["Radical" versus "functional" surgery of the paranasal sinuses-A contradiction?]

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by local chronic inflammation of the mucous membranes of the nose and paranasal sinuses. It affects approximately 5% of the population.

METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature, with particular attention to current national and international guidelines.

RESULTS

CRS is defined by, and diagnosed on the basis of, a combination of symptoms and objective findings of nasal endoscopy and imaging studies. It markedly impairs quality of life and gives rise to both direct and indirect health care costs. In 20-45% of cases, CRS is associated with comorbid bronchial asthma and a significantly elevated risk of further diseases (e.g., COPD, OR 1.73; depression, HR 1.50; obstructive sleep apnea, OR 1.91; carcinoma, OR 1.14-5.30). CRS is primarily treated medically with topical steroids (standardized mean difference of nasal symptoms, -0.63 (95% confidence interval [-0.89; -0.37]; standardized mean difference of quality of life as measured by SNOT -22, -5.46 [-8.08; -2.84]), as well as with nasal lavage and, as an option, systemic steroids (and antibiotics where appropriate). If appropriate medical treatment fails to bring about adequate and sustained improvement, endoscopic sinus surgery is indicated. This improves the individual symptoms, the overall symptom score, and patients' quality of life. Severe refractory CRS with nasal polyposis can be treated with biological agents.

CONCLUSION

CRS calls for individually adapted medical and/or surgical treatment.

[Decision-making in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biologics]

Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the most common chronic diseases in the population. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in adults is predominantly characterized by a type 2 inflammatory endotype. If sufficient control cannot be achieved through primary drug therapy, surgical intervention is usually recommended as the next stage of treatment. Nowadays, various biologics are available that have been or will be approved for use in these patients. This review summarizes the presentations from the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia 2023 and the latest findings on decision-making in the treatment of CRSwNP. Standard therapy with medication and sinus surgery fails in some patients with CRSwNP. Biologics that act on the type 2 inflammatory pathway led to a reduction in the nasal polyp score (NPS), an improvement in nasal obstruction, and an improvement in quality of life without significant side effects. Biomarkers such as total IgE, serum eosinophils, and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) can provide indications of the success of the treatment. In summary, it can be said that for many patients with recurrent CRSwNP, a combination of paranasal sinus surgery and treatment with a biologic that is precisely tailored to the patient's endotype is the best option. However, the question of which surgical approach and which biologic at which time and for which patient is still ongoing and requires further studies.

[Local flap reconstruction techniques after frontal sinus drainage type II and III according to Draf]

BACKGROUND

Extended endonasal endoscopic frontal sinus surgery is characterized by bone resection beyond the lamellae of the frontal sinus and is currently classified according to Draf as type IIa, type IIb, modified type III (also referred to as type IIc), and type III. This approach is indicated when the surgical goal cannot be achieved through complete removal of the anterior ethmoidal cells. Numerous studies indicate restenosis rates ranging from 7 to 36%, despite creation of maximal openings. Exposed bone, which tends to epithelize slowly with significant crusting and the risk of uncontrolled wound healing depending on the local environment and other factors, is considered a contributing factor. Covering the exposed bone with mucosa can significantly reduce the risk of restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A variety of flap techniques for frontal sinus drainage in Draf III procedures are presented, including some variants that were part of presentations at the 2023 Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia, Bulgaria. These include combinations of free mucosal grafts, pedicled mucosal flaps, and hybrids combining both techniques. Additionally, the results of current studies are presented.

CONCLUSION

The results and achieved opening areas in contemporary Draf III surgeries are significantly improved and larger compared to the early stages of these procedures. A multitude of published studies consistently demonstrate that outcomes are markedly improved with mucosal coverage. Depending on the prevailing anatomy, mucosal conditions, and the extent of the surgical intervention, the most suitable technique should be selected. Therefore, proficiency in various methods is crucial. The use of a flap technique (free, pedicled, or combinations thereof) should be defined as the standard when performing extended frontal sinus surgery (Draf IIb, IIc, III, or endonasal frontal sinus surgery [EFSS] 4-6).

[Difficult-to-treat chronic rhinosinusitis-when the standard treatment is not effective and biologics are not available]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, significant improvements have been made in the treatment options for uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to standard medical and surgical therapy. This is the result of a better understanding of the pathophysiology and the resulting development of biologicals for CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, biologics are not (yet) available for all patients in Europe.

OBJECTIVE

Based on the session "Difficult-to-treat CRS, when biologics are not available" at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society (ERS) 2023 in Sofia, Bulgaria, the treatment options for uncontrolled CRS with the exclusion of biologics will be discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The content of the presentations "Is there a place for antibiotics?" "Indications for revision surgery," "Novel systemic treatment options," "Novel local treatment options," and "Phototherapy for nasal polyps" are outlined and supported by a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Various treatment options are available for managing uncontrolled CRS, even if biologic treatments are unavailable. Treatment options for type‑2 (T2) CRS include steroid rinses, repeated short-term oral steroids, steroid-eluting stents, and extended sinus surgery. In the case of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization can be considered. Non-T2 endotypes or CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) may benefit from several weeks of macrolides and xylitol rinses.

CONCLUSION

To accurately assess the efficacy of second-line therapies for treatment of difficult-to-treat CRS within an endotype-specific framework, additional controlled clinical trials are needed that take into account the heterogeneity of CRS endotypes.