Einfluss des Beckenregisters der DGU auf die Versorgung von Beckenringfrakturen

Insufficiency Fractures vs. Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures - Epidemiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Characteristics of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) encompass two fracture entities: fracture after low-energy trauma and insufficiency fracture without trauma. It is unclear whether the two subgroups differ in terms of diagnosis and therapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate insufficiency fractures with regard to defined parameters and to compare specific parameters with the fractures after low-energy trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the period from 2008 to 2017, 203 patients with FFP were recorded at our clinic (Level 1 Trauma Centre DGU, SAV approval). Of these, 25 had an insufficiency fracture and 178 had a pelvic ring fracture after low-energy trauma. Epidemiological, diagnostic and therapeutic parameters were examined.

RESULTS

There was a relative increase in the insufficiency fracture within the FFP (2008 - 2009: 5.0% vs. 2015 - 2017: 17.8%). In these patients, osteoporosis tended to be more pronounced than in patients after low-energy trauma (t-value: - 3.66 vs. - 3.13). The diagnosis of insufficiency fractures showed increased use of MRI and DECT (60.9% vs. 26.0%) and a high proportion of type IV fractures after FFP (40.0% vs. 7.9%). In terms of therapy, surgical treatment of the insufficiency fracture was sought more often (68,2% vs. 52,1%), with a tendency towards increased use of combined osteosynthesis procedures (14.3% vs. 7.6%).

CONCLUSION

We were able to show that as the number of cases increases, the insufficiency fracture becomes more important within FFP. If these patients tend to have more pronounced osteoporosis, particular attention should be paid to the diagnosis and adequate therapy of the osteoporosis, especially in the case of an insufficiency fracture. In addition to the increased diagnostic testing using MRI and DECT to detect oedema and the increased surgical therapy for this type of fracture, it is also noteworthy that the insufficiency fracture can cause higher-grade fractures after FFP.

Patients with combined pelvic and spinal injuries have worse clinical and operative outcomes than patients with isolated pelvic injuries analysis of the German Pelvic Registry

Background

Pelvic fractures are often associated with spine injury in polytrauma patients. This study aimed to determine whether concomitant spine injury influence the surgical outcome of pelvic fracture.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data of patients registered in the German Pelvic Registry between January 2003 and December 2017. Clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between patients with isolated pelvic fracture (group A) and patients with pelvic fracture plus spine injury (group B). We also compared apart patients with isolated acetabular fracture (group C) versus patients with acetabular fracture plus spine injury (group D).

Results

Surgery for pelvic fracture was significantly more common in group B than in group A (38.3% vs. 36.6%; p = 0.0002), as also emergency pelvic stabilizations (9.5% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.0001). The mean time to emergency stabilization was longer in group B (137 ± 106 min vs. 113 ± 97 min; p < 0.0001), as well as the mean time until definitive stabilization of the pelvic fracture (7.3 ± 4 days vs. 5.4 ± 8.0 days; p = 0.147). The mean duration of treatment and the morbidity and mortality rates were all significantly higher in group B (p < 0.0001). Operation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group D (176 ± 81 min vs. 203 ± 119 min, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups with acetabular injuries. Although preoperative acetabular fracture dislocation was slightly less common in group D, postoperative fracture dislocation was slightly more common. The distribution of Matta grades was significantly different between the two groups. Patients with isolated acetabular injuries were significantly less likely to have neurological deficit at discharge (94.5%; p < 0.0001). In-hospital complications were more common in patients with combined spine plus pelvic injuries (groups B and D) than in patients with isolated pelvic and acetabular injury (groups A and C).

Conclusions

Delaying definitive surgical treatment of pelvic fractures due to spinal cord injury appears to have a negative impact on the outcome of pelvic fractures, especially on the quality of reduction of acetabular fractures.

Radiological and Functional Assessment of Treatment Outcomes in Patients after Open Reduction with Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Acetabular Fractures

(1) Fracture of the pelvis usually happens in young men and results from high-energy trauma. It generates high social and economic costs and results in further health problems. It is therefore important to assess long-term treatment results. (2) The study (NCT04902209) involved 31 patients (mean age 43.6 ± 14.8 years). We conducted fixation assessment on the basis of radiographs and CT scans and functional assessment based on functional scales. (3) We observed more degenerative changes in the less precise reconstruction of the acetabulum (p = 0.075). We did not find statistically significant relationships between the area of surgical approach, the gravity of fracture, and the development of degenerative changes. We did not find statistically significant relationships between patients' functional states and the type of surgical approach or the complexity of the fracture. We found a positive correlation between the time of surgical treatment and patients' functional state (p = 0.04). Patients whose joint surfaces were reconstructed anatomically had significantly higher scores in functional scales (HHS p = 0.05, Merle p = 0.03). (4) Patients after surgical fixation of the acetabulum have low functional abilities. The quality of reconstruction of the loaded surface as well as the length of time post-surgery seems to be essential for the patients' functional state.

Instability of the posterior pelvic ring: introduction of innovative implants

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of posterior pelvic ring fractures, especially in elderly patients, demonstrate the need for soft tissue protecting surgical techniques. Standard of care is iliosacral screw osteosynthesis. This type of osteosynthesis has its limitations especially in patients with reduced bone properties. Therefore, the development of new and straightforward surgical techniques and implant designs is favorable.

METHODS

Introducing this modular system for the posterior pelvic ring, known complications of iliosacral screw osteosynthesis, such as implant loosening and malpositioning may be reduced, due to innovative mechanical characteristics.

RESULTS

The shown cases demonstrate the potential benefits of the system with a wide range of treatment options due to its modularity.

CONCLUSION

The modular implant system presented here can significantly facilitate and improve the stabilization of posterior pelvic ring instabilities.

The FFP-classification: From eminence to evidence

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with a rapidly growing incidence among elderly women. The characteristics of these fractures are different from those appearing after high-energy trauma. In 2013, the comprehensive FFP-classification provided a new framework for analysis of these fractures. It is based on the estimation of loss of stability in the pelvic ring. It is connected with recommendations for surgical treatment, justified by the fact that higher instabilities will need surgical stabilization. Since ist appearance, we can observe an increasing clinical-scientific interest in FFP. Multiple publications use the FFP-classification studying the characteristics of fractures, choice of treatment and outcome. Other studies focus on minimal-invasive techniques for stabilization. The actual knowledge describes higher mortality rates as the reference population, lower mortality rates after operative treatment but for the price of surgery-related complications. Mobility, independency and quality of life are worse than before the fracture, independent of the FFP-classification and the type of treatment. The classification triggered a rapid increase of expertise. This publication gives a detailed overview on the evolution from eminence to evidence.

[Triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization for type C pelvic fractures according to AO/OTA and type IV according to FFP]

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic instability is common in type IV fragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFP) and type C traumatic pelvic fractures. This results in the indications for operative stabilization using a spinopelvic support. Due to the variety of surgical techniques for spinopelvic support it is unclear what importance a minimally invasive spinopelvic screw-rod osteosynthesis can have.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the retrospective clinical study over a period of 2 years, 23 patients (median age 67 years, 5 male and 18 female) with unstable pelvic fractures (FFP type IV: n = 12, AO/OTA type C: n = 11) treated by triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization (TMSS) were included in the study. The patient data were examined with respect to the parameters gender, age, fracture morphology, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative infection, postoperative reduction result in the computed tomography (CT) imaging and screw loosening.

RESULTS

The average age of the 11 type C fractures was 43 years and that of the 12 FFP type IV fractures was 80 years. The follow-up period was on average 12.2 months. The average operation time was 67 min, the blood loss was 70 ml, there were 2 postoperative infections and 4 cases of screw loosening. The reduction according to Matta was < 4 mm for all FFP and between 4-20 mm for traumatic pelvic fractures. Symptomatic pseudarthroses occurred in 3 cases.

CONCLUSION

The triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization (TMSS) showed a stable and sufficient treatment of the type IV fragility fractures and in the slightly displaced type C traumatic pelvic fractures. Coarse fracture dislocations limit the procedure.

Isolated Pubic Ramus Fractures Are Serious Adverse Events for Elderly Persons: An Observational Study on 138 Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Type I (FFP Type I)

Background: Fractures of the pubic ramus without involvement of the posterior pelvic ring represent a minority of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). The natural history of patients suffering this FFP Type I has not been described so far. Material and methods: All patients, who were admitted with isolated pubic ramus fractures between 2007 and mid-2018, have been reviewed. Epidemiologic data, comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and one-year mortality were recorded. Of all surviving patients, living condition before the fracture and at follow-up was noted. Mobility was scored with the Parker Mobility Score, quality of life with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L), subjective sensation of pain with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Results: A consecutive series of 138 patients was included in the study. There were 117 women (84.8%) and 21 men (15.2%). Mean age was 80.6 years (SD 8.6 years). 89.1% of patients presented with comorbidities, 81.2% of them had cardiovascular diseases. Five patients (4%) died during hospital-stay. Median in-hospital stay was eight days (2–45 days). There were in-hospital complications in 16.5%, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia being the most frequent. One-year mortality was 16.7%. Reference values for the normal population of the same age are 5.9% for men and 4.0% for women. One-year mortality rate was 22.2% in the patient group of 80 years or above and 8.8% in the patient group below the age of 80. The rate of surviving patients living at home with or without assistance dropped from 80.5% to 65.3%. The median EQ-5D-Index Value was 0.62 (0.04–1; IQR 0.5–0.78). Reference value for the normal population is 0.78. Average PMS was 4 and NRS 3. Within a two-year period, additional fragility fractures occurred in 21.2% and antiresorptive medication was taken by only 45.2% of patients. Conclusion. Pubic ramus fractures without involvement of the posterior pelvis (FFP Type I) are serious adverse events for elderly persons. During follow-up, there is an excess mortality, a loss of independence, a restricted mobility, and a decreased quality of life. Pubic ramus fractures are indicators for the need to optimize the patient’s general condition.

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring – Does the Evidence of Oedema Lead us to More Surgeries?

Introduction The choice of therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) is largely determined by the diagnosed fracture morphology. It is now unclear whether the change in diagnostic options – sensitive detection of fracture oedema in the sacrum using MRI and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) – has an impact on the therapeutic consequences. The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to evaluate the change in the diagnostics used and the resulting therapy regimen in our patient population.

Materials and Methods We performed a monocentric-retrospective analysis of 196 patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis in our clinic (national TraumaZentrum® DGU and SAV approval) in the period from 2008 to 2017. We examined changes in epidemiology, diagnostics/classification and therapy of the pelvic ring fractures treated by us.

Results The diagnostic procedures used are subject to a clear change towards oedema detection using MRI and DECT. The graduation has changed towards more severe forms of fracture after FFP. There is now also an increasing proportion of patients treated by surgery (2008 – 2009: 5.3% vs. 2015 – 2017: 60.3%).

Conclusion We were able to show that the introduction of sensitive diagnostic procedures coincided with a higher classification of the fractures. It is also noteworthy that the increase in operations is not only due to a higher degree of classification; also in relative terms, more patients are operated on within type FFP II.

Associated abdominal injuries do not influence quality of care in pelvic fractures-a multicenter cohort study from the German Pelvic Registry

Background

Pelvic fractures are rare but serious injuries. The influence of a concomitant abdominal trauma on the time point of surgery and the quality of care regarding quality of reduction or the clinical course in pelvic injuries has not been investigated yet.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the prospective consecutive cohort from the multicenter German Pelvic Registry of the German Trauma Society in the years 2003–2017. Demographic, clinical, and operative parameters were recorded and compared for two groups (isolated pelvic fracture vs. combined abdominal/pelvic trauma).

Results

16.359 patients with pelvic injuries were treated during this period. 21.6% had a concomitant abdominal trauma. The mean age was 61.4 ± 23.5 years. Comparing the two groups, patients with a combination of pelvic and abdominal trauma were significantly younger (47.3 ± 22.0 vs. 70.5 ± 20.4 years; p < 0.001). Both, complication (21.9% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.001) and mortality (8.0% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.001) rates, were significantly higher.

In the subgroup of acetabular fractures, the operation time was significantly longer in the group with the combined injury (198 ± 104 vs. 176 ± 81 min, p = 0.001). The grade of successful anatomic reduction of the acetabular fracture did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Patients with a pelvic injury have a concomitant abdominal trauma in about 20% of the cases. The clinical course is significantly prolonged in patients with a combined injury, with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. However, the quality of the reduction in the subgroup of acetabular fractures is not influenced by a concomitant abdominal injury.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03952026, Registered 16 May 2019, retrospectively registered

[Three-point buttressing with internal fixator for minimally invasive stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring : Operative technique and first clinical results]

BACKGROUND

The changing age distribution in society inevitably leads to a percentage increase in osteoporotic and fatigue fractures as well as the absolute number of insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring. Due to pain these fractures lead to a loss of mobility and autonomy. To prevent these consequences surgical treatment is increasingly being performed.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents a new configuration of an internal fixator on the anterior pelvic ring, the principle of which correlates to a three-point buttressing.

METHODS

In addition to a description of the configuration of the internal fixator on the anterior pelvic ring and the surgical technique, the article presents the results after the first 23 applications.

RESULTS

The first results after application of the new internal fixator on the pelvic ring show a low risk, sufficient and minimally invasive stabilization with an encouraging clinical and radiological outcome.

CONCLUSION

Missing long-term results, also taking into account a higher number of patients, as well as the biomechanical examination of the presented fixator configuration still have to be evaluated.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 1: Which Criteria Lead Us to Supplementary MRI Diagnostics?

Introduction Isolated pelvic fractures are relatively rare with an incidence of 3 – 6% of all fractures, but their incidence in polytraumatized individuals increases to 25%. The S3 guideline Polytrauma gives a clear recommendation for diagnostics by means of pelvic radiography (X-ray) and computed tomography (CT). A recommendation for the diagnosis by means of magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) especially in patients with low energetic/missing trauma does not currently exist. It is unclear on the basis of which criteria the MRI can be indicated in pelvic fractures. The aim of our study was therefore to retrospectively record indications for the indication of MRI in pelvic fractures – with adequate as well as inadequate trauma.

Material and Methods In a retrospective clinical study, a total of 140 patients (median 68 years, range 15 – 97, 75 female, and 66 male) with a pelvic fracture were included in the study over a period of three years. Overall, the trauma mechanism revealed 73 adequate and 67 inadequate fractures. 31/140 patients had undergone MRI of the pelvis in addition to a CT/X-ray scan. The two subgroups “with MRI” and “without MRI” were analyzed with regard to the parameters “sex”, “age”, “adequacy of the trauma”, “fracture localization”, “duration of admission to imaging”, “type of therapy” and “duration to surgery” compared.

Results It was shown that the MRI diagnosis was performed especially in female, elderly patients (81 years, range 19 – 94 years). Patients with inappropriate trauma have received MRI more frequently (74%) than patients with adequate trauma (26%). With regard to fracture localization no differences could be shown. The MRI was performed on a median 4 days after the CT examination. Regarding the decision “conservative” vs. “operationally” our two groups without and with MRT tended to differ not. Patients with MRI were operated on median 2 days later than patients who did not receive MRI.

Conclusions Pelvic fracture MRI should be performed primarily in elderly female patients without adequate trauma. In patients with adequate trauma, MRI is of low value, especially as MRI diagnostics are performed with delay, resulting in later surgery.

Determination of bone density in patients with sacral fractures via CT scan

BACKGROUND

Gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis is standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). CT is a standard diagnostic tool to detect injuries to the pelvic ring. The aim of the study was to collect information on bone density without DXA by determination of Hounsfield units (HU) in CT scans of patients with sacral fractures, to draw conclusions on the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients admitted to the investigating institution.

HYPOTHESIS

Is the determination of HU in CT scans a useful method to gain more information about bone density in patients with sacral fractures?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated from 2004-2014 with sacral fractures confirmed with a CT scan. A total of 531 patients (398 female, 133 male) were included in the study. Bone density was measured with CT scans in Hounsfield units in vertebral body L5. The assessment was performed by placing a single oval over the trabecular bone in the axial view. In the sagittal plane, the correct position in the middle of the vertebral body was checked. As in previously published studies, we defined bone of less than 100 HU as osteoporotic, 100-150 HU as osteopenic and above 150 HU as normal.

RESULTS

In 71.6% of the patients, bone density was reduced. Seventy-five percent of patients aged 65 or more exhibited manifest osteoporosis. With each additional year of age, bone density decreased by 2.7 Hounsfield units (p˂0.001). Female patients were predominant in the patient group with osteoporotic bone (p˂0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant prevalence of reduced bone density in the investigated patient group. The methodology used in this study is an uncomplicated procedure to further assess bone quality in patients with fractures of the pelvic ring. Fractures of the posterior pelvic ring in women over 65 years with low-energy trauma are most probably osteoporotic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.