Insulin glargine and insulin have identical effects on proliferation and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signalling in rat thyrocytes and human follicular thyroid cancer cells

Impaired Glucose Metabolism, Anti-Diabetes Medications, and Risk of Thyroid Cancer

Simple Summary

An epidemiologic link exists between obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, and some cancers, such as breast cancer and colon cancer. The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing, and additional epidemiologic data suggest that there may be a link between obesity and risk of thyroid abnormalities. Factors that may link obesity and diabetes with thyroid proliferative disorders include elevated circulating levels of insulin, increased body fat, high blood sugars, and exogenous insulin use. However, mechanisms underlying associations of obesity, diabetes, and thyroid proliferative disorders are not yet fully understood. The present manuscript reviews and summarizes current evidence of mechanisms and epidemiologic associations of obesity, insulin resistance, and use of anti-diabetes medications with benign and malignant proliferative disorders of the thyroid.

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity is progressively increasing along with the potential high risk for insulin resistance and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Obesity is associated with increased risk of many malignancies, and hyperinsulinemia has been proposed to be a link between obesity and cancer development. The incidence of thyroid cancer is also increasing, making this cancer the most common endocrine malignancy. There is some evidence of associations between obesity, insulin resistance and/or diabetes with thyroid proliferative disorders, including thyroid cancer. However, the etiology of such an association has not been fully elucidated. The goal of the present work is to review the current knowledge on crosstalk between thyroid and glucose metabolic pathways and the effects of obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, and anti-hyperglycemic medications on the risk of thyroid cancer development.

The Role of Insulin Glargine and Human Insulin in the Regulation of Thyroid Proliferation Through Mitogenic Signaling

Our aim was to investigate whether human insulin (HI) or insulin glargine treatment could promote the proliferation of thyroid cells and determine the association between type 2 diabetes and thyroid disease. Rats were treated with different doses of HI and insulin glargine. Plasma glucose and the phosphorylation levels of the insulin receptor (IR), insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), protein kinase B (Akt), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) were measured. A total of 105 rats were randomly assigned to three groups as follows: control group, HI group, and glargine group. Both drugs promoted the phosphorylation of IR, Akt, and ERK1/2 in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05), and the effect of glargine persisted for longer period. Treatment with ultra-therapeutic doses of HI or glargine (p < 0.05) increased the expression of Ki-67 in thyroid cells. The results demonstrated that therapeutic doses of glargine have a longer-lasting hypoglycemic control than HI. Based on the results, HI or glargine did not stimulate thyroid cell proliferation at therapeutic doses, but high doses did.

Treatment with human insulin does not increase thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Whether human insulin therapy may increase thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The reimbursement databases of all Taiwanese diabetic patients from 1996 to 2009 were retrieved from the Bureau of National Health Insurance. The entry date was set at 1 January 2004, and 968,384 patients with T2DM were followed up for thyroid cancer incidence until the end of 2009. Ever-users, never-users and subgroups of human insulin exposure (using tertile cut-offs of time since starting insulin, duration of therapy and cumulative dose) at entry date were calculated for thyroid cancer incidence. Insulin glargine was not marketed until after the entry date. Therefore, to exclude the potential contamination of insulin glargine, patients who happened to use insulin glargine were censored at the time of its initiation when calculating the period of follow-up. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression.

RESULTS

There were 111,121 ever-users and 857,263 never-users of human insulin, with respective numbers of incident thyroid cancer of 118 (0·11%) and 1047 (0·12%), and respective incidences of 23·9 and 23·8 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) did not show a significant association with human insulin in either the age-sex-adjusted or the fully adjusted model: 0·942 (0·778-1·141) and 1·096 (0·888-1·353), respectively. When categorized into tertiles of the dose-response parameters, none of the hazard ratios was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support the role of human insulin therapy in increasing the risk of thyroid cancer in patients with T2DM.

Cancer biology in diabetes

Diabetes is a serious metabolic disease that causes multiple organ dysfunctions. Recent evidence suggests that diabetes could contribute to the initiation and progression of certain cancers in addition to the classic diabetic complications. Furthermore, some of the drugs used clinically to treat patients with diabetes might affect cancer initiation, progression and mortality. The recent discovery of the possible anticancer effects of metformin, a classic antidiabetic drug, has led physicians and scientists to reconsider the interaction between diabetes and cancer. In the present review, we analyze recent reports in this field, and explore possible mechanistic links between diabetes and cancer biology.

Classifying the adverse mitogenic mode of action of insulin analogues using a novel mechanism-based genetically engineered human breast cancer cell panel

Insulin analogues are widely used in clinical practice. Modifications on the insulin molecular structure can affect the affinity and activation towards two closely related receptor tyrosine kinases: the insulin receptor (INSR) and the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R). A switch towards higher IGF1R affinity is likely to emphasize mitogenesis rather than glucose metabolism. Relevant well-validated experimental tools to address the insulin analogue activation of either INSR or IGF1R are missing. We have established a panel of human MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines either ectopically expressing the INSR (A or B isoform) in conjunction with a stable knockdown of the IGF1R or ectopically expressing the IGF1R in conjunction with a stable knockdown of the INSR. In these cell lines, we systematically evaluated the INSR and IGF1R receptor activation and downstream mitogenic signalling of all major clinical relevant insulin analogues in comparison with insulin and IGF1R. While most insulin analogues primarily activated the INSR, the mitogenic activation pattern of glargine was highly similar to IGF1 and insulin AspB10, known to bind IGF1R and induce carcinogenesis. Yet, in a long-term proliferation assay, the proliferative effect of glargine was not much different from regular insulin or other insulin analogues. This was caused by the rapid enzymatic conversion into its two metabolic active metabolites M1 and M2, with reduced mitogenic signalling through the IGF1R. In summary, based on our new cell models, we identified a similar mitogenic potency of insulin glargine and AspB10. However, rapid enzymatic conversion of glargine precludes a sustained activation of the IGF1R signalling pathway.

Insulin glargine and cancer risk in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis

AIM

The role of insulin glargine as a risk factor for cancer is controversial in human studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between insulin glargine and cancer incidence.

METHODS

All observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating the relationship of insulin glargine and cancer risk were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and the Chinese Biomedical Medical Literature Database, through March 2012. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Confidence in the estimates of the obtained effects (quality of evidence) was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies including 448,928 study subjects and 19,128 cancer patients were finally identified for the meta-analysis. Insulin glargine use was associated with a lower odds of cancer compared with non-glargine insulin use (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98, P = 0.03; very low-quality evidence). Glargine did not increase the odds of breast cancer (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.46, P = 0.966; very low-quality evidence). Compared with non-glargine insulin, no significant association was found between insulin glargine and prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer and respiratory tract cancer. Insulin glargine use was associated with lower odds of other site-specific cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the meta-analysis don't support the link between insulin glargine and an increased risk of cancer and the confidence in the estimates of the effects is very low. Further studies are needed to examine the relation between insulin glargine and cancer risk, especially breast cancer.

Insulin therapy and cancer in type 2 diabetes

Despite the availability of many other agents, insulin is widely used as a treatment for type 2 diabetes. In vitro, insulin stimulates the growth of cancer cells, through the interaction with insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors and its own receptors. In observational surveys on type 2 diabetes, insulin therapy is associated with an increased incidence of several forms of cancer, although it is difficult to discriminate the effect of confounders from that of insulin itself. Randomized trials do not confirm the increased risk associated with insulin therapy, although they do not allow to rule out some negative effects on specific forms of cancer, at least at higher doses. Among insulin analogues, glargine has a higher affinity for the IGF-1 receptor and a greater mitogenic potency in vitro than human insulin, but it is extensively metabolized in vitro to products with low IGF-1 receptor affinity. Overall, epidemiological studies suggest a possible increase of risk with glargine, with respect to human insulin, only at high doses and for some forms of cancer (i.e., breast). Data from clinical trials do not confirm, but are still insufficient to totally exclude, such increased risk. However, beneficial effects of insulin outweigh potential cancer risks.

Differential impact of structurally different anti-diabetic drugs on proliferation and chemosensitivity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

Hyperglycemia during hyper-CVAD chemotherapy is associated with poor outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (Cancer 2004; 100: 1179-85). The optimal clinical strategy to manage hyperglycemia during hyper-CVAD is unclear. To examine whether anti-diabetic pharmacotherapy can influence chemosensitivity of ALL cells, we examined the impacts of different anti-diabetic agents on ALL cell lines and patient samples. Pharmacologically achievable concentrations of insulin, aspart and glargine significantly increased the number of ALL cells, and aspart and glargine did so at lower concentrations than human insulin. In contrast, metformin and rosiglitazone significantly decreased the cell number. Human insulin and analogs activated AKT/mTOR signaling and stimulated ALL cell proliferation (as measured by flow cytometric methods), but metformin and rosiglitazone blocked AKT/mTOR signaling and inhibited proliferation. Metformin 500 μM and rosiglitazone 10 μM were found to sensitize Reh cells to daunorubicin, while aspart, glargine and human insulin (all at 1.25 mIU/L) enhanced chemoresistance. Metformin and rosiglitazone enhanced daunorubicin-induced apoptosis, while insulin, aspart and glargine antagonized daunorubicin-induced apoptosis. In addition, metformin increased etoposide-induced and L-asparaginase-induced apoptosis; rosiglitazone increased etoposide-induced and vincristine-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, our results suggest that use of insulins to control hyperglycemia in ALL patients may contribute to anthracycline chemoresistance, while metformin and thiazolidinediones may improve chemosensitivity to anthracycline as well as other chemotherapy drugs through their different impacts on AKT/mTOR signaling in leukemic cells. Our data suggest that the choice of anti-diabetic pharmacotherapy during chemotherapy may influence clinical outcomes in ALL.

New insulins and insulin therapy

The introduction of the so-called 'designer' insulins, the insulin analogues, has offered new opportunities in the clinical management of diabetes. Two additional new entities are close to reaching clinical practice. Linjeta™ (formally called VIAject) is not an analogue but rather a different formulation of human insulin which may give it a more rapid onset of action, potentially even faster than the currently available rapid-acting insulin analogues. Degludec™, on the other hand, is an insulin analogue molecule with an ultra-long clinical profile derived from the soluble multi-hexamer formation, resulting in a continuous slow and stable release of insulin degludec monomers which may last longer than currently available long-acting analogues. As with any new type of drug, the safety of the 'designer' insulins has to be closely scrutinised. Last year the increased cancer risk in diabetes entered the spotlight and the potential role of insulin analogues led to controversial discussions. In spite of recent new in vitro and observational data no new conclusive evidence became available. The need for multiple well-conducted and appropriately designed prospective observational studies to follow up the effectiveness and safety of the new insulins and the new insulin treatment regimens remains. In this chapter it was our mission to chose articles published about "new insulins" over the last year that have the most important contribution for the on-going development of ultra-fast- and ultra-long-acting insulin analogs and preparations and their potential side-effects, particularly cancer. This has been done by means of PubMed searches as well as a review of abstracts of the recent large international diabetes meetings such as ADA, EASD and ISPAD.

Differences in bioactivity between human insulin and insulin analogues approved for therapeutic use- compilation of reports from the past 20 years

In order to provide comprehensive information on the differences in bioactivity between human insulin and insulin analogues, published in vitro comparisons of human insulin and the rapid acting analogues insulin lispro (Humalog®), insulin aspart ( NovoRapid®), insulin glulisine (Apidra®), and the slow acting analogues insulin glargine (Lantus®), and insulin detemir (Levemir®) were gathered from the past 20 years (except for receptor binding studies). A total of 50 reports were retrieved, with great heterogeneity among study methodology. However, various differences in bioactivity compared to human insulin were obvious (e.g. differences in effects on metabolism, mitogenesis, apoptosis, intracellular signalling, thrombocyte function, protein degradation). Whether or not these differences have clinical bearings (and among which patient populations) remains to be determined.