[Acute liver failure]

Extracorporeal albumin dialysis

Patients with liver failure still present a high mortality. It can only be significantly improved by the rare resource of liver transplantation. Extracorporeal liver support devices have been developed to temporarily support liver detoxification. Artificial devices without hepatocytes ("liver dialysis" or "albumin dialysis") are already widely used in Europe. The two best-known systems, MARS and Prometheus, use a different technical approach to remove water-soluble as well as albumin-bound toxins from the blood. In MARS, toxins diffuse along a concentration gradient through an albumin-impermeable membrane into a secondary circuit that is pre-filled with an albumin solution. The albumin is continuously "recycled" inside the secondary circuit by different adsorber and low flux dialysis. In contrast, Prometheus includes an albumin-permeable filter allowing separation of the albumin fraction into the secondary circuit where the albumin-bound toxins are directly removed by two adsorbers. Thereafter, high flux dialysis is performed inside the primary circuit. For both extracorporeal systems, an improvement of hepatic encephalopathy and biochemical markers such as bilirubin is consistently reported. In-vivo comparisons of both systems showed significantly higher extraction capacities for protein-bound and water-soluble substances under Prometheus than under MARS treatment. Possible pathophysiological mechanisms could be a reduction of portal pressure or a removal of vasoactive cytokines. However, only few randomised controlled trials with low patient numbers and conflictive results regarding patient survival exist. Nevertheless, a Cochrane meta-analysis revealed a significant survival benefit for extracorporeal liver support devices in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Other promising indications are severe refractory cholestatic pruritus, intoxication with protein-bound substances and graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. As large randomised controlled multi-center trials are currently underway, better evidence will be available soon to define the clinical role of extracorporeal liver support devices.

Bioartificial liver: current status

Liver failure remains a life-threatening syndrome. With the growing disparity between the number of suitable donor organs and the number of patients awaiting transplantation, efforts have been made to optimize the allocation of organs, to find alternatives to cadaveric liver transplantation, and to develop extracorporeal methods to support or replace the function of the failing organ. An extracorporeal liver support system has to provide the main functions of the liver: detoxification, synthesis, and regulation. The understanding that the critical issue of the clinical syndrome in liver failure is the accumulation of toxins not cleared by the failing liver led to the development of artificial filtration and adsorption devices (artificial liver support). Based on this hypothesis, the removal of lipophilic, albumin-bound substances, such as bilirubin, bile acids, metabolites of aromatic amino acids, medium-chain fatty acids, and cytokines, should be beneficial to the clinical course of a patient in liver failure. Artificial detoxification devices currently under clinical evaluation include the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS), Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis (SPAD), and the Prometheus system. The complex tasks of regulation and synthesis remain to be addressed by the use of liver cells (bioartificial liver support). The Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device (ELAD), HepatAssist, Modular Extracorporeal Liver Support system (MELS), and the Amsterdam Medical Center Bioartificial Liver (AMC-BAL) are bioartificial systems. This article gives a brief overview on these artificial and bioartificial devices and discusses remaining obstacles.

[Acute liver failure. Current aspects of diagnosis and therapy]

Disturbances of some partial liver functions, such as synthesis, excretion, or biotransformation of xenobiotics, are important for prognosis and ultimate survival in patients presenting with multiple organ dysfunction on the intesive care unit (ICU). The incidence of liver dysfunction is underestimated when traditional "static" measures such as serum-transaminases or bilirubin as opposed to "dynamic" tests, such as clearance tests, are used to diagnose liver dysfunction. Similar to the central role of the failing liver in MODS, extrahepatic complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and brain edema develop in acute or fulminant hepatic failure and determine the prognosis of the patient. This is reflected in the required presence of hepatic encephalopathy in addition to hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy for the diagnosis of acute liver failure. In addition to these clinical signs, dynamic tests, such as indocyanine green clearance, which is available at the bed-side, are useful for the monitoring of perfusion and global liver function. In addition to specific and causal therapeutic interventions, e.g. N-acetylcysteine for paracetamol poisoning or termination of pregnancy for the HELLP-syndrome, new therapeutic measures, e.g. terlipressin/albumin or albumin dialysis are likely to improve the poor prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Nevertheless, liver transplantation remains the treatment of choice for fulminant hepatic failure when the expected survival is <20%.