[Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates]

Dose reduction in mammography by using imaging plate technology: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Conventional mammography is a decisive tool in detecting breast cancer. Continuous efforts are undertaken in order to further improve the image quality as well as to reduce the applied doses. The purpose of our study was to compare diagnostic image quality of dose reduced computed mammography with a new needle-based detector system to full dose powder imaging plates.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 360 randomly chosen mammographies performed on a GE Senographe DMR running the Agfa DX-M needle-based imaging plate system (NIP) with their preliminary examinations which were acquired at standard dose with the same GE mammography device and an Agfa CR85-X powdered storage phosphor imaging plate system (PIP). NIP-based mammographies were about 29.8 % dose-reduced. The preliminary examinations had to be performed not earlier than 2 years before the recent investigations. Exclusion criteria were changes in ACR level and appearance of the scored targets and not optimally positioned and exposed mammographies. The images were blinded and read separately twice by 2 mammography experts according to a 3-point score on diagnostic image quality and the visualization of parenchyma, cysts, fibroadenomas, physiologic lymph nodes, solitary microcalcifications and macrocalcifications.

RESULTS

Dose reduced NIPs showed a significantly better visualization of parenchyma at ACR II/III and solitary microcalcifications at ACR I-III mammographies (p < 0.001) whereas the difference in scoring macrocalcifications, cysts, fibroadenomas and physiologic lymph nodes was not significant. The reading showed an excellent intra- (r = 0.97/0.94) and interobserver agreement (r = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

With computed mammography using the needle-based detector system a significant dose reduction is possible without loss of diagnostic image quality.

Evaluation of 2D and 3D navigation for iliosacral screw fixation

PURPOSE

Image guidance is essential in some orthopedic surgical procedures, especially iliosacral screw fixation. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best image guidance technique. An ex-vivo study was performed to compare conventional, 2-dimensional (2D), and 3D imaging techniques and determine the optimal image guidance technique for pelvic surgery.

METHODS

Plastic (n = 9) and donated cadaver pelvises (n = 8) were evaluated in the laboratory. The pelvises were positioned on radiolucent operation tables in a prone position. Transiliosacral screws were inserted without or with 2D- and 3D-navigational support. A digital mobile X-ray unit with flat-panel fluoroscopy and navigation software was used to measure precision, radiation exposure, and time requirements.

RESULTS

2D-navigation resulted in 40% incorrect screw positioning for the cadavers, 6% for the plastic phantoms, and 21% overall. The highest accuracy was accomplished with 3D-navigation (plastic: 100%; cadavers: 83%; p < 0.05). The dose-area product showed that both 2D- and 3D-navigation required increased exposure compared to the conventional technique (p < 0.01). For both plastic and cadaver specimens, navigated techniques required significantly longer times for screw insertion than the conventional technique (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

3D image guidance for transiliosacral screw fixation enabled more accurate screw placement in S1 and S2 vertebrae. However, radiation exposure in 3D-navigation was excessive; thus, we recommend avoiding 3D-navigation in young patients. A primary advantage of 3D-navigation was that the operating team could leave the room during the scan; thus, it reduced their radiation exposure. Moreover, the time required for screw insertion with 3D-navigation was similar to that required in the conventional technique; thus, 3D-navigation is recommended for older patients.

Évaluation médico-économique d’un système capteur-plan grand champ en radiopédiatrie

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a completely automated digital radiography (DR) unit in a pediatric radiology department on productivity. Materials and methods. Comparative evaluation of DR and computerized radiography (CR) units on 193 patients imaged in a pediatric radiology department. The time to complete each step of all examinations was recorded. Half of the exams were performed using CR and the other half was performed using DR.

RESULTS

There was a 52% time gain for simple projection exams using DR and a 51% time gain for dual projection exams using DR (p<0.001). A workflow study performed a 9 month period showed that DR could absorb 84% of work previously performed on two conventional radiography units.

CONCLUSION

DR is necessary for digital imaging departments to increase productivity, while providing added ergonomic comfort and flexibility. It is particularly well suited for pediatric imaging departments.