[Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy : patient information, contact persons, postoperative proerectile therapy]

[Sexuality after radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of erectile function and patient counseling regarding their sex life]

BACKGROUND

Patient counseling by using the IIEF to assess erectile function (EF) before and after radical prostatectomy (RPX) is only possible under limited circumstances. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) could be used in addition to the IIEF for the assessment of EF and patient preference regarding counseling for their sex life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

EF was evaluated in 307 patients 3-60 months after RPX using the IIEF-EF and EHS. Questionnaires assessed sexual activity/intercourse as well as satisfaction with sex life irrespective of EF (10-point Likert scale). Patients were further asked concerning development of new sexual methods independent of erection firm enough for penetration and further wishes regarding counseling for their sex life.

RESULTS

Of 272 patients, 82.0% underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, 30.5% (n=83; mean age: 68.1 years) had sexual intercourse and 41.9% (n=114) were sexually active. EH Scores 1-2 and 4 coincided with compatible IIEF-EF Scores 1-21, and ≥ 26, respectively. Of the patients with an EHS of 3, 55.9% had an IIEF-EF score that was notably lower. Of patients with sexual intercourse, 65.8% were satisfied with their sex life; 53.2% of sexually active patients were satisfied without sexual intercourse. Alternative methods were manual/oral stimulation, cuddling, and the use of vibrators. Patients request individually tailored, realistic counseling.

CONCLUSION

The advantage of the EHS compared to the IIEF is that the erectile function can be assessed irrespective of sexual intercourse and sexual partner. Counseling should assist patients towards the attainment of a satisfying sex life-even without an erection.

Patients' desire to preserve sexual activity and final decision for a nerve-sparing approach: results from the MIRROR (Multicenter Italian Report on Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes and Research) Study

INTRODUCTION

Preservation of sexual function after surgery represents a major issue for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

AIM

To investigate determinants of patients' desire to preserve sexual activity before RP and surgeons' final decision to perform a nerve-sparing RP (NSRP).

METHODS

  Overall, 2,408 prostate cancer patients, candidates to RP, from 136 urologic departments across the Italian territory were evaluated in a multicenter prospective observational study. All patients underwent RP, according to single-center indications and procedures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, body mass index, previous benign prostatic hyperplasia history, preoperative tumor characteristics, quality of life through the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), erectile function through the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), desire to preserve sexual activity, NS operative outcomes, and surgical margins status were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,667 were interested to preserve sexual activity. Age, physical component summary of SF12 (PCS-12), sexual function score of UCLA-PCI, and IIEF-5 score were the main determinants of such interest. Only 1,246 patients were suitable for a NSRP according to guidelines. Surgeons performed a non-NSRP (NNSRP) in 1,234 patients, a unilateral NSRP in 318 and a bilateral NSRP in 856. Age, bioptical Gleason score, percentage of positive cores, PCS-12, and patient's desire to preserve sexual activity were the main determinants of final decision for a NSRP. Surgeons performed a NSRP in 424 not suitable and in 121 not interested patients. Positive surgical margins in not suitable patients submitted to NSRP were not higher if compared to that obtained after NNSRP in the same subgroup. Limits include lack of oncological and functional follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients are interested to preserve sexual activity. Discrepancies exist among patients' preferences, guidelines' indications, and surgeon's final decision.