[Early complication rate of fractures close to the hip joint. Dependence on treatment in on-call services and comorbidities]

Occurrence and clinical outcome of lateral wall fractures in proximal femoral fractures whose fracture line runs from femoral basal neck to subtrochanteric area

Treatment methods for proximal femoral fractures, when the fractures run from the femoral basal neck to the subtrochanteric area, have not yet been fully reported. Thus, we aimed to clarify osteosynthesis methods based on the fracture frequency and clinical results. We classified the proximal femoral fractures using the Area classification method based on the location (area) of the fracture line. The proximal femur has 4 areas with 3 boundaries; the center of the femoral neck, the boundary between femoral neck and trochanter, and the plane connecting the lower ends of the greater trochanter and the lesser trochanter. Fractures occurring only in Area-1 (proximal from the center of the femoral neck) were classified as Type 1; those in both Areas 1 and 2 (base of the femoral neck) were classified as Type 1-2. Therefore, fractures running from femoral basal neck to the subtrochanteric area were classified as Type 2-3-4. We targeted 60 Type 2-3-4 cases (average age 81 years, 10 men, 50 women) out of 1042 proximal femoral fracture cases who visited 8 hospitals in 2 years. We investigated the presence or absence of lateral trochanteric wall fractures, the selection of internal fixator, and the proportion of poor results. The lateral trochanteric wall fracture was observed in 48% of subjects. Long nails were selected to treat 46% cases, and nails with 2 or 3 proximal lag screws were used in 58% cases. Long nails and those with 2 or 3 lag screws were also used in 59% and 69% of lateral trochanteric wall fractures. Poor results such as cutout or excessive telescoping of lag screw occurred in 11.7% of cases and 17.2% of lateral trochanteric wall fractures. Even in cases where long nails and multiple lag screws were used for femoral trochanteric fractures whose fracture line ran from the femoral basal neck to subtrochanteric area were used, the failure rate was high in the presence of a lateral wall fracture. Therefore, it is necessary to consider careful post-operative treatment for proximal femoral fractures with lateral wall fracture, whose fracture line runs from femoral basal neck to subtrochanteric area.

[Influence of timing of surgery on complication rates after cemented hemiarthroplasty for treatment of medial femoral neck fractures]

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of the implantation of a cemented hemiarthroplasty in the management of displaced medial femoral neck fractures is still the subject of current research. According to the current recommendations, these cases should be surgically treated within 24 h. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of surgery on operation-specific and nonspecific complications, intensive care treatment as well as mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Overall, 152 cases were retrospectively investigated regarding several parameters (demographic data, comorbidities, surgery time, duration of hospital stay, intensive care treatment, general, bleeding, operation-specific and nonspecific complications). The statistical analysis was performed using the χ²-test and the unpaired Student's t‑test as well as logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included and 71.1% of the operations were performed within 24 h and the remaining 28.9% after 24 h. All groups showed a similar profile of comorbidities. The analysis of the intensive care treatment showed no significant differences between the individual groups. The rate of postoperative pneumonia was moderately higher among the patients with a procedure after 24 h; however, with no severe courses. There were no significant differences regarding all other complications and the mortality rate between the individual time points of surgery.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that patients operated on after 24 h showed no disadvantages regarding other complications, intensive care treatment or mortality, except from an increased postoperative pneumonia rate. These results could be taken into consideration for the next update of the treatment guidelines.

Bone cement implantation syndrome in cemented hip hemiarthroplasty-a persistent risk

Background

Every year, ~ 210,000 initial implantations of hip endoprostheses are carried out in Germany alone. The “bone cement implantation syndrome” (BCIS) is considered a severe peri- and early-postoperative complication when implanting cemented prostheses. The origin of the BCIS and its impact on the clinical outcome are still uncertain. This study investigates the clinical progression after BCIS cases in patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Risk factors for the occurrence of BCIS are evaluated.

Material and methods

Clinical data of all patients with a proximal femur fracture and which received a cemented hemiarthroplasty within a period of 9.5 years have been collected. BCIS (+) patients and BCIS (−) patients were compared with respect to their demographics and clinical outcome. Risk factors for the development of BCIS were identified.

Results

A total of 208 patients could be included with complete data sets. The mean age was 81.1 ± 10.0 years. Overall, 37% of the patients showed symptoms of BCIS. In comparison to BCIS (−) patients there was a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular complications (27.3% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.016) and a higher in-hospital mortality rate (15.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.006) in BCIS (+) patients. Age, absence of a femoral borehole and ASA status were identified as statistically significant risk factors of BCIS.

Conclusion

BCIS is frequently observed and in some cases severe complication. The therapy is exclusively symptomatic; identifying preventional measures might reduce the occurrence of BCIS.

Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum

Objective

Investigation of the treatment of femur fractures and the type of femur fracture‐associated complications regarding timing of surgery and length of hospital stay.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 358 hip fractures were evaluated retrospectively from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2010 at a level I trauma center in Germany. Inclusion criteria was age >18 years and a proximal femur fracture. Both sexes were evaluated. Mean age was 75.5 years, most patients were female (63.7%). Intervention was the operative treatment of proximal femur fracture. Outcome parameters were time until surgery, complications, reoperations, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Among the proximal femur fractures (n = 358), 46.6% were pertrochanteric, 11.2% subtrochanteric, and 42.2% femoral neck fractures. Operation upon hip fractures was managed regularly within 24 hours of injury (73%; mean for femoral neck: 28.3 hrs.; mean for pertrochanteric fractures: 21.4 hrs.; mean for subtrochanteric fractures: 19.5 hrs.). Delayed treatment, as well as implantation of hip total endoprosthesis (TEP), increased the overall length of hospital stay (15.4 vs 17.6 days; 18.1 vs 15.8 days). Accordingly, surgical procedures performed within 24 hours of injury resulted in a shorter hospital residence. Longest delay of operation was measured for hip fractures (28.3 hrs.).

In 351 patients, secondary injuries were detected in 94 individuals (26%), with fractures being the most common secondary injury (n = 40). We recorded postoperative complications of nonsurgical and surgical origin, and 33.6% of our patient cohort displayed complications. Complications were distributed among 118 patients. There was no significant difference in complications regarding the time of operation, with most nonsurgical and surgical complications appearing within 24 hours after operation (n = 110 vs n = 31). Nonsurgical complications, such as anemia (n = 49) and electrolyte imbalances (n = 30), were observed more frequently than surgical complications (n = 107 vs n = 34); however, these complications were reduced by delay in surgery (82.0% in 6–24 hrs. vs 74.2% in ≥24 hrs.). Anticoagulant therapy and age did not affect postoperative complications. The hospital mortality of patients was 6.2%. Follow‐up was restrained to ambulatory visits in the clinic.

Conclusions

Surgical management of hip fractures performed within 24 hours of injury minimizes hospital stay. We did not detect significant differences in the spectrum or number of complications regarding delay of surgery. Surgical complications mainly occur with rapid primary care, and medical complications can be reduced by more intensive preparation of patient and operation procedures.

[Changes in the patient population with proximal femur fractures over the last decade : Incidence, age, comorbidities, and length of stay]

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, the percentage of people >65 years has increased from 16.6% to 20.7%. In industrialized countries, the annual incidence in people >65 years with a proximal femur fracture is about 600-900 per 100,000 population. The incidence will increase by 3-5% per year. Guidelines advocate early surgery as soon as possible but within 24 h. External quality control requires surgical treatment within 48 h. In this study, the changes in the patient population with proximal femur fractures and their treatment during the last decade were investigated.

METHODS

From 2005-2014, data of all patients ≥65 years with proximal femur fractures were recorded. The patients were treated in a level 1 trauma center certified by the German Society for Trauma Surgery. The evaluation was carried out by means of descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In all, 2093 patients with proximal femur fractures (1164 trochanteric neck fractures and 929 femoral neck fractures) were evaluated. The annual increase in the percentage of patients was 1.5-2%. Over the decade, the percentage of patients increased by 20% and the average age increased by 2 years. There were no changes in comorbidities or case mix index during the investigation period. Despite the increase of the preoperative waiting times, a decrease in the total length of stay was found.

DISCUSSION

The increase in the number of patients, as well as the requirements of the guidelines and external quality control are relevant challenges for the hospitals. More human and material resources (e. g., surgical capacity) are needed. The increase in the age of the patients, their comorbidities, and medication must be taken into account, e. g., in the context of geriatric orthopedic trauma centers.

A 10-Year Retrospective Study of 490 Hip Fracture Patients: Reoperations, Direct Medical Costs, and Survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Reoperations after operative treatment of hip fracture patients may be associated with higher costs and inferior survival. We examined the acute hospital costs, long-term reoperation rates, and survival of patients with a new hip fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 490 consecutive new hip fracture patients treated at a single center between 31 December 2004 and 6 December 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Fractures were classified according to Garden and AO. All medical records were checked manually. The costs of reoperations were calculated using the diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based prices. Survival analysis was performed using the life-table method. The follow-up time was 10 years.

RESULTS

In all, 70/490 patients (14.3%) needed reoperations. Of all reoperations, 34.2% were performed during the first month and 72.9% within 1 year after the primary operation. The hemiarthroplasty dislocation rate was 8.5%, and mechanical failures of osteosynthesis occurred in 6.2%. Alcohol abuse was associated with a heightened risk of reoperation. The mean direct costs of primary fracture care were lower than the mean costs of reoperations (€7500 vs €9800). The mortality rate at 10 years was 79.8% among non-reoperated patients and 62.9% among reoperated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our hypothesis, the cost per patient of reoperation in acute care was 31% higher than the corresponding cost of a primary operation. Reoperations increased the overall immediate costs of index fractures by nearly 20%. One-third of all reoperations were performed during the first month and almost 75% within 1 year after the primary operation.

Infection Versus Hematoma Following Surgical Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Geriatric Patients

Introduction

The surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures predominantly involves geriatric patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, analyses on postoperative infections or hematoma are rare.

Methods

Patients requiring surgical revision due to infection (n = 90) or hematoma (n = 77) in the postoperative phase were identified from an electronic database of 2000 consecutive patients surgically treated for proximal femoral fractures between 2006 and 2014. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved, including information on the pathogens in patients with infection. A follow-up on morbidity and mortality was conducted via telephone for at least 2 years postsurgery.

Results

The follow-up rate was 100%, and the mean age was 81.9 years. The incidence rate of infection was 4.1% (90/2000), and women were commonly affected. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most commonly detected pathogens (35.5% and 25.5%, respectively). Mixed infections were observed in 15 patients, and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections were observed in only 4 patients. A total of 77 (85.6%) infections occurred within 30 days postsurgery. The implant was preserved in 76 (84.4%) patients, and resection arthroplasty was required in 14 patients. Dementia and pertrochanteric fractures were significantly more common in the infection than in the hematoma group. Although infections were associated with high mortality rates for up to 2 years postsurgery, the rates did not significantly differ from those in the hematoma control group.

Conclusion

One of every 2 patients who developed an infection following the surgical treatment of a proximal femoral fracture died within 2 years postsurgery. In addition, infections were significantly associated with dementia. Avoiding postoperative infection should be a high priority in the surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Mortality and readmission following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective study comparing conventional and fast-track care

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacies of two pathways-conventional and fast-track care-in patients with hip fracture.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-centre study.

SETTING

University hospital in middle Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

1820 patients aged ≥65 years with hip fracture (intracapsular, intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric).

INTERVENTIONS

788 patients were treated according to conventional care from April 2008 to September 2011, and 1032 patients were treated according to fast-track care from October 2011 to December 2013.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

Primary: mortality and readmission to hospital, within 365 days follow-up. Secondary: length of stay.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences in mortality and readmission rate between patients in the fast-track and conventional care models within 365 days after the initial hospital admission. The conventional care group had a higher, no statistical significant mortality HR of 1.10 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.31, p=0.326) without and 1.16 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.40, p=0.118) with covariate adjustment. Regarding the readmission, the conventional care group sub-HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.18, p=0.822) without and 0.97 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.12, p=0.644) with adjusting for covariates. Length of stay and time to surgery was statistically significant shorter for patients who received fast-track care, a mean difference of 3.4 days and 6 hours, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in sex, type of fracture, age or Charlson Comorbidity Index score at baseline between patients in the two pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

There was insufficient evidence to show an impact of fast-track care on mortality and readmission. Length of stay and time to surgery were decreased.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00667914; results.

[Length of hospital stay for patients with proximal femoral fractures : Influencing factors]

BACKGROUND

In departments of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients with proximal femoral fractures constitute the largest proportion of trauma patients. The length of stay (LOS) has economic consequences and prolonged LOS leads to a shortage in bed capacity.

OBJECTIVES

In this study treatment and patient-related factors that influence the LOS of patients with proximal femoral fractures were investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Treatment and patient-related data of 242 patients (age >64 years) were recorded retrospectively and included residential aspects, legal guardianship, time of admission and surgery, hospital mortality, LOS, diagnosis, comorbidities, medication, surgical treatment, general and surgical complications, intensive care therapy and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.

RESULTS

Of the patients, one fifth came from a nursing home and were under supervised care or a healthcare proxy at the time of admission. Two thirds were admitted to hospital and operated on during on-call service periods. One half of the patients did not return to their previous domestic environment and were usually admitted to a nursing home. Patients who came from or were admitted to nursing homes, who were under healthcare supervision as well as patients who rapidly underwent surgery had a shorter LOS. Hospitalization and surgery during on-call service periods did not extend the LOS and showed a tendency towards reduction. Older age correlated with a longer LOS and surgical complications doubled the LOS.

DISCUSSION

Surgical treatment during on-call service periods, short preoperative waiting times and avoidance of surgical complications shortened LOS and thus had an impact on costs and bed capacity.

[Reasons for proximal femoral fracture surgery delays : Analysis of the structured dialog in Rheinland-Pfalz]

BACKGROUND

For the "preoperative stay" quality indicator , which is part of the external quality assurance for proximal femoral fractures (module 17/1), a tolerance range for surgery within 48 h after admission of ≤15 % is given.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The structured dialog (2014) in Rheinland-Pfalz was analyzed with respect to reasons for delaying surgery for more than 48 h after admission.

RESULTS

A total of 331 cases were analyzed. In 60.7 % patient-related reasons and in 13.3 % administrative reasons were found. In 9.1 % the statements were not feasible. Due to a lack of software-related specifications in 7.3 % a wrong preoperative length of stay was generated. Wrong coding or a computer-related problem was found in 6.6 %. The most common reason for delay was the intake of an anticoagulant (25.7 %).

CONCLUSION

The significance of the quality indicator "Preoperative stay" without division into whether this was administrative or patient-related must be considered critically.

[Factors influencing course of hospitalization in patients with hip fractures: Complications, length of stay and hospital mortality]

BACKGROUND

Time of surgery, age, sex, and co-morbidities influence the complication and mortality rate in patients with hip fractures. Patients with relevant co-morbidities, who were hospitalized at the weekend have a higher mortality rate. Complications prolong length of stay (LOS), which results in higher costs and shortage of bed capacity.

OBJECTIVES

The influence of various factors on hospitalization with emphasis on complications, LOS, and clinical mortality should be observed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, 242 patients with hip fractures (>64a) were observed. In addition to age and sex, time of hospitalization and surgery, intensive care therapy, hospital mortality, LOS, comorbidities, ASA, and complications were recorded. Times were assigned to the work week or the weekend or regular or on-call duty service.

RESULTS

29.8 % were hospitalized at the weekend, 66.1% on on-call duty, 24.1% were operated on the weekend, 67.4% on on-call duty. 86.3% were operated <48 h after admission. The mortality rate was 8.3%. Longer time to surgery results in more frequent intensive care therapy, prolongs the LOS, and increases overall complications. Advanced age increases mortality and LOS. A higher value of the ASA classification leads to increased mortality; co-morbidities lead to more frequent intensive care therapy. Surgical complications prolong LOS of 10.8d (86.4%).

CONCLUSION

Hospitalization is influenced by age, ASA and co-morbidities as well as by time to surgery and operation in day or late and nighttime service. Early surgery and prevention of surgical complications reduce LOS.

Effect of Preexisting Cognitive Impairment on In-Patient Treatment and Discharge Management among Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of cognitive impairment on the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients with hip fracture during in-patient treatment.

METHODS

A total of 402 patients who were surgically treated for hip fractures were consecutively enrolled at a single trauma center. The patients were grouped according to their results on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), i.e., ≥20 points (group I) and ≤19 points (group II). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates as well as postoperative functional outcomes according to the Barthel Index (BI) were compared between the groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for additional factors.

RESULTS

33% of the patients had MMSE scores ≤19 points. The complication rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Likewise, the overall in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the patients in group I (4.5%) and those in group II (9.8%; β = 0.218, p < 0.740). Functional outcomes, as assessed by the BI, were lower in group II (β = -0.266, p < 0.001). The patients in group II were transferred to a rehabilitation clinic less frequently (52.3 vs. 76.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower MMSE scores are at a higher risk for poorer functional outcomes. Perioperative care should focus on the preservation of functional abilities to protect these patients from an additional loss of independence and disadvantageous clinical course.

The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures

Objectives:

Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, which is usually exacerbated by osteoporosis. A potential solution is the augmentation of implants, for example, of the femoral neck blade using bone cement.

Materials and Methods:

Ten patients (five loosening of femoral neck implant, two pseudarthrosis, two implant failures and one acute fracture) were included. The initial hardware was removed and a PFNA augmented was implanted. The perforated femoral neck blade was augmented using polymethyl methacrylate cement. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.4 months (SD ±4.34). The main outcome parameters were fracture healing and implant-related complications.

Results:

Technical handling was uneventful in all cases. No cement leakage into the joint occurred in any of the cases. The mean amount of cement injected was 5.3 ml. The fracture healed during follow-up in all cases except two patients who died from causes unrelated to the procedure and prior to complete consolidation. Problem-free elective hardware removal of the PFNA augmented was performed in two cases.

Discussion:

The PFNA augmented is a potential implant for joint-preserving revision surgery in proximal femur fractures. The augmentation improves implant anchorage in the impaired bone stock. In this preliminary series, no negative biological side effects of the cement (i.e. osteonecrosis) were observed.

Mortality after proximal femur fracture with a delay of surgery of more than 48 h

PURPOSE

For hip fractures, guidelines require surgery as soon as possible, but not later than 48 h. Some authors observed a positive and some a negative effect of early operation on mortality rate. The aim was to evaluate the mortality rate of patients with a delay of surgery >48 h after admission, as well as influencing factors and reasons for delay.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six patients with hip fractures (>65a) from 2007 to 2011 were included. Comorbidities, the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, time of admission and surgery, and mortality were recorded up to 12 months. Reasons for delay were divided into administrative-related or patient-related. The following time intervals were observed: 48.01-72 h (2-3 days), 72.01-120 h (3-5 days), 120.01-168 h (5-7 days), 168 h (>7 days).

RESULTS

94.9 % of the reasons for delay were patient-related. The mean survival times of the first three intervals were almost the same (9.5-9.9 months) (p = 0.75). The last group had a significantly shorter survival time (7.8 months). Summarizing the first three groups, a significant shorter (p = 0.03) survival time and significantly higher (p = 0.04) 12-month mortality rate in patients with a delay >7 days was observed. The probability of death was primarily dependent on the ASA classification (p < 0.0001) and secondarily on the patient's age at the time of injury (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In hip fractures, reasons for a delay >48 h are mainly patient-related. A delay up to 7 days did not influence survival time and mortality negatively. The higher the value of the ASA classification and the older the patient was at the time of injury, the higher the mortality rate and the shorter the survival time.

The reliability of classifications of proximal femoral fractures with 3-dimensional computed tomography: the new concept of comprehensive classification

The reliability of proximal femoral fracture classifications using 3DCT was evaluated, and a comprehensive "area classification" was developed. Eleven orthopedists (5-26 years from graduation) classified 27 proximal femoral fractures at one hospital from June 2013 to July 2014 based on preoperative images. Various classifications were compared to "area classification." In "area classification," the proximal femur is divided into 4 areas with 3 boundary lines: Line-1 is the center of the neck, Line-2 is the border between the neck and the trochanteric zone, and Line-3 links the inferior borders of the greater and lesser trochanters. A fracture only in the first area was classified as a pure first area fracture; one in the first and second area was classified as a 1-2 type fracture. In the same way, fractures were classified as pure 2, 3-4, 1-2-3, and so on. "Area classification" reliability was highest when orthopedists with varying experience classified proximal femoral fractures using 3DCT. Other classifications cannot classify proximal femoral fractures if they exceed each classification's particular zones. However, fractures that exceed the target zones are "dangerous" fractures. "Area classification" can classify such fractures, and it is therefore useful for selecting osteosynthesis methods.