[Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery]

Cervical vertebral body replacement using a modern in situ expandable and angulable corpectomy cage system: early clinical and radiological outcome

PURPOSE

Vertebral body replacement (VBR) cages are commonly implanted to reconstruct the cervical vertebrae in cases of tumour, trauma, spondylodiscitis, and degeneration. Expandable cages have been widely used for this purpose; however, the lacking congruence at the implant-bone interface and consequent implant displacement were considered as a serious drawback of such systems. Aim of this study is to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcome of a modern in situ not only expandable but also angulable cervical corpectomy cage system.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients who underwent a single or multilevel cervical VBR procedure were included and retrospectively evaluated in this single-centre case series. The neurological status was assessed using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score. Complications were categorized into surgical (including implant-associated) and general medical. Radiographic parameters included regional angulation, segmental height, and coronal alignment.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59.5 ± 20.6 years. The recorded ASIA score improved postoperatively by 10 points (p  0.0001). Surgical including implant-associated complication rates were 19.05%. Radiographic evaluation showed a height gain of 11.2 mm (p < 0.0001), lordotic correction of 7° (p < 0.0001), and coronal alignment of 3° (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up, loss of angulation correction of 1.9° (p  0.0002), subsidence of 1.92 mm (p  0.0006), and fusion rates of 68.42% were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an in situ angulable and expandable cage system in cervical VBR seems to offer better results compared to conventional static or expandable cages regarding segmental height gain, lordotic correction, and clinical improvement as well as low complication and revision rates. Significant height gain in multilevel surgeries is associated with higher rates of implant-associated complications.

Implants for Vertebral Body Replacement - Which Systems are Available and Have Become Established

Since the first vertebral body replacement operations over 50 years ago until now, there were developed numerous methods and implants. Vertebral body replacement after corpectomy nowadays is a standard procedure in spinal surgery. At the beginning mainly bone grafts were used. Due to continuous development, PMMA and titanium implants were developed. Nowadays various expandable and non-expandable implants are available. Numerous implants can still be justified. The question arises which methods and systems are on the market and which ones have proven themselves? This article describes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of each implant type.

[Trisegmental fusion by vertebral body replacement : Outcome following traumatic multisegmental fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine]

BACKGROUND

Around 5% of all trauma patients suffer from spinal trauma. Spinal fractures are mainly located in the thoracic and lumbar spine. For multisegmental vertebral fractures categorized as instable, combined dorsal instrumentation and ventral stabilization is recommended. Numerous vertebral body replacement systems are available for ventral stabilization.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to analyze radiological results following the implantation of a hydraulic expandable vertebral body replacement and the evaluation of patients' outcome three years after implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who suffered traumatic multisegmental fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine in the period from September 2009 to September 2012 were included in this study. Patients with additional injuries or abnormal sensitivity or motor function were excluded from the current study. All patients underwent dorsal percutaneous instrumentation. Afterwards, implantation of the vertebral body replacement was performed via the mini-open approach at our level I trauma center. In the computed tomography and X‑ray imaging, the sagittal kyphotic angle was measured. Furthermore, the clinical outcome (patients' satisfaction, VAS spine score) was analyzed using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

During the above mentioned period, seven patients (four female; three male) underwent dorsal instrumentation and ventral trisegmental fusion and were identified fitting the inclusion/exclusion criteria and thus could be included in the study. Most fractures were located in the thoracic-lumbar junction and were categorized A4 according to the AO Spine classification system. The analysis of the radiological data showed a pre-operative average traumatic segmental angle of 18.1 ± 14.9°, which could be decreased by reposition procedure to 6.4 ± 1.7°. The complete follow-up, including the data three years after implantation of the vertebral body implant, was available for three patients. The traumatic segmental angle remained stable in the follow-up three years later. In one case, a subsidence of the implant of 1.5 mm was observed, having no influence on the patients' satisfaction. All three patients indicated to be very satisfied with their outcome. The VAS spine score rating was in the range between 62.4 and 70.2.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that in the case of multisegmental fractures complete reposition by ligamentotaxis and by the percutaneous instrumentation system is possible. In addition to the percutaneous dorsal instrumentation, the implantation of a hydraulically expandable vertebral body replacement may allow a stable fusion after complex traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Patients are very satisfied with their outcome after this procedure.

Applications of 3D printing in the management of severe spinal conditions

The latest and fastest-growing innovation in the medical field has been the advent of three-dimensional printing technologies, which have recently seen applications in the production of low-cost, patient-specific medical implants. While a wide range of three-dimensional printing systems has been explored in manufacturing anatomical models and devices for the medical setting, their applications are cutting-edge in the field of spinal surgery. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and classification of the current applications of three-dimensional printing technologies in spine care. Although three-dimensional printing technology has been widely used for the construction of patient-specific anatomical models of the spine and intraoperative guide templates to provide personalized surgical planning and increase pedicle screw placement accuracy, only few studies have been focused on the manufacturing of spinal implants. Therefore, three-dimensional printed custom-designed intervertebral fusion devices, artificial vertebral bodies and disc substitutes for total disc replacement, along with tissue engineering strategies focused on scaffold constructs for bone and cartilage regeneration, represent a set of promising applications towards the trend of individualized patient care.

Five-year clinical and radiological results of combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures

OBJECT

Despite promising early clinical results, the long-term outcome of the use of expandable titanium cages to reconstruct the anterior column after traumatic burst fractures is still unknown. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the use of expandable titanium cages 5 years postoperatively.

METHODS

Eighty patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (T4-L5) underwent posterior stabilization followed by anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using expandable titanium cages with or without additional anterior plating. After 5 years, fusion was evaluated by means of plain radiographs and CT scans, and the patients' scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), their neurological status, and clinical results were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-five (56%) of the 80 patients could be examined after 5 years. There was a relatively high rate of complications related to thoracotomy (26%), but there were no complications directly related to the cages. Revision surgery was required in 1 case. The average postoperative loss of correction was only 2.4° due to minimal subsidence of the cages. No cage showed a radiolucent line or instability in flexion-extension views. Bony fusion, as assessed by CT scan, was achieved in 41 patients (91%). On clinical examination, 96% of all patients were ambulatory and showed minimal restriction of spinal range of motion; 71% did not need analgesic medication at all; and 67% were able to work. The average ODI score was 12. Thirty-one percent of patients complained of some kind of anterior approach-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar burst fractures with expandable titanium cages is a relative safe procedure with satisfactory radiological and clinical long-term outcome. High fusion rates can be achieved, with only minor loss of correction, typically occurring in the 1st year. However, open thoracotomy carries the risks of additional complications and development of post-thoracotomy syndrome.

[Fusion criteria for cages as vertebral body replacement in thoracolumbar fractures]

BACKGROUND

No commonly accepted criteria to evaluate bony incorporation of cages as vertebral body replacement in thoracolumbar fractures exist. The goal of this study was a thorough radiological evaluation of the fusion process in posterior-anterior stabilized fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study 35 patients were evaluated radiologically including computed tomography (CT) scanning and bone mineral density measurement inside the cages. Correction loss, cage subsidence and tilting, bone growth in and around the cages as well as bone mineral density were assessed. Fusion grading was assessed with defined criteria (i.e. bridging bone, bone growth through the cage, stability in functional X-rays and no radiolucent lines).

RESULTS

After 12 months minor subsidence and tilting of the cages had caused significant correction loss of the basal plate angle of 2.4° on average. Of the patients 20 (57%) fulfilled the criteria for complete or incomplete fusion and 5 (14%) showed no signs of bony fusion. Bone mineral density measurements were unreliable due to metallic artefacts.

CONCLUSIONS

The advocated criteria allow accurate assessment of bony incorporation of cages. Bony incorporation can be detected in and around the cages over time; however, only 57% of patients showed signs of bony fusion after 1 year.

Design and preliminary biomechanical analysis of artificial cervical joint complex

OBJECTIVE

To design an artificial cervical joint complex (ACJC) prosthesis for non-fusion reconstruction after cervical subtotal corpectomy, and to evaluate the biomechanical stability, preservation of segment movements and influence on adjacent inter-vertebral movements of this prosthesis.

METHODS

The prosthesis was composed of three parts: the upper/lower joint head and the middle artificial vertebrae made of Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy and polyethylene with a ball-and-socket joint design resembling the multi-axial movement in normal inter-vertebral spaces. Biomechanical tests of intact spine (control), Orion locking plate system and ACJC prosthesis were performed on formalin-fixed cervical spine specimens from 21 healthy cadavers to compare stability, range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segment and ROM of adjacent inter-vertebral spaces.

RESULTS

As for stability of the whole lower cervical spine, there was no significant difference of flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion between intact spine group and ACJC prosthesis group. As for segment movements, difference in flexion, lateral bending or torsion between ACJC prosthesis group and control group was not statistically significant, while ACJC prosthesis group showed an increase in extension (P < 0.05) compared to that of the control group. In addition, ACJC prosthesis group demonstrated better flexion, extension and lateral bending compared to those of Orion plating system group (P < 0.05). Difference in adjacent inter-vertebral ROM of the ACJC prosthesis group was not statistically significant compared to that of the control group.

CONCLUSION

After cervical subtotal corpectomy, reconstruction with ACJC prosthesis not only obtained instant stability, but also reserved segment motions effectively, without abnormal gain of mobility at adjacent inter-vertebral spaces.

Dynamics of neurological deficit after surgical decompression of symptomatic vertebral metastases

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study to examination the influence of preoperative duration of symptoms on the clinical outcome of patients that underwent surgical decompression because of neurologic deficit in metastatic disease of the spine. OBJECTIVES.: Our aim was to investigate possible correlations between the duration of neurologic deficit before surgery and postoperative outcome with respect to neural recovery in patients with spinal metastases, and second, based on those results, propose criteria for the timing of surgery in these patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It has not yet been determined whether the duration of preoperative symptoms has an influence on the postoperative outcome of patients with vertebral metastases. A standardized treatment or protocol defining a strategy of surgical treatment has yet to be designed.

METHODS

This study includes 194 patients. The duration of symptoms before surgical treatment and the neurologic status before and after operation were determined and classified according to the Frankel score.

RESULTS

Of 401 patients, who underwent surgery due to metastases to the spine, 194 suffered from neurologic deficit. Analyzing the postoperative neurostatus in these patients revealed an improvement in 78 patients (40%), impairment in 13 patients (7%), and in 103 patients it did not change. The relation of duration of neurologic symptoms before surgery, and the outcome after an operation was highly significant (P < 0.001). In patients with less than 3 days of neurologic deficit, the probability of improvement in neurostatus was highly significantly higher (P < 0.001) than in patients with neurologic deficit existing for more than 15 days.

CONCLUSION

Patients with neurologic deficit because of spinal bone metastases benefit from early operative intervention. Urgent surgery is indicated in patients with less than 3 days of neurologic deficit.

Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model

Minimally invasive surgery has become more and more important for the treatment of traumatic spine fractures. Besides, some clinical studies, objective data regarding the possible lower damage to the surrounding tissue of the spine is still missing. Here we report a sheep model where we compared a percutaneous versus an open approach for dorsal instrumentation with pedicle screws to the spine. Twelve skeletally mature sheep underwent bilateral pedicle screw fixation at the L4-L6 level. Forty-eight pedicle screws were bilaterally inserted into the pedicles and connected with rods using either an open dorsal standard or a percutaneous approach. Operation time, blood flow, compartment pressure, radiation time, loss of blood, laboratory findings and EMG were evaluated to objectify possible advantages for the percutaneous operation technique. Loss of blood and the distribution of CK-MM as a marker for muscle damage were significantly lower in the percutaneous group. However, radiation time was significantly longer in the percutaneous group. Other parameters like compartment pressure, blood flow and also measurement of the EMG at different time points did not reveal significant differences. Based on the results we found in the present study, percutaneous screw insertion can bring moderate advantages but it should be noted that essential functional deficits to the muscle could not be detected.

Secondary Collapse of an Expandable Cage After Vertebral Corpectomy

Expandable vertebral body replacement systems have been increasingly used for anterior stabilization of spine. We report a secondary collapse of an expandable vertebral body replacement system. This specific complication has not been reported in the literature so far. The most obvious reason for failure was insufficient tightening of a locking screw. This paper emphasizes the importance of correct technical application.

Expandable vertebral body replacement in patients with thoracolumbar spine tumors

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of surgical interventions for tumoral lesions of the spine include the establishment and improvement of tumor-related symptoms. Anterior tumor resection followed by reconstruction indicated if surgical treatment allowed a marginal removal of the tumor or could extend the individual survival rate in combination with adjuvant therapy options. Sufficient re-stabilization depends on adequate anterior column reconstruction. The purpose of this retrospective study was to present our experiences and results after anterior tumor resection followed by reconstruction with the expandable vertebral body replacement device (VBR, Ulrich, Germany) based on clinical application over 4 degrees years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out an anterior tumor resection followed by reconstruction using an anterior extendable device in 32 patients with different spine tumors between 1996 and 2000. A retrospective evaluation was executed considering the patients medical records and radiological findings. Additionally, a clinical and radiological investigation of still living postoperative patients was carried out.

RESULTS

The mean surgical time of all evaluated patients was 317.2 min. The average blood loss was 1,272.5 ml. According to the Tokuhashi score, patients with a postoperative survival time of at least 12 months demonstrated a score value > or = 9 points. According to our evaluated patients group metastatic lesions of the spine represented the largest group (78.1%). The average survival rate of this group amounted to 18.4 months postoperatively. Considering primary tumors the average survival rate at the time of last re-examination amounted to 34.8 months postoperatively. Preoperative neurological pathologies were present in 12 patients (Frankel stage C-D). During the postoperative monitoring period 58.3% of the patients demonstrated an improvement in initial neurological findings. There were no intraoperative complications or perioperative deaths. Implant dislocations were not observed.

CONCLUSION

On account of the underlying, the anterior tumor resection with supplementary instrumentation represented a sufficient procedure in spinal tumor surgery. Adjuvant therapy can influence the postoperative survival period positively in addition to the surgical procedure. Following anterior tumor resection, extendable vertebral body replacements like the VBR device provide immediate spine stability by excellent defect adaptation. With regard to their intraoperative flexibility, expandable cages are more advantageous in contrast to non-expandable implants or bone grafts.