[Complications associated with inguinal orchiectomy and scrotal orchiectomy]

[Use of men's support underwear after elective scrotal surgery-a prospective, randomized assessment of postoperative complication rates and health-related quality of life : A prospective, randomized assessment of postoperative complication rates and health-related quality of life]

BACKGROUND

Elective scrotal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. There is no specific recommendation for postoperative care.

AIM

We investigated whether support underwear has an impact on postoperative complications and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2020 to November 2021, patients with prior elective scrotal surgery were randomized into the intervention group "support underwear" or the control group. In addition to patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative findings were documented. The primary endpoint comprised postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were prolonged length of hospital stay, emergency visits, unplanned readmissions, increased use of analgesics, and quality of life, which was recorded using the EQ5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) questionnaire preoperatively, on day 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Data from 50 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 46.7 years (standard deviation [SD] 18.6). Inguinal surgery with/without orchiectomy (52%), hydrocele resection (22%), or ligation of varicocele (14%) were performed most frequently. The mean operating time was 62.8 min (SD 35.2); length hospital stay was 2.6 days (SD 1.2). In all, 20% of the patients suffered a postoperative complication. Type of surgery was significantly associated with postoperative complications (p = 0.01) and unplanned readmission (p = 0.04). Regarding biometric and perioperative data, there were no significant differences between the interventional group (n = 27) and control group (n = 23).

CONCLUSION

A nonnegligible number of complications occurs after elective scrotal surgery. Complications affects quality of life up to 4 weeks after the surgery. Postoperative care with support underwear does not appear to affect the postoperative complication rate, but it positively influences the quality of life in patients with scrotal access.

Insertion of a testicular prosthesis at the time of radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer is safe in patients who will subsequently undergo chemotherapy or radiotherapy

We aimed to assess the incidence of prosthesis-related complications in patients who received a testicular prosthesis at the time of radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer and were then treated with chemotherapy (ChT) or radiotherapy (RT). We reviewed the records of the patients who underwent radical orchiectomy at our Institute since 1999; we also retrieved data from patients who underwent surgery elsewhere and then received ChT or RT at our Institution since 1999. We used the chi-square test to evaluate differences in the incidence of prosthesis-related complications between the groups. We retrieved the records of 587 patients; 393 had a testicular prosthesis implanted. Median follow-up was 57.7 months. One hundred thirty-eight patients (35.11%) received ChT, 129 RT (38.82%) and 10 (2.55%) both ChT and RT; of them, 6 (4.34%), 8 (6.20%) and 0 reported problems respectively. Seven (6.03%) of the 116 patients (29.52%) who had no further treatment had complications. The incidence of complications was not significantly different between patients who had no further treatment versus patients who underwent ChT (p = .75) or RT (p = .83). Testicular prosthesis insertion at the time of radical orchiectomy is safe even in patients subsequently undergoing ChT or RT.

Significance of spermatic cord invasion in radical inguinal orchidectomy: Will a modified subinguinal orchidectomy suffice?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Radical inguinal orchidectomy with ligation and division of the spermatic cord at the deep inguinal ring is the treatment of choice for testicular mass suspicious of cancer. In the era of organ preserving and minimally invasive surgery, it may be possible to propose a less radical sub-inguinal orchidectomy that may avoid the morbidity associated with opening the inguinal canal. The effect of this approach on oncological margins is not known. The aim of this article was to investigate the presence of spermatic cord involvement after a radical inguinal orchidectomy with a view to test feasibility of a modified sub-inguinal approach for testicular tumour excision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study on all orchidectomies performed for suspected testicular cancer was performed at a single hospital from over an 8-year period from January 2005 to December 2013. Non-cancerous lesions were excluded after histopathological review. All testicular malignancies were included and detailed histopathological review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 121 orchidectomies were performed over the 8-year period. Three patients had spermatic cord involvement. Spermatic cord involvement did not adversely affect the outcome in these patients after a median follow-up of 5 years irrespective of tumour histology. The proximal spermatic cord was not involved in any testicular germ cell tumours on further cord sectioning, the only patient with proximal cord involvement had a B-cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that a sub-inguinal modified orchidectomy may be a less invasive alternative to radical inguinal orchidectomy, with comparable oncological outcomes based on low risk of spermatic cord involvement, which in itself is not a prognostic factor. We require further long-term follow-up studies on patients who have undergone this approach to validate the oncological outcomes and report the possible advantage of lower post-operative complications with this technique.

Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Older Adults

The aging of the population, along with rising life expectancy, means that increasing numbers of older men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and a large proportion of these men will present with metastatic disease. In this paper, we discuss recent advances in prostate cancer treatment. In particular, we review management approaches for older patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on the decision tree developed by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology, which categorized older men as "fit," "vulnerable," and "frail" according to comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant.

RESULTS

26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.