Olbert PJ, Maier M, Heers H, Hegele A, Hofmann R. [Indications for nephron-sparing surgery. Analysis over a 13-year period in the context of changing guidelines].
Urologe A 2016;
54:804-10. [PMID:
25503720 DOI:
10.1007/s00120-014-3710-2]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The indications for nephron-sparing surgery have been considerably extended by guideline recommendations in recent years. It remains unclear whether clinical practice still reflects these new guidelines.
OBJECTIVE
In this retrospective, monocentric analysis at a tertiary referral center the indications for partial nephrectomy over a 13-year period were evaluated.
METHODS
In a retrospective database analysis all cases of surgically treated renal masses from 2001 to 2013 were evaluated. Besides demographic, tumor-specific and perioperative variables the development of the surgical technique depending on the tumor stage was evaluated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The proportion of nephron-sparing surgery cases increased from below 20 % in 2001 to 35 % in 2013 in the entire cohort. For stage T1a tumors, partial nephrectomy increased from approximately 50 % to over 90 % and for T1b tumors it rose from 10 % to 50 %. Logistic regression revealed stage 1 tumors to be predictive of partial nephrectomy over the complete evaluation period. Extending the indications for partial nephrectomy even to higher stages is under discussion but not yet supported by data from prospective, controlled studies.
Collapse