Therapie mit PD-1/PD-L1- und CTLA-4-Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibitoren

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors for advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Outcomes including median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and ≥grade 3 TRAEs were extracted for further analysis. The risk of bias was assessed by subgroup analysis.

Results

12 articles with 566 patients were identified and subjected to meta-analysis. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled mOS and mPFS were 6.66 months (95%CI 4.85-9.16) and 2.92 months (95%CI 2.23-3.83), respectively. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 21% (95%CI 6%-41%) and 49% (95%CI 27%-71%), respectively. The pooled AEs rate and ≥ grade 3 AEs rate were 94% (95%CI 86%-99%) and 44% (95%CI 30%-58%).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors have shown promising clinical responses in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Although the incidence of adverse reactions is high, they are generally tolerable.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202480030.

Lung Clearance Index as a Screening Parameter of Pulmonary Impairment in Patients under Immune Checkpoint Therapy: A Pilot Study

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has presented a breakthrough in the treatment of malignant tumors and increased the overall survival of patients with various tumor entities. ICB may also cause immune-related adverse events, such as pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease. The lung clearance index (LCI) is a multiple-breath washout technique offering information on lung pathology in addition to conventional spirometry. It measures the degree of pulmonary ventilation inhomogeneity and allows early detection of pulmonary damage, especially that to peripheral airways. Methods: This cross-sectional study compared the lung function of patients with melanoma or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who received programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, alone or in combination, to age- and sex-matched controls. Lung function was assessed using spirometry, according to American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society standards, the LCI, and a diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) measurement. Results: Sixty-one screened patients and thirty-eight screened controls led to nineteen successfully included pairs. The LCI in the ICB-treated patients was 8.41 ± 1.15 (mean ± SD), which was 0.32 higher compared to 8.07 ± 1.17 in the control group, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.452). The patients receiving their ICB therapy for under five months showed a significantly lower LCI (7.98 ± 0.77) compared to the ICB patients undergoing therapy for over five months (9.63 ± 1.22) at the point of testing (p = 0.014). Spirometric analysis revealed that the forced expiratory volume between 25 and 75% of the forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%) in the ICB-treated patients was significantly reduced (p = 0.047) compared to the control group. DLCO (%predicted and adjusted for hemoglobin) was 94.4 ± 19.7 in the ICB patients and 93.4 ± 21.7 in the control group (p = 0.734). Conclusions: The patients undergoing ICB therapy showed slightly impaired lung function compared to the controls. Longer periods of ICB treatment led to deterioration of the LCI, which may be a sign of a subclinical inflammatory process. The LCI is feasible and may be easily integrated into the clinical daily routine and could contribute to early detection of pulmonary (auto-)inflammation.

Prognostic influence of PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors in combination with chemotherapeutic agents for non-small cell pulmonary carcinoma: system review and meta-analysis

Background

Lung cancer is a common malignant tumor, which is seriously harmful to human life and health. Nowadays, it has gradually become one of the best treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to combine immunotherapy and chemotherapy, and its clinical efficacy is preliminary. Nevertheless, substantial differences exist between various studies and various indicators. Despite their unconvincing results, high-quality research evidence is needed to support them. In this case, further correlative studies are necessary to investigate the prognostic outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs in NSCLC.

Methods

The online public databases were searchable for the clinical trials that consisted of NSCLC patients who had concluded their chemotherapy and who had accepted PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors. The time-span of the search spanned from the beginning to the end of the database. Two investigators retrieved the data independently. RevMan 5.3 statistical software was utilized for the assessment of bias risk. The software followed the Cochrane Handbook 5.3 guidelines.

Results

There were seven clinically controlled studies with 2781 NSCLC samples finally included in this study. A meta-analysis of the post-treatment overall response rate (ORR) was undertaken. A remarkably higher ORR rate was observed in the study group (p<0.05). Study participants had a noticeably longer PFS (HR=0.61, 95% CI=0.54-0.70, P<0.00001). Study participants had markedly longer overall survival (OS) (HR=0.651, 95% CI=0.52-0.82, P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of Grade 3 or above was not clinically clearly different (P>0.05), as demonstrated by the incidence of AEs. The funnel plots were separately charted in accordance with ORR rate, PFE, OS, and Grade 3 AEs. The majority of the funnel plots were symmetrical and a minority of funnel plots were asymmetrical, indicating the heterogeneity of research and the limited evidence available may lead to some publication bias in the contained literature.

Conclusion

The combined PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with conventional chemotherapy can dramatically elevate the prognosis of NSCLC patients, obviously enhancing the ORR rate and prolonging their PFS and OS. Furthermore, it was found that adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to conventional chemotherapy did not result in any additional adverse effects.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events from Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now, among other cancers, routinely used for the treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In mRCC various combinations of ICIs and inhibitors of the vascular epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (VEGFR-TKIs) as well as dual checkpoint inhibition (nivolumab + ipilimumab), the latter for patients with intermediate and poor risk according to IMDC only (international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium), are now standard of care in the first line setting. Therefore, a profound understanding of immune-related adverse events (irAE) and the differential diagnosis of adverse reactions caused by other therapeutic agents in combination therapies is of paramount importance. Here we describe prevention, early diagnosis and clinical management of the most relevant irAE derived from ICI treatment focusing on the new VEGFR-TKI/ICI combinations.

[Side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of urological tumors]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are currently routinely used for the treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial and renal cell carcinomas. Furthermore, several clinical trials are currently investigating their role in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings as well as in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. As a result, urologists are increasingly confronted with patients who are currently receiving, have recently received or will receive ICI treatment. Care is often interdisciplinary, with urologists playing a central role. Therefore, a profound understanding of immune-mediated adverse events and their differential diagnoses with respect to side effects of other medications in combination treatment are therefore extremely important. This article focusses on the prevention, early diagnosis and clinical management of the most relevant immune-related side effects derived from the new VEGFR-TKI/ICI combinations.

[Supportive therapy and management of side effects in dermato-oncology]

In the context of supportive therapy, possible complaints which may be caused by the cancer itself, by the antitumoral therapy or by psychosocial concerns are considered. Due to the introduction of new anticancer drugs in dermato-oncology, clinicians are confronted with a novel spectrum of adverse events. There are a number of inflammatory, immune-mediated side effects caused by immunotherapies, which can affect virtually any organ. Targeted therapies also have specific side effects. Basically, the management of adverse events depends on their severity. Besides treatment breaks and dosage modifications, immunotherapy-related adverse events are treated with systemic immunosuppressants. Supportive symptomatic therapy is offered. The additional consideration of psychosocial problems can improve quality of life of cancer patients.