Femoral neck fractures in old age treated with hemiarthroplasty

The influence of operation time for hip hemiarthroplasty on complication rates and mortality in patients with femoral neck fracture: a retrospective data analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of various factors, in particular operation time, on mortality and complication rates in patients with femoral neck fractures who have undergone hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) and to determine a cut-off value above which mortality and complication rates increase significantly.

METHODS

Cases of patients with femoral neck fracture treated with HHA between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2023 were screened for eligibility. Multiple logistic regressions were calculated to determine which factors (patient age, experience of surgeon, patient sex, ASA score, time to surgery, operation time) influenced the incidence of complications and mortality. The exact cut-off value for complications and mortality was determined using the Youden index of the ROC curve (sensitivity vs. specificity) of logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients were considered eligible for this study. During the 90-day follow-up period after HHA, 50 deaths and 34 complications were recorded, giving a mortality rate of 9.1%, and a complication rate of 6.2%. Of the 34 complications recorded, 32.3% were infections, 14.7% dislocations, 20.7% trochanteric avulsions, 11.8% periprosthetic fractures, 11.8% nerve injuries, and 8.8% deep vein thrombosis. The odds ratio (OR) of a patient experiencing a complication is 2.2% higher for every minute increase in operation time (Exponential Beta - 1 = 0.022; p = 0.0363). The OR of a patient dying is 8.8% higher for each year increase in age (Exponential Beta - 1 = 0.088; p = 0.0007). When surgery was performed by a certified orthopaedic surgeon the mortality rate lowered by 61.5% in comparison to the surgery performed by a trainee (1 - Exponential Beta = 0.594; p = 0.0120). Male patients have a 168.7% higher OR for mortality than female patients (Exponential Beta - 1 = 1.687; p = 0.0017). Patients with an operation time of ≥ 86 min. have a 111.8% higher OR for mortality than patients with an operation time of < 86 min. (Exponential Beta - 1 = 1.118).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective data analysis found that the risk of a patient experiencing a complication was 2.2% higher for every minute increase in operation time. Patients with an operation time above the cut-off of 86 min had a 111.8% higher risk of mortality than those with an operation time below the cut-off. Other influencing factors that operators should be aware of include patient age, male sex, and operator experience.

Delayed surgery is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with hip fracture undergoing hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroplasty (HA) is one of the most effective procedures for patients with hip fractures. The timing of surgery played a significant role in the short-term outcome for these patients, but conflicting evidence has been found.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was investigated from 2002 to 2014 and identified 247,377 patients with hip fractures undergoing HA. The sample was stratified into ultra-early (0 day), early (1-2 days) and delayed (3-14 days) groups based on time to surgery. Yearly trends, postoperative surgical and medical complications, postoperative length of hospital stay (POS) and total costs were compared after propensity scores were matched between groups by demographics and comorbidity.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2014, the percentage of hip fracture patients who underwent HA increased from 30.61 to 31.98%. Early surgery groups showed fewer medical complications but higher surgical complications. However, specific complication evaluation showed both ultra-early and early groups decreased most of the surgery and medical complications with increasing post hemorrhagic anemia and fever. Medical complications were also reduced in the ultra-early group, but surgical complications increased. Early surgery groups reduced the POS by 0.90 to 1.05 days and total hospital charges by 32.6 to 44.9 percent than delayed surgery groups. Ultra-early surgery showed no benefit from POS than early group, but reduced total hospital charges by 12.2 percent.

CONCLUSION

HA surgery performed within 2 days showed more beneficial effects on adverse events than delayed surgery. But surgeons should be cognizant of the potential increased risks of mechanical complications and post-hemorrhagic anemia.

Effects of SARS-CoV‑2 infections on inpatient mortality of geriatric patients after proximal femoral fracture surgery

BACKGROUND

The medical challenges caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV‑2) pose a tremendous burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to analyze the effects of a SARS-CoV‑2 infections or disease progression on inpatient mortality of geriatric patients after proximal femoral fracture surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in all patients with a proximal femoral fracture surgically treated in an urban regional trauma center from 01/01/2020 to 01/31/2021. According to PCR test results detecting SARS-CoV‑2, the patients were divided into two groups (SARS-CoV‑2 positive vs. SARS-CoV‑2 negative). Patient data, disease progression data, and treatment-related information were evaluated for all patients. Statistical data analysis was performed using unpaired Student's t test or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients (women: 70.4%, age: 82.0 ± 11.0 years) were included in this study. Of these 3.9% (12/311) had a positive test result for SARS-CoV‑2. Significantly more deceased patients were found in the group tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 (SARS-CoV‑2 positive: 41.7%, SARS-CoV‑2 negative: 5.4%, p < 0.001). In addition, the number of proximal femoral fracture associated deaths correlated with the number of positive test results performed in the Clinic. The length of stay of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19 survivors tended to be greater than in those who were tested negative (SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19 positive: 15.6 ± 13.1 days, SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19 negative: 11.5 ± 6.5 days, p = 0.683). Furthermore, a significant difference in age was found in SARS-CoV‑2 survivors and SARS-CoV‑2 decedents (deceased: 95.5 ± 7.5 years, alive: 83.5 ± 7.3 years, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

The study was conducted before the introduction of SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination. The results therefore refer to immune naive (unvaccinated) patients. In our study, more than 40% of all patients with proximal femoral fractures who tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 died during hospitalization. An additional, critical factor in this respect was the age of the infected patients. Nonetheless, a positive correlation was demonstrated between the mortality rate and the number of positive SARS-CoV‑2 detections. Regarding the greater length of stay of patients tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2, the limited transfer options (further rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility) of the infected ones can be considered as causal. Particularly the vulnerable older patients are increasingly endangered by a combination of proximal femoral fracture and SARS-CoV‑2.

Medial femoral plate with cannulated screw for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures often occur in the elderly, which usually results in hip pain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures with medial femoral support plate combined with cannulated screws and cannulated screws alone.

METHODS

PubMed, ScienceDirect, China Academic Journals Full-text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Embase and Cochrane Library were used to collect clinical controlled trials of the medial femoral support plate combined with hollow screw internal fixation and simple hollow screw internal fixation for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture.

RESULTS

Seven articles (n= 409 cases) were evaluated for quality and included in this meta-analysis. Four hundred and nine patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures were included: 202 in the experimental group and 207 in the control group. The results showed that, compared with simple hollow screw internal fixation, the medial femoral support plate combined with hollow screw internal fixation has a longer operation time (MD= 23.05, 95% CI= 13.86-32.24), and more intraoperative blood loss (MD= 91.55, 95% CI= 50.72-132.39), shorter healing time (MD=-1.48, 95% CI (-1.71, -1.26)), lower incidence of complications (RR= 0.34, 95% CI= 0.19-0.61), lower VAS score (MD=-1.28, 95% CI (-1.83, -0.72)), and higher Harris score (MD= 8.49, 95% CI (4.15, 12.83)).

CONCLUSION

Medial femoral plate combined with cannulated screw for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture can shorten healing time, reduce postoperative complications, and improve the postoperative Harris score.

Timing of hip hemiarthroplasty and the influence on prosthetic joint infection

Introduction

Previous research suggested that patients have increased risk of infection with increased time from presentation with a femoral neck fracture to treatment with a hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA). The purpose of this study was to determine if rates of prosthetic joint infections within 3 months of surgery was affected by the time from patient presentation with a femoral neck fracture to the time of treatment with HHA.

Materials and methods

Acute hip fractures treated with HHA between 2005 and 2017 at three centres in Norway were enrolled in the study. Multi-trauma patients were excluded. Univariable analysis was performed to determine any significant effect of pre-operative waiting time on infection rate. Two pre-planned analyses dichotomizing pre-operative waiting time cut-offs were performed.

Results

There were 2300 patients with an average age of 82 (range, 48–100) years included of which 3.4% experienced a prosthetic joint infection within 3 months. The primary analysis found no significant difference in infection rate depending on time to surgery (OR = 1.06 (95% CI 0.94–1.20, p = 0.33)). The secondary analyses showed no significant differences in infection rates when comparing pre-operative waiting time of <24 hours vs ≥24 hours (OR = 0.92 (95% CI 0.58–1.46, p = 0.73)) and <48 hours vs ≥48 hours (OR = 1.39 (95% CI 0.81–2.38, p = 0.23)).

Conclusion

Based off of a large retrospective Norwegian database of hip fractures there did not appear to be a significant difference in infection rate based on pre-operative wait time to surgery.