Neues zur symptomatischen MS‑Therapie: Teil 2 – Gangstörung und Spastik

[Treatment of antibody-mediated encephalomyelitis : Strategies for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease]

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated encephalomyelitis, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody-associated astrocytopathy belong to a group of newly described autoimmune diseases.

AIM

Presentation of the treatment of antibody-mediated encephalomyelitis with a focus on NMOSD and MOGAD.

METHODS

Selective literature search in PubMed taking the consultation version of the S2k guidelines of the German Society of Neurology (DGN) on the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), NMOSD and MOG IgG-associated diseases into account.

RESULTS

Acute relapses are treated with high-dose steroid pulse therapy or apheresis therapy (plasma exchange or immunoadsorption). It is crucial to start treatment as quickly as possible and apheresis therapy can also be used as first-line treatment under certain conditions. For prophylactic immunotherapy, steroids, classical immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies with specific mechanisms of action are used. Eculizumab, inebilizumab and satralizumab are the first drugs approved for NMOSD. Symptomatic treatment and neurorehabilitation are important complementary measures.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of antibody-mediated encephalomyelitis differs from treatment of multiple sclerosis and requires specific measures.

Physiotherapy use and access-barriers in persons with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional analysis

INTRODUCTION

Physiotherapy may alleviate many multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, yet very little is known about physiotherapy accessibility and possible barriers in persons with MS (pwMS). We therefore aimed to elucidate physiotherapy use and possible access-barriers using data from 1493 pwMS from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR), a patient-centered, longitudinal, observational MS study.

METHODS

We used data of the SMSR to investigate the question at hand in a multivariable logistic regression model with regularly receiving physiotherapy (yes/no) as the outcome. Potential explanatory variables were investigated following an AIC-driven model selection approach and consisted of a priori specified socio-demographic variables, health status, and personal or social mobility variables. As a last step, the impact of physiotherapist supply on regular use was assessed in the final model. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation (main analysis), and complete case sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The main analysis included 1493 participants. In the multivariable logistic regression, positive associations were found between the use of physiotherapy and the following variables: having a primary-progressive MS (Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Intervals] 1.97 [1.18; 3.29]), being more severely impaired (EDSS 4-6.5 OR 1.84 [1.16; 2.91]), higher number of current symptoms (1 OR 3.31 [1.63; 6.74], 2-3 OR 3.43 [1.8; 6.53], 4-5 OR 4.44 [2.28; 8.66], 6-7 OR 4.06 [1.90; 8.70], 8-9 OR 3.87 [1.71; 8.75], being on disability pension (OR 1.75 [1.24; 2.46], or having applied for it OR 2.25 [1.31; 3.85]), having gait problems (OR 1.58 [1.11; 2.23]), having been in a rehabilitation clinic in the past 12 months (OR 4.43 [2.17; 9.03]), and currently being on disease-modifying treatment (OR 1.61 [1.12; 2.31]). Negative associations were found for a higher quality of life (OR 0.92 [0.85; 0.98]), working more than 80% (OR 0.47 [0.30; 0.75]) and being from the French language region (OR 0.66 [0.47; 0.94]). No association between physiotherapist supply and regular physiotherapy use was detected.

DISCUSSION

In a large, Swiss-based MS population, little evidence for socio-demographic barriers to physical therapy was found. Physiotherapy uptake was higher among pwMS with more impairments, lower health-related quality of life, or who have been discharged recently from inpatient rehabilitation. The uptake differences by language region warrant further investigations.

[Multiple sclerosis in Germany: updated analysis of the German MS Registry 2014-2018]

Einleitung Unter Federführung der Deutschen Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft (DMSG), Bundesverband e. V. wurde 2001 ein bundesweites MS-Register initiiert, um epidemiologische Daten zur MS, deren Verlaufsformen und der Versorgungssituation in Deutschland zu erheben. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Auswertung war es, die Daten der letzten Auswertung von vor 10 Jahren zu aktualisieren.

Methodik Zum Stichtag 28. Februar 2018 nahmen 168 Zentren verschiedener Versorgungsbereiche (Universitätskliniken, Akutkliniken, Rehabilitationskliniken und neurologische Praxen) teil. Von 2014 bis 2016 wurde der Wechsel der Dokumentationsplattform zu einem internetbasierten elektronischen Datenerfassungssysstem (EDC) vorgenommen, das eine umfassende Datenerhebung und die Integration verschiedener Dokumentationssysteme erlaubt. Eine Reihe von Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen sichert eine valide und representative Datenerhebung. Um eine möglichst aktuelle Beschreibung der Versorgungssituation zu gewährleisten, wurde die Querschnittsanalyse auf Patientendaten der aktuellsten Visite aus den letzten 4 Jahren beschränkt.

Ergebnisse Daten von 18.030 MS-Betroffenen konnten ausgewertet werden. Das mittlere (± Standardabweichung) Alter betrug 46,3 ± 12,2 Jahre, 72 % der Patienten waren weiblich, im Mittel waren die Patienten 10,6 ± 8,7 Jahre erkrankt, der mediane EDSS lag bei 3,0. Die Mehrzahl der Patienten litt an einem schubförmigen Verlauf (74,2 %), 16,1 % hatten einen sekundär und 5,5 % einen primär progredienten Verlauf. Eine Immuntherapie wurde bei 75,2 % durchgeführt, am häufigsten mit Interferonen, gefolgt von Fingolimod, Glatirameracetat, Dimethylfumarat, Natalizumab und Teriflunomid. Symptomatische Therapiemaßnahmen erhielten zwischen 28,3 % (kognitive Störungen) und 86,0 % (Spastik) der Patienten, die an diesen Symptomen litten. Voll berufstätig waren nur noch 37,5 % der Betroffenen; 22,5 % waren vorzeitig berentet. Die berufliche Leistungsfähigkeit war negativ mit dem Alter und dem Behinderungsgrad assoziiert.

Diskussion Die vorliegende Auswertung des deutschen MS-Registers gibt einen aktuellen Überblick zur MS und deren Versorgungssituation in Deutschland. Die Ergebnisse sprechen für einen günstigeren Verlauf der MS im Lauf der letzten 10 Jahre. Während die Mehrzahl der Patienten mit immunmodulatorischen Substanzen therapiert wird, sind nach wie vor einige Symptome der MS wie Fatigue und kognitive Störungen unzureichend behandelt. Zwar hat die Beschäftigungsrate im Vergleich zu früheren Auswertungen zugenommen; dennoch erfordert der hohe Anteil der vorzeitig Berenteten effektive Maßnahmen, um die funktionellen Einschränkungen der Betroffenen zu verringern und ihnen die Teilhabe am gesellschaftlichen und beruflichen Leben möglichst lange zu ermöglichen.

Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol oromucosal spray in resistant multiple sclerosis spasticity: consistency of response across subgroups from the SAVANT randomized clinical trial

Objective: To determine whether differences in disability status, spasticity severity, and spasticity duration at treatment start in patients with resistant multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity might influence response to add-on tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol (THC:CBD) oromucosal spray (nabiximols) versus further re-adjustment of optimized first-line antispasticity medication.Methods: Using the database from the Sativex^® as Add-on therapy Vs. further optimized first-line ANTispastics (SAVANT) study, this post hoc analysis evaluated spasticity severity (0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS] scores) and pain severity (0-10 NRS scores) evolution from randomization (baseline) to week 12 (end of double-blind treatment) in defined subgroups: Expanded disability status scale [EDSS] score subgroups (<6 and ≥6); spasticity severity 0-10 NRS score subgroups (4 to ≤6 and >6), and spasticity duration subgroups (<5 and ≥5 years).Results: THC:CBD oromucosal spray (nabiximols) halved mean severity scores for spasticity and pain in all subgroups. Active treatment significantly improved mean spasticity severity scores versus placebo from week 4 onwards in both EDSS subgroups, in the severe spasticity subgroup, and in both spasticity duration subgroups. Active treatment significantly improved mean pain severity scores versus placebo in the ≥6 EDSS subgroup, in the severe spasticity subgroup and in both spasticity duration subgroups.Conclusion: Add-on THC:CBD oromucosal spray (nabiximols) consistently relieves resistant spasticity across subgroups defined by baseline EDSS score, spasticity severity NRS score and spasticity duration. Patients with moderate resistant MS spasticity benefit numerically from treatment; patients with severe resistant spasticity achieve significant therapeutic gains. Spasticity-associated pain often improves similarly in the same subgroups.