[Surviving multiple trauma--what comes next? The rehabilitation of seriously injured patients]

Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies.

DESIGN

Systematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18-75 years with an Injury Severity Score≥16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017060825.

[Rehabilitation after multiple traumata]

BACKGROUND

The reintegration into the social and professional environment and the achievement of the best possible quality of life after multiple injuries can often only be achieved after a lengthy rehabilitation process and belongs in the hands of experienced doctors, therapists, and rehabilitation managers.

REHABILITATION PHASES

Rehabilitation after serious accidents must be differentiated from "normal" orthopedic rehabilitation after elective surgery. The challenges of trauma rehabilitation require coordinated rehabilitation phases. This is the only way to avoid the so-called "rehab hole" between discharge from the acute clinic and the start of post-acute rehabilitation. A 6-phase model is described. After acute treatment (phase A) and any necessary early rehabilitation (phase B), phase C of post-acute rehabilitation places special demands on the rehabilitation facility. Phase D of the follow-up rehabilitation is established. The further rehabilitation (phase E) provides measures specifically tailored to the consequences of the accident, such as pain rehabilitation or activity-oriented procedures. Long-term follow-up care for previously severely injured patients is necessary (phase F).

PROSPECTS

An integration of trauma rehabilitation centers into the existing trauma network remains the goal to improve the outcome after polytrauma.

[Care Management for Polytrauma Patients in a Level-1 Trauma Centre]

Care Management for Polytrauma Patients in a Level-1 Trauma Centre Abstract. In our level-1 trauma institution, polytrauma patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher are facing waiting times for transfer to a rehabilitation facility, causing a negative financial outcome for our institution. The purpose of this study is to stimulate rapid transfer to a rehabilitation facility. In a single-centre case study, care management for (poly)trauma patients was started to ensure time-directed treatment for trauma patients related to Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG). In the period of 2013-2018 there was an increase in trauma admissions up to 14 % (n = 16 157) with a mean length of hospital stay of 6.4 days, together with a reduction in the number of trauma bed capacity from 50 to 42. In relation to the DRGs, regular trauma patients who were not in need of a stationary rehabilitation facility stayed in line with the expected time of hospital stay. But (poly)trauma patients (n = 1831) with the need of a stationary stay in a rehabilitation centre were faced with waiting times before they could be transferred. The average excess waiting time in relation to DRG for polytrauma patients was 5.1 days. Trauma patients for a rehabilitation centre have a higher Case Mix Index (CMI) compared to those who do not require inpatient rehabilitation (4.22 versus 1.04, p <0.0001). With about 280 trauma patients annually waiting an extra 5.1 days for transfer to a rehabilitation facility, the financial burden for our department amounts to Swiss francs 885,360 without reimbursement. Since no extra bed capacities in rehabilitation facilities are available in our area, it may be advised to set up an early in-hospital trauma rehabilitation program in a level-1 trauma centre in order to reduce financial loss.

The association between the levels of CRP, IL-10, PLA2, Fbg and prognosis in traumatic fracture of lower limb

The aim of the present study was to examine changes of sera levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-10 (IL-10), phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and fibrinogen β polypeptide chain gene (Fbg) in patients with traumatic fracture of lower limb, and to evaluate their association with prognosis. The changes in sera levels of CRP, IL-10, PLA2 and Fbg were observed at the time of injury, 24 h, and 5 and 7 days after surgery in 90 patients with traumatic fracture of lower limb. In addition, 50 cases, who presented for health examination, were included as the normal controls. The expression of sera levels of CRP, IL-10, PLA2 and Fbg in patients with traumatic fracture of lower limb, was markedly higher than that in the normal controls prior to surgery (P<0.05). The concentration of CRP significantly increased within 24 h after emergency, but decreased gradually as the wound healed, compared to the controls. Pre- and postoperative IL-10 levels increased within 24 h and then decreased gradually. The level of PLA2 in patients before and after surgery was increased, and then decreased gradually. The level of Fbg in patients with trauma was increased after 24 h and then decreased, and increased gradually. The correlation of serum CRP and IL-10 levels (r=0.634, P<0.05), and that of PLA2 and IL-10 levels (r=0.617, P<0.05) were positive. In conclusion, the expression of CRP, IL-10, PLA2 and Fbg levels in traumatic fracture of lower limb markedly increased and was closely associated with prognosis. CRP, IL-10, PLA2 and Fbg levels may therefore serve as useful indexes in determining the progression and prognosis of patients with traumatic fracture of lower limb.

[Rehabilitation in the German statutory accident insurance. Guide to the new outpatient and inpatient structures]

BACKGROUND

The German statutory accident insurance (DGUV) has the statutory mandate to eliminate or to prevent an aggravation of the consequences of accidents by all appropriate means and is based on the principle of rehabilitation before pension. For this, special methods have been developed in recent decades, such as employer's mutual insurance inpatient further treatment (BGSW, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Stationäre Weiterbehandlung) and extended outpatient physiotherapy (EAP, Erweiterte Ambulante Physiotherapie). In 2012 the workplace-related musculoskeletal rehabilitation (ABMR, Arbeitsplatz-bezogene muskuloskelettale Rehabilitation) was added to these complex treatments.

SPECIAL REHABILITATION MEASURES

For complex injuries and delayed healing these methods approach their limits. The accident clinics of the Association of Clinics in Statutory Accident Insurance (KUV, Klinikverbund der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung) provide a number of specialized rehabilitation measures in order to ensure an optimal seamless rehabilitation of the severely injured. In addition to complex inpatient rehabilitation (KSR, Komplexe Stationäre Rehabilitation) integrated special rehabilitation procedures, such as neurorehabilitation for severely traumatic brain injured patients and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury and other special rehabilitation methods, such as occupation-oriented rehabilitation (TOR, Tätigkeitsorientierte Rehabilitation) and pain rehabilitation, ensure that the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU) phase model of trauma rehabilitation is implemented. This provides an early start in the context of acute treatment as so-called early rehabilitation. After a specialized post-acute rehabilitation, additional therapeutic options are often required.

CONCLUSION

An appropriate treatment of severely injured patients is important, for example through rehabilitation managers, which must not end with discharge from the rehabilitation hospital. The aim of all efforts is the reintegration into the working and social environment in addition to the best possible quality of life.

[Sequelae of severe injuries : consequences for trauma rehabilitation]

Consequences of accidents are found not only in physical but also in psychological and social areas. The quality of life of severely injured patients is significantly reduced compared with the normal population even years after the trauma. Subjective experiences of severely injured patients during and after hospitalization have a major impact on the subsequent quality of life. Knowledge of these factors is essential for the planning, organization and implementation of rehabilitation after severe injury. The phase model of rehabilitation after trauma requires early initiation of therapy even during acute treatment as so-called early rehabilitation. After a specialized post-acute rehabilitation additional therapeutic options are often required. Besides pain management the focus lies especially in work-related rehabilitation and psychological support which is also decisive for the success of rehabilitation of accident victims. For severely injured patients it is important to provide sufficient support, e.g. through a case manager which does not end with discharge from the rehabilitation facility. The aim of all efforts is reintegration into the working and social environment and the best possible quality of life.

Outcome after severe multiple trauma: a retrospective analysis

Background

Aim of this study was to evaluate prognosis of severely injured patients.

Methods

All severely injured patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 50 were identified in a 6-year-period between 2000 and 2005 in German Level 1 Trauma Center Murnau. Data was evaluated from German Trauma Registry and Polytrauma Outcome Chart of the German Society for Trauma Surgery and a personal interview to assess working ability and disability and are presented as average.

Results

88 out of 1435 evaluated patients after severe polytrauma demonstrated an ISS ≥ 50 (6.5%), among them 23% women and 77% men. 66 patients (75%) had an ISS of 50-60, 14 (16%) 61-70, and 8 (9%) ≥ 70. In 27% of patients trauma was caused by motor bike accidents. 3.6 body regions were involved. Patients had to be operated 5.3 times and were treated 23 days in the ICU and stayed 73 days in hospital. Mortality rate was 36% and rate of multi-organ failure 28%. 15% of patients demonstrated severe senso-motoric dysfunction as well as residues of severe head injury. 25% recovered well or at least moderately. 29 out of 56 survivors answered the POLO-chart. A personal interview was performed with 13 patients. The state of health was at least moderate in 72% of patients. In 48% interpersonal problems and in 41% severe pain was observed. In 57% of patients problems with working ability regarding duration, as well as quantitative and qualitative performance were observed. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder were found in 41%. The more distal the lesions were located (foot/ankle) the more functional disability affected daily life. In only 15%, working ability was not impaired. 8 out of 13 interviewed patients demonstrated complete work disability.

Conclusions

Even severely injured patients after multiple trauma have a good prognosis. The ISS is an established tool to assess severity and prognosis of trauma, whereas prediction of clinical outcome cannot be deducted from this score.