U-Frakturen des Os sacrum – Wie therapiert man richtig?

[Closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation of a sacral avulsion fracture : Minimal invasiveness with maximum stability]

Surgical stabilization of high-energy sacral avulsion fractures with spinopelvic dissociation places high demands on the surgeon. The goal is to achieve maximum stability while minimizing invasiveness. The present case of a dislocated U‑type fracture in a 25-year-old motocross rider exemplifies how a reduction with the targeted application of closed reduction techniques through hyperextension of the hip joints and lordosis in the lumbosacral hinge and through a standardized procedure in intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, a minimally invasive stabilization by means of transsacral screw fixation and spinopelvic fixation of lumbar vertebra 5 to the ilium in the sense of a bilateral triangular stabilization is possible without compromising the achieved stability of the osteosynthesis. The limitations of the described approach are also pointed out.

[Clinical outcome and revenue situation after conservative, interventional and surgical/osteosynthetic treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures]

BACKGROUND

Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum are being detected increasingly more frequently, whereby their incidence will no doubt increase further as a result of the rise in life expectancy.

OBJECTIVE

The clinical appearance of sacral insufficiency fractures, the treatment approach taking into account the clinical outcomes and the DRG proceeds are discussed on the basis of clinical examples.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three female patients (average age 78.3 years) with sacral insufficiency fractures were admitted for inpatient treatment due to increasing disabling pain. Taking into account the clinical symptoms and the recommendation of an interdisciplinary case conference, one patient was treated conservatively with short-term bed rest, accompanying analgesic medication and pain-adapted exercise measures. The second patient underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided balloon sacroplasty. Transsacroiliac screw fixation was performed on the third patient. Pain was documented over the course on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the degree of independence on the Barthel scale. The fractures were classified according to Denis et al. and the classification of the FFP according to Rommens and Hofmann. The DRG revenue for the 2020 accounting period was then presented for each case.

RESULTS

Patient No. 1: conservative therapy, unilateral Denis 1 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 7 score points, at discharge 4 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 55 to 75 points. After 6 days hospitalization, transferred to rehab. The DRG proceeds were € 3817.95. Patient No. 2: balloon sacroplasty, bilateral Denis 1-2 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 9 score points, at discharge 2 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 35 to 95 points. After 4 days hospitalization, discharged to outpatient follow-up treatment. The DRG proceeds were € 7409.44. Patient No. 3: osteosynthesis, bilateral Denis 1 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 7 score points, at discharge 2 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 40 to 90 points. After 5 days hospitalization, transferred to rehab. The DRG proceeds were € 6714.30.

CONCLUSION

The sacral insufficiency fracture is a strong indicator for the presence of manifest osteoporosis. Fracture risk factors are the female sex, advanced age, the presence of osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency. Conservative therapy is the first step of the treatment cascade; however, in patients with persistent, disabling pain and no potential for mobilization, sacroplasty or osteosynthesis should be performed at an early stage. In patients treated with coordinated therapy processes and without clinical complications, all three treatment options are economically sufficient.