[Nationwide evaluation of German university teaching methods in neurology]

A nationwide survey on clinical neurophysiology education in Italian schools of specialization in neurology

Introduction

Clinical neurophysiology deals with nervous system functions assessed with electrophysiological and ultrasound-based imaging techniques. Even though the need for highly specialized neurophysiologists has increased, residency training rarely takes today’s requirements into account. This study aimed to snapshot the neurophysiological training provided by Italian specialization schools in neurology.

Methods

A single-page web-based survey comprising 13 multiple-choice categorical and interval scale questions was sent via e-mail to neurology specialization school directors. The survey addressed the programs’ structural neurophysiology organization, time dedicated to each clinical neurophysiology subspecialty, and descriptors assessing the discipline’s importance (e.g., residents who attempted residential courses, gained certifications, or awards gained).

Results

The most studied neurophysiological techniques were electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). Most specialization schools devoted less than 3 months each to multimodal evoked potentials (EPs), ultrasound sonography (US), and intra-operative monitoring. Of the 35 specialization schools surveyed, 77.1% reported that four students, or fewer, participated in the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Examination in Neurophysiology. Of the 35 specialization centers surveyed, 11.4% declared that the final evaluation required students to discuss a neurophysiological test.

Discussion

Our survey underlined the poorly standardized technical requirements in postgraduate neurology specialization schools, wide variability among training programs, and limited training on multi-modal evoked potentials, intraoperative monitoring, and sonography. These findings underline the need to reappraise and improve educational and training standards for clinical neurophysiology during postgraduate specialization schools in neurology with an international perspective.

[Nationwide survey of postgraduate medical training in clinical neurology]

BACKGROUND

Currently, no data are available, which reflect the situation of medical doctors specializing in neurology in German hospitals. In order to secure the high standard of neurological patient care it is essential to evaluate the working conditions and the specialty training in neurology.

OBJECTIVE

This nationwide survey was conducted throughout Germany with the aim to address problems and to give suggestions for improvements in neurological training curricula.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The survey was online from February to May 2017 and 953 neurologists undergoing further training participated.

RESULTS

More than half of the young neurologists were satisfied with their medical training. One of the main problems that complicates clinical training is the workload. In addition, organizational obstacles within the clinic, such as poor structure of education or a lack of mentors, lead to dissatisfaction among participants. The size or type of the department, as well as the prevailing service system, exert only a minor influence on the quality of specialist training, although there were differences especially in the self-assessment of the participants in connection with the type of department (university hospital versus public or private hospital).

CONCLUSION

Specialist training in neurology can be improved by simple arrangements, e. g., the introduction of a binding rotation scheme, internal mentoring and structured feedback. In addition, it will be necessary to relieve medical staff of administrative duties in order to create time for training and the learning of competencies.