1
|
Immunotherapy-induced Colitis: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Workup, and Management Plan. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:555-564. [PMID: 35470301 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies including advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers among others. Since their introduction, there has been significant improvement in survival and prognosis in patients with advanced malignancies. Unfortunately, improved outcomes have come at a price of significant immune-related adverse events, with those of the gastrointestinal tract being the most common. Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events frequently present as diarrhea and colitis, the severity of which can range from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis with intestinal perforation. Currently, management of ICI-induced colitis is primarily guided by retrospective studies and expert opinion. A significant number of ICI-induced colitis responds to high-dose corticosteroids; however, some patients require further therapy with biologics. There is limited information on the factors which may predispose patients to ICI-induced colitis. Future research elucidating these risk factors along with development of a scoring system could allow for risk-stratification of patients before initiation of ICI therapy. Such a system may help clinicians and patients keep a high index of suspicion regarding ICI-induced colitis and could hopefully reduce the incidence of severe cases. Similarly, future studies should investigate protective factors against ICI-induced colitis, which could potentially allow more patients to safely benefit from ICI therapy.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lai F, Ji M, Huang L, Wang Y, Xue N, Du T, Dong K, Yao X, Jin J, Feng Z, Chen X. YPD-30, a prodrug of YPD-29B, is an oral small-molecule inhibitor targeting PD-L1 for the treatment of human cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B 2022; 12:2845-2858. [PMID: 35755282 PMCID: PMC9214057 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies have brought about extraordinary clinical benefits for cancer patients, and their indications are expanding incessantly. Currently, most PD-1/PD-L1 agents are administered intravenously, which may be uncomfortable for some cancer patients. Herein, we develop a novel oral-delivered small molecular, YPD-29B, which specifically targets human PD-L1. Our data suggested that YPD-29B could potently and selectively block the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1, but did not inhibit any other immune checkpoints. Mechanistically, YPD-29B induced human PD-L1 dimerization and internalization, which subsequently activated T lymphocytes and therefore overcomes immunity tolerance in vitro. YDP-29B was modified as the YPD-30 prodrug to improve druggability. Using humanized mice with human PD-1 xenografts of human PD-L1 knock-in mouse MC38 cancer cells, we demonstrated that YPD-30 exhibited significant antitumor activity and was well tolerated in vivo. Taken together, our results indicate that YPD-30 serves as a promising therapeutic candidate for anti-human PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangfang Lai
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Ming Ji
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Lei Huang
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yunchen Wang
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Nina Xue
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Tingting Du
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Kai Dong
- Tianjin Chase Sun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Xiaoqing Yao
- Tianjin Chase Sun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
- Corresponding authors. Tel./fax: +86 10 863165207.
| | - Zhiqiang Feng
- Department of Pharmacochemistry, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
- Corresponding authors. Tel./fax: +86 10 863165207.
| | - Xiaoguang Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
- Corresponding authors. Tel./fax: +86 10 863165207.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller K, Bergmann L, Doehn C, Grünwald V, Gschwend JE, Ivanyi P, Kuczyk MA. [Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma]. Aktuelle Urol 2021; 53:403-415. [PMID: 34852368 DOI: 10.1055/a-1579-0562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been replaced mostly by immunotherapy combinations with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), especially in first line therapy. Due to these novel therapies, the prognosis of patients has been improved further. In pivotal studies a median overall survival of 3-4 years has been achieved. TKI monotherapy remains important for patients with low risk, a contraindication against immunotherapy and with regard to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Selection of the correct first line therapy is difficult to answer because there are two CPI-TKI combinations and one CPI-combination. Temsirolimus and the combination bevacizumab + interferon alfa have become less important. In second line therapy, nivolumab and cabozantinib have demonstrated superior overall survival compared to everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib + everolimus and axitinib are approved treatment options in the second line and further settings. TKI are an option as well, but they have lower supporting evidence. Everolimus has been replaced in the second line setting by these new options. Biomarkers are not available. The German S3 guideline has been updated recently to give better orientation in clinical practice.The question of the optimal sequence is still unanswered. Most second line options were evaluated after failure of anti-VEGF-TKI, but these are only applicable for a minority of patients.The purpose of an interdisciplinary expert meeting in november 2020 was to debate which criteria should influence the therapy. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with advanced or metastatic RCC, including the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented in this publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Miller
- Urologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lothar Bergmann
- Ambulantes Krebszentrum Schaubstraße (AKS), Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Jürgen E. Gschwend
- Urologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Urologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller K, Bergmann L, Doehn C, Grünwald V, Gschwend JE, Ivanyi P, Keilholz U, Kuczyk MA. [Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma]. Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51:572-581. [PMID: 33027832 DOI: 10.1055/a-1252-1780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Due to novel therapies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved. A median overall survival of more than two years is a realistic goal. Immunotherapy combinations with checkpoint inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib are new first-line options.Sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib and the combination of bevacizumab + interferon alpha are approved for first-line therapy regardless of the progression risk score. The use of both the combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab and cabozantinib is restricted to intermediate and high-risk patients. In this subgroup, the immunotherapy combination was more effective in terms of overall survival compared with sunitinib. Temsirolimus is only approved for high-risk patients.Sunitinib and pazopanib can also be applied as second-line options - for pazopanib the use is restricted to the event of cytokine failure. Nivolumab and cabozantinib demonstrated superior overall survival compared with everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib + everolimus and axitinib are approved treatment options in the second-line and further settings. Everolimus has been replaced in the second-line setting by these new options.The question regarding the optimal sequence is still unanswered.The purpose of an interdisciplinary expert meeting was to debate which criteria should influence treatment. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented in this publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Miller
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Urologie, Berlin
| | | | | | | | - Jürgen E. Gschwend
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Urology, München
| | | | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin LL, Lin GF, Yang F, Chen XQ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune-mediated liver dysfunction in non-small cell lung cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 2020; 83:106537. [PMID: 32371246 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been identified as validated medications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, they are often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including liver dysfunction. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and performed a meta-analysis to ascertain overall incidence and risk of immune mediated liver dysfunction in NSCLC patients. METHODS PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) were searched from inception to December 2019. Studies regarding all grade (1-5), high grade (3-5) hepatitis and ALT or AST elevation were included. RESULTS A total of 11 clinical trials including 7086 patients were selected for further assessment. The overall incidence of ALT elevation, AST elevation and hepatitis for the application of ICIs was 6.18%, 4.99% and 1.09%, respectively. Compared with chemotherapy group, treatment with ICIs had a significantly higher risk of all grade (RR: 7.27, p = 0.001) and high grade (RR: 6.70, p = 0.003) hepatitis. When ICIs combined with chemotherapy, the relative risk of all grade hepatitis was higher than monotherapy group (RR: 7.89, p = 0.044 vs RR: 6.94, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION The application of ICIs could result in a higher incidence and relative risk of all grade immune-induced liver dysfunction. Moreover, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may also increase relative risk of all grade hepatic AEs when compared with monotherapy. Prompt recognition and proper administration is required for clinicians to prevent potentially hepatic deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Lan Lin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Guo-Fu Lin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang-Qi Chen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abu-Sbeih H, Wang Y. Hepatobiliary Adverse Events. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1244:271-276. [PMID: 32301021 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41008-7_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for multiple cancer types. Hepatotoxicity is a reported adverse event of ICI treatment. It can present as asymptomatic elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase or symptomatic hepatitis with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. The diagnosis of ICI-induced hepatitis is made after exclusion of other etiologies based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. Treatment of ICI-induced hepatitis consists of ICI discontinuation and immunosuppression in severe cases. Pancreatic injury as asymptomatic lipase elevation or acute pancreatitis-like disease with abdominal pain and evidence on imaging has been documented as a toxicity of ICI therapy. Appropriate treatment of pancreatitis still needs further investigation. Few cases, reports, and series documented cholecystitis and cholangitis as possible adverse events related to ICI therapy as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah Abu-Sbeih
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Yinghong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grimm MO, Leucht K, Grünwald V, Foller S. New First Line Treatment Options of Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Patients with PD-1 or PD-L1 Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapies. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9020565. [PMID: 32092974 PMCID: PMC7074019 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) the PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Nivolumab became a standard second line treatment option in 2015 based on a significant improvement of overall survival compared to Everolimus. Current pivotal phase 3 studies showed that PD-1 ICI-based combinations were more efficacious than the VEGFR-TKI Sunitinib, a previous standard of care, leading to approval of three new regimens as guideline-recommended first-line treatment. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab is characterized by a survival advantage, a high rate of complete response and durable remissions in intermediate and poor prognosis patients. Despite frequent immune-mediated side effects, fewer symptoms and a better quality of life were observed compared to Sunitinib. Pembrolizumab or Avelumab plus Axitinib were characterized by an improved progression-free-survival and a high response rate with a low rate of intrinsic resistance. In addition, Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib reached a significant survival benefit. The side effect profile is driven by the chronic toxicity of Axitinib, but there is additional risk of immune-mediated side effects of the PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. The quality of life data published so far do not suggest any improvement regarding patient-reported outcomes compared to the previous standard Sunitinib. The PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs thus form the backbone of the first-line therapy of mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany; (K.L.); (S.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-3641-9329901
| | - Katharina Leucht
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany; (K.L.); (S.F.)
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Interdisciplinary Urology, Western German Tumor Center Essen, Department for Internal Medicine and Urology, University Hospital Essen, 45127 Essen, Germany;
| | - Susan Foller
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany; (K.L.); (S.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller K, Bergmann L, Doehn C, Gschwend JE, Kuczyk MA. [Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma]. Aktuelle Urol 2019; 50:s1-s10. [PMID: 31486061 DOI: 10.1055/a-0972-0914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Due to novel therapies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has improved significantly. A median overall survival of more than two years is a realistic goal. Immunotherapies with checkpoint inhibitors are new first-line and second-line options. Sunitinib, Pazopanib, Tivozanib and the combination of Bevacizumab + interferon alpha are approved for first-line therapy, regardless of the progression risk score. The use of both the combination Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Cabozantinib is limited to intermediate and high-risk patients. In this subgroup, the immunotherapy combination was more effective in terms of overall survival compared with Sunitinib. Temsirolimus is only approved for high-risk patients. Sunitinib and Pazopanib can also be used as second-line options, with the use of Pazopanib being limited to the event of cytokine failure. Nivolumab and Cabozantinib demonstrated superior overall survival compared to Everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of Lenvatinib + Everolimus and Axitinib are approved treatment options in second-line and further settings. Everolimus monotherapy has been replaced by the new options. The question regarding the optimal sequence of treatments is still unanswered. An interdisciplinary expert meeting aimed to discuss the criteria that should be used for therapy. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with RCC. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Miller
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Urologie, Berlin
| | | | | | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, München
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Urologie und Urologische Onkologie, Hannover
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grimm MO, Bex A, De Santis M, Ljungberg B, Catto JW, Rouprêt M, Hussain SA, Bellmunt J, Powles T, Wirth M, Van Poppel H. Safe Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Multidisciplinary Management of Urological Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019. Eur Urol 2019; 76:368-380. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
10
|
Suresh K, Naidoo J, Lin CT, Danoff S. Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Benefits and Pulmonary Toxicities. Chest 2018; 154:1416-1423. [PMID: 30189190 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are newer, immunotherapy-based drugs that have been shown to improve survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike traditional chemotherapeutic agents, ICIs work by boosting the body's natural tumor killing response. However, this unique mechanism of action has also led to the recognition of class-specific side effects. Labeled immune-related adverse events, these toxicities can affect multiple organ systems including the lungs. Immune-mediated lung injury because of ICI use, termed checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), occurs in about 3% to 5% of patients receiving ICIs; however, the real-world incidence of this entity may be higher, especially now that ICIs are being used in nonclinical trial settings. In this review, we briefly introduce the biology of ICIs and the indications for ICI use in NSCLC and then discuss the epidemiology and clinical and radiologic manifestations of CIP. Next, we discuss management strategies for CIP, including the current consensus on management of steroid-refractory CIP. Given the nascent nature of this field, we highlight areas of uncertainty and emerging research questions in the burgeoning field of checkpoint inhibitor pulmonary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Suresh
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cheng Ting Lin
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sonye Danoff
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grimm MO, Oppel-Heuchel H, Foller S. Therapie mit PD-1/PD-L1- und CTLA-4-Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibitoren. Urologe A 2018; 57:543-551. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0635-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
12
|
Occurrence of pneumonitis following radiotherapy of breast cancer - A prospective study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:520-532. [PMID: 29450591 PMCID: PMC5960004 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1257-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM of this study is to determine the temporal resolution of therapy-induced pneumonitis, and to assess promoting factors in adjuvant treated patients with unilateral mammacarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 100 post-surgery patients were recruited. The cohort was treated by 2 field radiotherapy (2FRT; breast and chest wall, N = 75), 3 field radiotherapy (3FRT; + supraclavicular lymphatic region, N = 8), or with 4 field radiotherapy (4FRT; + parasternal lymphatic region, N = 17). Ninety-one patients received various systemic treatments prior to irradiation. Following an initial screening visit post-RT, two additional visits after 12 and 25 weeks were conducted including radiographic examination. In addition, general anamnesis and the co-medication were recorded. The endpoint was reached as soon as a pneumonitis was developed or at maximum of six months post-treatment. RESULTS A pneumonitis incidence of 13% was determined. Of 91 patients with prior systemic therapy, 11 patients developed pneumonitis. Smoking history and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) appeared to be positive predictors, whereas past pneumonia clearly promoted pneumonitis. Further pneumonitis-promoting predictors are represented by the applied field extensions (2 field radiotherapy [2FRT] < 3 field radiotherapy [3FRT] < 4 field radiotherapy [4FRT]) and the type of combined initial systemic therapies. As a consequence, all of the three patients in the study cohort treated with 4FRT and initial chemotherapy combined with anti-hormone and antibody protocols developed pneumonitis. A combination of the hormone antagonists tamoxifen and goserelin might enhance the risk for pneumonitis. Remarkably, none of the 11 patients co-medicated with statins suffered from pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS The rapidly increasing use of novel systemic therapy schedules combined with radiotherapy (RT) needs more prospective studies with larger cohorts. Our results indicate that contribution to pneumonitis occurrence of various (neo)adjuvant therapy approaches followed by RT is of minor relevance, whereas mean total lung doses of >10 Gy escalate the risk of lung tissue complications. The validity of potential inhibitors of therapy-induced pneumonitis as observed for statin co-medication should further be investigated in future trials.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tian Y, Abu-Sbeih H, Wang Y. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Hepatitis. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2018; 995:159-164. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02505-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
14
|
Shi Y, Lin P, Ho EY, Nock CJ. Nivolumab-associated nausea and vomiting as an immune adverse event. Eur J Cancer 2017; 84:367-369. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|