[Cost effectiveness of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging with a mobile surgical C-arm]

Complete Intra-Operative Image Data Including 3D X-rays: A New Format for Surgical Papers Needed?

Intra-operative 3D X-rays have been confirmed to decrease revision rates and improve optimal screw placement in complex fractures of the distal radius. Compared with traditional surgical publications, another advantage of whole intraoperative clinical imaging can be presented in electronic databases, e.g., the ICUC working group, through a link without size limitation. The detail of complete intra-operative image dataset includes essential technical details which can be analyzed secondarily for costs and complications, considering the technical performance bias. Furthermore, the new format complies with reading/learning preferences of young surgeons and allows secondary work-up by artificial intelligence. Intra-operative 3D X-ray is a new approach for better surgical outcomes, economic benefit, and educational purposes.

Effects of intra-operative fluoroscopic 3D-imaging on peri-operative imaging strategy in calcaneal fracture surgery

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies demonstrated that intra-operative fluoroscopic 3D-imaging (3D-imaging) in calcaneal fracture surgery is promising to prevent revision surgery and save costs. However, these studies limited their focus to corrections performed after 3D-imaging, thereby neglecting corrections after intra-operative fluoroscopic 2D-imaging (2D-imaging). The aim of this study was to assess the effects of additional 3D-imaging on intra-operative corrections, peri-operative imaging used, and patient-relevant outcomes compared to 2D-imaging alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this before-after study, data of adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a calcaneal fracture between 2000 and 2014 in our level-I Trauma center were collected. 3D-imaging (BV Pulsera with 3D-RX, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) was available as of 2007 at the surgeons' discretion. Patient and fracture characteristics, peri-operative imaging, intra-operative corrections and patient-relevant outcomes were collected from the hospital databases. Patients in whom additional 3D-imaging was applied were compared to those undergoing 2D-imaging alone.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were included of whom 107 (46%) were operated with the use of 3D-imaging. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics. The median duration of surgery was significantly longer when using 3D-imaging (2:08 vs. 1:54 h; p = 0.002). Corrections after additional 3D-imaging were performed in 53% of the patients. However, significantly fewer corrections were made after 2D-imaging when 3D-imaging was available (Risk difference (RD) -15%; 95% Confidence interval (CI) -29 to -2). Peri-operative imaging, besides intra-operative 3D-imaging, and patient-relevant outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative 3D-imaging provides additional information resulting in additional corrections. Moreover, 3D-imaging probably changed the surgeons' attitude to rely more on 3D-imaging, hence a 15%-decrease of corrections performed after 2D-imaging when 3D imaging was available. No substantiation for cost reduction was found through reduction in peri-operative imaging or in terms of improved patient-relevant outcomes.

[Intraoperative 3D imaging in spinal surgery]

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative imaging during spinal interventions has experienced significant developments over the last two decades. By the introduction of flat screen detectors, 3D imaging has been made possible and easier and by developing compact and mobile systems computed tomography can even be used in the operating theater.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of modern intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation in spinal surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The techniques of intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation during spinal procedures are presented based on the currently available literature and own experiences at a German national spine and trauma center.

RESULTS

The use of flat panel detectors and the possibility of 3D visualization nowadays substantially facilitate the use of navigation and allow certain control of surgical results even during the intervention. Radiation exposure of the whole team in the operating theater can be significantly reduced by the new techniques.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of intraoperative 3D imaging with a clear improvement of visualization for spinal surgeons and the certain control of materials at the end of the operation are obvious. Even the use of navigation has been greatly simplified and can therefore lead to an even greater precision and less radiation exposure. There are even more sophisticated developments, such as operation suites and intraoperative computed tomography but these are initially reserved for selected centers.

Imaging in cochlear implant patients

Imaging procedures are a mainstream tool in the daily ENT workflow. Cochlear Implant patients are representing a special population with specific demands for imaging. There are different imaging techniques available for pre-operative evaluation, surgery and postoperative controls with different indications and consequences. High-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are mainly used in the evaluation process. New procedures, as digital volume tomography, are increasingly used intra- and postoperatively. Especially the intracochlear positioning in malformations of the inner ear, eventually added with radiological assisted navigation, can be considered a standard of modern cochlear implant surgery. In addition, digital volume tomography may serve as a quality control tool focusing on the evaluation of the intracochlear electrode position. The range of applications, indications and current results are illustrated.

[Treatment costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: procedure related cost analysis in an university hospital]

BACKGROUND

Complex procedures in knee surgery, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the double bundle technique are not specially recognized within the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system. Hence, the goal of the present study was to perform a cost unit calculation and evaluate how ACL reconstruction in single versus double bundle techniques is remunerated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 30 patients ACL reconstruction was performed with the single bundle technique (group A) and in 21 an anatomic double bundle reconstruction (group B) was performed. All costs including those for human resources, implants and materials, as well as general costs for administration and facilities were calculated.

RESULTS

All cases entered one DRG category, the I30Z "complex procedures at the knee joint". Thus, the revenue in 2008 was 2,996.65 euro per case and in 2009 3,120.35 euro per case. Calculating all costs, the profit contributions in 2008 and 2009 were 592,42 euro and 716,12 euro, respectively for group A. However, in group B the profit contributions were 314,68 euro and 438,38 euro, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Performing the double bundle technique for ACL reconstruction in a university hospital setting, significant cost reductions are needed to achieve the revenue generated by the single bundle technique. Additional changes of the relative weighting in the DRG are also necessary.

[Integrated navigation. Preclinical evaluation and initial clinical experience]

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation systems have increasingly become part of the surgical routine due to the improvements of intraoperative visualization procedures. Because of limited space in the operating room and insufficient workflow, the project of integrated navigation had been started.

METHODS

As the first step, the navigation system VectorVision2 and the second-generation fluoroscopic C-arm system Orbic 3D were integrated into one common trolley. In an experimental study the integrated navigation system was used to drill 160 pedicle screws. Afterwards the system was clinically evaluated in 11 surgical procedures.

RESULTS

During the whole experimental study the system could be used for all 160 drilling procedures without any technical faults, causing a failure rate of 4.2%. For clinical evaluation the integrated navigation system was used in seven patients with navigated dorsal spine instrumentation, in three cases sacroiliac screws were placed, and in one case supra-acetabular screw osteosynthesis was performed for an acetabular fracture. In all cases the positioning of the screws was correct and no system failure occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the navigation system and the C-arm system in one common trolley is a major improvement of the surgical workflow. In the experimental study and the clinical trials the system worked extremely reliably and with high precision.