[120-day follow-up after proximal femoral fractures-first results from the Geriatric Trauma Registry DGU®]

Are Process Changes Measurable? An Analysis of 4136 Proximal Femur Fractures over 16 Year

Prozessänderungen im perioperativen Setting werden selten analysiert, weil ihre Ergebnisse nicht unmittelbar fassbar sind und es einer hohen Fallzahl bedarf. Primäres Ziel war es, Prozessänderungen retrospektiv anhand proximaler Femurfrakturen (PF) zu evaluieren und deren Effekt mit verschiedenen Zielkriterien zu überprüfen. Sekundäres Ziel war die Definition möglicher Qualitätskriterien für die Versorgung von PF.Retrospektive Analyse der Datenbank eines Level-1-Traumazentrums zu PF. Eingeschlossen wurden alle osteosynthetisch und endoprothetisch versorgten PF im Behandlungszeitraum vom 01.01.2006 bis 31.12.2021. Der Zeitraum von 16 Jahren wurde für die Statistik trichotom aufgeteilt und die ersten 6 Jahre als Ausgangsbasis verwendet. Insgesamt 10 Prozessänderungen wurden in den folgenden 10 Jahren vorgenommen. Die Auswirkungen dieser Änderungen wurden anhand 1. der operativen Revisionsrate, 2. der Infektionsrate, 3. der perioperativen Transfusionsrate sowie 4. der 1-Jahres-Letalität überprüft.Insgesamt 4163 PF wurden analysiert. Hinsichtlich der Zielkriterien zeigten die Änderungen der ersten 5 Jahre (2012-2016; intramedulläres Verfahren für Osteosynthesen sowie Einwegabdeckung und Einwegkittel) den stärksten Effekt mit einer erstmaligen Senkung der operativen Revisionsrate unter 10% auf Dauer. Weitere Prozessoptimierungen der letzten 5 Jahre (2017-2021) erbrachten ebenfalls messbare Verbesserungen (Senkung der Infektions- und Transfusionsrate). Die 1-Jahres-Letalität blieb unverändert, auch während der COVID-19-Pandemie.Prozessänderungen bei PF führen nicht unmittelbar zu objektiv messbaren Verbesserungen. Rückblickend erscheint der Paradigmenwechsel von extra- auf intramedulläre Osteosynthese den höchsten Effekt erzielt zu haben, wenngleich über die letzten 10 Jahre eine schrittweise Besserung aller Zielkriterien eintrat - mit Ausnahme der Letalität. Als objektive Qualitätskontrolle sollte eine 1-Jahres-Revisionsrate unter 10% angestrebt sein.

Effects of an Integrated Geriatric-Orthopedic Co-management (InGerO) on the Treatment of Older Orthopedic Patients with Native and Periprosthetic Joint Infections

PURPOSE

In view of our aging society, co-management with a geriatrician is becoming increasingly important. While such collaborations have been working successfully in trauma surgery for years, it is still unclear whether they are also helpful for non-trauma patients in orthopedics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of such a cooperation in orthopedic non-trauma patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections on the basis of five key areas.

RESULTS

Analysis was carried out with 59 patients "with" and 63 "without" geriatric co-management. In the co-management group, delirium was detected significantly more often (p < 0.001), significantly lower pain intensities were measured at the time of discharge (p < 0.001), transfer ability had clearly improved more (p = 0.04), and renal function was more frequently noted (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found with respect to principal diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, complication rates, pressure ulcer and delirium incidence, operative revisions, or length of inpatient stay.

CONCLUSION

Orthogeriatric co-management in orthopedic patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections and nontraumatic surgery appears to have positive impacts on recognition and treatment of delirium, pain management, transfer performance, and attention to renal function. Further studies should follow in order to conclusively assess the value of such co-management in orthopedic nontraumatic surgery patients.

Spinal anesthesia with better outcome in geriatric hip fracture surgery - An analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU)

BACKGROUND

Literature shows conflicting results regarding spinal (SA) or general anesthesia (GA) and their influence on the outcome of elderly patients with hip fractures. We, therefore, conducted an analysis from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter registry study including patients aged 70 years or above with hip fractures requiring surgery from 131 Centers for Geriatric Trauma (AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®) from 2016 to 2021. Patients with SA or GA were compared using matched-pair analysis and linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 43,714 patients were included, of whom 3,242 received SA. The median age was 85 (SA) and 84 years (GA). Adjustments for the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, sex, age, additional injuries, and anticoagulation resulted in a higher in-hospital (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 - 1.61, p = 0.009) and 120 days mortality (OR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.1 - 1.95, p = 0.009) in the GA group. GA had a significant negative influence on walking ability seven days after surgery and on the quality of life (QoL). The length of hospital stay (LoS) was significantly shorter in the SA group.

CONCLUSIONS

SA is associated with a higher survival rate, a better walking ability seven days after surgery, a higher QoL, and a shorter LoS.

Risk Factors of 120-Day Mortality Among Hip Fractures With Concomitant COVID-19 Infection

Background Hip fractures cause substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has only worsened the global burden. Increased 120-day mortality is well established in the literature among hip fractures with COVID-19. However, the risk factors associated with mortality have been poorly understood. We aimed to determine the risk factors associated with increased 120-day mortality among hip fractures with COVID-19. Methods Seventy patients with hip fractures with confirmed COVID-19 infection between March 2020 and December 2021 were included. Thirty-three patients who died within 120 days of admission were allotted to the non-survivor group and the rest 37 patients were allotted to the survivor group. Various parameters such as demographic variables, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), Abbreviated Mental Score Test (AMTS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), fracture type, operation type, and delay in surgery were compared between the groups to determine the risk factors for increased mortality. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to know the independent association with increased mortality. Results A total of 33 patients died within 120 days giving the 120-day mortality rate of 47.1%. Baseline parameters such as ASA, AMTS on admission, NEWS on admission, and type of residence did not significantly affect mortality. The mean NHFS was significantly high in non-survivors (5.38 ± 1.52) compared to survivors (4.40 ± 1.75) (p < 0.001). Similarly, mean CCI was also significantly high in non-survivors (5.58 ± 1.74) compared to survivors (4.76 ± 2.29) (p < 0.001). A total of 70% (seven out of 10) of patients with delayed surgery of more than 36 hours from the admission died within 120 days of admission (p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in patients who underwent internal fixation of fractures like a dynamic hip screw (DHS) or intramedullary (IM) nailing than in those who underwent hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Post-operative parameters such as early mobilization and the multidisciplinary approach to review these patients made no difference to the mortality. Multivariate regression analysis of the parameters that made a significant difference in the mortality showed that delay in surgery and type of surgery (internal fixation) independently increased the mortality among these patients (p < 0.001). However, NHFS and CCI were not independently affecting the mortality among hip fractures with concomitant COVID-19. Conclusion The 120-day mortality rate among patients with hip fractures with concomitant COVID-19 was 47.1%. Delay in surgery of more than 36 hours and patients who underwent internal fixation were independent risk factors associated with increased mortality among these patients.

The interdisciplinary fracture liaison service improves health-related outcomes and survival of older adults after hip fracture surgical repair

Due to the high burden of fragility fractures, we developed an interdisciplinary FLS care pathway for early management and monitoring of older adults discharged from a high-volume trauma center after hip fracture repair. Interdisciplinary FLS effectively improves up to 1-year adherence to treatments for secondary prevention of fragility fractures, reduces health facility admission, and improves long-term survival.

PURPOSE

To compare adherence to secondary fragility fracture prevention, falls, healthcare facility admissions, and mortality between hip fracture older adults who entered the fracture liaison services pathway of care (FLS-CP) and those managed according to the usual traumatologist model of care (U-CP).

METHODS

Prospective observational study enrolling subjects aged ≥ 65 years discharged by high-volume trauma center after hip fracture repair from February 2016 to February 2017, who consecutively entered FLS-CP or U-CP according to their preference and goals.

RESULTS

Compared to U-CP, those in FLS-CP had higher initiation rate and up to 1-year adherence to secondary prevention of fragility fracture, including vitamin D and calcium (87.7% vs 36.9%; p &lt; 0.0001), specific anti-osteoporosis drugs (75.1% vs 8.0%; p &lt; 0.0001), and complete anti-fracture therapy (72.3% vs 5.7%; p &lt; 0.0001). Older adults belonging to FLS-CP showed a lower likelihood of healthcare facility admission (RR 0.597; 95% CI 0.398-0.895; p = 0.0125), with a longer re-hospitalization-free survival (176.4 vs 88.7 days; p = 0.0152) than those in U-CP. One-year incidence of falls and fractures was similar between groups, with a lower tendency of the subjects in the FLS-CP to be multiple fallers (19% vs 34.8%; OR 0.057; 95% CI 0.004-0.876; p = 0.0690). The FLS-CP group experienced a lower 1-year (87.2% vs 74.3%; p = 0.001) and 3-year mortality (67.9% vs 55.6%; p = 0.0245) and a lower adjusted 5-year mortality hazard ratio (50.2% vs 58%; HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.60; 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The FLS-CP may improve initiation and adherence to secondary prevention of fragility fractures, reduces healthcare facility admission, and improves long-term survival.

Increased Geriatric Treatment Frequency Improves Mobility and Secondary Fracture Prevention in Older Adult Hip Fracture Patients-An Observational Cohort Study of 23,828 Patients from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU)

Interdisciplinary orthogeriatric care of older adult hip fracture patients is of growing importance due to an ageing population, yet there is ongoing disagreement about the most effective model of care. This study aimed to compare different forms of orthogeriatric treatment, with focus on their impact on postoperative mobilization, mobility and secondary fracture prevention. In this observational cohort study, patients aged 70 years and older with a proximal femur fracture requiring surgery, were included from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019. Data were recorded from hospital stay to 120-day follow-up in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU), a specific designed registry for older adult hip fracture patients. Of 23,828 included patients from 95 different hospitals, 72% were female, median age was 85 (IQR 80–89) years. Increased involvement of geriatricians had a significant impact on mobilization on the first day (OR 1.1, CI 1.1–1.2) and mobility seven days after surgery (OR 1.1, CI 1.1–1.2), initiation of an osteoporosis treatment during in-hospital stay (OR 2.5, CI 2.4–2.7) and of an early complex geriatric rehabilitation treatment (OR 1.3, CI 1.2–1.4). These findings were persistent after 120 days of follow-up. Interdisciplinary treatment of orthogeriatric patients is beneficial and especially during in-patient stay increased involvement of geriatricians is decisive for early mobilization, mobility and initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Standardized treatment pathways in certified geriatric trauma departments with structured data collection in specific registries improve outcome monitoring and interpretation.

Fragility Fractures: Risk Factors and Management in the Elderly

Given the progressive ageing of Western populations, the fragility fractures market has a growing socioeconomic impact. Fragility fractures are common in the elderly, negatively impacting their quality of life, limiting autonomy, increasing disability, and decreasing life expectancy. Different causes contribute to the development of a fractures in frail individuals. Among all, targeting fragile patients before the development of a fracture may represent the greatest challenge, and current diagnostic tools suffer from limitations. This study summarizes the current evidence on the management of fragility fractures, discussing risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, and actual limitations of the clinical therapeutic options, putting forward new ideas for further scientific investigation.

Quality of life, walking ability and change of living situation after trochanteric femur fracture in geriatric patients-Comparison between sliding hip screw and cephalomedullary nails from the registry for geriatric trauma

BACKGROUND

There is no well-established gold standard for treating trochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. The two common treatment options are cephalomedullary nails (CMN) and sliding hip screws (SHS). In this study, treatment using CMN and SHS were compared for a cohort of patients older than 70 years of age: The main outcomes were quality of life and main residence after surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we analyzed 24,919 patients from 100 hospitals, treated between 2016 and 2019 and documented in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma. The impact of CMN vs. SHS on the walking ability, quality of life (QoL), living situation, mortality, and revision rate were analyzed. To analyze the change of the living situation, the main residence 120 days after surgery for patients, who lived in their own home before fracture, was described for both groups.

FINDINGS

A total of 10,995 patients could be included of which 10,436 patients were treated with CMN and 369 patients with SHS. 120 days postoperative the QoL differed significantly (p = 0.020) in favor of treatment using CMN. 26% of the SHS group who lived at home prior to surgery had to reside in a nursing home after surgery, whereas the rate was only 18% in the CMN group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the mortality rate nor a difference in the walking ability 120 days postoperative were found. CMN were implanted more promptly (median: 13.9 vs. 18.4 hours; p < 0,001). No differences were found concerning the revision rate between the two groups, neither during inpatient treatment (p = 0.723) nor during the 120 day follow-up period (p = 0.524).

INTERPRETATION

There might be a benefit for geriatric patients with trochanteric femur fractures to be treated with a proximal femur nail in regard to a higher QoL and a reduced institutionalization rate. Mortality or revision rate was not affected by the chosen implant.

No Consequence for Lateral View X-Ray in Displaced Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly

Background: Due to demographic changes, proximal femoral fractures (PFF) in the elderly rise constantly. The standard diagnostic tool is still the X-ray of the pelvis/hip in two planes. Our hypothesis was that the lateral-view X-ray has little influence on classification, planning of the operative procedure, and choice of implant in geriatric patients.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all initial X-rays of PFF in geriatric patients (≥70 years) from May 2018 until August 2019 in a Level I Trauma center. Three experienced consultants categorized the fractures on the ap pelvis view and performed Garden and Pauwels classification as well as a two-staged classification displaced/nondisplaced [for femoral neck fractures (FNF)] or AO Classification [for intertrochanteric fractures (ITF)]. Afterward, they decided the operative strategy as well as implant choice [dynamic hip screw (DHS), intramedullary nail (IMN), or arthroplasty]. After 4 weeks, they categorized all fractures again with now available lateral view X-rays in a different order.

Results: Two hundred seven patients (146 female, 61 male; 70.5 vs. 29.5%) with 90 FNF and 117 ITF (43.5 vs. 56.5%) could be included. Age was 84.6 ± 6.9 years. The treatment was in 45 cases DHS, in 82 cases IMN, and for the other 80 cases arthroplasty. The interobserver reliability of the classifications were poor, except for the two-staged classification [Fleiss-κ ap view only = 0.708 (CI 95% 0.604, 0.812) vs. additional lateral = 0.756 (CI 95% 0.644, 0.869)]. Moreover, independent from the classification, there were no significant changes in management and choice of implant with additional lateral view.

Conclusions: Regarding our results, we consider the lateral view dispensable for standard X-ray of displaced PFF in geriatric patients. In nondisplaced fractures, it could be added secondary.

One Hundred Twenty-Day Mortality Rates for Hip Fracture Patients with COVID-19 Infection

Background

Increased 30-day mortality rates have been reported for patients with hip fractures and a concurrent diagnosis of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infection. Due to nosocomial spread of infection and the variable incubation period with the virus, follow-up past 30 days after injury is required to evaluate the true mortality amongst these patients. We aim to assess 120-day mortality rates in hip fracture patients with COVID-19 infection and compare this to hip fracture patients without COVID-19 infection presenting during the same time period.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter review of all patients aged ≥ 60 years admitted with a fractured neck of femur between March 5 and April 5, 2020, at nine U.K. trauma units. COVID-19 status, demographic data, comorbidities, and date of death (if applicable) were collected.

Results

Data were collected for 265 hip fracture patients. Forty-six patients (17.4%) tested positive for COVID-19 infection. There were no significant differences in age or Charlson comorbidity score between those with or without COVID-19. Those with COVID-19 infection were more likely to be male (p = 0.01). Patients with COVID-19 had a 30-day mortality of 35% versus 10% in patients without (p < 0.01). One hundred twenty-day mortality was also greater in those with COVID-19 infection at 63% compared to those without at 17% (p < 0.01). Previous history of myocardial infarction was the only independent factor that showed to increase mortality rate (p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis also revealed significantly increased mortality rates at 120 days in men (27% vs. 67%), women (14% vs. 59%), and those undergoing surgery (56% vs. 30%).

Conclusions

We report a significantly increased mortality rate at 30 and 120 days after injury in an already high-risk cohort of surgical patients. With nearly half of patients being diagnosed with COVID-19 at 14 days or greater following admission, this study highlights the importance of taking appropriate measures to decrease the incidence of nosocomial infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in hip fracture patients.

Four-month outcome after proximal femur fractures and influence of early geriatric rehabilitation: data from the German Centres of Geriatric Trauma DGU

This study analyzed the outcome of orthogeriatric patients with hip fracture 4 months after surgery. The overall mortality rate was 12.2%. Sixty-five percent presented a degradation in walking ability, and 16% had to move to a nursing home. Early geriatric rehabilitation reduces the mortality rate and increases the rate of anti-osteoporotic treatment.

PURPOSE

Hip fractures are increasingly common with severe consequences. Therefore, the German Trauma Society (DGU) implemented an orthogeriatric co-management and developed the concept for certified Centre for Geriatric Trauma DGU. The patients' treatment data and the optional 120 days of follow-up were collected in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma DGU (ATR-DGU). This study analyzed these 4-month treatment results.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the ATR-DGU was conducted. Outcome parameters were the rate of readmission, rate of re-surgery, anti-osteoporotic therapy, housing, mortality, walking ability, and quality of life (QoL) 120 days post-surgery. The influence of the early geriatric rehabilitation (EGR) was evaluated using a regression analysis.

RESULTS

The follow-up data from 9780 patients were included. After 120 days, the mortality rate was 12.2%, the readmission rate 4%, and the re-surgery rate 3%. The anti-osteoporotic treatment increased from 20% at admission to 32%; 65% of the patients had a degradation in walking ability, and 16% of the patients who lived in their domestic environment pre-surgery had to move to a nursing home. QoL was distinctly reduced. The EGR showed a positive influence of anti-osteoporotic treatment (p<0.001) and mortality (p=0.011) but led to a slight reduction in QoL (p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

The 4-month treatment results of the ATR-DGU are comparable to international studies. The EGR led to a significant rise in anti-osteoporotic treatment and a reduction in mortality with a slight reduction in QoL.

[Influence of timing of surgery on complication rates after cemented hemiarthroplasty for treatment of medial femoral neck fractures]

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of the implantation of a cemented hemiarthroplasty in the management of displaced medial femoral neck fractures is still the subject of current research. According to the current recommendations, these cases should be surgically treated within 24 h. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of surgery on operation-specific and nonspecific complications, intensive care treatment as well as mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Overall, 152 cases were retrospectively investigated regarding several parameters (demographic data, comorbidities, surgery time, duration of hospital stay, intensive care treatment, general, bleeding, operation-specific and nonspecific complications). The statistical analysis was performed using the χ²-test and the unpaired Student's t‑test as well as logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included and 71.1% of the operations were performed within 24 h and the remaining 28.9% after 24 h. All groups showed a similar profile of comorbidities. The analysis of the intensive care treatment showed no significant differences between the individual groups. The rate of postoperative pneumonia was moderately higher among the patients with a procedure after 24 h; however, with no severe courses. There were no significant differences regarding all other complications and the mortality rate between the individual time points of surgery.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that patients operated on after 24 h showed no disadvantages regarding other complications, intensive care treatment or mortality, except from an increased postoperative pneumonia rate. These results could be taken into consideration for the next update of the treatment guidelines.

Differences of hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement in orthogeriatric treated elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma DGU®

PURPOSE

Medial femoral neck fractures are typically managed with hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients. There is a debate as to which treatment predominates. The literatures have reported better outcomes for those patients with proximal femur fracture who were treated in an orthogeriatric centres compared to standard orthopaedic hospitals. Therefore, we have analysed the differences of outcome between HA and THA on patients, exclusively treated in orthogeriatric co-management and compared the results with the available literature.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective registry analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma DGU^®. Between 2016 and 2018, data for 16,236 patients from 78 different hospitals were available: they were analysed univariably, and differences between HA and THA were examined using propensity score matching, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Identification-of-Seniors-At-Risk (ISAR) Score, anticoagulation level, sex, age, and walking ability prefracture.

RESULTS

There were 4,662 patients treated with HA and 892 with THA, meeting inclusion criteria. Patients in the HA group were older (84 years (IQR 80-89) vs. 79 years (IQR 75-83); p < 0.001), with more severe preexisting conditions, with an ASA grade ≥ 3 in 79% vs. 57% in the THA group (p < 0.001). After matching, the mortality rate, in-house revision rate, and quality of life (QoL) 7 days postoperatively were not significantly different by group. After 120 days, the HA group presented a lower rate of surgical complications (4% vs. 10%; p = 0.006), while the THA group had a higher rate of independent walking (18% vs. 28%; p = 0.001) and a higher QoL, measured by the EQ-5D-3L (0.81 (IQR 0.7-1.0) vs. 0.9 (IQR 0.72-1.0); p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to better walking ability and QoL, THA might be the better choice in healthier and more mobile patients, while HA would be better for multimorbid patients to avoid additional complication-associated treatments. Not the age of the patient but the preoperative condition might be important for the choice between THA and HA.

Orthogeriatric co-management for proximal femoral fractures. Can two additions make a big difference?

BACKGROUND

Proximal femoral fractures are a major socioeconomic burden and they occur mainly in geriatric patients. High mortality and complication rates are reported. To reduce the mortality and morbidity of these patients, co-management with geriatricians has been recommended. Most previous studies have focused on relatively comprehensive care models. Models with only a few additions to the usual care have not been extensively evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included all patients aged ≥70 years (mean age: 84.5 ± 7.1 years, 70% women) with an isolated proximal femoral fracture treated surgically in our institution from May 2018 to October 2019. In the first 9 months, patients were treated with the usual care (control group, n = 103). In the second 9 months, patients were treated with our multidisciplinary care model (intervention group, n = 104), which included the usual care, plus: (1) one multidisciplinary ward round per week and (2) one "elective" operation slot per day reserved for proximal femoral fractures. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures of the hospital stay were extracted from electronic health records. A 3-month follow-up was conducted by phone.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). The hospital stay was shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (7.8 ± 4.3 vs. 9.1 ± 4.5; p = 0.022). The intervention reduced the waiting time for surgery by more than 10 h (intervention: 25.4 ± 24.5 vs. control: 35.8 ± 34.1 h; p = 0.013). A structured phone interview was not performed in 30.9% of the cases. The model reduced the overall dissatisfaction rate by more than half (12.9% vs. 32.4%; p = 0.008). On the other hand, the groups had similar perioperative complication rates (25% vs. 24.3%; p > 0.9999) and mortality (4.8% vs. 3.9%; p > 0.9999) and they remained similar at the 3-month follow-up (complications: 20.3% vs. 17.6% p = 0.831, mortality: 18.2% vs. 15.0% p = 0.573).

CONCLUSION

We found that two additions to the usual proximal femoral fracture regimen could significantly improve the overall satisfaction rate, reduce the length of hospital stay and shorten the waiting time for surgery. In contrast to previous studies, we observed no significant improvements in complication or mortality rates. Further changes in the standard care might be needed for this purpose.

[Challenges of discharge management in geriatric traumatology : Example of an integrated orthogeriatric service]

BACKGROUND

Geriatric patients are currently responsible for almost one third of all emergency hospital admissions. An increase of 50% is expected in the next decade. This age redistribution poses new challenges for inpatient care and discharge management. The requirements of an orthopedic trauma surgery clinic in the care of this patient group can be clarified with the help of this first collaboratively created geriatric orthopedic trauma surgery complex treatment unit of a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE

What influence do age and delirium have on discharge management, length of inpatient stay and discharge destination in a geriatric cohort?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who received inpatient treatment as part of the orthopedic trauma surgery geriatric complex treatment (GKB) between May 2017 and December 2019 were evaluated. An analysis of the demographics, length of inpatient stay, discharge destinations and evaluation of the Barthel index collected on admission and discharge, the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the geriatric depression scale (GDS) were carried out.

RESULTS

Out of 312 patients, 110 men and 193 women with a median age of 81 years, 77 patients (24.6%) showed delirium when enrolled in the GKB and 39 (12.5%) dementia. Older patients presented more often with delirium than younger people (p = 0.013), especially those aged 70-79 years (p = 0.037). Dementia patients suffered more frequently from postoperative delirium (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was 17.79 days (±4.6 days). The GKB was regularly completed in 60.7% of all cases and 39.3% patients dropped out early. Patients with delirium were discharged significantly less often into their own home but into short-term care or nursing homes (p = 0.038). A general correlation between delirium development and the discharge destination was noticeable (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with dementia are more likely to develop delirium postoperatively, which leads to an increase in the length of inpatient stay, an increase in treatment costs and more work for the discharge management team. In addition, the discharge to the patients' home is impaired by delirium, which means that the growing need for places in short-term care and nursing homes also creates socioeconomic burdens.