[Clinical treatment and therapy for dissected cervicocerebral artery]

Maxillofacial trauma - Underestimation of cervical spine injury

Undiagnosed cervical spine injury can have devastating results. The aim of this study was to analyse patients with primary maxillofacial trauma and a concomitant cervical spine injury. It is hypothetised that cervical spine injury is predictable in maxillofacial surgery. A monocentric clinical study was conducted over a 10-year period to analyse patients with primary maxillofacial and associated cervical spine injuries. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, specific trauma and treatments provided were reviewed. Additionally a search of relevant international literature was conducted in PubMed by terms "maxillofacial" AND "cervical spine" AND "injury". Of 3956 patients, n = 3732 (94.3%) suffered from craniomaxillofacial injuries only, n = 174 (4.4%) from cervical spine injuries only, and n = 50 (1.3%) from both craniomaxillofacial and cervical spine injuries. In this study cohort the most prevalent craniofacial injuries were: n = 41 (44%) midfacial and n = 21 (22.6%) skull base fractures. Cervical spine injuries primarily affected the upper cervical spine column: n = 39 (58.2%) vs. n = 28 (41.8%). Only in 3 of 50 cases (6%), the cervical spine injury was diagnosed coincidentally, and the cervical spine column was under immobilised. The operative treatment rate for maxillofacial injuries was 36% (n = 18), and for cervical spine injuries 20% (n = 10). The overall mortality rate was 8% (n = 4). The literature search yielded only 12 papers (11 retrospective and monocentric cohort studies) and is discussed before our own results. In cases of apparently isolated maxillofacial trauma, maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of a low but serious risk of underestimating an unstable cervical spine injury.

[The importance of CT angiography for screening supra-aortic vascular damage in severely injured patients]

PURPOSE

Traumatic injury of supra-aortic vessels remains a challenge in the initial diagnostics of severely injured patients. The presented prospective study analyzed the impact of multislice computed tomography angiography (CTA) as the primary diagnostic method.

METHODS

Patients with the following criteria were included and screened for a dissection of the supra-aortic vessels: a) admission directly from the scene, b) resuscitation room treatment indicated by the official criteria of the DGU (German Society for the Surgery of Trauma), c) suspected blunt trauma to head or trunk as well as d) age over 16 years.

RESULTS

During a period of 18 months 374 patients were treated for blunt trauma in the resuscitation room. In 176 cases CTA of the supra-aortic vessels was performed and pathological findings were observed in 16 patients. In 4 cases (2%) a traumatic dissection of supra-aortal vessels was diagnosed and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients received heparin in a PTT effective dosage for 2 weeks and after rehabilitation there were no neurologic deficits.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic supra-aortic dissection was found in 2% of cases in the presented study group. The mechanisms of injury were not distinct in this group. Essentially MSCT angiography screening was demonstrated to be a safe diagnostic tool.

[Bilateral spontaneous carotid artery dissection in osteogenesis imperfecta (type I)]

We report on a 36-year-old patient with an acute cerebral infarction due to a spontaneous dissection of both internal carotid arteries in conjunction with type I osteogenesis imperfecta. Spontaneous dissections of cerebral arteries (DCA) represent a common cause of cerebral infarctions in younger patients. Our case shows that a hereditary connective tissue disorder should be considered in all patients with "spontaneous" DCA. The identification of an - initially unknown - hereditary connective tissue disorder may con-tribute to primary and secondary prophylaxis of cerebral ischemia.