1
|
Culen C, Herle M, König M, Hemberger SH, Seferagic S, Talaska C, Ertl DA, Wagner G, Straub C, Johnson K, Wood DL, Häusler G. Be on TRAQ – Cross-cultural adaptation of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ 5.0) and pilot testing of the German Version (TRAQ-GV-15). JOURNAL OF TRANSITION MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1515/jtm-2018-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTransfer from pediatric care into the adult health care system is known to be a vulnerable phase in the lives of youth with special health care needs (YSHCN). Recommendations from the literature favor assessment of transition readiness rather than simply pass over YSHCN from pediatric to adult-centered care by the age of 18. Nevertheless, no validated and disease neutral assessment instrument in German exists to date. Hence, our aim was to cross-culturally adapt and to pilot-test a German version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ 5.0). We wanted to provide a tool that can be applied broadly during the health care transition (HCT) process of YSHCN.MethodsThe development included translating and adapting TRAQ 5.0 to German and conducting a pilot-study with 172 YSHCN between the ages of 14 and 23.ResultsCross-cultural adaptation resulted in the TRAQ-GV-15. Exploratory factor analysis led to a 3 factor-structure. Internal consistency for the overall score was good with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82. Age, in contrast to sex, had a significant effect on the TRAQ scoring. The administration of the TRAQ-GV-15 was well received and demonstrated good feasibility.ConclusionThe TRAQ-GV-15 is an easily applicable and clinically usable instrument for assessing transition readiness in German speaking YSHCN prior to HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Culen
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Marion Herle
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Marianne König
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sophie-Helene Hemberger
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Gastroenterology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sanja Seferagic
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Gastroenterology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Carolin Talaska
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana-Alexandra Ertl
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Gudrun Wagner
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Straub
- University of Freiburg, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, Center for Pediatrics, Department of General Pediatrics, Adolescent Medicine And Neonatology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kiana Johnson
- East Tennessee State University, Quillen College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johnson City, TN, USA
| | - David L. Wood
- East Tennessee State University, Quillen College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johnson City, TN, USA
| | - Gabriele Häusler
- Medical University of Vienna, University Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (UKKJ), Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Phone: +43 1 40 400 40160
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rieger S, Bethe D, Bagorda A, Treiber D, Beimler J, Sommerer C, Höcker B, Fichtner A, Vinke T, Zeier M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B. A need-adapted transition program after pediatric kidney transplantation. JOURNAL OF TRANSITION MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1515/jtm-2018-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractA successful transition of renal transplant recipients from pediatric to adult care requires a structured, need-adapted and multidisciplinary approach to preserve renal graft function during this critical period of life. In this article we present our clinical protocol for transition from pediatric to adult care, which we developed on the basis of the International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) consensus guidelines influenced by our own experience. This transition program was established in our center in July 2017. The entire transition process is structured and accompanied by a transition key worker (social worker). From 12 years of age we train pediatric renal transplant recipients in medical knowledge, self-management skills and networking with self-help groups. The training is adapted to the individual patient‘s intellectual ability, lasts about 10 years and takes place with increasing intensity. Repeatedly we perform standardized informational interviews and check patient’s knowledge of transplant-related topics. Psychosocial and educational issues are evaluated concomitantly. The actual transfer takes place in a pediatric-adult-transition clinic. Relevant medical and psychosocial aspects are discussed and the future treatment regimen is established. The date of transfer is adapted to the individual patient’s need; it varies between 18 and 24 years of age. In periods of increased risk for non-adherence the transfer is postponed to intensify the efforts for training and assistance. After transfer a standardized evaluation of each individual patient takes place focusing on medical and psychosocial issues and on satisfaction with the transition process. Collection of these data is still in progress and will be analyzed systematically at a later stage in order to evaluate the impact of this new transition program on the stability of transplant function. That analysis might serve as a basis for negotiations about refunding with health insurance companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Rieger
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Bethe
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Bagorda
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Treiber
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Höcker
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Fichtner
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Vinke
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadlo A, Altevers J, Peplies J, Kaltz B, Claßen M, Bauer A, Koletzko S, Timmer A. Measuring satisfaction with health care in young persons with inflammatory bowel disease--an instrument development and validation study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:97. [PMID: 24581043 PMCID: PMC3946022 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient satisfaction is a relevant prognostic factor in young persons with chronic disease and may be both age and disease specific. To assess health care quality from the patient’s view in young persons with inflammatory bowel disease, an easy to use, valid, reliable and informative specific instrument was needed. Methods All parts of the study were directed at persons with inflammatory bowel disease aged 15 to 24 (“youth”). A qualitative internet patient survey was used to generate items, complemented by a physician survey and literature search. A 2nd internet survey served to reduce items based on perceived importance and representativeness. Following pilot testing to assess ease of use and face validity, 150 respondents to a postal survey in patients from a paediatric clinical registry were included for validation analyses. Construct validity was assessed by relating summary scores to results from global questions on satisfaction with care using ANOVA. To assess test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), a subset of patients were assessed twice within 3 months. Results 302 persons with IBD and 55 physicians participated in the item generating internet survey, resulting in 3,954 statements. After discarding redundancies 256 statements were presented in the 2nd internet survey. Of these, 32 items were retained. The resulting instrument assesses both the perceived relevance (importance) of an item as well as the performance of the care giver for each item for calculation of a summary satisfaction score (range 0 to 1). Sensibility testing showed good acceptance for most items. Construct validity was good, with mean scores of 0.63 (0.50 to 0.76), 0.71 (0.69 to 0.74) and 0.81 (0.79 to 0.83) for no, some and good global satisfaction (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (ICC 0.6 to 0.7). Conclusions We developed an easy to use, patient oriented, valid instrument to assess satisfaction with care in young persons with IBD for use in survey research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antje Timmer
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstr, 30, 28359 Bremen, German.
| |
Collapse
|