Eine neuartige Kniegelenksendoprothese mit physiologischer Gelenkform

Clinical Course of Pain and Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely considered a successful intervention for osteoarthritis and other degenerative knee diseases. This study addresses the need for a high-quality meta-analysis that outlines the clinical course of pain and function post-TKA.

METHODS

The review included prospective cohort studies assessing pain or function of patients undergoing primary TKA at baseline (preoperatively) and at least 2 additional time points including one at least 12 months postoperatively. Two reviewers independently screened references, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The time course of recovery of pain and function was modeled using fractional polynomial meta-regression.

RESULTS

In total, 191 studies with 59,667 patients were included, most with low risk of bias. The variance-weighted mean pain score (/100, 0 = no pain) was 64.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2-67.7) preoperatively, 24.1 (95% CI 20.3-27.9) at 3 months, 20.4 (95% CI 16.7-24.0) at 6 months, and 16.9 (95%CI 13.6-20.3) at 12 months, and remained low (10.1; 95% CI 4.8-15.4) at 10 years postoperatively. The variance-weighted mean function score (/100, 0 = worst function) was 47.1 (95% CI 45.7-48.4) preoperatively, 72.8 (95% CI 71.3-74.4) at 3 months, 76.3 (95% CI 74.7-77.8) at 6 months, and 78.1 (95%CI 76.4-79.7) at 12 months. Function scores were good (79.7; 95% CI 77.9-81.5) at 10 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary TKA can expect a large and rapid but incomplete recovery of pain and function in the first postoperative year. At 10 years, the gains in pain scores may still remain while there is an improvement in function.

[Early results of gender-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing]

INTRODUCTION

To address anatomical gender differences in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) specific total knee prostheses have been developed for women. Potential benefits of these modified prostheses are currently under debate. The present study investigated whether the modified design features bring benefits compared to uni-sex TKA.

METHODS

A total of 80 prospectively blinded and randomized patients underwent implantation of unilateral TKAs with NexGen LPS Gender Solutions (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA, group gender-specific GS prosthesis, n = 40) or NexGen LPS Flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA, control group standard prosthesis ST, n = 40) The follow-up was carried out 10 days and 6 weeks postoperatively. Clinical data and the subjective assessment of quality of life were evaluated using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS), the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC).

RESULTS

The two groups showed equal values in KSS, SF-36 and WOMAC preoperatively and ten days postoperatively the GS group reached an average KSS knee score of 62.6 ± 16.1 points (ST group 56.9 ± 14.7, p = 0.184) and a functional score of 28.5 ± 12.1 (ST group 24.3 ± 15.3, p = 0.082). In the overall score the GS group reached 91.1 ± 24.1 points (ST group 81.0 ± 27.1, p = 0.104). The GS group reached a knee score of 85.5 ± 14.4 points (ST group 77.8 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) and a functional score of 68.1 ± 20.7 points (ST group 62.3 ± 18.5, p = 0.185) 6 weeks postoperatively. In the overall score the GS group reached 153.7 ± 30.7 points (ST group 139.6 ± 32.4, p = 0.048). The analysis of SF-36 and WOMAC showed no significant differences at all time points. No evidence of loosening or migration was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data presented, gender-specific TKA type NexGen LPS Gender Solutions has advantages in terms of early functional outcome. This result is not reflected in the patient satisfaction and is not considered to be clinically relevant.