Stellenwert der Duktoskopie in der Mammadiagnostik

Selective microdochectomy after ductoscopic wire marking in women with pathological nipple discharge

Background

To investigate the diagnostic reliability of selective microdochectomy after direct ductoscopic wire marking of suspect lesions in patients with pathological nipple discharge.

Methods

Selective microdochectomy due to pathological discharge was performed in 33 patients with mean age of 51.7 years. Ductoscopes of 0.9 and 1.1 mm in diameter with a channel for wire marking were used. Only patients without sonographic or mammographic correlation for the discharge were included. The pathologic mammary duct was wire marked and extirpated under direct visual guidance via the ductoscope. The histological results were compared with cytology, galactography and ductoscopy.

Results

In 24 out of 33 cases (72%) an intraductal, epithelial proliferation was found histologically. The following sensitivities for intraductal, epithelial proliferations could be determined: cytology 4%, galactography 74%, and ductoscopy 78%.

Conclusion

The method allows selective microdochectomy of the pathological duct and the intraductal proliferation under visual guidance. The resection volume can be reduced in contrast to the unselective ductectomy after injection of methylene blue.

Autofluorescence Ductoscopy: A New Imaging Technique for Intraductal Breast Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Conventional diagnostic imaging techniques of the female breast, eg, ultrasound, mammography, breast magnetic resonance imaging, or ductography, can only give indirect information about the inside of breast ducts. Diagnostic ductoscopy is the first approach for direct visualization of intraductal lesions. Autofluorescence ductoscopy is a new, noninvasive imaging technique that better identifies intraductal lesions under direct vision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe the technical development of autofluorescence ductoscopy and initial experience with early clinical evaluation at Frauenklinik (OB/GYN) of Technical University Munich, Germany, and its potential future application. In contrast to standard white light breast endoscopy, autofluorescence ductoscopy uses a different light spectrum and, after sophisticated data processing, can mark suspicious intraductal lesions in blue-violet colors. Autofluorescence ductoscopy adds new visual information previously not seen in white-light endoscopy. Technical development is completed and clinical evaluation is under way.

RESULTS

In a small series, the autofluorescence ductoscope was used and confirmed the initial expectations. No complication was expected or occurred. At present time, it is being used on an experimental basis for evaluation of its clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

The clinical evaluation of autofluorescence ductoscopy is a work in progress at an early stage. This technique is intended to improve visualization and identification of breast duct walls and lesions and possibly allows an instant visual semiquantitative histologic evaluation of nonbenign ductal lesions.

Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods

BACKGROUND

Ductoscopy is gaining increased importance in the diagnosis of nipple discharge of unclear origin and intraductal proliferation. For this reason we compared its diagnostic value and feasibility to standard diagnostic methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ductoscopy was compared to mammography, galactography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nipple smear, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and high-speed core biopsy; feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity were investigated for each method.

RESULTS

71 ductoscopies were evaluated, which were followed up by open biopsies. Here, 3 invasive and 8 ductal carcinomas in situ were found, as well as 3 atypical ductal hyperplasias, 44 papillomas/papillomatoses, and 13 benign findings. Feasibility of ductoscopy was in this series 100%. Duct sonography showed the highest sensitivity (67.3%), followed by MRI (65.2%), galactography (56.3%), ductoscopy (55.2%), and FNAC (51.9%). The highest specificity was shown by FNAC, core biopsy, and galactography (each 100.0%), followed by mammography (92.3%), nipple smear (77.8%), ductoscopy, and duct sonography (each 61.5%); the lowest specificity was displayed by MRI (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm that ductoscopy can be performed within the same range of sensitivity and specificity as other techniques. In order to make conclusive statements about ductoscopy, especially in order to precisely define the indications for this method, a prospective multicenter study was initiated.