1
|
Pracheil BM, McManamay RA, Parish ES, Curd SL, Smith BT, DeRolph CR, Witt AM, Ames S, Day MB, Graf W, Infante D, McCoskey DN, Rugani K, Vezina C, Welch T, West A. A Checklist of River Function Indicators for hydropower ecological assessment. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 687:1245-1260. [PMID: 31412459 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Hydropower generation has advantages for societies that seek low-carbon, renewable energy alternatives, but sustainable hydropower production will require an explicit consideration of potential tradeoffs between socioeconomic and environmental priorities. These tradeoffs are often explored during a formal environmental impact assessment process that can be complex and controversial. The steps taken to address stakeholder concerns through impact hypotheses and field studies are not always transparent. We have created a Checklist of River Function Indicators to facilitate stakeholder discussions during hydropower licensing and to support more transparent, holistic, and scientifically informed hydropower environmental analyses. Based on a database of environmental metrics collected from hydropower project studies documented by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the International Hydropower Association, the Low Impact Hydropower Institute, and peer-reviewed scientific literature, our proposed Checklist of River Function Indicators contains 51 indicators in six categories. We have tested the usefulness of the Indicators by applying them to seven hydropower projects documented by FERC. Among the case study projects, 44 of the 51 Indicators were assessed according to the FERC documentation. Even though each hydropower project presents unique natural resource issues and stakeholder priorities, the proposed Indicators can provide a transparent starting point for stakeholder discussions about which ecological impacts should be considered in hydropower planning and relicensing assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda May Pracheil
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America.
| | - Ryan A McManamay
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Esther S Parish
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Shelaine L Curd
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Brennan T Smith
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Christopher R DeRolph
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Adam M Witt
- Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Shannon Ames
- Low Impact Hydropower Institute, Lexington, MA 02420, United States of America
| | - Mary Beth Day
- Kearns & West, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States of America
| | - Will Graf
- Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America
| | - Dana Infante
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
| | - Dana N McCoskey
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Water Power Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, United States of America
| | - Kelsey Rugani
- Kearns & West, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States of America
| | - Corey Vezina
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Water Power Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, United States of America
| | - Timothy Welch
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Water Power Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, United States of America
| | - Anna West
- Kearns & West, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Escherichia coli as a bioreporter in ecotoxicology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 88:1007-25. [PMID: 20803141 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2826-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2010] [Revised: 08/02/2010] [Accepted: 08/03/2010] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Ecotoxicological assessment relies to a large extent on the information gathered with surrogate species and the extrapolation of test results across species and different levels of biological organisation. Bacteria have long been used as a bioreporter for genotoxic testing and general toxicity. Today, it is clear that bacteria have the potential for screening of other toxicological endpoints. Escherichia coli has been studied for years; in-depth knowledge of its biochemistry and genetics makes it the most proficient prokaryote for the development of new toxicological assays. Several assays have been designed with E. coli as a bioreporter, and the recent trend to develop novel, better advanced reporters makes bioreporter development one of the most dynamic in ecotoxicology. Based on in-depth knowledge of E. coli, new assays are being developed or existing ones redesigned, thanks to the availability of new reporter genes and new or improved substrates. The technological evolution towards easier and more sensitive detection of different gene products is another important aspect. Often, this requires the redesign of the bacterium to make it compatible with the novel measuring tests. Recent advances in surface chemistry and nanoelectronics open the perspective for advanced reporter based on novel measuring platforms and with an online potential. In this article, we will discuss the use of E. coli-based bioreporters in ecotoxicological applications as well as some innovative sensors awaited for the future.
Collapse
|