1
|
Hiller S, Götzl C, Rauschenberg C, Fechtelpeter J, Koppe G, Wierzba E, Sauter J, Dietrich S, Durstewitz D, Reininghaus U, Krumm S. Health-Promoting Effects and Everyday Experiences With a Mental Health App Using Ecological Momentary Assessments and AI-Based Ecological Momentary Interventions Among Young People: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025; 13:e65106. [PMID: 40300160 PMCID: PMC12076033 DOI: 10.2196/65106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2025] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 05/01/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the high prevalence of mental health conditions among young people and the technological advancements of artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches in health services, mobile health (mHealth) apps for mental health are a promising way for low-threshold and large-scale mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention strategies, especially for young people. However, insufficient evidence on health-promoting effects and deficient user-centric designs emphasize the necessity for participatory methods in the interventions' development processes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore young people's everyday experiences using an AI-based mHealth app for mental health promotion based on ecological momentary assessments and ecological momentary interventions. Our analysis of qualitative data focused on exploring young people's use patterns in daily life and mental health-promoting effects. METHODS We conducted problem-centered interviews and focus groups with a subsample of 27 young people aged 14 to 25 years, who were among the participants of 2 microrandomized trials testing and evaluating an AI-based mHealth app (AI4U training). Our study used a participatory approach, with "co- and peer researchers" from the dialogue population actively engaged in research processes and data analysis. Structural content analysis guided the qualitative analysis. RESULTS Participants reported enhanced emotional self-awareness and regulation in daily life through the ecological momentary assessments and ecological momentary interventions. Young people appreciated the AI4U training for managing emotions and stress. They had no trust issues regarding disclosing their mental health via the AI4U training in daily life. Some faced challenges integrating it into their daily routines and highlighted the value of autonomy in use decision-making processes. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reveal that young people benefited from enhanced emotional awareness and management through the use of the AI4U training, appreciating its anonymity for facilitating emotional disclosure. The results suggest that enhanced self-directed use may improve daily life integration, although participants noted that they sometimes avoided using the AI4U training during distress despite recognizing its potential benefits. These findings indicate the importance of balancing directed use and autonomy in digital interventions to harmonize compliance with effectiveness in daily life. We highlight the importance of participatory research for tailored digital mental health solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina Hiller
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Götzl
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christian Rauschenberg
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Mannheim-Heidelberg-Ulm, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Janik Fechtelpeter
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Hector Institute for AI in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Theoretical Neuroscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georgia Koppe
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Hector Institute for AI in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Wierzba
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julia Sauter
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
| | - Sina Dietrich
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Durstewitz
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Theoretical Neuroscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Mannheim-Heidelberg-Ulm, Mannheim, Germany
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University, Medical Faculty, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scheydt S. [Psychosocial Care Demands and Possible Implications for the Role of Mental Health Nursing - Development of an Exemplary Future Scenario]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2025; 52:48-55. [PMID: 38749453 DOI: 10.1055/a-2288-6856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
This study focuses on the development of a possible future scenario for mental health nursing in Germany. Based on the identified trends in mental health care, important implications for the design of future-oriented mental health nursing were identified and discussed. The developed model describes a type of mental health nursing that takes place on an "extended" or "advanced" level, close to the community and in a multi-professional setting in the living environment of the affected persons and their relatives. It integrates digital elements of mental health care, while practicing person-centered, diversity- and trauma-informed approaches. Although this describes an approach to mental health nursing that could meet the expected trends and developments in mental health care, critical discussion and reflected consensus on these ideas is needed in an interdisciplinary body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Scheydt
- Abteilung Public Mental Health, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim
- Standort Mannheim-Heidelberg-Ulm, Deutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit (DZPG), Mannheim
- Departement Gesundheit, Berner Fachhochschule, Bern, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schick A, Rauschenberg C, Ader L, Daemen M, Wieland LM, Paetzold I, Postma MR, Schulte-Strathaus JCC, Reininghaus U. Novel digital methods for gathering intensive time series data in mental health research: scoping review of a rapidly evolving field. Psychol Med 2023; 53:55-65. [PMID: 36377538 PMCID: PMC9874995 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Recent technological advances enable the collection of intensive longitudinal data. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of methods for collecting intensive time series data in mental health research as well as basic principles, current applications, target constructs, and statistical methods for this type of data.In January 2021, the database MEDLINE was searched. Original articles were identified that (1) used active or passive data collection methods to gather intensive longitudinal data in daily life, (2) had a minimum sample size of N ⩾ 100 participants, and (3) included individuals with subclinical or clinical mental health problems.In total, 3799 original articles were identified, of which 174 met inclusion criteria. The most widely used methods were diary techniques (e.g. Experience Sampling Methodology), various types of sensors (e.g. accelerometer), and app usage data. Target constructs included affect, various symptom domains, cognitive processes, sleep, dysfunctional behaviour, physical activity, and social media use. There was strong evidence on feasibility of, and high compliance with, active and passive data collection methods in diverse clinical settings and groups. Study designs, sampling schedules, and measures varied considerably across studies, limiting the generalisability of findings.Gathering intensive longitudinal data has significant potential to advance mental health research. However, more methodological research is required to establish and meet critical quality standards in this rapidly evolving field. Advanced approaches such as digital phenotyping, ecological momentary interventions, and machine-learning methods will be required to efficiently use intensive longitudinal data and deliver personalised digital interventions and services for improving public mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Schick
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rauschenberg
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leonie Ader
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maud Daemen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lena M. Wieland
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Isabell Paetzold
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mary Rose Postma
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia C. C. Schulte-Strathaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schwarz J, Hemmerling J, Kabisch N, Galbusera L, Heinze M, von Peter S, Wolff J. Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:826. [PMID: 36572855 PMCID: PMC9791145 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, intensive psychiatric home treatment has been increasingly implemented as a community-based alternative to inpatient admission. Since 2018, the so-called Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT; German: "Stationsäquivalente Behandlung", short: "StäB") has been introduced as a particularly intensive form of home treatment that provides at least one daily treatment contact in the service users' (SU) home environment. Prior research shows that this can be challenging in rural catchment areas. Our paper investigates to which extent the location of the SU home location within the catchment area as well as the distance between the home and the clinic influence the utilisation of inpatient treatment compared to IEHT. METHOD Routine data of one psychiatric hospital in the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany were analysed for the observational period 07/2018-06/2021. Two comparison groups were formed: SU receiving inpatient treatment and SU receiving IEHT. The SU places of residence were respectively anonymised and converted into geo-coordinates. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to visualise the places of residence, and car travel distances as well as travel times to the clinic were determined. Spatial analyses were performed to show the differences between comparison groups. In a more in-depth analysis, the proximity of SU residences to each other was examined as an indicator of possible clustering. RESULTS During the observational period, the location of 687 inpatient and 140 IEHT unique SU were mapped using the GIS. SU receiving treatment resided predominantly within the catchment area, and this proportion was slightly higher for SU receiving IEHT than for those treated in inpatient setting (95.3% vs. 84.7%). In the catchment area, the geographical distribution of SU place of residence was similar in the two groups. There was a general higher service provision in the more densely populated communities close to Berlin. SU with residence in peripheral communities were mainly treated within the inpatient setting. The mean travel times and distances to the place of residence only differed minimally between the two groups of SU (p > 0.05). The places of residence of SU treated with IEHT were located in greater proximity to each other than those of SU treated in inpatient setting (p < 0.1). CONCLUSION In especially peripheral parts of the examined catchment area, it may be more difficult to have access to IEHT rather than to inpatient services. The results raise questions regarding health equity and the planning of health care services and have important implications for the further development of intensive home treatment. Telehealth interventions such as blended-care approaches and an increase of flexibility in treatment intensity, e.g. eliminating the daily visit requirement, could ease the implementation of intensive home treatment especially in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Schwarz
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
- Centre for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
- Faculty for Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.
| | - Jan Hemmerling
- Geography Institute, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nadja Kabisch
- Institute for Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laura Galbusera
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Martin Heinze
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Centre for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty for Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Sebastian von Peter
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty for Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Jan Wolff
- Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of the TU Braunschweig and the Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meyer-Lindenberg A. [Digital life in a networked world: opportunities and risks for psychiatry]. DER NERVENARZT 2021; 92:1130-1139. [PMID: 34648056 PMCID: PMC8515321 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-021-01203-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
This overview addresses some opportunities and risks of digital transformation in their significance for the diagnostics and therapy of mental illnesses under the aspect of the convergence of new digital technologies. Possibilities of smartphone-based technologies for the recording of the lifeworld context are explained and the application of this approach to the investigation of resilience mechanisms for improving mental well-being is presented on the basis of two current research results. Subsequently, the increasing networking of the environmental context itself is taken into account against the background of the so-called internet of things (IoT). These converging technologies, combined with new developments in artificial intelligence, enable a new generation of ecological momentary interventions (EMI) based on innovative sensors, local assessment of the lifeworld context and their evaluation using artificial intelligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
- Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, J5, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rauschenberg C, Schick A, Goetzl C, Roehr S, Riedel-Heller SG, Koppe G, Durstewitz D, Krumm S, Reininghaus U. Social isolation, mental health, and use of digital interventions in youth during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally representative survey. Eur Psychiatry 2021; 64:e20. [PMID: 33686930 PMCID: PMC7985650 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Public health measures to curb SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates may have negative psychosocial consequences in youth. Digital interventions may help to mitigate these effects. We investigated the associations between social isolation, COVID-19-related cognitive preoccupation, worries, and anxiety, objective social risk indicators, and psychological distress, as well as use of, and attitude toward, mobile health (mHealth) interventions in youth. Methods Data were collected as part of the “Mental Health And Innovation During COVID-19 Survey”—a cross-sectional panel study including a representative sample of individuals aged 16–25 years (N = 666; Mage = 21.3; assessment period: May 5, 2020 to May 16, 2020). Results Overall, 38% of youth met criteria for moderate or severe psychological distress. Social isolation worries and anxiety, and objective risk indicators were associated with psychological distress, with evidence of dose–response relationships for some of these associations. For instance, psychological distress was progressively more likely to occur as levels of social isolation increased (reporting “never” as reference group: “occasionally”: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3–19.1, p < 0.001; “often”: aOR 22.2, CI 9.8–50.2, p < 0.001; “very often”: aOR 42.3, CI 14.1–126.8, p < 0.001). There was evidence that psychological distress, worries, and anxiety were associated with a positive attitude toward using mHealth interventions, whereas psychological distress, worries, and anxiety were associated with actual use. Conclusions Public health measures during pandemics may be associated with poor mental health outcomes in youth. Evidence-based digital interventions may help mitigate the negative psychosocial impact without risk of viral infection given there is an objective need and subjective demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rauschenberg
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Schick
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian Goetzl
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Roehr
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Steffi G Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Georgia Koppe
- Department of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Durstewitz
- Department of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Guenzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|