Reangiographie nach perimesenzephaler Subarachnoidalblutung

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Negative Initial Digital Subtraction Angiography: Subsequent Detection of Aneurysms and Complication Rates of Repeated Angiography

BACKGROUND

 The data on handling of spontaneous, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with negative initial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are still inconclusive. The intention of this study was to evaluate the requirement of repeat DSA in patients with negative initial DSA and to compare the clinical outcomes of these cases.

METHODS

 In a retrospective study, we reviewed patients with SAH and negative initial DSA treated in our department from January 2006 until December 2017. The patients were divided according to an established radiographic classification into perimesencephalic (pm) and nonperimesencephalic (npm) SAH. An interventional neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon reviewed all DSA scans.

RESULTS

 In all, 52 patients with negative initial DSA, comprising 36 (69.2%) patients with pm and 16 (30.8%) patients with npm bleeding pattern, were included. All patients underwent a second and 23 of these patients underwent a third DSA. In these 23 patients, subarachnoid blood distribution in the initial computed tomography (CT) scan was suspicious for the presence of aneurysm. In total, two aneurysms were detected during the second DSA (diagnostic yield: 3.85%). Both were in the pm group (diagnostic yield: 5.6%). The second repeat DSA did not show any causative vascular lesion. Complications after the DSA occurred in only 2 of 127 patients (1.6%). The rate of complications concerning vasospasm (pm 52.8%, npm 56.3%), hydrocephalus (pm 47.2%, npm 50%), and the need for temporary or permanent shunt (pm 44.4%, npm 50%) was similar in both groups and there was no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

 Repeat DSA after negative initial DSA in pm SAH had a diagnostic yield of 5.6%. However, a second repeat DSA cannot be recommended in case of SAH with initial negative DSA. The pm SAH should not be underrated concerning the occurrence of complications and cared with a high level of surveillance.

A quantitative model to differentiate nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage from aneurysmal etiology

OBJECTIVE

Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (pmSAH) is considered to have a lower-risk pattern than other types of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, a minority of patients with pmSAH may harbor a causative posterior circulation aneurysm. To exclude this possibility, many institutions pursue exhaustive imaging. In this study the authors aimed to develop a novel predictive model based on initial noncontrast head CT (NCHCT) features to differentiate pmSAH from aneurysmal causes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed patients admitted to an academic center for treatment of a suspected aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) during the period from 2016 to 2021. Patients with a final diagnosis of pmSAH or posterior circulation aSAH were included. Using NCHCT, the thickness (continuous variable) and location of blood in basal cisterns and sylvian fissures (categorical variables) were compared between groups. A scoring system was created using features that were significantly different between groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to measure the accuracy of this model in predicting aneurysmal etiology. A separate patient cohort was used for external validation of this model.

RESULTS

Of 420 SAH cases, 48 patients with pmSAH and 37 with posterior circulation aSAH were identified. Blood thickness measurements in the crural and ambient cisterns and interhemispheric and sylvian fissures and degree of extension into the sylvian fissure were all significantly different between groups (all p < 0.001). The authors developed a 10-point scoring model to predict aneurysmal causes with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00; OR per point increase 10; 95% CI 2.18-46.4). External validation resulted in persistently high accuracy (AUC 0.97; 95% CI 0.92-1.00) of this model.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk stratification score using initial blood clot burden may accurately differentiate between aneurysmal and nonaneurysmal pmSAH. Larger prospective studies are encouraged to further validate this quantitative tool.

Meta-analysis of recent literature on utility of follow-up imaging in isolated perimesencephalic hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage is an uncommon, distinct subtype of subarachnoid hemorrhage with a more benign prognosis. A negative computed tomographic angiogram has been shown to be reliable in excluding aneurysmal rupture as the underlying etiology. However, some studies continue advocating for more imaging to determine a vascular cause in perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The objective of this study is to evaluate the evidence for use and utility of repeat angiographic imaging after a negative computed tomographic angiogram in patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective institutional analysis of patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage was performed from 2014 to 2017 for number and types of follow-up angiographic imaging studies performed. Updated meta-analysis of literature was performed from 2014 onwards to assess the utility of follow-up imaging after a negative initial angiographic study.

RESULTS

The institutional review revealed no utility of additional imaging after a negative computed tomographic angiogram in 6 patients with isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Literature review and metaanalysis of 13 studies with 588 patients revealed a vascular etiology in 3 patients with isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage from a single study- 2 aneurysms and 1 patient with vasculitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of repeat angiographic imaging after a negative computed tomographic angiogram for perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage patients remains not uncommon, despite previous meta-analysis. Review of the more recent literature is consistent with previously published meta-analysis and shows limited benefits despite frequent use. In patients with a strictly defined perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage pattern and clinical picture consistent with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage, an initial negative computed tomographic angiogram should be adequate and repeated follow-up studies can be avoided.

Use of Follow-Up Imaging in Isolated Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose—

Multiple studies have shown that negative computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) are reliable in excluding aneurysms in patients with isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (pSAH). We evaluate the use of digital subtraction angiography versus CTA for initial diagnosis and of angiographic follow-ups in patients with pSAH by performing an institutional analysis and a meta-analysis of literature.

Methods—

Retrospective institutional analysis of patients with pSAH was performed from 2008 to 2014. The number and types of follow-up imaging studies were tabulated. Initial and follow-up studies were evaluated by an experienced neuroradiologist for intracranial aneurysm. Meta-analysis of literature was performed to assess the use of initial digital subtraction angiography and of follow-up imaging.

Results—

Our institutional review revealed no additional use of initial digital subtraction angiography or of any angiographic follow-up after initial negative CTA in patients with pSAH on noncontrast CT. Meta-analysis of 40 studies yielded a total of 1031 patients. Only 8 aneurysms were first diagnosed on follow-ups (0.78%). Careful review showed that some of these aneurysms reported on follow-up are of questionable validity. Initial digital subtraction angiography and follow-up imaging after a negative initial CTA showed no statistically significant benefits.

Conclusions—

In patients meeting the strict imaging criteria of pSAH, initial negative CTA is reliable in excluding aneurysms. A critical review of the literature through meta-analysis shows no foundation for multiple follow-up studies in patients with pSAH.