[Is surgery likely to be successful as a treatment for traumatic lesions of the superficial radial nerve?]

Surgical interventions for the treatment of painful neuroma: a comparative meta-analysis

A consensus on the optimal treatment of painful neuromas does not exist. Our objective was to identify available data and to examine the role of surgical technique on outcomes following surgical management of painful neuromas. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a comprehensive literature search to identify studies measuring the efficacy of the surgical treatment of painful neuromas in the extremities (excluding Morton's neuroma and compression neuropathies). Surgical treatments were categorized as excision-only, excision and transposition, excision and cap, excision and repair, or neurolysis and coverage. Data on the proportion of patients with a meaningful reduction in pain were pooled and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The effects of confounding, study quality, and publication bias were examined with stratified, meta-regression, and bias analysis. Fifty-four articles met the inclusion criteria, many with multiple treatment groups. Outcomes reporting varied significantly and few studies controlled for confounding. Overall, surgical treatment of neuroma pain was effective in 77% of patients [95% confidence interval: 73-81]. No significant differences were seen between surgical techniques. Among studies with a mean pain duration greater than 24 months, or median number of operations greater than 2 prior to definitive neuroma pain surgery, excision and transposition or neurolysis and coverage were significantly more likely than other operative techniques to result in a meaningful reduction in pain (P < 0.05). Standardization in the reporting of surgical techniques, outcomes, and confounding factors is needed in future studies to enable providers to make comparisons across disparate techniques in the surgical treatment of neuroma pain.

Predictive value of a diagnostic block in focal nerve injury with neuropathic pain when surgery is considered

OBJECT

In patients with focal nerve injury and neuropathic pain cutting the nerve to obtain permanent pain reduction can be considered. Surgery is indicated only if a diagnostic nerve block provides temporary pain relief. We evaluated the predictive value of a block on the outcome of surgery.

METHODS

In total, three blocks were performed at two week intervals. Patients were blinded to injections containing lidocaine 1% and a placebo was included. Surgery was offered regardless of the effect of the blocks. Twenty-four patients received 72 blocks. Sixteen patients opted for surgery, 5 patients refrained from surgery, and in 3 the blocks provided permanent pain relief. The predictive ability of the block on the outcome of surgery was assessed by calculating the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The AUC of the first lidocaine block was 0.35 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.077 to 0.62. At 95% confidence (two-sided), the AUC is less than 0.62, and hence the predictive ability of the block was poor. The outcome of the second lidocaine block and saline block did not change the conclusion of the first block.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the use of blocks to select patients for surgery should be critically appraised.

PERSPECTIVE

A pain relieving response to one open block is currently considered mandatory before patients with focal nerve injury and neuropathic pain are offered surgery. Blinded blocks including a placebo show that responses for selection should be carefully interpreted because they may not be as predictive as generally presumed.

Distal sensory nerve transfers in lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus

PURPOSE

To report the results of sensory nerve transfers to reconstruct sensation on the ulnar side of the hand in lower-type palsies of the brachial plexus.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2009, we operated on 6 men and 2 women with a lower-type injury of the brachial plexus and observed them for a minimum of 24 months. The mean interval between the injury and surgery was 8 months (SD ± 8.6 mo). Before surgery, we documented anesthesia on the ulnar side of the hand in all patients. Donor nerves included cutaneous branches of the median nerve to the palm (n = 5) or the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (n = 3). The ulnar proper digital nerve of the little finger was the recipient nerve. We evaluated sensory recovery by assessing static 2-point discrimination and sensation to Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.

RESULTS

According to the British Medical Council system of evaluation, 5 patients scored S3 and 3 scored S3+.

CONCLUSIONS

In lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus, transfer of median nerve branches that innervate the palm of the hand to the ulnar proper digital nerve of the little finger predictably restored protective sensation on the ulnar side of the hand.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Relocation of painful neuromas in Zone III of the hand and forearm

Painful nerves are a difficult and complex clinical problem. We describe the result of treatment by proximal relocation of 51 painful end neuromas and scarred nerves of the forearm in 33 patients. The relocated nerves included 29 superficial radial nerves, 16 lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves, two medial cutaneous nerves and four posterior cutaneous nerves. These relocations achieved no, or only mild, pain in 100% of nerves at the original site and 94% of nerves at the relocation site. It also achieved no, or only mild, hypersensitivity in 96% of nerves at the original site and 98% of nerves at the relocation site. The technical difficulties encountered in this region, in particular on the radial aspect of the wrist, are discussed.