[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®]

Injuries From Explosions: More Differences Than Similarities Between Various Types

OBJECTIVE

To compare injury patterns of different types of explosions.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 4508 patients hospitalized due to explosions recorded in the Israel National Trauma Registry between January 1997 and December 2018. The events were divided into 4 groups: terror-related, war-related, civilian intentional explosions, and civilian unintentional explosions. The groups were compared in terms of injuries sustained, utilization of hospital resources, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Civilian intentional and terror-related explosions were found to be similar in most aspects except for factors directly influencing mortality and a larger volume of severely injured body regions among terror-victims. Comparisons between other groups produced some parallels, albeit less consistent. Civilian intentional explosions and civilian unintentional explosions were different from each other in most aspects. The latter group also differed from others by its high volume of life-threatening burns and a higher proportion of children casualties.

CONCLUSIONS

While consistent similarities between explosion casualties exist, especially between victims of intentional civilian and terror-related explosions, the general rule is that clinical experience with a type of explosion cannot be directly transferred to other types.

The First Aid and Hospital Treatment of Gunshot and Blast Injuries

BACKGROUND

When gunshot and blast injuries affect only a single person, first aid can always be delivered in conformity with the relevant guidelines. In contrast, when there is a dynamic casualty situation affecting many persons, such as after a terrorist attack, treatment may need to be focused on immediately life-threatening complications.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in Medline and on the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

In a mass-casualty event, all initial measures are directed toward the survival of the greatest possible number of patients, in accordance with the concept of "tactical abbreviated surgical care." Typical complications such as airway obstruction, tension pneumothorax, and hemorrhage must be treated within the first 10 minutes. Patients with bleeding into body cavities or from the trunk must be given priority in transport; hemorrhage from the limbs can be adequately stabilized with a tourniquet. In-hospital care must often be oriented to the principles of "damage control surgery," with the highest priority assigned to the treatment of life-threatening conditions such as hemodynamic instability, penetrating wounds, or overt coagulopathy. The main considerations in initial surgical stabilization are control of bleeding, control of contamination and lavage, avoidance of further consequences of injury, and prevention of ischemia. Depending on the resources available, a transition can be made afterward to individualized treatment.

CONCLUSION

In mass-casualty events and special casualty situations, mortality can be lowered by treating immediately life-threatening complications as rapidly as possible. This includes the early identification of patients with lifethreatening hemorrhage. Advance preparation for the management of a masscasualty event is advisable so that the outcome can be as favorable as possible for all of the injured in special or tactical casualty situations.