[Antibiotic stewardship (ABS). Definition, contents, necessity and practice on examples of current clinical-urological controversies]

[What is the proportion of infectiology in the specialization urology? : A pilot study to underline the significance of Antibiotic Stewardship in urology]

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections account for one of the most bacterial infectious diseases worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this pilot project was to identify the relative percentage of antibiotic use in comparison to all patients in a university medical center for the better establishment of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an epidemiological pilot project. In the time period of three months it was evaluated which relative percentage of the patients was treated with antibiotics for bacterial urinary tract infection in comparison to all patients.

RESULTS

In summary, about 40% of all urological patients received an antibiotic treatment against urinary tract infections or as perioperative prophylaxis against bacterial infection in the operating room (OR). The antibiotic use at the urological ward is highest in comparison to ambulance or OR.

CONCLUSION

Infectious diseases, especially bacterial infections, account for a significant part of urology. This knowledge is essential to establish ABS programs and to tackle the progression of antibiotic resistance. Detailed studies are necessary to understand antibiotic prescription practice in urology to develop targeted ABS interventions.

Rising significance of antibiotic stewardship in urology and urinary tract infections - a rapid review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of the significance as well as recent developments in antibiotic stewardship (ABS) in urology and for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI). This rapid review is focused on recent publications during the past 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the evidence to support the use of ABS interventions in the treatment of UTIs, there remains considerable inappropriate use of antibiotics, up to 68%, especially concerning the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and the overuse of fluoroquinolones. Emerging evidence indicate that ABS programs can improve patient outcome and reduce multidrug-resistant pathogens.Interestingly, in this past 18 months new targets for ABS have been developed, e.g. involvement of a pharmacist, strict adherence to guidelines, improvement of the guidelines itself and understanding the prescription process in the emergency room as well as the analysis of own surveillance data.

SUMMARY

ABS programs in urology are essential and their significance has become more apparent than ever before. New targets for ABS interventions should be evaluated in prospective controlled clinical trials of their effectiveness to reduce further inappropriate antibiotic use without hindering the treatment of UTIs.

[Nationwide survey among institutes of microbiology in academic medicine : Is the interdisciplinary approach the right way to treat patients with urogenital infections?]

BACKGROUND

Increasing antibiotic resistance is a current and severe problem in medicine, especially in urology. Multidisciplinary antibiotic stewardship programmes are an important approach to counteract increasing resistance rates. This approach includes collaboration between urologists and microbiologists.

OBJECTIVES

The primary endpoint was to describe the current setting of interdisciplinary work of urologists and microbiologists in university hospitals in Germany. The secondary endpoints were the identification of problems of this interdisciplinary approach in daily routine and implications for the future in patient treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A newly developed, 24-item questionnaire was sent to 34 German microbiology departments at medical universities between June and October 2016; the departments were contacted up to four times. Only complete questionnaires were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate was 50.0%. In the majority of the urological cases a microbiologist was only contacted sporadically and asked for advice, but on the other hand most of the microbiologists think that this contact and discussion about the patient is reasonable and preferable. Of the respondents, 82.4% think that with a consequent interdisciplinary approach there might be lower antibiotic resistance rates in the future. One essential problem of ideal microbial diagnostics and therapeutic advice is that the microbiologist does not receive all relevant information upon request. This might be the case in up to 76.5%. Other problems are of economic nature or shortage of manpower.

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary patient care between urologists and microbiologists is reasonable and preferable. This approach has the potential of decreasing antibiotic resistance rates in the future.