Effects of new insulin analogues HMR1964 (insulin glulisine) and HMR1423 on insulin receptors

Review of Evidence for Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management Protocols

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an endocrine emergency with associated risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, DKA management lacks strong evidence due to the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

To review existing studies investigating inpatient DKA management in adults, focusing on intravenous (IV) fluids; insulin administration; potassium, bicarbonate, and phosphate replacement; and DKA management protocols and impact of DKA resolution rates on outcomes.

METHODS

Ovid Medline searches were conducted with limits "all adult" and published between "1973 to current" applied. National consensus statements were also reviewed. Eligibility was determined by two reviewers' assessment of title, abstract, and availability.

RESULTS

A total of 85 eligible articles published between 1973 and 2016 were reviewed. The salient findings were (i) Crystalloids are favoured over colloids though evidence is lacking. The preferred crystalloid and hydration rates remain contentious. (ii) IV infusion of regular human insulin is preferred over the subcutaneous route or rapid acting insulin analogues. Administering an initial IV insulin bolus before low-dose insulin infusions obviates the need for supplemental insulin. Consensus-statements recommend fixed weight-based over "sliding scale" insulin infusions although evidence is weak. (iii) Potassium replacement is imperative although no trials compare replacement rates. (iv) Bicarbonate replacement offers no benefit in DKA with pH > 6.9. In severe metabolic acidosis with pH < 6.9, there is lack of both data and consensus regarding bicarbonate administration. (v) There is no evidence that phosphate replacement offers outcome benefits. Guidelines consider replacement appropriate in patients with cardiac dysfunction, anaemia, respiratory depression, or phosphate levels <0.32 mmol/L. (vi) Upon resolution of DKA, subcutaneous insulin is recommended with IV insulin infusions ceased with an overlap of 1-2 h. (vii) DKA resolution rates are often used as end points in studies, despite a lack of evidence that rapid resolution improves outcome. (viii) Implementation of DKA protocols lacks strong evidence for adherence but may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There are major deficiencies in evidence for optimal management of DKA. Current practice is guided by weak evidence and consensus opinion. All aspects of DKA management require RCTs to affirm or redirect management and formulate consensus evidence-based practice to improve patient outcomes.

Insulin Glulisine—A Comprehensive Preclinical Evaluation

Receptor binding and signaling and the mitogenic potential of insulin glulisine (glulisine), regular human insulin (RHI), and Asp(B10) were compared in vivo and in vitro. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) receptor binding was studied with human insulin receptors (293HEK cells) and the human osteosarcoma-derived cell line B10. Insulin receptor–mediated signaling was assessed in rat-1 fibroblasts overexpressing insulin receptors. Activation of insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 (IRS-1/IRS-2) was studied in rat and human myoblasts and rat cardiomyocytes. DNA synthesis induction was assessed by [3H] thymidine incorporation in the human epithelial breast cell line MCF10. Interaction with the IGF-1 receptor, DNA synthesis, and intracellular signal transduction were assessed in cardiac K6 myoblasts. Immunohistochemical examination of Sprague-Dawley rat tissue treated with glulisine for 6 months ( n = 40), and glulisine and RHI for 12 months ( n = 60), was performed. Steady-state insulin receptor binding affinity was slightly lower for glulisine versus RHI (~0.70). IGF-1 receptor binding affinity was lower (four-to fivefold) for glulisine, but significantly higher (four-fold) for Asp(B10) versus RHI. Glulisine, Asp(B10), and RHI showed similar insulin receptor–association kinetics; however, Asp(B10) revealed increased insulin receptor affinity. Glulisine and RHI showed similar insulin receptor–mediated phosphorylation and IRS-2 activation. Activation of IRS-1 was 6- to 10-fold lower with glulisine; glulisine was less potent and Asp(B10) slightly more potent in stimulating DNA synthesis versus RHI. Stimulation of DNA synthesis was comparable for glulisine and RHI in K6 myoblasts. At 12 months, there was no significant difference between glulisine and RHI in proliferative activity. This preclinical evaluation suggests that structural changes in glulisine versus RHI are not associated with any safety issues.

Impact of Single or Repeated Dose Intranasal Zinc-free Insulin in Young and Aged F344 Rats on Cognition, Signaling, and Brain Metabolism

Novel therapies have turned to delivering compounds to the brain using nasal sprays, bypassing the blood brain barrier, and enriching treatment options for brain aging and/or Alzheimer's disease. We conducted a series of in vivo experiments to test the impact of intranasal Apidra, a zinc-free insulin formulation, on the brain of young and aged F344 rats. Both single acute and repeated daily doses were compared to test the hypothesis that insulin could improve memory recall in aged memory-deficient animals. We quantified insulin signaling in different brain regions and at different times following delivery. We measured cerebral blood flow (CBF) using MRI and also characterized several brain metabolite levels using MR spectroscopy. We show that neither acute nor chronic Apidra improved memory or recall in young or aged animals. Within 2 hours of a single dose, increased insulin signaling was seen in ventral areas of the aged brains only. Although chronic Apidra was able to offset reduced CBF with aging, it also caused significant reductions in markers of neuronal integrity. Our data suggest that this zinc-free insulin formulation may actually hasten cognitive decline with age when used chronically.

(Poly)peptide-based therapy for diabetes mellitus: insulins versus incretins

Insulin therapy remains the standard of care for achieving and maintaining adequate glycemic control, especially in hospitalized patients with critical and noncritical illnesses. Insulin therapy is more effective against elevated fasting glycaemia but less in the reduction of postprandial hyperglycaemia. It is associated with a high incidence of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Contrary, GLP-1 mimetic therapy improves postprandial glycaemia without the hypoglycaemia and weight gain associated with aggressive insulin therapy. Moreover, it has the potential to reduce cardiovascular related morbidity. However, its increased immunogenicity and severe gastrointestinal adverse effects present a huge burden on patients. Thus, a right combination of basal insulin which has lowering effect on fasting plasma glucose and GLP-1 mimetic with its lowering effect on postprandial plasma glucose with minimal gastrointestinal adverse effects, seems the right therapy choice from a clinical point of view for some diabetic patients. In this article, we discuss the pros and cons of the use of insulin analogues and GLP-1 mimetics that are associated with the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

New approaches to the use of insulin in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is one of the most common and serious acute complications of diabetes and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the last decade the mortality rate from DKA has declined because of greater recognition and improvements in its management. The current available guidelines state that the most effective means of insulin delivery during DKA is a continuous infusion of regular insulin, usually referred to as continuous low-dose insulin infusion. However, the cost of this treatment is usually quite high, because patients are required to be admitted to an intensive care unit in order to be monitored closely. New analogs of human insulin that have a rapid onset of action have become available in the past decade and represent potential alternatives to the use of regular insulin in the treatment of DKA. In several trials it has been demonstrated that the use of subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin analogs represents a safe, cost-effective and technically simpler treatment that precludes intensive care unit admission without significant differences in outcome in the management of patients with mild to moderate, uncomplicated DKA. The long-acting insulin analog may have a role in facilitating the transition from continuous intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneous maintenance therapy in patients with DKA. This avoids rebound hyperglycaemia and ketogenesis when intravenous insulin is stopped and may avoid excess length of stay.

Insulin analogs and cancer

Today, insulin analogs are used in millions of diabetic patients. Insulin analogs have been developed to achieve more physiological insulin replacement in terms of time-course of the effect. Modifications in the amino acid sequence of the insulin molecule change the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the analogs in respect to human insulin. However, these changes can also modify the molecular and biological effects of the analogs. The rapid-acting insulin analogs, lispro, aspart, and glulisine, have a rapid onset and shorter duration of action. The long-acting insulin analogs glargine and detemir have a protracted duration of action and a relatively smooth serum concentration profile. Insulin and its analogs may function as growth factors and therefore have a theoretical potential to promote tumor proliferation. A major question is whether analogs have an increased mitogenic activity in respect to insulin. These ligands can promote cell proliferation through many mechanisms like the prolonged stimulation of the insulin receptor, stimulation of the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R), prevalent activation of the extracellular-signaling-regulated kinase (ERK) rather than the protein kinase B (PKB/AKT) intracellular post-receptor pathways. Studies on in vitro models indicate that short-acting analogs elicit molecular and biological effects that are similar to those of insulin. In contrast, long-acting analogs behave differently. Although not all data are homogeneous, both glargine and detemir have been found to have a decreased binding to receptors for insulin but an increased binding to IGF-1R, a prevalent activation of the ERK pathway, and an increased mitogenic effect in respect to insulin. Recent retrospective epidemiological clinical studies have suggested that treatment with long-acting analogs (specifically glargine) may increase the relative risk for cancer. Results are controversial and methodologically weak. Therefore prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate the possible tumor growth-promoting effects of these insulin analogs.

Differences in bioactivity between human insulin and insulin analogues approved for therapeutic use- compilation of reports from the past 20 years

In order to provide comprehensive information on the differences in bioactivity between human insulin and insulin analogues, published in vitro comparisons of human insulin and the rapid acting analogues insulin lispro (Humalog®), insulin aspart ( NovoRapid®), insulin glulisine (Apidra®), and the slow acting analogues insulin glargine (Lantus®), and insulin detemir (Levemir®) were gathered from the past 20 years (except for receptor binding studies). A total of 50 reports were retrieved, with great heterogeneity among study methodology. However, various differences in bioactivity compared to human insulin were obvious (e.g. differences in effects on metabolism, mitogenesis, apoptosis, intracellular signalling, thrombocyte function, protein degradation). Whether or not these differences have clinical bearings (and among which patient populations) remains to be determined.

Insulin and its analogs: actions via insulin and IGF receptors

Insulin analogs are artificially modified insulin molecules that allow better metabolic controls of diabetes through either more rapid or more prolonged activity. The interaction of insulin analogs with the insulin receptor isoforms (IR-A and IR-B) and with the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) is similar but not identical to that of insulin, and therefore, their biological effects do not always reproduce insulin actions in terms of quantity, quality and timing. Studies on in vitro models indicate that short-acting analogs elicit molecular and biological effects that are similar, but not identical, to those of insulin via IR-A, IR-B and IGF-IR. In contrast, long-acting analogs behave in a more different way relative to insulin. Although data are not homogeneous and observations on the more recently introduced detemir are scarce, both glargine and detemir often show a decreased binding to IR and increased binding to IGF-IR. Also, intracellular signaling is different with respect to insulin, with a prevalent activation of the ERK rather than the AKT pathway. Finally, an increased mitogenic response has often been observed with these analogs in a variety of cell models. Of course, in vitro studies do not necessarily reflect what occurs in patients, due to the different metabolism of analogs in vivo and their interaction with components of the extracellular environment. After many years of analog's use, observations in patients indicate that insulin analogs are both effective and safe. Prospective clinical studies, however, may add further useful information on the issue of the insulin analogs' possible differences with respect to native insulin.

The role of insulin glulisine to improve glycemic control in children with diabetes mellitus

Glulisine (Apidra(®)) is a rapid-acting human insulin analog approved for use in children with diabetes mellitus ≥4 years of age. Management of children with type 1 diabetes has seen a shift in favor of mimicking normal physiological insulin responses with multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions (CSII). Few studies have compared the rapid-acting insulin analogs in this population but limited data indicate that glulisine is as effective as lispro when used in a basal-bolus regimen. This review appraises the current available studies and reviews on insulin glulisine in children. An extensive keyword search of 'insulin glulisine', 'insulin analogs', and 'Apidra' in the pediatric population was performed. These studies have suggested that glulisine is safe, well tolerated, and is an effective option in the diabetes armamentarium. Further studies are needed to determine its safety for use in CSII pumps in the pediatric population.

Insulin, insulin resistance, obesity, and cancer

Epidemiologic studies have proposed a link between obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. The pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the development of type 2 diabetes, namely hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, have also been implicated in cancer development. Patients with type 2 diabetes are reported to have a worse response to cancer chemotherapy, have more complications, and have a poorer prognosis than patients with cancer without diabetes. Studies also have reported that insulin, insulin secretagogues, and metformin may have effects on tumor growth. Given the escalating worldwide prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, their relationship to cancer has generated great interest and research across many fields of medicine.

Insulin glulisine: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus

Insulin glulisine (Apidra) is a human insulin analogue approved for the improvement of glycaemic control in adults, adolescents and children with diabetes mellitus. It has similar binding properties, and is associated with a faster onset but similar level of glucose disposal, to regular human insulin (RHI). Insulin glulisine and insulin lispro have similar effects on glucose levels. Insulin glulisine is effective when compared to other short- and rapid-acting insulins, demonstrating either noninferiority, no significant difference, or superiority in primary endpoints in studies involving patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. It is more effective and has a faster onset and shorter duration of activity than RHI. Insulin glulisine is as effective as insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes; however, there is a need for further, well designed head-to-head comparisons with insulin lispro in patients with type 2 diabetes and with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to fully establish the place of insulin glulisine in the management of diabetes. Insulin glulisine has a flexible administration period, as it can be administered immediately before or after meals. Hypoglycaemia, a common risk with insulins, occurs at a similar rate among recipients of insulin glulisine to that seen with other insulins. Thus, insulin glulisine is an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Proliferative effect of Apidra (insulin glulisine), a rapid-acting insulin analogue on mammary epithelial cells

The structural modification of insulin results in the generation of insulin analogues that show altered binding affinities to the insulin receptor and/or the IGF-I receptor, and as a consequence insulin analogues may have altered mitogenic potency. We analysed the proliferative effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogue Apidra (insulin glulisine) on mammary epithelial cells. We show that Apidra and Actrapid (recombinant human insulin) have similar proliferative effects on benign MCF10A and tumorigenic MCF7 cells and on epithelial cells of mouse mammary gland. Whereas Apidra and Actrapid induced similar activation of Erk1/2, activation of Akt/PKB by Apidra was significantly weaker compared to regular insulin. As AKT/PKB, an effector of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway, mediates metabolic effects of insulin, we studied induction of hexokinase-2 in MCF7 cells and hexokinase-2 and hexokinase-4 in HepG2 cells by Actrapid and Apidra. Both genes were not significantly induced by Actrapid and Apidra in these cell lines.

Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of insulin analogs and human insulins both during acute intravenous treatment and during the transition to subcutaneous insulin in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a controlled multicenter and open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with DKA to receive intravenous treatment with regular or glulisine insulin until resolution of DKA. After resolution of ketoacidosis, patients treated with intravenous regular insulin were transitioned to subcutaneous NPH and regular insulin twice daily (n = 34). Patients treated with intravenous glulisine insulin were transitioned to subcutaneous glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 34).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the mean duration of treatment or in the amount of insulin infusion until resolution of DKA between intravenous treatment with regular and glulisine insulin. After transition to subcutaneous insulin, there were no differences in mean daily blood glucose levels, but patients treated with NPH and regular insulin had a higher rate of hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dl). Fourteen patients (41%) treated with NPH and regular insulin had 26 episodes of hypoglycemia and 5 patients (15%) in the glargine and glulisine group had 8 episodes of hypoglycemia (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular and glulisine insulin are equally effective during the acute treatment of DKA. A transition to subcutaneous glargine and glulisine after resolution of DKA resulted in similar glycemic control but in a lower rate of hypoglycemia than with NPH and regular insulin. Thus, a basal bolus regimen with glargine and glulisine is safer and should be preferred over NPH and regular insulin after the resolution of DKA.

Growth effects of insulin and insulin analogues

The definition of mitogenic activity of insulin is controversial. Under physiological conditions, mitogenic refers to cell proliferation and tissue repair. In pathological conditions, it may refer to stimulation of tumour cells in pre-existing (undiagnosed) tumours. The in vitro investigations using benign and malignant cell lines compare proliferative activity of insulin molecules (animal, human and analogues). In these studies, inclusion of [B10-Asp] insulin would be a valuable link to the existing evidence on proliferation of mammary tissue in rodents. Animal and human insulin have growth promoting activity on spontaneously arising tumours (e.g. mammary tumours in rodents). They have no carcinogenic activity (cell transformation), and moreover insulin is not a co-carcinogen when evaluated in special toxicology. Mitogenicity (growth promoting activity) of insulin may be a problem in people with undiagnosed tumours, and may require definition of patient groups who would benefit from targeted monitoring.

Insulin, insulin analogues and diabetic retinopathy

Insulin is absolutely vital for living beings. It is not only involved in metabolism, but also in the regulation of growth factors, e.g. IGF-1. In this review we address the role insulin has in the natural evolution of diabetic retinopathy. On the one hand, chronic deficiency of insulin and IGF-1 at the retina is thought to cause capillary degeneration, with subsequent ischaemia. On the other hand, acute abundance of (exogenously administered) insulin and IGF-1 enhances ischaemia-induced VEGF expression. A critical ratio of tissue VEGF-susceptibility: VEGF-availability triggers vascular proliferation (i.e. of micro-aneurysms and/or abnormal vessels). The patent-protected insulin analogues Lispro, Glulisine, Aspart, Glargine and Detemir are artificial insulin derivatives with altered biological responses compared to natural insulin (e.g. divergent insulin and /or IGF-1 receptor-binding characteristics, signalling patterns, and mitogenicity). Their safety profiles concerning diabetic retinopathy remain to be established by randomised controlled trials. Anecdotal reports and circumstantial evidence suggest that Lispro and Glargine might worsen diabetic retinopathy.

Insulin analogues: action profiles beyond glycaemic control

A variety of studies have documented significant improvements in the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes after the introduction of artificial insulins. This review gives an overview of insulin analogues which are currently approved for therapeutical use. Clinical data regarding the efficiency to control blood glucose level as well as improving HbA1c level in comparison to conventional insulin preparations in type 1 and 2 diabetic patients are summarized. Furthermore, special features of insulin analogues regarding their signalling properties are discussed with focus on the proliferative effects of insulin glargine as well as some recent data of insulin detemir.

Insulin glulisine: efficacy and safety compared with other rapid-acting insulin analogues

Glulisine insulin is the latest addition to the class of rapid-acting insulin analogues. It is important that it is comparable in safety not only to human regular insulin, but also to the well established analogue insulins, aspart and lispro. In this summary the evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of glulisine with its counterpart insulins in various groups of diabetic patients is discussed.

Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia

In healthy individuals, blood glucose levels in the fasting state are maintained by the continuous basal-level insulin secretion. After a meal, the rise in postprandial glucose (PPG) is controlled by the rapid pancreatic release of insulin, stimulated by both glucose and the intestinal production of the incretins glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1. In diabetic individuals, postprandial insulin secretion is insufficient to suppress an excessive rise in PPG. There is increasing evidence that elevated PPG exerts a more deleterious effect on the vascular system than elevation of fasting plasma glucose. In particular, individuals with normal fasting plasma glucose but impaired glucose tolerance have significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events. With the recognition of the importance of PPG and the availability of new pharmacologic options, management of diabetes will shift to greater attention to PPG levels. The prototype for such an approach is in the treatment of gestational diabetes and diabetic pregnancies where PPG is the primary target of efforts at glycemic control. These efforts have been extremely successful in improving the outlook for diabetic pregnant women. There are many approaches to reduction of PPG; dietary management and promotion of exercise are very effective. Sulfonylureas, meglitinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, and disaccharidase inhibitors all counteract PPG elevation. The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists such as exendin and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors such as vildagliptin offers a new approach to suppression of PPG elevation. New semisynthetic insulin analogues permit a more aggressive response to postprandial glucose elevation, with lower risk of hypoglycemia, than with regular insulin. Inhaled insulin also has a rapid onset of action and offers benefits in PPG control. It is proposed that an aggressive treatment approach focusing on PPG, similar to the current standards for diabetic pregancies, be directed at individuals with diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.

Insulin Glulisine

Insulin glulisine is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue that has a faster onset of action and shorter duration of action than regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and is efficacious in controlling prandial blood glucose levels in these patients. In large, well designed trials in patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin glulisine demonstrated a similar degree of glycaemic control, as measured by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, to RHI after 12 weeks and insulin lispro after 26 weeks. Pre-meal insulin glulisine was also more effective than RHI at controlling 2-hour post-prandial glucose excursions in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes over a period of 12 weeks. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin glulisine induced significantly greater reductions in HbA(1c) levels and 2-hour post-breakfast and post-dinner blood glucose levels than RHI over a period of 26 weeks. Insulin glulisine was generally well tolerated by patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and had a similar safety profile to insulin lispro or RHI. Severe hypoglycaemia was experienced by similar proportions of insulin glulisine or comparator insulin (insulin lispro or RHI) recipients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.