[Cardiovascular side effects in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: superiority of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists? An update]

The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the Cardiovascular System in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, improving progression-free survival. ADT suppresses the production of testosterone and reduces circulating levels of the hormone. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists are the most commonly used ADT modality. They can be given alone or in combination with androgen synthesis inhibitors or androgen receptor antagonists. An estimated 40% of prostate cancer patients will receive ADT as part of their therapy during their lifetime. However, ADT has numerous adverse effects, including an increased cardiovascular risk that impacts quality of life. Relugolix is an alternative form of ADT. It is the only oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, circumventing injection site reactions, making it easier for patients to take, and thus increasing compliance. Testosterone suppression with relugolix is excellent and testosterone recovery after discontinuation is rapid. This paper reviews the ADT and anti-androgen treatment options for men with prostate cancer and the cardiovascular effects of these therapies. There is accumulating evidence that cardiovascular risk with relugolix is lower than with other ADT medications and also lower than with androgen synthesis inhibitors and androgen receptor antagonists. This paper provides insight into the use of different ADT regimens based on the cardiovascular status and circumstances. It explores strategies to mitigate negative cardiovascular consequences and highlights the need for further study.

[Prostate Cancer: Side-Effect Management for Androgen Deprivation Therapy]

Drug-based hormonal ablation is an essential component of therapy in hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer and as a backbone in castration resistance. LHRH agonists are among the most widely used medicinal products. Since these are usually given for life, therapy management is very important. Common side-effects typical of the substance class, such as weight gain, cardiovascular problems, hot flushes, erectile dysfunction or osteoporosis, can significantly reduce patients' quality of life and increase morbidity and mortality. This endangers adherence and, hence, treatment success. This paper provides an overview of how to deal with side-effects during LHRH therapy based on current data and practical experience.

The Treatment of Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostatic Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For many years, the standard treatment of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostatic carcinoma (mHSPC) was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. By lowering the testosterone level into the castration range, ADT deprives the tumor of a key growth factor.

METHODS

For this article, we evaluated the treatment recommendations contained in national and international guidelines (German S3 guidelines and those of the European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO], European Association of Urology [EAU], and National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]), as well as pertinent publications revealed by a PubMed search and the congress abstracts of the ESMO and of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO].

RESULTS

The past few years have witnessed fundamental changes in the treatment of mHSPC. Treatment intensification with docetaxel or with the new drugs directed against the androgen receptor signal pathway (abiraterone, apalutamide and enzalutamide) has been found to lower mortality by 19-40% and is now an integral component of first-line therapy. Relevant new findings have also been obtained with threefold combinations of ADT, docetaxel, and abiraterone or darolutamide. For patients with a light tumor burden, local radiotherapy of the primary tumor improves the probability of survival at 3 years by 8% (45.4 versus 49.1 months, difference 3.6 months; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 6.2 months).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of mHSPC is constantly changing. Phase III trials that are now in the recruitment stage, as well as our continually improving understanding of the underlying molecular-pathological mechanisms, will be altering the treatment landscape still further in the years to come.

Androgens, brain and androgen deprivation therapy in paraphilic disorders: A narrative review

Sexual delinquency is a global problem where those with paraphilic disorders, such as paedophiles, are more likely to commit and reoffend. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been suggested as a solution. The objective of this narrative review is to present current information on its risks, benefits and limitations as a treatment for paraphilias. The importance of testosterone in sexual function, the effect of its deficiency by age or by pharmacological treatment (anti-androgens, GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists) and the effect of testosterone replacement therapy will be reviewed. The relationship between androgens, brain, sexual behaviour and pathophysiology of paraphilic disorders will also be explored. ADT reduces sexual urges, but has adverse effects and, because its reversible nature, it does not ensure less recidivism. Likewise, the research quality of ADT drugs is limited and not enough to support their use. Child sex offenders, and not paraphilic subjects who have not committed assaults, show signs of elevated prenatal exposure to androgens and a higher methylation state of the androgen receptor gene. Sexual behaviour is regulated by subcortical (hypothalamus, brainstem and spinal cord) and cortical structures of the brain, in addition to brain circuits (dopaminergic, serotonergic). Those with paraphilic disorders show abnormalities at these levels that could relate to the risk of sexual offences. In conclusion, androgens represent a significant part of the pathophysiology of paraphilias and therefore, ADT seems promising. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to make definite conclusions about the efficacy of long-term ADT in paraphilic patients.