1
|
Cruppe G, Lemes da Silva C, Lollato RP, Fritz AK, Kuhnem P, D Cruz C, Calderon L, Valent B. QTL Pyramiding Provides Marginal Improvement in 2N vS-Based Wheat Blast Resistance. PLANT DISEASE 2023; 107:2407-2416. [PMID: 36691278 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-09-22-2030-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Wheat blast, caused by the fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum pathotype (MoT), is a devastating disease affecting South America, Bangladesh, and Zambia. Resistance to wheat blast has strongly relied on the 2NvS translocation; however, newer MoT isolates have increased aggressiveness, threatening the 2NvS translocation's effectiveness and durability. To identify genomic regions associated with wheat blast resistance, we performed a quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping study using 187 double-haploid (DH) lines from a cross between the Brazilian wheat cultivars 'TBIO Alvorada' and 'TBIO Sossego', which are moderately resistant and susceptible to blast, respectively. The DH population was evaluated in a greenhouse in Brazil and Bolivia, and field conditions in Bolivia. Contrasting models best explained the relationship between traits evaluated according to differences in disease levels and the presence of the 2NvS. A large effect-locus, derived from 'TBIO Sossego', was identified on chromosome 2AS, which was confirmed to be 2NvS translocation and explained 33.5 to 82.4% of the phenotypic variance. Additional significant loci were identified on 5AL, 1DS, 4DS, 5DL, and 6DL chromosome arms with phenotypic variance <6%, but they were not consistent across trait-environment combinations. QTL pyramiding analyses showed that some specific loci had an additive effect when combined with the 2NvS, suggesting that stacking multiple loci may be an effective strategy to help manage wheat blast. The markers associated with the 2NvS can be used as dominant diagnostic markers for this alien translocation. Additional characterization of these loci using a broader set of MoT isolates is critical to validate their effectiveness against current MoT populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovana Cruppe
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A
| | | | - Romulo P Lollato
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A
| | - Allan K Fritz
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A
| | - Paulo Kuhnem
- Biotrigo Genetica, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul 99052, Brazil
| | - Christian D Cruz
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A
| | - Lidia Calderon
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A
| | - Barbara Valent
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiao J, Liu B, Yao Y, Guo Z, Jia H, Kong L, Zhang A, Ma W, Ni Z, Xu S, Lu F, Jiao Y, Yang W, Lin X, Sun S, Lu Z, Gao L, Zhao G, Cao S, Chen Q, Zhang K, Wang M, Wang M, Hu Z, Guo W, Li G, Ma X, Li J, Han F, Fu X, Ma Z, Wang D, Zhang X, Ling HQ, Xia G, Tong Y, Liu Z, He Z, Jia J, Chong K. Wheat genomic study for genetic improvement of traits in China. SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2022; 65:1718-1775. [PMID: 36018491 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-022-2178-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a major crop that feeds 40% of the world's population. Over the past several decades, advances in genomics have led to tremendous achievements in understanding the origin and domestication of wheat, and the genetic basis of agronomically important traits, which promote the breeding of elite varieties. In this review, we focus on progress that has been made in genomic research and genetic improvement of traits such as grain yield, end-use traits, flowering regulation, nutrient use efficiency, and biotic and abiotic stress responses, and various breeding strategies that contributed mainly by Chinese scientists. Functional genomic research in wheat is entering a new era with the availability of multiple reference wheat genome assemblies and the development of cutting-edge technologies such as precise genome editing tools, high-throughput phenotyping platforms, sequencing-based cloning strategies, high-efficiency genetic transformation systems, and speed-breeding facilities. These insights will further extend our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks underlying agronomic traits and facilitate the breeding process, ultimately contributing to more sustainable agriculture in China and throughout the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Xiao
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Bao Liu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Yingyin Yao
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Zifeng Guo
- Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China
| | - Haiyan Jia
- Crop Genomics and Bioinformatics Center and National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Lingrang Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China
| | - Aimin Zhang
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Wujun Ma
- College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China
| | - Zhongfu Ni
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Shengbao Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
| | - Fei Lu
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Yuannian Jiao
- State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China
| | - Wuyun Yang
- Institute of Crop Research, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, 610066, China
| | - Xuelei Lin
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Silong Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China
| | - Zefu Lu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Lifeng Gao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Guangyao Zhao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Shuanghe Cao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Qian Chen
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Kunpu Zhang
- College of Agronomy, State Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, and Center for Crop Genome Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Mengcheng Wang
- The Key Laboratory of Plant Development and Environment Adaptation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China
| | - Meng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Zhaorong Hu
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Weilong Guo
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Guoqiang Li
- Crop Genomics and Bioinformatics Center and National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Xin Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China
| | - Junming Li
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Hebei Collaboration Innovation Center for Cell Signaling, Hebei Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, China
| | - Fangpu Han
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xiangdong Fu
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Zhengqiang Ma
- Crop Genomics and Bioinformatics Center and National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Daowen Wang
- College of Agronomy, State Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, and Center for Crop Genome Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
| | - Xueyong Zhang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Hong-Qing Ling
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Guangmin Xia
- The Key Laboratory of Plant Development and Environment Adaptation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
| | - Yiping Tong
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Zhiyong Liu
- The State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Zhonghu He
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
- CIMMYT China Office, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Jizeng Jia
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Kang Chong
- Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
- The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan H, Wani SH, Bhardwaj SC, Rani K, Bishnoi SK, Singh GP. Wheat spike blast: genetic interventions for effective management. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:5483-5494. [PMID: 35478296 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07356-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The fundamental concepts of the genetics, race classification and epidemiology of the Wheat spike blast causing fungus Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT) are still evolving despite of its discovery in 1985 in Brazil for the first time. The fungus seems to defy the research progress that is being made globally by continuously evolving into pathotypes which have already overcome the much celebrated 2NS resistance in wheat lines as well as few of the initially effective fungicides. The compartmentalized i.e. two speed genome of the MoT, conferring the fungus an evolutionary advantage, has emerged as a challenge for the wheat spike blast researchers complicating its already difficult management. The airborne fungus with a range of alternative hosts is finding new geographical niches situated on different continents and is a matter of great apprehension among the nations whose food security is primarily dependent on wheat. The wheat blast outbreak in Bangladesh during 2016 was attributed to an isolate from Latin America escaping through a seed import consignment while the latest Zambian outbreak is still to be studied in detail regarding its origin and entry. The challenges in dealing wheat spike blast are not only on the level of genetics and epidemiology alone but also on the levels of policy making regarding international seed movement and research collaborations. The present review deals with these issues mainly concerning the effective management and controlling the international spread of this deadly disease of wheat, with a particular reference to India. We describe the origin, taxonomy, epidemiology and symptomology of MoT and briefly highlight its impact and management practices from different countries. We also discuss the advances in genomics and genome editing technologies that can be used to develop elite wheat genotypes resistant against different stains of wheat spike blast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanif Khan
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, 132001, Karnal, Haryana, India.
| | - Shabir Hussain Wani
- Mountain Research Center for Field Crops, Khudwani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, 192101, Khudwani, J & K, India
| | - Subhash Chander Bhardwaj
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Regional Station, Flowerdale, 171 002, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Kirti Rani
- ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), 362001, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
| | - Santosh Kumar Bishnoi
- ICAR- Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Seed & Research Farm, 125001, Hisar, Haryana, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Phuke RM, He X, Juliana P, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Marza F, Roy C, Singh GP, Chawade A, Joshi AK, Singh PK. Identification of Genomic Regions and Sources for Wheat Blast Resistance through GWAS in Indian Wheat Genotypes. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:596. [PMID: 35456402 PMCID: PMC9025667 DOI: 10.3390/genes13040596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Wheat blast (WB) is a devastating fungal disease that has recently spread to Bangladesh and poses a threat to the wheat production in India, which is the second-largest wheat producing country in the world. In this study, 350 Indian wheat genotypes were evaluated for WB resistance in 12 field experiments in three different locations, namely Jashore in Bangladesh and Quirusillas and Okinawa in Bolivia. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome were obtained using DArTseq® technology, and 7554 filtered SNP markers were selected for a genome-wide association study (GWAS). All the three GWAS approaches used identified the 2NS translocation as the only major source of resistance, explaining up to 32% of the phenotypic variation. Additional marker-trait associations were located on chromosomes 2B, 3B, 4D, 5A and 7A, and the combined effect of three SNPs (2B_180938790, 7A_752501634 and 5A_618682953) showed better resistance, indicating their additive effects on WB resistance. Among the 298 bread wheat genotypes, 89 (29.9%) carried the 2NS translocation, the majority of which (60 genotypes) were CIMMYT introductions, and 29 were from India. The 2NS carriers with a grand mean WB index of 6.6 showed higher blast resistance compared to the non-2NS genotypes with a mean index of 46.5. Of the 52 durum wheats, only one genotype, HI 8819, had the 2NS translocation and was the most resistant, with a grand mean WB index of 0.93. Our study suggests that the 2NS translocation is the only major resistance source in the Indian wheat panel analysed and emphasizes the urgent need to identify novel non-2NS resistance sources and genomic regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul M. Phuke
- ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Indore 452001, India;
- ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440010, India
| | - Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, Mexico;
| | - Philomin Juliana
- Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA)/CIMMYT-India, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India; (P.J.); (A.K.J.)
| | - Muhammad R. Kabir
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh; (M.R.K.); (K.K.R.)
| | - Krishna K. Roy
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh; (M.R.K.); (K.K.R.)
| | - Felix Marza
- Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), La Paz 3798, Bolivia;
| | - Chandan Roy
- Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 813210, India;
| | - Gyanendra P. Singh
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Maharaja Agarsain Marg, P.O. Box 158, Karnal 132001, India;
| | - Aakash Chawade
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden;
| | - Arun K. Joshi
- Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA)/CIMMYT-India, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India; (P.J.); (A.K.J.)
| | - Pawan K. Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, Mexico;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Juliana P, He X, Marza F, Islam R, Anwar B, Poland J, Shrestha S, Singh GP, Chawade A, Joshi AK, Singh RP, Singh PK. Genomic Selection for Wheat Blast in a Diversity Panel, Breeding Panel and Full-Sibs Panel. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2022; 12:745379. [PMID: 35069614 PMCID: PMC8782147 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.745379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Wheat blast is an emerging threat to wheat production, due to its recent migration to South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Because genomic selection (GS) has emerged as a promising breeding strategy, the key objective of this study was to evaluate it for wheat blast phenotyped at precision phenotyping platforms in Quirusillas (Bolivia), Okinawa (Bolivia) and Jashore (Bangladesh) using three panels: (i) a diversity panel comprising 172 diverse spring wheat genotypes, (ii) a breeding panel comprising 248 elite breeding lines, and (iii) a full-sibs panel comprising 298 full-sibs. We evaluated two genomic prediction models (the genomic best linear unbiased prediction or GBLUP model and the Bayes B model) and compared the genomic prediction accuracies with accuracies from a fixed effects model (with selected blast-associated markers as fixed effects), a GBLUP + fixed effects model and a pedigree relationships-based model (ABLUP). On average, across all the panels and environments analyzed, the GBLUP + fixed effects model (0.63 ± 0.13) and the fixed effects model (0.62 ± 0.13) gave the highest prediction accuracies, followed by the Bayes B (0.59 ± 0.11), GBLUP (0.55 ± 0.1), and ABLUP (0.48 ± 0.06) models. The high prediction accuracies from the fixed effects model resulted from the markers tagging the 2NS translocation that had a large effect on blast in all the panels. This implies that in environments where the 2NS translocation-based blast resistance is effective, genotyping one to few markers tagging the translocation is sufficient to predict the blast response and genome-wide markers may not be needed. We also observed that marker-assisted selection (MAS) based on a few blast-associated markers outperformed GS as it selected the highest mean percentage (88.5%) of lines also selected by phenotypic selection and discarded the highest mean percentage of lines (91.8%) also discarded by phenotypic selection, across all panels. In conclusion, while this study demonstrates that MAS might be a powerful strategy to select for the 2NS translocation-based blast resistance, we emphasize that further efforts to use genomic tools to identify non-2NS translocation-based blast resistance are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, Mexico
| | - Felix Marza
- Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), La Paz, Bolivia
| | - Rabiul Islam
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Babul Anwar
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Jesse Poland
- Department of Plant Pathology, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
| | - Sandesh Shrestha
- Department of Plant Pathology, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
| | - Gyanendra P. Singh
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, India
| | - Aakash Chawade
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Arun K. Joshi
- Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA), Ludhiana, India
- CIMMYT-India, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravi P. Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, Mexico
| | - Pawan K. Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genetic dissection for head blast resistance in wheat using two mapping populations. Heredity (Edinb) 2021; 128:402-410. [PMID: 34880420 PMCID: PMC9177698 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00480-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Wheat head blast is a dangerous fungal disease in South America and has recently spread to Bangladesh and Zambia, threatening wheat production in those regions. Host resistance as an economical and environment-friendly management strategy has been heavily relied on, and understanding the resistance loci in the wheat genome is very helpful to resistance breeding. In the current study, two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations, Alondra/Milan (with 296 RILs) and Caninde#2/Milan-S (with 254 RILs and Milan-S being a susceptible variant of Milan), were used for mapping QTL associated with head blast resistance in field experiments. Phenotyping was conducted in Quirusillas and Okinawa, Bolivia, and in Jashore, Bangladesh, during the 2017–18 and 2018–19 cropping cycles. The DArTseq® technology was employed to genotype the lines, along with four STS markers in the 2NS region. A QTL with consistent major effects was mapped on the 2NS/2AS translocation region in both populations, explaining phenotypic variation from 16.7 to 79.4% across experiments. Additional QTL were detected on chromosomes 2DL, 7AL, and 7DS in the Alondra/Milan population, and 2BS, 4AL, 5AS, 5DL, 7AS, and 7AL in the Caninde#2/Milan-S population, all showing phenotypic effects <10%. The results corroborated the important role of the 2NS/2AS translocation on WB resistance and identified a few novel QTL for possible deployment in wheat breeding. The low phenotypic effects of the non-2NS QTL warrantee further investigation for novel QTL with higher and more stable effects against WB, to alleviate the heavy reliance on 2NS-based resistance.
Collapse
|
7
|
Roy C, Juliana P, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Gahtyari NC, Marza F, He X, Singh GP, Chawade A, Joshi AK, Singh PK. New Genotypes and Genomic Regions for Resistance to Wheat Blast in South Asian Germplasm. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 10:plants10122693. [PMID: 34961165 PMCID: PMC8708018 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Wheat blast (WB) disease, since its first identification in Bangladesh in 2016, is now an established serious threat to wheat production in South Asia. There is a need for sound knowledge about resistance sources and associated genomic regions to assist breeding programs. Hence, a panel of genotypes from India and Bangladesh was evaluated for wheat blast resistance and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed. Disease evaluation was done during five crop seasons-at precision phenotyping platform (PPPs) for wheat blast disease at Jashore (2018-19), Quirusillas (2018-19 and 2019-20) and Okinawa (2019 and 2020). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) across the genome were obtained using DArTseq genotyping-by-sequencing platform, and in total 5713 filtered markers were used. GWAS revealed 40 significant markers associated with WB resistance, of which 33 (82.5%) were in the 2NS/2AS chromosome segment and one each on seven chromosomes (3B, 3D, 4A, 5A, 5D, 6A and 6B). The 2NS markers contributed significantly in most of the environments, explaining an average of 33.4% of the phenotypic variation. Overall, 22.4% of the germplasm carried 2NS/2AS segment. So far, 2NS translocation is the only effective WB resistance source being used in the breeding programs of South Asia. Nevertheless, the identification of non-2NS/2AS genomic regions for WB resistance provides a hope to broaden and diversify resistance for this disease in years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandan Roy
- Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 813210, India;
| | - Philomin Juliana
- BISA/CIMMYT-India, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India; (P.J.); (A.K.J.)
| | - Muhammad R. Kabir
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh; (M.R.K.); (K.K.R.)
| | - Krishna K. Roy
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh; (M.R.K.); (K.K.R.)
| | - Navin C. Gahtyari
- ICAR–Vivekanand Parvatiya Krishi Anushandhan Sansthan, Almora 263601, India;
| | - Felix Marza
- Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), La Paz, Bolivia;
| | - Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico DF 06600, Mexico;
| | - Gyanendra P. Singh
- ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Maharaja Agarsain Marg, P.O. Box 158, Karnal 132001, India;
| | - Aakash Chawade
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden;
| | - Arun K. Joshi
- BISA/CIMMYT-India, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India; (P.J.); (A.K.J.)
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico DF 06600, Mexico;
| | - Pawan K. Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico DF 06600, Mexico;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singh PK, Gahtyari NC, Roy C, Roy KK, He X, Tembo B, Xu K, Juliana P, Sonder K, Kabir MR, Chawade A. Wheat Blast: A Disease Spreading by Intercontinental Jumps and Its Management Strategies. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:710707. [PMID: 34367228 PMCID: PMC8343232 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.710707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Wheat blast (WB) caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT) is an important fungal disease in tropical and subtropical wheat production regions. The disease was initially identified in Brazil in 1985, and it subsequently spread to some major wheat-producing areas of the country as well as several South American countries such as Bolivia, Paraguay, and Argentina. In recent years, WB has been introduced to Bangladesh and Zambia via international wheat trade, threatening wheat production in South Asia and Southern Africa with the possible further spreading in these two continents. Resistance source is mostly limited to 2NS carriers, which are being eroded by newly emerged MoT isolates, demonstrating an urgent need for identification and utilization of non-2NS resistance sources. Fungicides are also being heavily relied on to manage WB that resulted in increasing fungal resistance, which should be addressed by utilization of new fungicides or rotating different fungicides. Additionally, quarantine measures, cultural practices, non-fungicidal chemical treatment, disease forecasting, biocontrol etc., are also effective components of integrated WB management, which could be used in combination with varietal resistance and fungicides to obtain reasonable management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawan K. Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Navin C. Gahtyari
- ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (VPKAS), Almora, India
| | - Chandan Roy
- Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, BAC, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India
| | - Krishna K. Roy
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - B. Tembo
- Zambia Agricultural Research Institute (ZARI), Chilanga, Zambia
| | - Kaijie Xu
- Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
| | - Philomin Juliana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Kai Sonder
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Muhammad R. Kabir
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Aakash Chawade
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He X, Juliana P, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Islam R, Marza F, Peterson G, Singh GP, Chawade A, Joshi AK, Singh RP, Singh PK. Screening and Mapping for Head Blast Resistance in a Panel of CIMMYT and South Asian Bread Wheat Germplasm. Front Genet 2021; 12:679162. [PMID: 34054928 PMCID: PMC8155635 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.679162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Wheat blast (WB) is a destructive disease in South America and its first outbreak in Bangladesh in 2016 posed a great risk to food security of South Asian countries. A genome wide association study (GWAS) was conducted on a diverse panel of 184 wheat genotypes from South Asia and CIMMYT. Phenotyping was conducted in eight field experiments in Bolivia and Bangladesh and a greenhouse experiment in the United States. Genotypic data included 11,401 SNP markers of the Illumina Infinium 15K BeadChip and four additional STS markers on the 2NS/2AS translocation region. Accessions with stable WB resistance across experiments were identified, which were all 2NS carriers. Nevertheless, a dozen moderately resistant 2AS lines were identified, exhibiting big variation among experiments. Significant marker-trait associations (MTA) were detected on chromosomes 1BS, 2AS, 6BS, and 7BL; but only MTAs on 2AS at the 2NS/2AS translocation region were consistently significant across experiments. The resistant accessions identified in this study could be used in production in South Asian countries as a preemptive strategy to prevent WB outbreak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Philomin Juliana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Muhammad R Kabir
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Bangladesh
| | - Krishna K Roy
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Bangladesh
| | - Rabiul Islam
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Bangladesh
| | - Felix Marza
- Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), La Paz, Bolivia
| | - Gary Peterson
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, Fort Detrick, MD, United States
| | | | - Aakash Chawade
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
| | | | - Ravi P Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Pawan K Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Juliana P, He X, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Anwar MB, Marza F, Poland J, Shrestha S, Singh RP, Singh PK. Genome-wide association mapping for wheat blast resistance in CIMMYT's international screening nurseries evaluated in Bolivia and Bangladesh. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15972. [PMID: 33009436 PMCID: PMC7532450 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72735-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Wheat blast caused by the fungus Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT) is an emerging threat to wheat production. To identify genomic regions associated with blast resistance against MoT isolates in Bolivia and Bangladesh, we performed a large genome-wide association mapping study using 8607 observations on 1106 lines from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre’s International Bread Wheat Screening Nurseries (IBWSNs) and Semi-Arid Wheat Screening Nurseries (SAWSNs). We identified 36 significant markers on chromosomes 2AS, 3BL, 4AL and 7BL with consistent effects across panels or site-years, including 20 markers that were significant in all the 49 datasets and tagged the 2NS translocation from Aegilops ventricosa. The mean blast index of lines with and without the 2NS translocation was 2.7 ± 4.5 and 53.3 ± 15.9, respectively, that substantiates its strong effect on blast resistance. Furthermore, we fingerprinted a large panel of 4143 lines for the 2NS translocation that provided excellent insights into its frequency over years and indicated its presence in 94.1 and 93.7% of lines in the 2019 IBWSN and SAWSN, respectively. Overall, this study reinforces the effectiveness of the 2NS translocation for blast resistance and emphasizes the urgent need to identify novel non-2NS sources of blast resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philomin Juliana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, DF, Mexico
| | - Xinyao He
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, DF, Mexico
| | - Muhammad R Kabir
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Krishna K Roy
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Md Babul Anwar
- Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
| | - Felix Marza
- Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), La Paz, Bolivia
| | - Jesse Poland
- Department of Plant Pathology, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Sandesh Shrestha
- Department of Plant Pathology, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Ravi P Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
| | - Pawan K Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|