[Total hip replacement in avascular femoral head necrosis]

Functionalized biomimetic mineralized collagen promotes osseointegration of 3D-printed titanium alloy microporous interface

Mineralized collagen (MC) is the fundamental unit of natural bone tissue and can induce bone regeneration. Unmodified MC has poor mechanical properties and a single component, making it unable to cope with complex physiological environment. In this study, we introduced sodium alginate (SA) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) into the MC material to construct functionalized mineralized collagen (FMC) with good mechanical strength and the ability to continuously release growth factors. The FMC is filled into the pores of 3D printed titanium alloy scaffold to form a new organic-inorganic bioactive interface. With the continuous degradation of FMC, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in the surrounding environment are recruited to the surface of the scaffold to promote bone and vascular regeneration. After implanting the scaffold into the distal femoral defect of rabbits, Micro CT, histological, push-out, as well as immunohistochemical analysis showed that the composite interface can significantly promote osseointegration. These findings provide a new strategy for the development and application of mineralized collagen materials.

Increasing trend toward joint-preserving procedures for hip osteonecrosis in the United States from 2010 to 2019

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head is estimated at about 10 to 20,000 patients annually, and, when left untreated, 80% or more of cases progress to femoral head collapse. A series of joint-preserving procedures have been developed to prevent/delay the need for hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to provide a five-year update: (1) evaluating temporal trends of arthroplasty vs. joint-preservation techniques such as core decompression, bone grafting, osteotomies, and arthroscopy; (2) determining proportions of procedures in patients aged less than vs. over 50 years; and (3) quantifying rates of specific operative techniques.

METHODS

A total of 10,334 patients diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the femoral head and having received hip surgery were identified from a nationwide database between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019, by using the International Classification of Disease, the Ninth/Tenth revision (ICD-9/10) codes. The percentage of patients managed by each operative procedure was calculated annually. To identify trends, patients were grouped by age under/over 50 years and divided into a joint-preserving and a non-joint-preserving (arthroplasty) group. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the total number of procedures per year.

RESULTS

Rates of arthroplasty far exceeded those for joint-preserving procedures. However, from 2015 to 2019, significantly more joint-preserving procedures were performed than in 2010 to 2014 (4.3% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001). Significantly more joint-preserving procedures were performed in patients aged < 50 years relative to those ≥ 50 years (7.56% vs. 1.86%, P < 0.001). Overall, total hip arthroplasty was the most common procedure (9,814; 94.97%) relative to core decompression (331; 3.20%), hemiarthroplasty/resurfacing (102; 0.99%), bone grafting (48; 0.46%), and osteotomy (5; 0.05%).

CONCLUSION

Management of patients who have osteonecrosis of the femoral head continues to be predominantly arthroplasty procedures, specifically, total hip arthroplasty. Our findings suggest a small, but significant trend toward increased joint-preserving procedures, especially in patients under 50 years. In particular, the proportion of patients receiving core decompression has increased significantly from 2015 to 2019 relative to prior years.

Intramedullary core decompression combined with endoscopic intracapsular decompression and debridement for pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

The effect of core decompression on the treatment of pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is still limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of core decompression combined with intra-articular decompression (debridement of the hip joint and incision of the hip capsule) under hip arthroscopic guidance in patients with pre-collapse ONFH.

METHODS

The clinical data of 101 patients with pre-collapse ONFH were analysed retrospectively. Sixty patients (80 hips) received small-diameter multi-channel core decompression alone in first half review period (group B). Forty-one patients (59 hips) were treated with small-diameter multi-channel core decompression combined with intra-articular decompression under hip arthroscopy guidance in second half review period (group A). The surgical duration; intraoperative bleeding; intra-articular pressure(IAP) before and after surgery; length of hospital stay; hospitalisation expenses; visual analogue scale (VAS) score before, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after surgery; and Harris score of the hip joint before, 3 months and 1 year after surgery were recorded and compared between group A and group B. X-ray examination was performed every month to observe the collapse of the femoral head within 2 years after surgery, which was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis.

RESULTS

When the two groups were compared, the surgical duration was longer and hospitalisation expenses were higher in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). However, the VAS score and the Harris score of the hip joint after surgery improved significantly compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), which were more apparent in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). X-ray examination revealed that 6 hips in group A and 22 in group B received femoral head collapse at the 2-year follow-up. The survival rate of the femoral head in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Small-diameter multi-channel core decompression combined with intra-articular decompression (debridement of the hip joint and incision of the hip capsule) under hip arthroscopic guidance for treating early ONFH can more effectively alleviate joint pain, improve joint function and delay ONFH progression.

Nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head : Arthroscopic and navigation-supported core decompression

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to address core decompression and pathologies of the femoral head, treating them during the same procedure. Furthermore, radiation exposure will be reduced.

INDICATIONS

Femoral head necrosis ARCO (Association Research Circulation Osseous) stages I-III.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Progressive femoral head necrosis as ARCO stages IIIC-IV.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Arthroscopically navigated core decompression of the femoral head using an established optoelectronic system with fluoro-free software module. First, hip joint arthroscopy was performed and further pathologies were treated. Second, core decompression was navigated by a navigation pointer and drill sleeve to reach the correct target point. After visualization, the procedure is repeated 3-5 times.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Limited weight bearing of the operated leg (20 kg) for 10-14 days. Active or passive continuous motion machine for 4 weeks. Adjuvant postoperative indomethacin therapy for 10 days to reduce pain and bone marrow edema.

RESULTS

From May 2018 to January 2019, 7 patients (male = 4; 40 ± 9 years) underwent arthroscopically navigated core decompression with 2 (29%) and 5 (71%) patients being classified as ARCO II and III, respectively. Preoperatively, all patients reported load-dependent pain. In all cases, we could identify synovitis, which results in soft tissue release and synovectomy. Furthermore, 4 of 7 patients had an additional labrum lesion, which is addressed by refixation or shrinking.

DISCUSSION

Compared to the conventional technique, this fluoro-free navigation procedure allows more precise drilling. Moreover, additional pathologies, as found in all our cases, could be simultaneously addressed. The intraoperative radiation exposure for the patient and surgical team could also be reduced. Although arthroscopically assisted core decompression requires more preparation time, there are advantages over conventional surgery.