaches, robotic VHR may demonstrate reduced postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays even if an higher rate of seroma formation was retrieved probably related to technical details. Nevertheless, longer operative times and higher costs remain significant limitations. Further high-quality comparative studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair

The recent availability of robotic platforms has facilitated the adoption of advanced minimally invasive ventral hernia repair. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is an evolving field with many new techniques and acronyms for different accesses and approaches. This paper aims to describe the four currently most used procedures for robotic ventral hernia repair, all of which are MIS sublay repairs; robotic Trans-Abdominal-Preperitoneal (r-TAPP), robotic Trans-Abdominal-Retromuscular-Mesh (r-TARM), robotic Extended-Totally-Extra-Peritoneal (r-E-TEP), and robotic Transversus-Abdominis-Release (RoboTAR). Their descriptions are supported by illustrations. The paper describes trocar placement, practical tips and tricks, and briefly discusses the indications for each procedure. Furthermore, technical details such as the incision of the flap, access to the correct anatomical planes, dissection techniques, handling of the hernia sac, mesh choice and placement, and restoration of the abdominal wall layers are described. In conclusion, robotic ventral hernia repair has gained wide acceptance with promising postoperative results. There are many different techniques and approaches available, and this paper describes the four most commonly performed procedures in a detailed step-by-step fashion.

Assessment of myofascial medialization following intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) in a cadaveric model

PURPOSE

Intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) for the treatment of large ventral hernias and loss of domain (LOD) hernias is a promising tool in abdominal wall surgery. However, little is known about the extent of gain in myofascial advancement especially for the anterior rectus sheath. We, therefore, used a cadaveric model to determine the medialization during IFT.

METHODS

4 fresh frozen specimens were used. Retromuscular preparation was carried out followed by IFT with diagonal vertical traction for 30 min. Medial advancement of the anterior rectus sheath was measured after 15 and 30 min as well as traction forces.

RESULTS

Total medialization for anterior rectus sheath after 30 min of IFT was 10.5 cm (mean). The mean traction force was 16.28 kg. Total medialization was significantly higher during the first 15 min of vertical fascial traction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IFT provides significant medialization for the anterior rectus sheath in the cadaveric model. The findings align with results from a retrospective case study. Therefore, we see IFT as a beneficial tool in abdominal wall surgery.

[Robot-assisted extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair-Experience from the first 61 consecutive operations with eTEP and eTAR techniques]

BACKGROUND

As in many other fields of surgery, robotically assisted surgical procedures have been established in the treatment of ventral hernias in recent years. The use of the robot can combine the demands of a minimally invasive approach and retromuscular mesh placement. In addition to a transabdominal approach, these procedures can also be performed using an extraperitoneal approach.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that robotic total extraperitoneal management of abdominal wall hernias is safe and efficient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all robotically operated patients on ventral hernia using extraperitoneal eTEP technique from September 2019 to May 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 ventral hernias were operated on using the robotic eTEP technique during the study period. In 14 patients retro-rectal dissection was extended laterally by an extraperitoneal transversus abdominis release (eTAR) because of the hernia size or a lateral hernia localization. In all cases, an uncoated synthetic mesh was placed in the retromuscular position with complete closure of the hernia defects. The median hernia defect area was 30 cm² (4-308 cm²). The median mesh size was 540 cm² (300-1350 cm²). The median mesh defect ratio (MDR) was 17.78 (3.06-145). One intraoperative and three postoperative complications were encountered. Neither conversion nor reoperation were required.

CONCLUSION

The robotic extraperitoneal eTEP technique enables the required retromuscular mesh placement in a minimally invasive approach. With the possibility of a combination with a transversus abdominis release, even complex findings can be treated using this technique.

Robotic Ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Uncomplicated Spigelian Hernia

Spigelian hernias are rare herniations through the Spigelian fascia, with an incidence rate of 0.12-2.0% of all hernias. Diagnosis may be difficult due to a potential lack of symptoms until complications arise. Therefore, imaging with either ultrasound or CT with oral contrast is recommended to confirm the diagnosis if a Spigelian hernia is suspected. Once the diagnosis has been established, it is essential that operative repair be performed as soon as possible because 24% of Spigelian hernias become incarcerated, and 27% of Spigelian hernias lead to strangulation. Management options include open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery. This case report discusses the management of a 47-year-old man with an uncomplicated Spigelian hernia that was repaired with the robotic ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair technique.

Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

[Robotic hernia surgery IV. German version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results]

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

Open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic posterior component separation in complex abdominal wall repair

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is a surgical technique used in the treatment of complex ventral hernias. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of open (oTAR) versus robotic-assisted (rTAR) posterior component separation by TAR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients at two European hernia centres who underwent bilateral TAR were included. The primary endpoint was the duration of postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

Data from 90 rTAR and 79 oTAR operations were evaluated. Patient demographics were similar between groups in terms of age, sex, BMI, and co-morbidities. There were more smokers, and hernias were larger in the oTAR group (width 8.7 cm versus 10.0 cm; P = 0.031, length 11.6 cm versus 14.1 cm; P = 0.005). Duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the rTAR group (3.4 days versus 6.9 days; P < 0.001). Short-term serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III and above) were more frequent (20.3 per cent versus 7.8 per cent; P = 0.018), and there were more surgical site infections (12.7 per cent versus 3.3 per cent; P = 0.010) in the oTAR group. During a median follow-up of 19 months in the rTAR group and 43 months in the oTAR group, reoperation (4.4 per cent versus 8.9 per cent; P = 0.245), and recurrence rates (5.6 per cent versus 5.1 per cent; P > 0.009) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ventral incisional hernias who undergo bilateral rTAR had significantly shorter postoperative hospital stays and fewer short-term complications compared with patients undergoing bilateral oTAR.