[Inflammatory reactions in the wear particle induced and infectious periprosthetic membrane of loosened hip- and knee endoprostheses: pathogenetic relevance of differentially expressed genes cd9, cd11b, cd18, cd52 and pdgfrbeta]

Gene expression in endoprosthesis loosening: chitinase activity for early diagnosis?

The aim of the study was to identify markers for the early diagnosis of endoprosthesis loosening, for the differentiation between wear particle-induced and septic loosening and to gather new insights into the pathogenesis of endoprosthesis loosening. Gene expression profiles were generated from five periprosthetic membranes of wear particle-induced and five of infectious (septic) type using Affymetrix HG U133A oligonucleotide microarrays. The results of selected differentially expressed genes were validated by RT-PCR (n = 30). The enzyme activity and the genotype of chitinase-1 were assessed in serum samples from 313 consecutive patients hospitalized for endoprosthesis loosening (n = 54) or for other reasons, serving as control subjects (n = 259). Eight hundred twenty-four genes were differentially expressed with a fold change greater than 2 (data sets on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ GSE 7103). Among these were chitinase 1, CD52, calpain 3, apolipoprotein, CD18, lysyl oxidase, cathepsin D, E-cadherin, VE-cadherin, nidogen, angiopoietin 1, and thrombospondin 2. Their differential expression levels were validated by RT-PCR. The chitinase activity was significantly higher in the blood from patients with wear particle-induced prosthesis loosening (p = 0.001). However, chitinase activity as a marker for early diagnosis has a specificity of 83% and a sensitivity of 52%, due to a high variability both in the disease and in the control group.

The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study

Background

The most frequent complications of joint arthroplasty are septic or aseptic loosening of endoprostheses. Preoperative differentiation is essential, since very different treatment methods result from the diagnoses. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical value of ¹⁸F-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) as a diagnostic modality for inflammation and loosening in hip and knee joint prostheses.

Methods

¹⁸F-FDG-PET examinations and multiphase bone scan were performed on hip and knee endoprostheses in 27 patients prior to revision surgical procedures planned for prosthetic loosening. Intact prostheses were found at the opposite site in some patients so that additional 9 joints could be examined with the field of view of ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Verification and valuation of the PET and scintigraphic image findings were conducted by comparing them with information combined from intraoperative findings, histopathology, and microbiological investigations.

Results

Evidence of loosening was correctly determined in 76.4% of cases using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET, and in 75% of cases using bone scan. The detection of periprosthetic inflammation using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 100% for septic cases and of 45.5% in cases of increased abrasion and aseptic foreign-body reactions. However, reliable differentiation between abrasion-induced and bacterial-caused inflammation was not possible using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) allows reliable prediction of peri-prosthetic septical inflammatory tissue reactions. Because of the high sensitivity of this method, a negative PET result in the setting of a diagnostically unclear situation eliminates the need for revision surgery. In contrast, a positive PET result gives no clear differentiation regarding the cause of inflammation.