[Management of pre-existing anticoagulation for timely treatment of proximal femoral fractures]

[Treatment of proximal femoral fractures : Principles, tips and tricks]

Proximal femoral fractures occur at an annual incidence of approximately 200/100,000 inhabitants and mortality rates range up to 30% especially in geriatric patients where complications are not necessarily associated to surgery. In nearly all cases surgical treatment is required. Procedures to preserve the femoral head have to be performed as early as possible (as specified by the Federal Joint Committee, GBA, within 24 h). For joint-preserving approaches in medial femoral neck fractures a time to surgery within 6 h is considered to be advantageous. Perioperative patient care is of high importance regarding the prevention of pneumonia, renal failure, delirium and further complications. Postoperatively full weight bearing enables for early mobilization and prevention of surgery-related complications. Nonunions, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, cut-out and prosthetic dislocation must be avoided by the selection of the appropriate procedure. Minimally displaced femoral neck fractures are primarily treated by osteosynthesis and conservative management is only considered in isolated cases. For displaced femoral neck fractures, factors such as a young biological age with high activity levels, the absence of arthritis and good bone quality with a successful reduction favor for a femoral head-preserving osteosynthesis. Otherwise, (hybrid) total hip replacement (THR) is the preferred method for unstable and displaced fractures, whereby hemiarthroplasty should only be considered for very old and patients with pre-existing diseases. Fractures in the trochanteric region are treated with a proximal femoral nail and subtrochanteric fractures are managed using a long proximal femoral nail. To avoid secondary complications, the choice of optimal treatment should be based on a good understanding of the injury pattern, biomechanical and technical aspects of each procedure.

[Long-term anticoagulation treatment in proximal femoral fractures as obstacle to surgery in the 24h time window? : Results of an analysis of Quality Assurance data on 32,252 treatment courses with osteosynthesis]

BACKGROUND

Both in Germany and internationally there is a vehement controversy about the appropriate time for care of proximal femoral fractures in older patients. The effort to achieve high quality and uniform standards of care culminated in the German healthcare system in the strict requirement of delay-free surgery within 24 h. Until now, in view of their high vulnerability patients who were severely injured were too often operated on late with the reference to a general medical condition that could be improved preoperatively. In particular, the fear of complications due to a pre-existing long-term anticoagulation treatment was repeatedly emphasized.

OBJECTIVE

The present study is dedicated to the question of whether a delay in surgery of anticoagulated patients with proximal femoral fractures already during the inpatient course has a detrimental effect on the complication statistics and the mortality of the patients. The extent to which external quality assurance data are suitable for rebutting any objections to an operation as soon as possible are examined.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study is based on treatment data from the external inpatient quality assurance procedure of the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia from the years 2018-2020. Patients with a proximal femoral fracture were considered. This includes femoral neck fractures and fractures in the area of the pertrochanteric to subtrochanteric region. Only cases with joint-preserving fracture care were selected. The data sets were analyzed using suitable statistical software.

RESULTS

More general complications and deaths have been observed in anticoagulated patients. The trend of delayed fracture treatment under anticoagulant medication continues to be clearly visible. A positive association between longer preoperative waiting time and undesirable courses can be confirmed.

CONCLUSION

With respect to fracture care when taking anticoagulants, it must be critically examined to what extent a rapid normalization of the coagulation situation is necessary and this actually improves the chances of low complication courses. Should the elimination of the anticoagulant effect by substitution or antidote appear necessary, this should not prevent early care.

Anticoagulation management in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures - overview of current concepts

Objectives

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are common injuries in elderly patients and can have considerable effects on their quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Due to pre-existing comorbidities, the prevalence of anticoagulated patients is increasing. The right timing for surgery and perioperative anticoagulation treatment remains controversial.

Content

This overview aims to summarize current practices in the pre- and postoperative anticoagulation management and the recommended time to surgery in elderly patients with PFF.

Summary and Outlook

Time to surgery for anticoagulated patients is often prolonged due to worries about serious perioperative bleeding and higher transfusion demands. But the delay of surgical PFF treatment increases the risk for perioperative complications like pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and urinary tract infections. Early surgery can be achieved with a consistent and interdisciplinary perioperative anticoagulation management. Antiplatelets do not have to be discontinued and surgery should be performed early without delay. For patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) an INR less than 1.5 is recommended prior to surgery, which can be achieved by pausing VKA intake or by administering vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). For the treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) a plasma drug level of under 50 pg/mL is considered safe for surgery. If the plasma level can not be determined, a gap of 24 h between the last DOAC dose and surgery is recommended. The systemic administration of tranexamic acid can reduce overall blood loss and transfusion rates in anticoagulated patients with PFF. Surgical treatment of PFF should be performed within 24 h, as delayed surgery increases the risk for perioperative complications. This also applies to anticoagulated patients, when clinically appropriate. International and interdisciplinary guidelines are necessary to ensure early and appropriate treatment of anticoagulated elderly patients with PFF.

Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget

Hip fractures are a leading cause of hospitalisation in elderly patients, representing an increasing socioeconomic problem arising from demographic changes, considering the increased number of elderly people in our countries. Adequate peri-operative treatment is essential to decrease mortality rates and avoid complications. Modern management should involve a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, early surgery, pain treatment, balanced fluid therapy, and prevention of delirium, to improve patients' functional and clinical outcomes. The operative treatment for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures is intramedullary nail or sliding/dynamic hip screw (DHS) on the basis of the morphology of the fracture. In the case of neck fractures, total hip replacement (THR) or hemiarthroplasty are recommended. However, several topics remain debated, such as the optimum thromboprophylaxis to reduce venous thromboembolism or the use of bone cement. Postoperatively, patients can benefit from early mobilisation and geriatric multidisciplinary care. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a prolonged time to operation with a subsequent increased complication rate have burdened frail and elderly patients with hip fractures. Future studies are needed with the aim to investigate better strategies to improve nutrition, postoperative mobility, to clarify the role of home-based rehabilitation, and to identify the ideal analgesic treatment and adequate tools in case of patients with cognitive impairment.

Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options

As one of the leading causes of elderly patients’ hospitalisation, proximal femur fractures (PFFs) will present an increasing socioeconomic problem in the near future. This is a result of the demographic change that is expressed by the increasing proportion of elderly people in society. Peri-operative management must be handled attentively to avoid complications and decrease mortality rates. To deal with the exceptional needs of the elderly, the development of orthogeriatric centres to support orthogeriatric co-management is mandatory. Adequate pain medication, balanced fluid management, delirium prevention and the operative treatment choice based on comorbidities, individual demands and biological rather than chronological age, all deserve particular attention to improve patients’ outcomes. The operative management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures favours intramedullary nailing. For femoral neck fractures, the Garden classification is used to differentiate between non-displaced and displaced fractures. Osteosynthesis is suitable for biologically young patients with non-dislocated fractures, whereas total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are the main options for biologically old patients and displaced fractures. In bedridden patients, osteosynthesis might be an option to establish transferability from bed to chair and the restroom. Postoperatively, the patients benefit from early mobilisation and early geriatric care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged time until surgery and thus an increased rate of complications took a toll on frail patients with PFFs. This review aims to offer surgical guidelines for the treatment of PFFs in the elderly with a focus on pitfalls and challenges particularly relevant to frail patients.

[Injury of the profunda femoris artery with bleeding requiring transfusion due to secondary dislocation of the lesser trochanter after osteosynthesis of an intertrochanteric femoral fracture]

Ein 95-jähriger Patient erlitt eine transfusionspflichtige Blutung nach Osteosynthese einer pertrochantären Femurfraktur mittels proximalem Femurnagel. Das bei der Erstmobilisation sekundär dislozierte Fragment des Trochanter minor perforierte einen Seitenast der A. profunda femoris. Die Blutung konnte mittels Embolisation gestillt werden, und der Patient wurde wenige Tage später mit stabilem Hämoglobinwert entlassen. Wiederholt sinkende Hämoglobinwerte trotz mehrmaliger Bluttransfusion weisen auf eine aktive Blutung hin. Die genaue Identifikation der Blutungsquelle nach Osteosynthese proximaler Femurfrakturen ist entscheidend für die korrekte Therapie.

[Osteosynthetic treatment of proximal femoral fractures: the timing of treatment is delayed in cases of pre-existing anticoagulation : Results of the data of external inpatient quality assurance from North Rhine-Westphalia with 24,786 cases within the framework of using secondary data]

Hintergrund und Fragestellung

Proximale Femurfrakturen stellen mit ca. 100.000 Betroffenen/Jahr in Deutschland ein häufiges Krankheitsbild dar. Durch eine zeitnahe Versorgung (<24 h) konnte die Mortalität erheblich gesenkt werden. Ziele der Arbeit waren, die Prävalenz der Antikoagulation und hiermit assoziierte Komplikationen bei osteosynthetisch versorgter, proximaler Femurfraktur und deren Impact auf die präoperative Verweildauer zu analysieren und Potenziale zum optimalen perioperativen Gerinnungsmanagements aufzuzeigen.

Material und Methoden

Die Daten der externen vergleichenden Qualitätssicherung Nordrhein-Westfalen für die Jahre 2015 und 2016 wurden ausgewertet. Dabei wurden ausschließlich Fälle analysiert, bei denen eine hüftgelenknahe Femurfraktur osteosynthetisch versorgt wurde. Insgesamt wurden 24.786 Fälle hüftgelenknaher Femurfrakturen in die Studie eingeschlossen.

Ergebnisse

Von den Patienten mit einer antithrombotischen Dauertherapie (ATDT) wurden in der größten Subgruppe mit ASS-Medikation (n = 4005) 17 %, in der zweitgrößten Gruppe mit Vitamin-K-Antagonisten-Einnahme (n = 2157) 44,6 % und in der drittgrößten Gruppe mit Einnahme von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien (DOAKs, n = 994) 18,2 % verzögert operiert.

Schlussfolgerungen

Das größte Potenzial zur Verkürzung der präoperativen Verweildauer ergibt sich in der Gruppe der Patienten, die ASS (17 % auffällig) oder einen Vitamin-K-Antagonisten (VKA, 44,6 % auffällig) einnehmen. Eine Antagonisierung der Wirkung von VKA lässt sich innerhalb kurzer Zeit durch die Gabe von Prothrombinkomplex (PPSB) erreichen. Auch unter der Einnahme von DOAKs muss das noch gängige Prozedere einer verzögerten operativen Versorgung kritisch hinterfragt werden. Die Etablierung eines Gerinnungsmanagements ist zu fordern. Neben der medizinischen Intervention (Gabe von Antidota) müssen Strukturen geschaffen werden, die eine zeitnahe Versorgung ermöglichen.