Endoskopische Knochentransplantation an der Wirbels�ule

Implants for Vertebral Body Replacement - Which Systems are Available and Have Become Established

Since the first vertebral body replacement operations over 50 years ago until now, there were developed numerous methods and implants. Vertebral body replacement after corpectomy nowadays is a standard procedure in spinal surgery. At the beginning mainly bone grafts were used. Due to continuous development, PMMA and titanium implants were developed. Nowadays various expandable and non-expandable implants are available. Numerous implants can still be justified. The question arises which methods and systems are on the market and which ones have proven themselves? This article describes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of each implant type.

Comparison of Anteroposterior to Posterior-Only Correction of Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Matched-Pair Radiographic Analysis of 92 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic benchmark study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the amount of instrumented correction obtained from a combined anterior/posterior (A/P) versus posterior-only (post-only) approach for Scheuermann's kyphosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An A/P approach was thought to optimize correction; however, instrumentation advances using pedicle screws allow treatment through an all-posterior approach.

METHODS

A total of 166 Scheuermann's kyphosis patients were treated between 2 centers: 90 by combined A/P approach at 1 center and 76 by post-only at the second center. From the 166 patients, a matched cohort of 92 (46 from each) was established according to preoperative sagittal (±10°) and hyperextension (HE) Cobb (±10°) measurements and matched for age and gender.

RESULTS

In the matched-pair group, average preoperative sagittal Cobb angles were 75.9° for the A/P group versus 78.8° for the post-only group (p = .2). The HE Cobb angles were similar (52.4° vs. 51.1°; p = .6). They showed similar corrections (33.7° vs. 30.6°; p = .3) and postoperative Cobb measurements (43.4° vs. 47.1°; p = .2) as well. The number of fusion levels was 9 in the A/P group and 12 in the post-only group; the difference yielded significance (p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The A/P and post-only approaches averaged similar degrees of correction. The A/P patients were likely to correct more than their preoperative HE sagittal Cobb measurement, whereas the post-only group corrected close to their preoperative HE measurement. The number of fusion levels was larger with the post-only group.

Compression and contact area of anterior strut grafts in spinal instrumentation: a biomechanical study

Background

Anterior bone grafts are used as struts to reconstruct the anterior column of the spine in kyphosis or following injury. An incomplete fusion can lead to later correction losses and compromise further healing. Despite the different stabilizing techniques that have evolved, from posterior or anterior fixating implants to combined anterior/posterior instrumentation, graft pseudarthrosis rates remain an important concern. Furthermore, the need for additional anterior implant fixation is still controversial. In this bench-top study, we focused on the graft-bone interface under various conditions, using two simulated spinal injury models and common surgical fixation techniques to investigate the effect of implant-mediated compression and contact on the anterior graft.

Methods

Calf spines were stabilised with posterior internal fixators. The wooden blocks as substitutes for strut grafts were impacted using a “pressfit” technique and pressure-sensitive films placed at the interface between the vertebral bone and the graft to record the compression force and the contact area with various stabilization techniques. Compression was achieved either with posterior internal fixator alone or with an additional anterior implant. The importance of concomitant ligament damage was also considered using two simulated injury models: pure compression Magerl/AO fracture type A or rotation/translation fracture type C models.

Results

In type A injury models, 1 mm-oversized grafts for impaction grafting provided good compression and fair contact areas that were both markedly increased by the use of additional compressing anterior rods or by shortening the posterior fixator construct. Anterior instrumentation by itself had similar effects. For type C injuries, dramatic differences were observed between the techniques, as there was a net decrease in compression and an inadequate contact on the graft occurred in this model. Under these circumstances, both compression and the contact area on graft could only be maintained at high levels with the use of additional anterior rods.

Conclusions

Under experimental conditions, we observed that ligamentous injury following type C fracture has a negative influence on the compression and contact area of anterior interbody bone grafts when only an internal fixator is used for stabilization. Because of the loss of tension banding effects in type C injuries, an additional anterior compressing implant can be beneficial to restore both compression to and contact on the strut graft.

Implications of the center of rotation concept for the reconstruction of anterior column lordosis and axial preloads in spinal deformity surgery

OBJECT

In thoracolumbar deformity surgery, anterior-only approaches are used for reconstruction of anterior column failures. It is generally advised that vertebral body replacements (VBRs) should be preloaded by compression. However, little is known regarding the impact of different techniques for generation of preloads and which surgical principle is best for restoration of lordosis. Therefore, the authors analyzed the effect of different surgical techniques to restore spinal alignment and lordosis as well as the ability to generate axial preloads on VBRs in anterior column reconstructions.

METHODS

The authors performed a laboratory study using 7 fresh-frozen specimens (from T-3 to S-1) to assess the ability for lordosis reconstruction of 5 techniques and their potential for increasing preloads on a modified distractable VBR in a 1-level thoracolumbar corpectomy. The testing protocol was as follows: 1) Radiographs of specimens were obtained. 2) A 1-level corpectomy was performed. 3) In alternating order, lordosis was applied using 1 of the 5 techniques. Then, preloads during insertion and after relaxation using the modified distractable VBR were assessed using a miniature load-cell incorporated in the modified distractable VBR. The modified distractable VBR was inserted into the corpectomy defect after lordosis was applied using 1) a lamina spreader; 2) the modified distractable VBR only; 3) the ArcoFix System (an angular stable plate system enabling in situ reduction); 4) a lordosizer (a customized instrument enabling reduction while replicating the intervertebral center of rotation [COR] according to the COR method); and 5) a lordosizer and top-loading screws ([LZ+TLS], distraction with the lordosizer applied on a 5.5-mm rod linked to 2 top-loading pedicle screws inserted laterally into the vertebra). Changes in the regional kyphosis angle were assessed radiographically using the Cobb method.

RESULTS

The bone mineral density of specimens was 0.72 ± 22.6 g/cm(2). The maximum regional kyphosis angle reconstructed among the 5 techniques averaged 9.7°-16.1°, and maximum axial preloads averaged 123.7-179.7 N. Concerning correction, in decreasing order the LZ+TLS, lordosizer, and ArcoFix System outperformed the lamina spreader and modified distractable VBR. The order of median values for insertion peak load, from highest to lowest, were lordosizer, LZ+TLS, and ArcoFix, which outperformed the lamina spreader and modified distractable VBR. In decreasing order, the axial preload was highest with the lordosizer and LZ+TLS, which both outperformed the lamina spreader and the modified distractable VBR. The technique enabling the greatest lordosis achieved the highest preloads. With the ArcoFix System and LZ+TLS, compression loads could be applied and were 247.8 and 190.6 N, respectively, which is significantly higher than the insertion peak load and axial preload (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Including the ability for replication of the COR in instruments designed for anterior column reconstructions, the ability for lordosis restoration of the anterior column and axial preloads can increase, which in turn might foster fusion.

[Reconstruction after spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar region]

The morbidity of anterior approaches has significantly influenced the development of therapeutic concepts for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Minimally-invasive techniques such as mini-open and endoscopic have enlarged the numbers of anterior reconstruction after spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar region. These minimally-invasive approaches have been facilitated by the development of special implants adapted to the new technique and to the local anatomical requirements.Two multi center studies in Germany (MCSI and II) showed the trend towards minimal invasive procedures and anterior approaches in the German speaking spine centers. Since the first report on thoracoscopic anterior procedures in Germany in 1997 a growing number of spine centers established this method. There is still no evidence based high level literature to substantiate a significant benefit for the patients by anatomical reduction and reconstruction of the anterior spinal column. However, there are some reports on better short outcomes in radiological parameters as well as better clinical results in 5 to 8 year follow-ups.The minimal invasive anterior approach seems to be advantageous for the patients by reducing significantly additive operation morbidity. It has become more important over the last two decades for anterior reconstruction after trauma and posttraumatic malalignment of the thoracolumbar spine.

The morbidity of open transthoracic approach for anterior scoliosis correction

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the patient satisfaction and the patients' perceived approach-related morbidity (ArM) after open thoracotomy (OTC) for instrumented anterior scoliosis surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no mid- to long-term data on the patients' perceived ArM concerning chest wall dissection for open anterior scoliosis correction.

METHODS

A specific questionnaire was used to retrospectively evaluate mid- to long-term follow-up data concerning ArM after OTC of patients younger than 30 years (range, 11-28 years) who underwent anterior open transthoracic scoliosis surgery. The questionnaire was comprised of detailed scar-related questions. Applying strict inclusion criteria, we could analyze outcomes in terms of percentage morbidity (morbidity [%]) of 40 patients who underwent OTC for instrumented scoliosis correction.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 16 ± 3.8 years, follow-up was 61.5 ± 72.6 months on average, and mean incision length was 25.7 ± 3.1 cm. Mean number of levels fused was 5.9 ± 1.5. Single thoracotomy was performed in 25 patients and a thoracoabdominal approach in 15 patients. Mean morbidity (0%, not delineating no ArM; 100%, delineating highest ArM) was 5.4% ± 11.3%; 47.5% of patients had no morbidity; 12.5% had morbidity >10% (mean: 28.5%). Signs of intercostal neuralgia (ICN) were present in 10%. Patients judged their clinical outcome as "good" in 20% and "excellent" in 80%. Statistical analysis did not reveal differences in outcomes and percentage morbidity concerning age of patients, extent of approach (thoracotomy vs. thoracoabdominal approach) and incision length, gender, or follow-up length. However, the presence of ICN had a significant effect on the outcome, showing high correlation with increased morbidity (P < 0.0001). In the clinical judgment of outcomes, the severity of the ArM after OTC was mild, except for 2 patients who had moderate approach and scar-related morbidity.

CONCLUSION

ArM after open thoracic spinal surgery or thoracoscopic procedures can be assessed using the questionnaire. The current study showed that ArM in young patients who underwent OTC for anterior instrumented scoliosis correction was low. Patients with increased signs of ICN did worse in terms of the questionnaire survey. The study showed that neither cosmesis nor scar-related problems were a concern for patients undergoing OTC.

PLIF in thoracolumbar trauma: technique and radiological results

Patients with fractures from the 11th thoracic to the 5th lumbar vertebra had a reconstruction of the anterior column with monocortical iliac crest autograft by using a single dorsal approach. The loss of correction was observed using X-rays pre- and post-operatively, at 3 months and after implant removal (IR). Successful fusion was assessed using computed tomography after the implant removal. To assess the loss of correction and intervertebral fusion rate of this technique. There are still controversial discussions about the treatment modalities of spine lesions, especially in cases of burst fractures. Dorsal, combined and ventral procedures are reported with different assets and drawbacks. We want to present a method to restore the weight-bearing capability of the anterior column using a single dorsal approach. From 2001 to 2005, a total of 100 patients was treated with this technique at our department. Follow-up examination was possible in 82 patients. The X-rays and CT scans were proofed for loss of correction and fusion rate. The anterior column has been restored using a monocortical strut graft via a partial resection of the lamina and the apophyseal joint on one side to access the disc space. The dorsal reduction has been achieved using an angular stable pedicle screw system. The mean follow-up time was 15 months (range 8-39); 67 patients had a CT scan at follow-up and 83% showed a 360 degrees fusion. The average post-operative loss of correction was 3.3 degrees (range 0-21). The average duration of operation was 192 min (range 120-360) and the mean blood loss was 790 ml (range 300-3,400 ml). Regarding the complications we did not have any deep wound infections. We had two epidural haematomas postoperatively with a neurological deterioration that had to be revised. We were able to decompress the neurological structures and restore the weight-bearing capability of the anterior column in a one-stage procedure. So we think that this technique can be an alternative procedure to combined operations regarding the presented radiological results of successful fusion and loss of correction.

[Spinal column injuries in sport: treatment strategies and clinical results]

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with sport-related injuries of the spine is a challenging issue with regard to the ability to resume former sport activities. The current study analyses the rate of resumption of sports participation after conservative and operative treatment.

METHODS

In a 2-year period, 96 patients with sport-related injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine were included in this prospective study. Conservative (19%) or operative treatment (81%) was performed depending on the extent, severity and instability of the trauma. The reduction, the loss of reduction over time and the VAS and Odom scores were assessed. A questionnaire was included to estimate the rate of resumption of sports participation.

RESULTS

Of the patients 91% resumed sports participation and 9% had to abandon all sport activities mostly due to neurological deficits. Minor loss of correction was found in patients with 360 degrees short segment fusions and major loss was found after conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

The current management of injuries of the spine effectuates a high rate of resumption of sports activity following conservative or operative treatment.

Fusion rates after thoracoscopic release and bone graft substitutes in idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective assessment of fusion rates using either morselized allograft bone or demineralized bone matrix (DBM) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare fusion rates between allograft bone and demineralized bone matrix (Grafton DBM Flex) following VATS using on standard standing lateral spine radiographs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Both VATS and bone graft substitutes are accepted surgical techniques. However, their concomitant use in spinal deformity surgery has not been previously reported. Bone graft substitute has the advantage of decreasing operative time, blood loss, and donor site morbidity associated with autografts.

METHODS

Anterior thoracic discectomies were performed using VATS. Forty patients with 1 year or more follow-up were evaluated-12 with morselized allograft bone (Allograft group) and 28 with folded Grafton DBM Flex (DBM group). Factors analyzed included age, number of anterior levels fused, operative time, anterior perioperative blood loss, curve correction, and fusion rates. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed before surgery and at month, 1 year, and at most recent follow-up. Interbody fusion was assessed on standing lateral radiographs using the Newton et al 4-level grading scale.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age at surgery, number of anterior vertebral levels fused, anterior operative time per level, anterior intraoperative blood loss, chest tube drainage and duration, or total perioperative anterior blood loss between the 2 groups. Percent curve correction from before surgery to the most recent follow-up were very similar in both Allograft (68%) and DBM groups (67%). At most recent assessment, 60 of 73 disc spaces (82%) in the Allograft group and 100 of 109 disc spaces (92%) in the DBM group were rated as radiographically fused (Newton et al Grade I and II). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.088). No patients were observed to have crankshaft, pseudoarthrosis or hardware failure. There were no complications related to the bone graft material used.

CONCLUSION

Demineralized bone matrix (Grafton DBM Flex) seem to be an effective bone graft substitute in thoracoscopic surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.