1
|
O'Dwyer ST, Sansom A, Mars B, Reakes L, Andrewartha C, Melluish J, Walker A, Biddle L, Slater T, Burrows D, Hastings RP, Moran P, Stallard P, Janssens A. Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Parents Caring for Children with Disabilities and Long-Term Illnesses. Arch Suicide Res 2025; 29:468-485. [PMID: 38949265 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2363230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a growing body of evidence on suicide risk in family carers, but minimal research on parents caring for children with disabilities and long-term illnesses. The aim of this study was to conduct the first dedicated research on suicide risk in parent carers and identify: (1) the number of parent carers experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and (2) the risk and protective factors for suicidality in this population. METHOD A cross-sectional survey of parent carers in England (n = 750), co-produced with parent carers. Suicidal thoughts and behaviors were measured with questions from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Frequencies summarized the proportion of carers experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Logistic regressions identified risk and protective factors. RESULTS 42% of parents had experienced suicidal thoughts and behaviors while caring for a disabled or chronically ill child. Only half had sought help for these experiences. Depression, entrapment, dysfunctional coping, and having a mental health diagnosis prior to caring, were significant risk factors. CONCLUSION Parent carers contemplate suicide at levels that exceed those of other family carers and the general public. There is an urgent need, in policy and practice, to recognize parent carers as a priority group for prevention and intervention.
Collapse
|
2
|
Katisko K, Krüger J, Soppela H, Hartikainen P, Haapasalo A, Remes AM, Solje E. Psychopharmacological Medication Use in Frontotemporal Dementia at the Time of Diagnosis: Comparison with Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 95:677-685. [PMID: 37574738 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the significant presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum disorders, psychiatric misdiagnoses, diagnostic delay, and use of psychiatric treatments are common prior to the FTD diagnosis. Furthermore, treatment of diagnosed FTD patients mainly relies on off-label psychopharmacological approaches. Currently, limited real-world data are available regarding the actual use of psychopharmacological medications in FTD. OBJECTIVE To evaluate psychopharmacological medication use at the time of FTD diagnosis. METHODS Psychopharmacological medication use was evaluated in a Finnish FTD cohort containing 222 FTD patients, including the major clinical disease phenotypes (behavioral, language, and motor variants) and genetic patients carrying the C9orf72 repeat expansion. A cohort of 214 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients was used as a neurodegenerative disease reference group. RESULTS Active use of psychopharmacological medications at the time of diagnosis was significantly more common in FTD compared to AD, especially in the case of antidepressants (26.1% versus 15.0%, OR = 2.01, p = 0.008), antipsychotics (23.9% versus 9.3%, OR = 3.15, p < 0.001), and mood-stabilizers (6.3% versus 1.9%, OR = 2.93, p = 0.085; not statistically significant), whereas the use of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine was nearly nonexistent in FTD patients. Female gender and behavioral variant of FTD phenotype alongside with depressive and psychotic symptoms were the most prominent factors associating with the use of these medications among the FTD spectrum patients. CONCLUSION Use of off-label psychopharmacological medication and polypharmacy is substantially common at the time of FTD diagnosis. This likely reflects the challenges in using symptom-driven treatment approaches, especially prior to the eventual diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Katisko
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Johanna Krüger
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- MRC, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Helmi Soppela
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Hartikainen
- Neuro Center - Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Annakaisa Haapasalo
- A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences - University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- MRC, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eino Solje
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Neuro Center - Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mikkola TM, Mänty M, Kautiainen H, von Bonsdorff MB, Koponen H, Kröger T, Eriksson JG. Use of prescription benzodiazepines and related drugs in family caregivers: a nation-wide register-based study. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6936400. [PMID: 36571780 PMCID: PMC9792078 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND objective indicators of sleep and mental health problems in family caregivers have rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE to study the use of prescription benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDRD) in Finnish family caregivers and matched controls. DESIGN prospective follow-up in 2012-17. SETTING nationwide register-linkage study. SUBJECTS all individuals who received family caregiver's allowance in Finland in 2012 (N = 42,256; mean age 67 years; 71% women) and controls matched for age, sex and municipality of residence (N = 83,618). METHODS information on purchases of prescription BZDRD, including the number of defined daily doses (DDDs), between 2012 and 2017 was obtained from the Dispensations Reimbursable under the National Health Insurance Scheme register. Background information was obtained from national registers. RESULTS more caregivers than controls used BZDRD, both among women (users per 100 person-years: 17.2 versus 15.2, P < 0.001) and men (14.6 versus 11.8, P < 0.001). These differences were largely explained by hypnotic BZDRD use. There were also more long-term BZDRD users per 100 person-years among caregivers than controls, both among women (5.0 versus 4.3, P = 0.001) and men (5.3 versus 3.8, P < 0.001). Use of hypnotic BZDRD in number of DDDs was higher in caregivers than in controls, particularly among men above 50 years. Caregivers used more anxiolytic BZDRD than controls from middle age to 75 years but less in the oldest age groups. CONCLUSIONS higher level of BZDRD use among caregivers indicates that caregivers have more sleep and mental health problems than non-caregivers. Adequate treatment of these problems and support for caregiving should be ensured for caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuija M Mikkola
- Address correspondence to: Tuija M. Mikkola, Folkhälsan Research Center, PO Box 211, 00251 Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Minna Mänty
- Unit of Strategy and Research, City of Vantaa, Vantaa, Finland,Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hannu Kautiainen
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland,Primary Health Care Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikaela B von Bonsdorff
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland,Gerontology Research Centre and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Hannu Koponen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teppo Kröger
- Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland,Centre for Care Research West, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johan G Eriksson
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland,Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore,Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mikkola TM, Mänty M, Kautiainen H, von Bonsdorff MB, Haanpää M, Koponen H, Kröger T, Eriksson JG. Work incapacity among family caregivers: a record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76:580-585. [PMID: 35135858 PMCID: PMC9118073 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-217901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Family caregiving-related physical and mental health problems may lead to work incapacity in employed caregivers. The aim of this study was to quantify sickness absences and disability pensions (SADP) among high-intensity family caregivers available to the labour market compared with a control population. Methods The study sample included all individuals in Finland, who had received caregiver’s allowance and were available to the labour market in 2012 (n=16 982) and their controls (n=35 371). Information on the number of sickness absence (spells >10 days) and disability pension (SADP) days and related diagnoses according to ICD-10 were obtained from national registers for the years 2012–2017. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, occupational status, education, income and degree of urbanisation. Results During the follow-up, 40.9% of caregivers and 39.5% of controls had at least one sickness absence spell and 6.1% and 4.7%, respectively, received disability pension. The mean annual number of SADP days was 23.2 (95% CI 22.3 to 24.1) for caregivers and 18.5 (95% CI 18.0 to 19.0) for controls (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.16, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.22). The number of annual SADP days due to mental disorders was higher in caregivers (7.2, 95% CI 6.7 to 7.8) than controls (4.0, 95% CI 3.8 to 4.3; adjusted IRR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.75). There were no differences in SADP days due to cancer, neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, or musculoskeletal diseases, or external causes. Discussion Higher number of SADP days due to mental disorders in caregivers suggests that family caregiving has an adverse effect on work capacity and that caregivers are at increased risk for mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuija M Mikkola
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Samfundet Folkhälsan, Helsinki, Finland .,Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Minna Mänty
- Unit of Strategy and Research, City of Vantaa, Vantaa, Finland.,Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hannu Kautiainen
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Samfundet Folkhälsan, Helsinki, Finland.,Primary Health Care Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikaela B von Bonsdorff
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Samfundet Folkhälsan, Helsinki, Finland.,Gerontology Research Center and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Maija Haanpää
- Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hannu Koponen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teppo Kröger
- Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.,Centre for Care Research West, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johan G Eriksson
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Samfundet Folkhälsan, Helsinki, Finland.,Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.,Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|