[Endovascular interventions for multiple trauma]

[Vascular causes of clinically unclear acute abdomen]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Vascular abnormalities are a rare cause of an acute abdomen. They include arterial bleeding and ischemia, the latter being either in the arterial or venous system. The most common cause of an acute ischemic abdomen is acute mesenteric ischemia caused by a thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery, followed by thrombotic occlusion of the portal vein, the mesenteric vein as well as the hepatic veins and the suprahepatic part of the inferior vena cava. In the case of an acute abdomen due to internal bleeding, all abdominal arteries can be the source but most common are ruptures of aortic aneurysms and inflammatory-driven bleeding from the superior mesenteric artery.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Due to the high mortality, vascular causes should be diagnosed as soon as possible. For this purpose, computed tomography (CT) has evolved into the preferred tool due to its high availability and speed. To differentiate various vascular causes of an acute abdomen, it is important to incorporate a CT protocol without contrast media as well as contrast-enhanced series in arterial and venous phases. Conventional angiography has been replaced by CT for the diagnosis of vascular pathologies causing an acute abdomen; however, it plays an increasing role in the treatment of these pathologies.

Interventional treatment experience in multiple injury with major abdominal or pelvic injuries: 160 cases analysis

PURPOSE

To observe the therapeutic effect of interventional embolization and haemorrhage control in multiple trauma patients with a major abdominal or pelvic injury.

METHODS

Data of 160 multiple trauma patients with a major abdominal or pelvic injury were retrospectively analyzed. They were admitted into the Department of Emergency of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College from October 2013 to April 2016. Eighty-seven patients who received emergent intervention for embolization and haemorrhage control were set as group A, including 72 males and 15 females, with an average age of (39.32 ± 14.0) years. Patients underwent emergent intervention for embolization and hemostasis. The other 73 patients who received traditional surgeries were set as group B, including 62 males and 11 females, with an average age of (38.48 ± 13.12) years. The time from admission to emergency intervention, the time of interventional embolization, transfusion during hospitalization, length of stay and prognosis were observed. The whole treatment and prognosis were compared between group A and group B.

RESULTS

In group A, the average time from admission to intervention exploration was (132.05 ± 86.80) min, the average operation time was (149 ± 49.69) min, the average hospitalization time was (18.37 ± 4.71) days, the average amount of RBC transfusion during hospitalization was (7.2 ± 4.33) units, and the mortality was 4.60% (4 patients died). The corresponding data in group B were respectively (138.95 ± 82.49) min, (183 ± 52.39) min, (22.72 ± 6.63) days, (12.23 ± 5.43) units, and 9.59% (7 cases died). There was no statistical difference in the time from admission to operation between the two groups (p > 0.05), but there was statistical difference in operation time, RBC transfusion, hospitalization time, prognosis, and mortality between the two groups (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The emergent intervention for embolization and haemorrhage control of multiple trauma patients with a major abdominal or pelvic injury and visceral organ haemorrhage has the advantages of less trauma, shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, less blood transfusion in comparison to the traditional emergency surgeries.