[SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation]

Prospective surgical solutions in degenerative spine: spinal simulation for optimal choice of implant and targeted device development

Objectives

The most important goal of surgical treatment for spinal degeneration, in addition to eliminating the underlying pathology, is to preserve the biomechanically relevant structures. If degeneration destroys biomechanics, the single segment must either be surgically stabilized or functionally replaced by prosthetic restoration. This study examines how software-based presurgical simulation affects device selection and device development.

Methods

Based on videofluoroscopic motion recordings and pixel-precise processing of the segmental motion patterns, a software-based surrogate functional model was validated. It characterizes the individual movement of spinal segments relative to corresponding cervical or lumbar spine sections. The single segment-based motion of cervical or lumbar spine of individual patients can be simulated, if size-calibrated functional X-rays of the relevant spine section are available. The software plug-in “biokinemetric triangle” has been then integrated into this software to perform comparative segmental motion analyses before and after treatment in two cervical device studies: the correlation of implant-induced changes in the movement geometry and patient-related outcome was examined to investigate, whether this surrogate model could provide a guideline for implant selection and future implant development.

Results

For its validation in 253 randomly selected patients requiring single-level cervical (n=122) or lumbar (n=131) implant-supported restoration, the biokinemetric triangle provided significant pattern recognition in comparable investigations (p<0.05) and the software detected device-specific changes after implant-treatment (p<0.01). Subsequently, 104 patients, who underwent cervical discectomy, showed a correlation of the neck disability index with implant-specific changes in their segmental movement geometry: the preoperative simulation supported the best choice of surgical implants, since the best outcome resulted from restricting the extent of the movement of adjacent segments influenced by the technical mechanism of the respective device (p<0.05).

Conclusions

The implant restoration resulted in best outcome which modified intersegmental communication in a way that the segments adjacent to the implanted segment undergo less change in their own movement geometry. Based on our software-surrogate, individualized devices could be created that slow down further degeneration of adjacent segments by influencing the intersegmental communication of the motion segments.

[Minimally invasive spinal surgery: stages of development]

In recent decades, spinal surgery has changed significantly. The active use of modern knowledge of anatomy, various diagnostic modules, specialized surgical equipment and high-tech tools has made it possible to transform classical surgical techniques into a new area of spinal neurosurgery - minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Its main goals are to reduce damage to the skin and adjacent tissues, significantly reduce the level of pain, reduce the duration of inpatient treatment and fully restore functional status in the shortest possible time. This article reflects the main criteria for MISS compliance and types of surgical interventions, provides information on the advantages of minimally invasive surgical technologies and their possible disadvantages. Currently, the use of MISS is observed in all areas of vertebrology - for degenerative diseases, tumors, inflammatory and traumatic lesions of the spine. At the same time, minimizing surgical aggression while maximizing the achievement of goal becomes the main rule of modern spinal surgery.

Effects of Preoperative Simulation on Minimally Invasive Hybrid Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

The main focus of this study was to evaluate how preoperative simulation affects the surgical work flow, radiation exposure, and outcome of minimally invasive hybrid lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-HLIF).

METHODS

A total of 132 patients who underwent single-level MIS-HLIF were enrolled in a cohort study design. Dose area product was analyzed in addition to surgical data. Once preoperative simulation was established, 66 cases (SIM cohort) were compared with 66 patients who had previously undergone MIS-HLIF without preoperative simulation (NO-SIM cohort).

RESULTS

Dose area product was reduced considerably in the SIM cohort (320 cGy·cm² NO-SIM cohort: 470 cGy·cm²; P < 0.01). Surgical time was shorter for the SIM cohort (155 minutes; NO-SIM cohort, 182 minutes; P < 0.05). SIM cohort had a better outcome in Numeric Rating Scale back at 6 months follow-up compared with the NO-SIM cohort (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative simulation reduced radiation exposure and resulted in less back pain at the 6 months follow-up time point. Preoperative simulation provided guidance in determining the correct cage height. Outcome controls enabled the surgeon to improve the procedure and the software algorithm.