The impact of hospital-diagnosed depression or use of antidepressants on treatment initiation, adherence and HbA1c/LDL target achievement in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Cardiovascular risk management among individuals with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness: a cohort study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to compare cardiovascular risk management among people with type 2 diabetes according to severe mental illness (SMI) status.

METHODS

We used linked electronic data to perform a retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in Scotland between 2004 and 2020, ascertaining their history of SMI from hospital admission records. We compared total cholesterol, systolic BP and HbA1c target level achievement 1 year after diabetes diagnosis, and receipt of a statin prescription at diagnosis and 1 year thereafter, by SMI status using logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and clinical history.

RESULTS

We included 291,644 individuals with type 2 diabetes, of whom 1.0% had schizophrenia, 0.5% had bipolar disorder and 3.3% had major depression. People with SMI were less likely to achieve cholesterol targets, although this difference did not reach statistical significance for all disorders. However, people with SMI were more likely to achieve systolic BP targets compared to those without SMI, with effect estimates being largest for schizophrenia (men: adjusted OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.49, 1.98; women: OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.38, 1.96). HbA1c target achievement differed by SMI disorder and sex. Among people without previous CVD, statin prescribing was similar or better in those with vs those without SMI at diabetes diagnosis and 1 year later. In people with prior CVD, SMI was associated with lower odds of statin prescribing at diabetes diagnosis (schizophrenia: OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.43, 0.68, bipolar disorder: OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.56, 1.01, major depression: OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.83, 1.01), with this difference generally persisting 1 year later.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

We found disparities in cholesterol target achievement and statin prescribing by SMI status. This reinforces the importance of clinical review of statin prescribing for secondary prevention of CVD, particularly among people with SMI.

Impact of depression on self-efficacy, illness perceptions and self-management among people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

BACKGROUND

Treating comorbid depression does not always improve outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. Evidence is lacking on potential psychological and behavioural intermediaries of the impact of depression on diabetes outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise evidence on the impact of comorbid depression on self-efficacy, illness perceptions, and self-management in people with type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Health databases from inception up to 29th March 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Only prospective studies (cohort or intervention studies) were included, with no restrictions on language. The outcomes were self-efficacy, illness perceptions, and self-management.

PARTICIPANTS

People with type 2 diabetes in community or health settings.

EXPOSURE

Comorbid depression or depressive symptoms in people with type 2 diabetes.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

A narrative review of heterogeneous studies.

RISK OF BIAS

The risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool for quantitative studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were included, all from high-income countries. Depression was associated with lower self-efficacy (2 studies), poor illness perception (1 study), and poor self-management practices (17 studies) in people with type 2 diabetes. In 6/7 studies, depressive symptoms predicted less adherence to dietary recommendations, 8/10 studies found depressive symptoms were associated with poor medication adherence, 1/3 study found that depressive symptoms were associated with poor weight control, 3/4 with less physical exercise, and 2/3 with general self-care practices.

LIMITATIONS

There were no studies from low- and middle-income countries and non-Western settings, and we cannot assume the mechanisms linking comorbid depression with diabetes outcomes are similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid depression was associated with lower self-efficacy, poorer self-management, and less adaptive illness perceptions among people with diabetes.

The development of type 2 diabetes management in people with severe mental illness in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2001 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment has changed markedly within the last decades. We aimed to explore whether people with severe mental illness (SMI) have followed the same changes in T2D treatment as those without SMI, as multiple studies suggest that people with SMI receive suboptimal care for somatic disorders.

METHODS

In this registry-based annual cohort study, we explored the T2D treatment from 2001 to 2015 provided in general practices of the Greater Copenhagen area. We stratified the T2D cohorts by their pre-existing SMI status. T2D was defined based on elevated glycated hemoglobin (≥48 mmol/mol) or glucose (≥11 mmol/L) using data from the Copenhagen Primary Care Laboratory Database. Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (ICD-10 F20-29) or affective disorders (bipolar disorder or unipolar depression, ICD-10 F30-33) were identified based on hospital-acquired diagnoses made within 5 years before January 1 each year for people with prevalent T2D or 5 years before meeting our T2D definition for incident patients. For comparison, we defined a non-SMI group, including people who did not have a hospital-acquired diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, affective disorders, or personality disorders. For each calendar year, we assembled cohorts of people with T2D with or without SMI. We used Poisson regression to calculate the rates per 100 person-years of having at least one biochemical test (glycated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine albumin-creatinine ratio), having poor control of these biochemical results, taking glucose-lowering or cardiovascular medications, or experiencing a clinical outcome, including all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Three outcomes (cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality) were additionally examined and adjusted for age and sex in a post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2015, 66,914 individuals were identified as having T2D. In 2015, 1.5% of the study population had schizophrenia spectrum disorder and 1.4% had an affective disorder. The number of people who used biochemical tests or had poor biochemical risk factor control was essentially unrelated to SMI status. One exception was that fewer LDL cholesterol tests were done on people with affective disorders and schizophrenia spectrum disorders at the beginning of the study period compared to people in the non-SMI group. This difference gradually diminished and was almost nonexistent by 2011. There was also a slightly slower rise in UACR test rates in the SMI groups compared to other people with T2D during the period. Throughout the study period, all groups changed their use of medications in similar ways: more metformin, less sulfonylurea, more lipid-lowering drugs, and more ACEi/ARBs. However, people with schizophrenia disorder consistently used fewer cardiovascular medications. Cardiovascular events were more common in the affective disorder group compared to the non-SMI group from 2009 to 2015 (rate ratio 2015 : 1.36 [95% CI 1.18-1.57]). After adjustment for age and sex, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder each year from 2003 to 2015 compared to the non-SMI group (rate ratio 2015 : 1.99 [95% CI 1.26-3.12]).

CONCLUSION

Persons with schizophrenia or affective disorders demonstrated the same treatment changes for T2D as those without SMI in general practice. The lower use of most types of cardiovascular medications among people with schizophrenia disorders indicates potential undertreatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia and remains throughout the study period. Cardiovascular events were most common among people with affective disorders, but this was not reflected in a higher proportion using cardiovascular preventive medications. This knowledge should be considered in the management of this vulnerable patient group.

Diabetes treatment for persons with severe mental illness: A registry-based cohort study to explore medication treatment differences for persons with type 2 diabetes with and without severe mental illness

It has been argued that persons with severe mental illness (SMI) receive poorer treatment for somatic comorbidities. This study assesses the treatment rates of glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medications among persons with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and SMI compared to persons with T2D without SMI. We identified persons ≥30 years old with incident diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol and/or glucose ≥ 11.0 mmol/L) from 2001 through 2015 in the Copenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database. The SMI group included persons with psychotic, affective, or personality disorders within five years preceding the T2D diagnosis. Using a Poisson regression model, we calculated the adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for the redemption of various glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medications up to ten years after T2D diagnosis. We identified 1,316 persons with T2D and SMI and 41,538 persons with T2D but no SMI. Despite similar glycemic control at diagnosis, persons with SMI redeemed a glucose-lowering medication more often than persons without SMI in the period 0.5-2 years after the T2D diagnosis; for example, the aRR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.11) in the period 1.5-2 years after the T2D diagnosis. This difference was mainly driven by metformin. In contrast, persons with SMI were less often treated with cardiovascular medications during the first 3 years after T2D diagnosis, e.g., in the period 1.5-2 years after T2D diagnosis, the aRR was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99). For people with SMI in addition to T2D, metformin is more likely to be used in the initial years after T2D diagnosis, while our results suggest potential room for improvement regarding the use of cardiovascular medications.

Antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescribing and diabetes outcomes: A systematic review of observational studies

AIMS

Psychotropic medication may be associated with adverse effects, including among people with diabetes. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies investigating the association between antidepressant or antipsychotic drug prescribing and type 2 diabetes outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to 15th August 2022 to identify eligible studies. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess study quality and performed a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We included 18 studies, 14 reporting on antidepressants and four on antipsychotics. There were 11 cohort studies, one self-controlled before and after study, two case-control studies, and four cross-sectional studies, of variable quality with highly heterogeneous study populations, exposure definitions, and outcomes analysed. Antidepressant prescribing may be associated with increased risk of macrovascular disease, whilst evidence on antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing and glycaemic control was mixed. Few studies reported microvascular outcomes and risk factors other than glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescribing in relation to diabetes outcomes are scarce, with shortcomings and mixed findings. Until further evidence is available, people with diabetes prescribed antidepressants and antipsychotics should receive monitoring and appropriate treatment of risk factors and screening for complications as recommended in general diabetes guidelines.

Indicators of quality of diabetes care in persons with type 2 diabetes with and without severe mental illness: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to examine quality of diabetes care in persons with type 2 diabetes with and without severe mental illness (SMI).

METHODS

In a nationwide prospective register-based study, we followed persons with type 2 diabetes in Denmark with and without SMI including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression. Quality of care was measured as receipt of care (hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and urine albumin creatinine ratio assessment and eye and foot screening) and achievement of treatment targets between 2015 and 2019. Quality of care was compared in persons with and without SMI using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for key confounders.

FINDINGS

We included 216,537 persons with type 2 diabetes. At entry 16,874 (8%) had SMI. SMI was associated with lower odds of receiving care, with the most pronounced difference in urine albumin creatinine ratio assessment and eye screening (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.53-0.58 and OR: 0.37 95% CI: 0.32-0.42, respectively). Among those with an assessment, we found that SMI was associated with higher achievement of recommended hemoglobin A1c levels and lower achievement of recommended low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. Achievement of recommended low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels was similar in persons with versus without schizophrenia.

INTERPRETATION

Compared to persons without SMI, persons with SMI were less likely to receive process of care, with the most pronounced differences in urine albumin creatinine ratio assessment and eye screening.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen through an unrestricted grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Risk factors associated with mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes and depression across two cohorts

OBJECTIVE

Depression has been linked to excess mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes, but it remains unclear what drives this association. We examined if the association depends on unhealthy lifestyle and medical comorbidity.

METHODS

We followed a clinically recruited cohort of Danish people with type 2 diabetes (n = 8175) with fine-grained clinical information and a population-wide register-based cohort of Danish individuals with HbA1c-defined type 2 diabetes (n = 87 500) representing everyday clinical practice. Antidepressant drug use prior to the onset of type 2 diabetes was used as a proxy for preexisting depression. In both cohorts, we first estimated the association between depression and 5-year mortality following type 2 diabetes, using a Cox proportional hazards model, yielding sex- and age-adjusted mortality rate ratios (MRRs). We subsequently examined how further adjustment for markers of unhealthy lifestyle (smoking, physical inactivity, obesity, alcohol abuse, and marital status) and medical comorbidity affected the association.

RESULTS

Preexisting depression was associated with an approximately 50% increased age- and sex-adjusted all-cause mortality rate in both the clinically recruited- (5-year MRR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12-1.90) and the register-based type 2 diabetes cohort (5-year MRR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.45-1.57). The excess mortality associated with depression almost disappeared when the analyses were adjusted for unhealthy lifestyle and medical comorbidity in both the clinically recruited- (MRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.72-1.52) and the register-based type 2 diabetes cohort (MRR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

A large fraction of the excess mortality associated with preexisting depression in type 2 diabetes is attributable to the unhealthy lifestyle and medical comorbidity accompanying depression.

Achieving diabetes treatment targets in people with registered mental illness is similar or improved compared with those without: Analyses of linked observational datasets

AIMS

To determine the association between registered mental illness and type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment targets, while taking into account the effects of health expenditure and social determinants of health.

METHODS

This observational cross-sectional study was based on routine primary care data, linked to socio-economic and medical claims data. The main outcomes, analysed by multivariate logistic regression, were achieving primary care guideline treatment targets for HbA1c , systolic blood pressure (SBP) and LDL-cholesterol in 2017. We examined the association with diagnosed mental illness registered by the general practitioner (GP) or treated via specialist' mental healthcare between 2016 and 2018, adjusting for, medication use, body mass index, co-morbidity, smoking, and additionally examining effect-modification of healthcare expenditures, migration status, income and demographics.

RESULTS

Overall (N = 2862), 64.0% of participants achieved their treatment targets for HbA1c , 65.1% for SBP and 53.0% for LDL-cholesterol. Adjusted for migrant background, income and care expenditures, individuals <65 years of age with mental illness achieved their HbA1c treatment target more often than those without (OR (95% CI)): treatment by GP: 1.46 (1.01, 2.11), specialist care: 1.61 (1.11, 2.34), as did men with mental illness for SBP: GP OR 1.61 (1.09, 2.40), specialist care OR 1.59 (1.09, 2.45). LDL-cholesterol target was not associated with mental illness. A migrant background or low income lowered the likelihood of reaching HbA1c targets.

CONCLUSIONS

People with registered mental illness appear comparable or better able to achieve diabetes treatment targets than those without. Achieving HbA1c targets is influenced by social disadvantage.

Evaluation of knowledge, barriers, and attitudes in the management of type 2 diabetes in elderly patients: A Delphi study on primary and hospital care

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to explore attitudes regarding the management of elderly or frail patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the routine clinical practice of a multidisciplinary group of physicians in Spain.

METHODS

A mixed survey was used that included both Delphi and opinion, attitude, and behaviour (OAB) questions. Perceptions in primary care (n = 211) and hospital care (n = 80) were compared.

RESULTS

Consensus was obtained on all statements. Eighty-seven percent of participants considered that severe psychiatric disorders conditioned antidiabetic treatment and 72% that a psychocognitive assessment is as relevant as the assessment of other comorbidities. Hospital care physicians more frequently considered that comorbidity affects self-care (95.0% vs. 82.9%), that a lack of de-intensification is a form of therapeutic inertia (88.8% vs. 76.3%), that classifying older adults as frail is fundamental to choosing targets (96.3% vs. 87.7%), that de-intensification of antidiabetic treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors should be considered in those over 80 years of age (90.0% vs. 78.7%), and that type 2 diabetes mellitus predisposes patients to sarcopenia (86.3% vs. 71.6%). The usefulness of clinical guidelines was more highly valued among primary care participants (79.1% vs. 72.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement on several aspects of managing elderly or frail patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, including inertia in treatment de-intensification, conducting a psychocognitive assessment, or the identification of frailty and sarcopenia.

A Within-Subject Before-After Study of the Impact of Antidepressants on Hemoglobin A1c and Low-Density Lipoprotein Levels in Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Data on the effect of treatment with antidepressant drugs on metabolic control in diabetes are sparse. In this controlled within-subject before-after study, the impact of initiation and discontinuation of antidepressant treatment on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in type 2 diabetes was estimated.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

All individuals with newly developed type 2 diabetes (first HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) between 2000 and 2016 in Northern and Central Denmark were identified using register-based health care data. Among these, we identified individuals initiating and discontinuing antidepressant treatment. Using a within-subject before-after design, we examined HbA1c and LDL in the 16 months leading up to and the 16 months after antidepressant treatment initiation or discontinuation, respectively. For comparison, we ran similar time trend analyses in a reference population of age- and sex-matched type 2 diabetes individuals not receiving antidepressant treatment.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Mean HbA1c decreased after initiation of antidepressant treatment (-0.16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.13%). In the reference population, no material change in HbA1c over time (-0.03%; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01%) was seen. Mean LDL decreased not only in antidepressant initiators (-0.17 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.15 mmol/L) but also in the reference population (-0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.13 mmol/L). Among antidepressant discontinuers, there was also a decrease in HbA1c (-0.32%; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.28%), with no change in the reference population (-0.02%; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00%). Decreases in LDL were found both in antidepressant discontinuers (-0.09 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.04 mmol/L) and in the reference population (-0.16 mmol/L0; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.13 mmol/L).

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant treatment in type 2 diabetes may have a beneficial effect on glycemic control, as the decrease in HbA1c after discontinuation of antidepressants likely reflects remission of depression. Conversely, antidepressant treatment does not seem to affect LDL levels.

Are There Different Viewpoints About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidities? A Multidisciplinary Spanish Qualitative Research

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the vision of a large multidisciplinary group of physicians treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Spain, with a special focus on controversial management aspects. The perceptions of primary care (PC) physicians and hospital care (HC) specialists were compared.

METHODS

This was a mixed survey that included Delphi-like statements and opinion, attitude and behaviour (OAB) questions. The Delphi-like statements were assessed on the basis of the degree of agreement among respondents, and a descriptive analysis was performed on the answers to the OAB questions.

RESULTS

A total of 296 participants responded to the first wave of the survey, of whom 293 responded to the second wave (211 from PC and 80 from HC, with two respondents for whom there were no data on specialty). A high degree of consensus (CNS ≥ 0.8) was obtained in all the statements. A proactive approach to detect prediabetes or T2DM in asymptomatic people was highly supported (80.4% of agreement). Introducing early treatment intensification was considered to favour the durability of glycaemic control and to delay the progression of the disease (80.4%). There was agreement on the statement that glycaemic variability constitutes a risk factor for chronic complications, although differences in the perceptions of HC physicians and PC specialists were identified (86.3 vs. 80.1%, respectively). More HC physicans than PC specialists considered comorbidities to affect the ability to self-care (95 vs. 82.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The survey revealed that there was a high, albeit not universal, degree of agreement amongst PC physicians and HC specialists in relation to prevention, screening and diagnosis of T2DM; early treatment intensification; dysglycaemias; and the management of patients with comorbidities. The statement on the management of patients with comorbidities elicited the highest difference between PC physicans and HC specialists. The results of this survey indicate that there is room for improvement in terms of implementing strategies in these areas.

Four-year HbA1c and LDL-cholesterol trajectories among individuals with mental disorders and newly developed type 2 diabetes

The impact of different types of mental disorders on long-term glycemic and lipid trajectories following newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unknown. We used real-world clinical data in a population-based cohort to fill this knowledge gap. We found that individuals with new T2D and preexisting personality, anxiety, unipolar depression, or psychotic disorder had higher mean HbA1c levels over 4 years following the onset of T2D, whereas no differences were found regarding LDL-C levels. This knowledge should be considered in the management of T2D in these vulnerable groups.