[Development of the inpatient quality of care of surgically treated patients with a proximal femoral fracture in North Rhine-Westphalia : Analysis of 61,249 treatment courses based on data from external inpatient quality assurance]

[How does the preoperative waiting time affect hospital mortality and complication rates in geriatric patients with medial femoral neck fractures?]

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines of the German Federal Joint Committee on the treatment of proximal femoral fractures require that patients with a proximal femoral fracture receive surgical treatment as soon as possible and within 24 h of admission. This is intended to reduce perioperative complication rate and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the hospital mortality as well as complication rates and types in relation to the preoperative waiting time.

METHODOLOGY

From 2010 to 2020, a total of 575 patients with femoral neck fractures treated with a bipolar prosthesis were retrospectively analyzed with respect to hospital mortality and the occurrence of complications. Patients with pathological fractures, femoral neck fractures more than 4 weeks old and those treated with osteosynthesis were excluded. Patient-specific data, hospital mortality and complication rates and types were recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, the implementation of the given guidelines resulted in a reduction in the preoperative waiting time from a median of 38 h in 2010 to 19 h in 2020. Surgical treatment was performed on average after 14.2 h in patients who had surgery within 24 h after admission and on average after 40.2 h for those who had surgery after 24 h. The average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score for all 575 patients was 2.76. The group of patients who had surgery after more than 24 h had a significantly higher ASA classification (p = 0.024). A total of 12 (4.2%) patients in the group surgically treated within 24 h died, compared to 24 (8.5%) deaths in the group surgically treated after 24 h (p = 0.035). The complication rate for the entire cohort was 15% (88 patients). There was no difference in the occurrence of complications and the overall complication rate with respect to the timing of surgery.

CONCLUSION

During the study period the preoperative waiting time was halved from 39h to 19 h. Patients who were surgically treated within 24 h had a significantly lower hospital mortality than those surgically treated after 24 h; however, the group surgically treated after 24 h simultaneously showed higher baseline comorbidities and in the adjusted analysis for age and ASA score, the 24‑h threshold no longer emerged as an independent risk factor for hospital mortality. Regarding complication rates, no significant differences were found between the groups based on the timing of surgery.

Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review

Aims

Performance indicators are increasingly used to evaluate the quality of healthcare provided to patients with a hip fracture. The aim of this review was to map the variety of performance indicators used around the world and how they are defined.

Methods

We present a mixed methods systematic review of literature on the use of performance indicators in hip fracture care. Evidence was searched through 12 electronic databases and other sources. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A protocol for a suite of related systematic reviews was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023417515).

Results

A total 24,634 articles were reviewed, of which 171 met the criteria of the review. Included studies were heterogenous in design and came from varied healthcare systems in 34 different countries. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries in Europe (n = 118), followed by North America (n = 33), Asia (n = 21), Australia (n = 10), and South America (n = 2). The highest number of studies in one country came from the UK (n = 45). Only seven of the 171 studies (< 2,000 participants) were conducted across ten low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There was variation in the performance indicators reported from different healthcare systems, and indicators were often undefined or ambiguously defined. For example, there were multiple definitions of 'early' in terms of surgery, different or missing definitions of 'mobilization', and variety in what was included in an 'orthogeriatric assessment' in hip fracture care. However, several performance indicators appeared commonly, including time to surgery (n = 142/171; 83%), orthogeriatric review (n = 30; 17%), early mobilization after surgery (n = 58; 34%), and bone health assessment (n = 41; 24%). Qualitative studies (n = 18), mainly from high-income countries and India, provided evidence on the experiences of 192 patients and 138 healthcare professionals with regard to the use of performance indicators in clinical care and rehabilitation pathways. Themes included the importance of education and training in parallel with the introduction of performance indicators, clarity of roles with the clinical team, and the need for restructuring or integration of care pathways.

Conclusion

This review identified a large number of performance indicators related to the delivery of healthcare for patients with a hip fracture. However, their definitions and thresholds varied across studies and countries. Evidence from LMICs is sparse. Both qualitative and quantitative evidence indicates that there remains a pressing need for further research into the use and standardization of performance indicators in hip fracture care and their influence on patient outcomes and economic costs.

Anticoagulant Medication in Endoprosthetically Treated Proximal Femur Fracture - Complications and Mortality Considering the Time of Treatment as a Quality Criterion

There is an international debate on the optimal time to surgery following hip fracture in older patients. Pre-existing anticoagulation seems to be a major concern when it comes to a delay in operative fracture treatment. The aim of this study was to examine complication and mortality rates for elderly anticoagulated hip fracture patients considering early (< 24 h) vs. delayed (> 24 h) surgery.Our Analysis is based on data of the external inpatient quality assurance of North Rhine Westphalia as the most populous German federal state. We identified 13,201 hip fracture patients with antithrombotic medication and a minimum age of 65 years treated from January 2015 to December 2017.Delayed surgery was associated with significantly higher rates of general and surgical complications as well as mortality. Except for pre-existing heart failure, we were not able to identify certain comorbidities that could clearly indicate, why there might have been a delay.In most cases, patients with antithrombotic medication have a poor outcome to be expected due to serious comorbidity. If there was a delay in surgery for those patients, treatment results were even worse. Thus, surgery with a delay of > 24 h must be avoided to reduce the risk of complications.

Are Process Changes Measurable? An Analysis of 4136 Proximal Femur Fractures over 16 Year

Prozessänderungen im perioperativen Setting werden selten analysiert, weil ihre Ergebnisse nicht unmittelbar fassbar sind und es einer hohen Fallzahl bedarf. Primäres Ziel war es, Prozessänderungen retrospektiv anhand proximaler Femurfrakturen (PF) zu evaluieren und deren Effekt mit verschiedenen Zielkriterien zu überprüfen. Sekundäres Ziel war die Definition möglicher Qualitätskriterien für die Versorgung von PF.Retrospektive Analyse der Datenbank eines Level-1-Traumazentrums zu PF. Eingeschlossen wurden alle osteosynthetisch und endoprothetisch versorgten PF im Behandlungszeitraum vom 01.01.2006 bis 31.12.2021. Der Zeitraum von 16 Jahren wurde für die Statistik trichotom aufgeteilt und die ersten 6 Jahre als Ausgangsbasis verwendet. Insgesamt 10 Prozessänderungen wurden in den folgenden 10 Jahren vorgenommen. Die Auswirkungen dieser Änderungen wurden anhand 1. der operativen Revisionsrate, 2. der Infektionsrate, 3. der perioperativen Transfusionsrate sowie 4. der 1-Jahres-Letalität überprüft.Insgesamt 4163 PF wurden analysiert. Hinsichtlich der Zielkriterien zeigten die Änderungen der ersten 5 Jahre (2012-2016; intramedulläres Verfahren für Osteosynthesen sowie Einwegabdeckung und Einwegkittel) den stärksten Effekt mit einer erstmaligen Senkung der operativen Revisionsrate unter 10% auf Dauer. Weitere Prozessoptimierungen der letzten 5 Jahre (2017-2021) erbrachten ebenfalls messbare Verbesserungen (Senkung der Infektions- und Transfusionsrate). Die 1-Jahres-Letalität blieb unverändert, auch während der COVID-19-Pandemie.Prozessänderungen bei PF führen nicht unmittelbar zu objektiv messbaren Verbesserungen. Rückblickend erscheint der Paradigmenwechsel von extra- auf intramedulläre Osteosynthese den höchsten Effekt erzielt zu haben, wenngleich über die letzten 10 Jahre eine schrittweise Besserung aller Zielkriterien eintrat - mit Ausnahme der Letalität. Als objektive Qualitätskontrolle sollte eine 1-Jahres-Revisionsrate unter 10% angestrebt sein.

Coiling of a Postinterventional Pseudoaneurysm After Distal Locking of a Proximal Femoral Nail

Pertrochanteric femoral fractures are among the most common injuries in geriatric patients. Intramedullary implants are used to restore patient mobility. We report coil embolisation of an aneurysma spurium of the profunda femoral artery as a complication after distal nail locking of a proximal femoral nail.

[Long-term anticoagulation treatment in proximal femoral fractures as obstacle to surgery in the 24h time window? : Results of an analysis of Quality Assurance data on 32,252 treatment courses with osteosynthesis]

BACKGROUND

Both in Germany and internationally there is a vehement controversy about the appropriate time for care of proximal femoral fractures in older patients. The effort to achieve high quality and uniform standards of care culminated in the German healthcare system in the strict requirement of delay-free surgery within 24 h. Until now, in view of their high vulnerability patients who were severely injured were too often operated on late with the reference to a general medical condition that could be improved preoperatively. In particular, the fear of complications due to a pre-existing long-term anticoagulation treatment was repeatedly emphasized.

OBJECTIVE

The present study is dedicated to the question of whether a delay in surgery of anticoagulated patients with proximal femoral fractures already during the inpatient course has a detrimental effect on the complication statistics and the mortality of the patients. The extent to which external quality assurance data are suitable for rebutting any objections to an operation as soon as possible are examined.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study is based on treatment data from the external inpatient quality assurance procedure of the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia from the years 2018-2020. Patients with a proximal femoral fracture were considered. This includes femoral neck fractures and fractures in the area of the pertrochanteric to subtrochanteric region. Only cases with joint-preserving fracture care were selected. The data sets were analyzed using suitable statistical software.

RESULTS

More general complications and deaths have been observed in anticoagulated patients. The trend of delayed fracture treatment under anticoagulant medication continues to be clearly visible. A positive association between longer preoperative waiting time and undesirable courses can be confirmed.

CONCLUSION

With respect to fracture care when taking anticoagulants, it must be critically examined to what extent a rapid normalization of the coagulation situation is necessary and this actually improves the chances of low complication courses. Should the elimination of the anticoagulant effect by substitution or antidote appear necessary, this should not prevent early care.

Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery in Germany in 2023 - Will We Have Sufficient Doctors in the Future?

There has been a growing shortage of physicians in Germany in recent years. In this study, we analyse the situation facing orthopaedic hospitals and trauma centres.Between 22 November and 5 December 2022, a web-based questionnaire was sent out by the Academy of the German Trauma Society (AUC) and by the Society of Leading Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons (VLOU).The questionnaire was answered by 185 heads of department. Of the responses, 20% came from university hospitals or major trauma centres, and a third from regional or local clinics. More than half of the hospital departments (55%) had a median of 2.7 vacant doctor positions. Among those hospitals, 47% had a vacant position for a consultant, 33% for a board-certified specialist, and 89% for a junior doctor. Within the university hospitals, only one third had vacant doctor positions. The responding heads of department gave negative feedback regarding the number of applications, the qualifications of young doctors, and their motivation for scientific work (in university hospitals).More than half of the responding hospitals had vacant doctor positions. If we are to counteract the growing shortage of doctors in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, the number of clinical doctors in general and the working conditions in hospitals have to be improved. Teaching hospitals should try to improve the training of medical students with a view to inspiring greater motivation to work in orthopaedics and trauma surgery.

Rate of Complications after Hip Fractures Caused by Prolonged Time-to-Surgery Depends on the Patient's Individual Type of Fracture and Its Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly and are usually treated with timely surgery. While severe postoperative complications are reported for up to 10% of patients, many studies identified predictive factors for the occurrence of complications postoperatively. A controversially discussed factor is "time-to-surgery". The aim of the study was to examine if time-to-surgery was associated with the occurrence of complications and if the complication rate differed between the patient individual fracture types of intracapsular on the one hand and extracapsular hip fractures on the other hand. We hypothesized that time-to-surgery had less impact on complications in intracapsular hip fractures compared to extracapsular ones, and therefore, guidelines should pay attention to the patient individual case scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who were admitted to the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery of an academic teaching hospital for hip fracture surgery (n = 650) over a five-year period were included in the study. After the application of the exclusion criteria, such as periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, cases needed immediate surgical treatment, and after outlier adjustment, 629 cases remained in the study. Hip fractures were classified into intracapsular fractures (treated by hip arthroplasty) and extracapsular fractures (treated by intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis). The occurrence of severe complications in patients treated within 24 h was compared with patients treated later than 24 h after injury. For statistical evaluation, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of time-to-surgery interval on the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Patients with an extracapsular fracture, which was treated with intramedullary nailing (44.5%), rarely suffered a serious complication when surgery was performed within 24 h after injury. However, when the interval of the time-to-surgery was longer than 24 h, the complication rate increased significantly (8.63% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.002). In contrast to this finding in patients with intracapsular fractures (55.5%), which were treated with cemented arthroplasty, complication rates did not depend on the 24 h interval (26.17% vs. 20.83%, p = 0.567).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of complications after surgical treatment of hip fractures is associated with the time interval between injury and surgery. A 24 h time interval between injury and surgical procedure seems to play a major role only in extracapsular fractures treated with osteosynthesis but not in intracapsular fractures treated with arthroplasty. Therefore, guidelines should take notice of the patient individual case scenario and, in particular, the individual hip fracture type.