Insuffizienzfrakturen des Beckenrings

Hemorrhage Versus Thrombosis: A Risk Assessment for Anticoagulation Management in Pelvic Ring and Acetabular Fractures-A Registry-Based Study

Background: The increasing incidence of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures represents a major challenge in the field of trauma surgery. Hemorrhage and thrombosis are among the most severe complications associated with these injuries. The common instability of those fractures, together with an anatomic proximity to blood vessels, increases the risk of perioperative bleeding. Vascular wall irritation during surgery additionally adds to a substantial risk for thrombotic events. Therefore, evaluating the risk for hemorrhage and thrombosis in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures is vital to identify an adequate anticoagulation management. Methods: The incidence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, as well as the association of patient characteristics with the investigated outcomes of 16,359 cases, were analyzed retrospectively using data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry. Moreover, a risk assessment survey was conducted among traumatologists experienced in pelvic ring and acetabular surgery. The results were compared to those of the registry study. Results: A high rate of thrombotic events was found in the middle-age decade (41-50 years). In patients with an age ≤ 40 and >50 years, hemorrhage complications predominated. The logistic regression identified pelvic ring fractures in geriatric patients, acetabular fractures, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 to be associated with bleeding complications. Factors associated with thrombosis included pelvic ring fractures in non-geriatric patients, acetabular fractures in geriatric and non-geriatric patients, ISS, and male gender. The survey demonstrated that preoperatively, the risk for hemorrhage was considered more significant. Perioperatively, however, thrombosis was regarded as more important. Conclusions: Separate guidelines for prophylactic anticoagulation in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures that also consider individual patient characteristics, such as age, gender, and ISS, are necessary to improve perioperative management and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with these injuries.

Acetabular fractures in geriatric patients: epidemiology, pathomechanism, classification and treatment options

The incidence of geriatric acetabular fractures has shown a sharp increase in the last decades. The majority of patients are male, which is different to other osteoporotic fractures. The typical pathomechanism generally differs from acetabular fractures in young patients regarding both the direction and the amount of force transmission to the acetabulum via the femoral head. Geriatric fractures very frequently involve anterior structures of the acetabulum, while the posterior wall is less frequently involved. The anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fracture is the most common fracture type. Superomedial dome impactions (gull sign) are a frequent feature in geriatric acetabular fractures as well. Treatment options include nonoperative treatment, internal fixation and arthoplasty. Nonoperative treatment includes rapid mobilisation and full weighbearing under analgesia and is advisable in non- or minimally displaced fractures without subluxation of the hip joint and without positive gull sign. Open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures leads to good or excellent results, if anatomic reduction is achieved intraoperatively and loss of reduction does not occur postoperatively. Primary arthroplasty of geriatric acetabular fractures is a treatment option, which does not require anatomic reduction, allows for immediate postoperative full weightbearing and obviates several complications, which are associated with internal fixation. The major issue is the fixation of the acetabular cup in the fractured bone. Primary cups, reinforcement rings or a combination of arthroplasty and internal fixation may be applied depending on the acetabular fracture type.

Long-term physical and psychological outcome following traumatic hemipelvectomy

Purpose

First time examination of the physical and psychological long-term outcome following traumatic hemipelvectomy.

Methodology

In this study, all patients suffering from traumatic hemipelvectomy that were treated in a level-A trauma center since 1988 were retrospectively evaluated. The authors aimed to compare the physical and psychological outcome following primary amputation (A) vs. limb-preservation (LP) procedures. The patients were examined with a focus on pain, function, mobility and general health. As part of this examination, various scores were recorded, i.e., Majeed Score, Time up & Go or SF-36.

Results

The following work showed 13 patients who had suffered a traumatic hemipelvectomy, 8 of whom survived. Five of these were available for subsequent clinical re-examination; of these, three patients underwent an amputation, while limb preservation was performed on two patients. Mean follow-up of the amputee group was after 12 years compared to 6.5 years following limb preservation. After limb preservation, both patients reported phantom limb pain at the affected leg, despite pain medication. The general state of health was assessed as 82/100 (A) and 45/100 (LP). The Majeed score was 61 (A) vs. 45 (LP). In the clinical examination, three out of five patients (2 LP, 1 A) showed peroneal palsy (PP). In the quality-of-life analysis based on the SF12/36 and the NHP, amputees scored higher than the patients who underwent limb preservation surgery.

Conclusion

In our small patient cohort, satisfaction, pain and mobility tend to be better following primary amputation compared to limb preserving surgery.

Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study

PURPOSE

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types.

RESULTS

We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types (P = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.

Dual-energy CT in sacral fragility fractures: defining a cut-off Hounsfield unit value for the presence of traumatic bone marrow edema in patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Demographic change entails an increasing incidence of fragility fractures. Dual-energy CT (DECT) with virtual non-calcium (VNCa) reconstructions has been introduced as a promising diagnostic method for evaluating bone microarchitecture and marrow simultaneously. This study aims to define the most accurate cut-off value in Hounsfield units (HU) for discriminating the presence and absence of bone marrow edema (BME) in sacral fragility fractures.

METHODS

Forty-six patients (40 women, 6 men; 79.7 ± 9.2 years) with suspected fragility fractures of the sacrum underwent both DECT (90 kVp / 150 kVp with tin prefiltration) and MRI. Nine regions-of-interest were placed in each sacrum on DECT-VNCa images. The resulting 414 HU measurements were stratified into "edema" (n = 80) and "no edema" groups (n = 334) based on reference BME detection in T2-weighted MRI sequences. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to determine the desired cut-off value and an associated conspicuity range for edema detection.

RESULTS

The mean density within the "edema" group of measurements (+ 3.1 ± 8.3 HU) was substantially higher compared to the "no edema" group (-51.7 ± 21.8 HU; p < 0.010). Analysis in DECT-VNCa images suggested a cut-off value of -12.9 HU that enabled sensitivity and specificity of 100% for BME detection compared to MRI. A range of HU values between -14.0 and + 20.0 is considered indicative of BME in the sacrum.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of DECT-VNCa with a cut-off of -12.9 HU allows for excellent diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of sacral fragility fractures with associated BME. A diagnostic "one-stop-shop" approach without additional MRI is feasible.

[Sacral fractures in geriatric patients]

Sacral fractures in geriatric patients are increasing and form a distinct entity. Clinical findings can be unspecific, which is why they are easily overlooked. It is mandatory to analyze the whole pelvic ring for evaluation of pelvic stability and for making treatment decisions. The primary diagnostics are made using plain X‑radiography; however, for assessment of the posterior pelvic ring an examination using sectional imaging is regularly necessary. The fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification is suitable as a guideline for the surgical treatment to be used. Stable fractures without relevant displacement after initial mobilization should be treated conservatively. Instability, failure of mobilization and persistent pain are, however, common reasons for surgical treatment. Fracture displacement determines if minimally invasive procedures for posterior and anterior pelvic ring stabilization are possible. Otherwise, complex open procedures such as spinopelvic fixation may be necessary.

The surgical treatment of unstable osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures with bilateral vertebropelvic stabilization using a less invasive technique

By immobilizing the joint partners between the lumbar spine and the pelvis, the vertical and horizontal forces on the sacrum are both transferred through the ilium caudally. Therefore persistent stress on the fracture is avoided. To ensure sufficient soft tissue coverage the pedicle screws are inserted via small incisions in the lumbar spine area and the iliac screws via slightly oblique incisions on both sides laterally of the posterior iliac spine. At the end the instrumentation is completed by connecting the lumbar longitudinal carriers with the cross connection between the two iliac screws via the pre-existing incisions. Due to this less invasive technique, disorders of wound healing can be avoided. Due to the lower Morbidity rate and its associated reduction in blood loss, there is corresponding decrease in the number of postoperative symptoms, which has a positive effect on early mobilization. None of the described patients showed neurological deficits preoperatively or postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Technical note, retrospective.

Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF)

Purpose: Aim of this retrospective cohort study was the comparison of the transiliac fixator (TIFI) and spinopelvic fixation (SPF) for fixation of dorsal pelvic ring fractures in terms of clinical outcome, complications, and quality of life. Methods: Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women; mean age 47 ± 19 years) with dorsal pelvic ring fractures (type-C-injuries after AO/OTA) that have been stabilized by either TIFI (group TIFI, n = 22) or SPF (group SPF, n = 16) between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measurements included demographic data, perioperative parameters, and complications and were obtained from the medical information system. Quality of life was assessed using the German version of the short form 36 (SF-36) and short muskuloskeletal function assessment (SMFA-D). Clinical results were assessed using Merle d'Aubigné-Score, Iowa Pelvic Score, and Majeed Pelvic Score. Results: Both groups show relatively good post-operative results, which has previously been reported. Quality of life was comparable in both groups. Group TIFI was slightly superior regarding complication rates, cutting/suture time, and fluoroscopy time. Group SPF seemed to be superior regarding pain and pelvic scores. Conclusion: None of the methods could demonstrate significant superiority over the other. Management of pelvic injuries remains a highly individual challenge adapted to the individual patients' condition. Nevertheless, if fractures allow for stabilization with TIFI, the use of this method should be taken into consideration as a less invasive and more tissue-conserving approach.

[Triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization for type C pelvic fractures according to AO/OTA and type IV according to FFP]

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic instability is common in type IV fragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFP) and type C traumatic pelvic fractures. This results in the indications for operative stabilization using a spinopelvic support. Due to the variety of surgical techniques for spinopelvic support it is unclear what importance a minimally invasive spinopelvic screw-rod osteosynthesis can have.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the retrospective clinical study over a period of 2 years, 23 patients (median age 67 years, 5 male and 18 female) with unstable pelvic fractures (FFP type IV: n = 12, AO/OTA type C: n = 11) treated by triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization (TMSS) were included in the study. The patient data were examined with respect to the parameters gender, age, fracture morphology, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative infection, postoperative reduction result in the computed tomography (CT) imaging and screw loosening.

RESULTS

The average age of the 11 type C fractures was 43 years and that of the 12 FFP type IV fractures was 80 years. The follow-up period was on average 12.2 months. The average operation time was 67 min, the blood loss was 70 ml, there were 2 postoperative infections and 4 cases of screw loosening. The reduction according to Matta was < 4 mm for all FFP and between 4-20 mm for traumatic pelvic fractures. Symptomatic pseudarthroses occurred in 3 cases.

CONCLUSION

The triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization (TMSS) showed a stable and sufficient treatment of the type IV fragility fractures and in the slightly displaced type C traumatic pelvic fractures. Coarse fracture dislocations limit the procedure.

An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries

INTRODUCTION

Classification and management of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries (OPRI) continue to pose a considerable challenge to orthopaedic traumatologists. The currently used fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification of OPRI has recently been shown to have significant weaknesses. The aim of this study therefore was to propose a new, simple, yet comprehensive alphanumeric classification (ANC) of OPRI and to assess its intra- and interobserver reliability. Furthermore, its potential advantages over the FFP classification are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive CT scans from patients with OPRI were evaluated by three orthopaedic traumatologists with varying levels of experience and one musculoskeletal radiologist. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the proposed classification system was assessed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics and percentage agreement. In addition, the Fleiss' kappa statistic was computed to assess interobserver agreement among all four raters.

RESULTS

Overall intraobserver reliability of the proposed ANC was substantial [κ ranging from 0.71 to 0.80; percentage agreement: 70% (range, 67-76%)]. Overall interobserver reliability between pairs of raters was substantial as well [κ ranging from 0.61 to 0.68; percentage agreement: 58% (range, 53-61%)]. For ANC types, groups and subgroups, intra- and interobserver reliability were substantial to almost perfect. Interobserver agreement among all four raters was moderate to substantial, with Fleiss' kappa values of 0.48, 0.69, 0.71 and 0.52 for ANC overall, types, groups and subgroups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The proposed ANC of OPRI demonstrated overall reliability comparable to that of the FFP classification. The ANC, however, is simple, more comprehensive, and consistently relates to injury severity.

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring – Does the Evidence of Oedema Lead us to More Surgeries?

Introduction The choice of therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) is largely determined by the diagnosed fracture morphology. It is now unclear whether the change in diagnostic options – sensitive detection of fracture oedema in the sacrum using MRI and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) – has an impact on the therapeutic consequences. The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to evaluate the change in the diagnostics used and the resulting therapy regimen in our patient population.

Materials and Methods We performed a monocentric-retrospective analysis of 196 patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis in our clinic (national TraumaZentrum® DGU and SAV approval) in the period from 2008 to 2017. We examined changes in epidemiology, diagnostics/classification and therapy of the pelvic ring fractures treated by us.

Results The diagnostic procedures used are subject to a clear change towards oedema detection using MRI and DECT. The graduation has changed towards more severe forms of fracture after FFP. There is now also an increasing proportion of patients treated by surgery (2008 – 2009: 5.3% vs. 2015 – 2017: 60.3%).

Conclusion We were able to show that the introduction of sensitive diagnostic procedures coincided with a higher classification of the fractures. It is also noteworthy that the increase in operations is not only due to a higher degree of classification; also in relative terms, more patients are operated on within type FFP II.

Dual-energy CT as an innovative method for diagnosing fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: a retrospective comparison with MRI as the gold standard

INTRODUCTION

As the average age of society increases, so does the number of cases of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can visualise associated oedema and is thus the gold standard for diagnosing such fractures. MRI, however, is costly, not always available, and involves certain exclusion criteria. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) appears to be a promising alternative. It is unclear, however, whether it could be used for diagnosing FFP with similar sensitivity/specificity. The aim of our study was thus to compare conventional CT and DECT with MRI in cases of suspected FFP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 46 patients with suspected FFP underwent MRI, CT and DECT scans. There were three comparison groups for each of these patients: conventional CT image analysis without dual-energy modification (Arm 1), DECT analysis (Arm 2) and MRI as the gold standard (Arm 3). Diagnosis and FFP classification were performed by a radiologist in random order and without clinical information. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional CT and DECT were calculated in comparison with MRI as the reference standard.

RESULTS

With 100% sensitivity and specificity, DECT is on par with MRI when it comes to diagnosing fragility fractures of the pelvis and is superior to conventional CT (90.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity). In terms of classification as well, there were no differences between DECT and MRI. On conventional CT, on the other hand, 16 patients were classified differently than they were on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows DECT to be reliable and superior to conventional CT in terms of oedema detection and specific fracture classification in FFP. DECT thus combines the advantages of conventional CT (good visualisation of bone matter) and MRI (medullary cavity and visualisation of occult fractures).

The one-year mortality rate in elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis

Osteoporosis is a common condition for elderly people. The incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures has been increasing. Osteoporotic pelvic fractures are associated with increased mortality rates. Based on the aim of our study, we found out that one-year mortality rate after a pelvic fracture is high and depends on the fracture type.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the one-year mortality rate in patients aged 65+ with osteoporotic pelvic fractures depending on the type of fracture according to AO/OTA classification.

METHODS

Patients aged 65+ with pelvic insufficiency fractures admitted to a single center between 1 June 2013 and 31 December 2016 were enrolled in the study. The fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The start of the survival time analysis was the date of the injury. The end of the analysis was 31 December 2017 or the date of the patient's death. Mortality rates were assessed with respect to fracture types using Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to assess the dependence of mortality on the fracture type.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with 95 (90.5%) being female were enrolled in this prospective study. The average age was 80.3 years (95% CI 78.8-81.7). Mean follow-up time was 23.5 months (95% CI 20.7-26.4). According to AO/OTA classification, 30 (28.6%) patients had a type A pelvic fracture, 73 (69.5%) patients-type B fracture, and 2 (1.9%)-type C fracture. Overall, the one-year mortality rate was 23.8% (95% CI 16.8-33.2%). For patients with type A fracture, the one-year mortality rate was 13.3% (95% CI 5.2-31.7%) compared with 27.4% (95% CI 18.6-39.2%) in the group with type B fracture, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that within a year after an osteoporotic pelvic fracture, the number of deaths in the patients having type B pelvic fracture was twice higher than in the patients with type A fracture.

[Percutaneous stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring in osteoporotic fractures]

The number of low energy traumas in older people with subsequent pelvic ring fractures is increasing in contrast to high energy traumas with pelvic injury in younger people. Geriatric pelvic fractures can be treated conservatively with analgesics and physiotherapy-assisted mobilization, depending on the symptoms. If physical complaints do not allow adequate mobilization, surgical stabilization is indicated. It is often possible to stabilize the dorsal pelvic ring with transiliosacral screws. If additional instability associated with anterior pelvic ring complaints is prevalent, stabilization of the anterior ring can be achieved by invasive osteosynthesis using a plate or percutaneously by implanting an intramedullary plastic polymer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 2: Gaining Information and Clinical Therapeutic Relevance

Background Magnetic resonance and computed tomography (MRI, CT) has been known to compare the sensitivity for the detection of pelvic fractures with others. It is unclear whether MRI imaging beyond CT leads to therapy change. The aim of our study is to determine the information gained from MRI in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures and to reduce the effects on the form of therapy.

Patients and Methods In a retrospective, clinical study, 31 patients with pelvic fracture and CT and MRI imaging (median 81 ± 20 years, 22 female and 9 male) were examined. There was a classification according to AO classification for adequate or FFP classification for inadequate fractures. In addition, vascular, muscular, haematomatous and organic concomitant injuries as well as bone marrow edema and additional secondary findings requiring evaluation were evaluated. The type of therapy (conservative vs. surgical) and a possible type of therapy change were documented for each patient. Exact test according to Fisher was tested orienting.

Results Overall, MRI showed a greater fracture rate of pelvic fractures in 29% (n = 9) patients than CT. Four type I fractures according to FFP classification were identified as type II fractures and 4 type II fractures as type IV fractures. One type B1 fracture according to AO classification was found to be C2 fracture on MRI. Fisherʼs Exact Test found that the parameters “adequacy of trauma” and “fracture type change” by MRI were p = 0.38. MRI showed a total of 82 concomitant injuries, CT 31. Overall, MRI gained information in 75% (n = 24) of all patients examined. A change from conservative to operative after MRI took place in 2 patients. No patient was surgically changed from planned surgery to conservative. The extent to which MRI caused changes within one form of therapy (conservative, operative) could not be determined retrospectively. In 18% of patients with an inadequate fracture, however, according to the literature, the treatment regimen would have changed pro forma.

Conclusion In summary, it can be stated that the MRI in our study provided an information gain in the case of adequate and inadequate pelvic fractures as well as their accompanying injuries and that a possible therapeutic relevance of this information gain could be obtained specially at the inadequate fractures showed.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 1: Which Criteria Lead Us to Supplementary MRI Diagnostics?

Introduction Isolated pelvic fractures are relatively rare with an incidence of 3 – 6% of all fractures, but their incidence in polytraumatized individuals increases to 25%. The S3 guideline Polytrauma gives a clear recommendation for diagnostics by means of pelvic radiography (X-ray) and computed tomography (CT). A recommendation for the diagnosis by means of magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) especially in patients with low energetic/missing trauma does not currently exist. It is unclear on the basis of which criteria the MRI can be indicated in pelvic fractures. The aim of our study was therefore to retrospectively record indications for the indication of MRI in pelvic fractures – with adequate as well as inadequate trauma.

Material and Methods In a retrospective clinical study, a total of 140 patients (median 68 years, range 15 – 97, 75 female, and 66 male) with a pelvic fracture were included in the study over a period of three years. Overall, the trauma mechanism revealed 73 adequate and 67 inadequate fractures. 31/140 patients had undergone MRI of the pelvis in addition to a CT/X-ray scan. The two subgroups “with MRI” and “without MRI” were analyzed with regard to the parameters “sex”, “age”, “adequacy of the trauma”, “fracture localization”, “duration of admission to imaging”, “type of therapy” and “duration to surgery” compared.

Results It was shown that the MRI diagnosis was performed especially in female, elderly patients (81 years, range 19 – 94 years). Patients with inappropriate trauma have received MRI more frequently (74%) than patients with adequate trauma (26%). With regard to fracture localization no differences could be shown. The MRI was performed on a median 4 days after the CT examination. Regarding the decision “conservative” vs. “operationally” our two groups without and with MRT tended to differ not. Patients with MRI were operated on median 2 days later than patients who did not receive MRI.

Conclusions Pelvic fracture MRI should be performed primarily in elderly female patients without adequate trauma. In patients with adequate trauma, MRI is of low value, especially as MRI diagnostics are performed with delay, resulting in later surgery.

Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly

Pelvic ring fractures are rare injuries in the elderly though the incidence is increasing due to the increasing age of the population.

Main goal of treatment is the quickest possible re-mobilization to prevent side-effects of immobilization such as osteopenia, pulmonary infections or thromboembolic events.

Isolated anterior pelvic ring fractures are stable injuries and therefore they usually can be treated conservatively, while pelvic ring injuries with involvement of the posterior ring are considered unstable and should undergo surgical stabilization if the patient’s condition allows for it.

Conservative treatment includes adequate analgesia, guided mobilization with partial weight bearing if possible and osteoanabolic medication.

The appropriate surgical procedure should be discussed in an interdisciplinary round considering patient’s pre-injury condition, anaesthetic and surgical risks.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180062

Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries

INTRODUCTION

The classification and management of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries (OPRI) remain challenging. The fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification system proposed by Rommens and Hofmann constitutes the first comprehensive classification system of OPRI and may contribute to a more thorough assessment and grading of these injuries. The reliability of the FFP classification system, however, has not been evaluated yet. The purpose of this study therefore was to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the FFP classification system and to critically analyse its strengths and weaknesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred pelvic CT scans obtained from a consecutive series of patients aged 70 years and older who sustained a low-energy pelvic ring injury were included in this study. Three orthopaedic traumatologists of varying levels of experience (one experienced pelvic surgeon, one consultant, one resident) and one musculoskeletal radiologist independently classified each OPRI according to the FFP classification in two different sessions. Intra- and interobserver reliability were determined using percentage agreement and Cohen's Kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

The observed relative distribution of FFP fracture types was comparable to that reported in the original study by Rommens and Hofmann. Overall interobserver reliability for all 100 cases was moderate with Kappa values from 0.42 to 0.59 (mean percentage agreement: 61% (54%-68%)), while intraobserver reliability was substantial with Kappa values from 0.68 to 0.72 (mean percentage agreement: 77% (76%-78%)). Subgroup analysis revealed lowest reliability for the classification of Type IIc, IIIc and IVb injuries (32 cases). Within this subgroup of combined anterior and posterior OPRI involving a complete nondisplaced or displaced (uni- or bilateral) sacral fracture, Kappa values for interobserver reliability ranged from 0.10 to 0.52, while those for intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.29 to 0.66.

CONCLUSION

Overall interobserver reliability of the FFP classification system was moderate, while intraobserver reliability was substantial. Despite the acceptable overall reliability, classification of FFP subtypes involving a complete nondisplaced or displaced sacral fracture showed relatively poor reliability. The latter limits the usefulness of the FFP classification for both clinical and research purposes and needs to be addressed in future studies.

Outcome and 2-Year Survival Rate in Elderly Patients With Lateral Compression Fractures of the Pelvis

Introduction:

Osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures are a rising problem for surgeons in industrialized countries. There is no evidence-based treatment strategy especially for lateral compression (LC) fractures involving the sacrum. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare outcome and survival rate of nonoperative and operative treatment strategies for lateral compression fractures.

Patients and Methods:

In a retrospective study, 128 patients (aged ≥65 years) with an Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) types B2.1 and B3.3 fracture were included and analyzed regarding demographic and treatment data and adverse events. After a follow-up period of at least 2-year survival rate, quality of life and pain were evaluated using the EuroQol-5D and Short Form–12 questionnaires and the visual analog scale.

Results:

Fifty patients (78.3 ± 7.6 years) obtained operative treatment and 77 patients (82.7 ± 7.9 years) obtained nonoperative treatment. One died within 24 hours after admission. High rates of complications occurred in both groups (operative group: 18% and nonoperative group: 8%). Eighteen percent (14 of the 77) of conservatively treated patients needed operative treatment after discharge due to worsening pain and mobilization. The 2-year follow-up showed a high overall mortality (30%), with a significant higher survival rate for operatively treated patients (2-year survival: operatively treated 82% vs conservative 61%). No difference was found in pain and quality of life.

Discussion:

Elderly patients display a high rate and variety of complications and mortality in the aftermath of lateral compression fractures of the pelvis. Although a significantly higher 2-year survival rate for operatively treated patients was found, this study cannot give proof of superior position for operative treatment. Due to lacking data for alternative treatment algorithms especially for fracture-related immobilized patients, we recommended operative treatment with the aim to reduce complications related to prolonged bed rest and ensure early mobilization.

Primary stability of three different iliosacral screw fixation techniques in osteoporotic cadaver specimens-a biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of osteoporotic and insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring is increasing. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with cannulated sacroiliac screws is well-established in the operative treatment of osteoporotic posterior pelvic ring fractures. However, osteoporotic bone quality might lead to the risk of screw loosening. For this reason, cement augmentation of the iliosacral screws is more frequently performed and recommended.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present biomechanical study was to evaluate the primary stability of three methods of iliosacral screw fixation in human osteoporotic sacrum specimens.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This study used methodical cadaver study.

METHODS

A total of 15 fresh frozen human cadaveric specimens with osteoporosis were used (os sacrum). After matched pair randomization regarding bone quality (T-score), three operation technique groups were generated: screw fixation (cannulated screws) without cement augmentation (Group A); screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement (cannulated screws) (Group B); and screw fixation with perforated screws and cement augmentation after screw placement (Group C). In all specimens both sides of the os sacrum were used for operative treatment, resulting in a group size of 10 specimens per group. One operation technique was used on each side of the sacral bone to compare biomechanical properties in the same bone quality. Pull-out tests were performed with a rate of 6 mm/min. A load versus displacement curve was generated.

RESULTS

Subgroup 1 (Group A vs. Group B): Screw fixation without cement augmentation: 594.4 N±463.7 and screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 1,020.8 N±333.3; values were significantly different (p=.025). Subgroup 2 (Group A vs. Group C): Screw fixation without cement augmentation: 641.8 N±242.0 and perforated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1,029.6 N±326.5; values were significantly different (p=.048). Subgroup 3 (Group B vs. Group C): Screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 804.0 N±515.3 and perforated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 889.8 N±503.3; values were not significantly different (p=.472).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding iliosacral screw fixation in osteoporotic bone, the primary stability of techniques involving cement augmentation is significantly higher compared with screw fixation without cement augmentation. Perforated screws with the same primary stability as that of conventional screw fixation in combination with cement augmentation might be a promising alternative in reducing complications of cement leakage. These biomechanical results have to be transferred into clinical practice and prove their clinical value.

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after osteoporotic posterior ring fractures of the pelvis reduces pain significantly in elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic posterior ring fractures of the pelvis are common injuries in the elderly, but the treatment of these fractures still remains controversial. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is one surgical option if conservative treatment cannot provide sufficient pain reduction. The aim of this study is to provide short-term results of elderly patients with percutaneous screw fixation.

METHODS

30 patients with posterior ring fractures were treated between 12/2009 and 01/2014 with percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. Patients' mean age was 78.4 years. Concerning short-term outcome, we focused on initial pain level and postoperative pain reduction together with intra- and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The average hospital stay was 23.7 days, with surgical treatment performed after an average of 9.2 days. 90% of our patients were female. All 30 patients had a lower level of pain at discharge compared with admission or immediately prior to surgery. The difference in pain level at admission compared with the pain level upon discharge showed a mean reduction from 6.8 to 1.8 with a statistically significant change (P≤0.001). 24 of 30 patients had no registered complications, one screw malpositioning with postoperative nerve irritation occurred.

DISCUSSION

Conventional percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a successful operative treatment for elderly patients with persistent lower back pain after unstable posterior ring fractures of the pelvis. Intra- and postoperative complications are rare, so this treatment can be regarded as a safe procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective study).